Bantec, Inc.
Bantec, Inc. BANT Peers
See (BANT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Aerospace & Defense Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BANT | $0.00 | -99.50% | 54.00 | N/A | -$0.14 | N/A |
| EADSF | $179.15 | +0.08% | 141.05B | 28.26 | $6.34 | +1.90% |
| EADSY | $44.31 | -1.64% | 139.55B | 28.04 | $1.58 | +1.65% |
| SAFRY | $70.31 | -0.19% | 118.07B | -156.24 | -$0.45 | +0.82% |
| SAFRF | $283.25 | +0.80% | 118.05B | -156.49 | -$1.81 | +0.84% |
| RLLCF | $0.01 | +15.38% | 104.14B | 0.42 | $0.02 | N/A |
| RYCEY | $10.64 | -0.80% | 90.16B | 26.61 | $0.40 | +0.54% |
| RYCEF | $10.53 | -1.59% | 89.19B | 26.32 | $0.40 | +0.56% |
| RNMBF | $1,788.20 | -0.94% | 81.39B | 85.40 | $20.94 | +0.73% |
| RNMBY | $358.27 | -1.26% | 79.94B | 85.92 | $4.17 | +0.34% |
Stock Comparison
BANT vs EADSF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, EADSF has a market cap of 141.05B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while EADSF trades at $179.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EADSF's P/E ratio is 28.26. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EADSF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to EADSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs EADSY Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, EADSY has a market cap of 139.55B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while EADSY trades at $44.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EADSY's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EADSY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to EADSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs SAFRY Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, SAFRY has a market cap of 118.07B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while SAFRY trades at $70.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAFRY's P/E ratio is -156.24. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAFRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to SAFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs SAFRF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, SAFRF has a market cap of 118.05B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while SAFRF trades at $283.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAFRF's P/E ratio is -156.49. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAFRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to SAFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs RLLCF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, RLLCF has a market cap of 104.14B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while RLLCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLLCF's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RLLCF's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to RLLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs RYCEY Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, RYCEY has a market cap of 90.16B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while RYCEY trades at $10.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYCEY's P/E ratio is 26.61. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RYCEY's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to RYCEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs RYCEF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, RYCEF has a market cap of 89.19B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while RYCEF trades at $10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYCEF's P/E ratio is 26.32. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RYCEF's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to RYCEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs RNMBF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, RNMBF has a market cap of 81.39B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while RNMBF trades at $1,788.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNMBF's P/E ratio is 85.40. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RNMBF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to RNMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs RNMBY Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, RNMBY has a market cap of 79.94B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while RNMBY trades at $358.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNMBY's P/E ratio is 85.92. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RNMBY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to RNMBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs BAESY Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, BAESY has a market cap of 68.64B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while BAESY trades at $91.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAESY's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAESY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to BAESY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs BAESF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, BAESF has a market cap of 66.32B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while BAESF trades at $22.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAESF's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAESF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to BAESF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs FINMY Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, FINMY has a market cap of 58.31B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while FINMY trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FINMY's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FINMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to FINMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs THLEF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, THLEF has a market cap of 55.74B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while THLEF trades at $271.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THLEF's P/E ratio is 49.45. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to THLEF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to THLEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs THLLY Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, THLLY has a market cap of 54.80B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while THLLY trades at $53.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THLLY's P/E ratio is 48.51. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to THLLY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to THLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs FINMF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, FINMF has a market cap of 28.62B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while FINMF trades at $49.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FINMF's P/E ratio is 23.53. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FINMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to FINMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs NSKFF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, NSKFF has a market cap of 27.39B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while NSKFF trades at $155.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSKFF's P/E ratio is 55.60. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NSKFF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to NSKFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs DUAVF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, DUAVF has a market cap of 26.47B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while DUAVF trades at $339.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUAVF's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DUAVF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to DUAVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs SAABY Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, SAABY has a market cap of 23.38B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while SAABY trades at $21.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAABY's P/E ratio is 48.83. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAABY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to SAABY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs SAABF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, SAABF has a market cap of 23.19B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while SAABF trades at $43.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAABF's P/E ratio is 48.83. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAABF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to SAABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs MTUAF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, MTUAF has a market cap of 20.32B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while MTUAF trades at $377.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTUAF's P/E ratio is 28.98. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTUAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to MTUAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs MTUAY Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, MTUAY has a market cap of 19.79B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while MTUAY trades at $183.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTUAY's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTUAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to MTUAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs SGGKF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, SGGKF has a market cap of 18.53B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while SGGKF trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGGKF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGGKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to SGGKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs HAGHY Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, HAGHY has a market cap of 17.07B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while HAGHY trades at $36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAGHY's P/E ratio is 71.06. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAGHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to HAGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs SGGKY Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, SGGKY has a market cap of 16.67B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while SGGKY trades at $53.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGGKY's P/E ratio is 31.23. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGGKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to SGGKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs HNSDF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, HNSDF has a market cap of 8.79B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while HNSDF trades at $76.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HNSDF's P/E ratio is 72.48. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HNSDF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to HNSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs BDRAF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, BDRAF has a market cap of 6.41B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while BDRAF trades at $65.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDRAF's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BDRAF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to BDRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs YSHLF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, YSHLF has a market cap of 6.40B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while YSHLF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YSHLF's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YSHLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to YSHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs BDRBF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, BDRBF has a market cap of 6.35B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while BDRBF trades at $64.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDRBF's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BDRBF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to BDRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs BOMBF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, BOMBF has a market cap of 6.33B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while BOMBF trades at $10.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOMBF's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BOMBF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to BOMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs BDRPF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, BDRPF has a market cap of 6.33B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while BDRPF trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDRPF's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BDRPF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to BDRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs BDRXF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, BDRXF has a market cap of 6.33B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while BDRXF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDRXF's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BDRXF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to BDRXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs ACLLY Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, ACLLY has a market cap of 5.36B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while ACLLY trades at $57.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACLLY's P/E ratio is 31.55. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACLLY's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to ACLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs SMBMF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, SMBMF has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while SMBMF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMBMF's P/E ratio is 38.75. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMBMF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to SMBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs SMBMY Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, SMBMY has a market cap of 5.18B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while SMBMY trades at $15.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMBMY's P/E ratio is 42.46. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMBMY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to SMBMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs ACLIF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, ACLIF has a market cap of 4.50B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while ACLIF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACLIF's P/E ratio is 26.52. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACLIF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to ACLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs FNCNF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, FNCNF has a market cap of 4.20B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while FNCNF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNCNF's P/E ratio is 86.67. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FNCNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to FNCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs AVIJF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, AVIJF has a market cap of 4.20B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while AVIJF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVIJF's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AVIJF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to AVIJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs QNTQF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, QNTQF has a market cap of 3.15B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while QNTQF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QNTQF's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QNTQF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to QNTQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs QNTQY Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, QNTQY has a market cap of 3.10B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while QNTQY trades at $22.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QNTQY's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QNTQY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to QNTQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs MDALF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, MDALF has a market cap of 2.09B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while MDALF trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDALF's P/E ratio is 30.62. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MDALF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to MDALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs CMGMY Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, CMGMY has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while CMGMY trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMGMY's P/E ratio is 27.90. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMGMY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to CMGMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs AUTLF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, AUTLF has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while AUTLF trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUTLF's P/E ratio is 67.60. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AUTLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to AUTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs CMGMF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, CMGMF has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while CMGMF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMGMF's P/E ratio is 26.25. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMGMF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to CMGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs LSIIF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, LSIIF has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while LSIIF trades at $29.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSIIF's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LSIIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to LSIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs CZGZF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, CZGZF has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while CZGZF trades at $31.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CZGZF's P/E ratio is 31.80. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CZGZF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to CZGZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs ATROB Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, ATROB has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while ATROB trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATROB's P/E ratio is -65.22. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATROB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to ATROB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs MIESY Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, MIESY has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while MIESY trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIESY's P/E ratio is 2.76. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MIESY's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to MIESY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs GGRGF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, GGRGF has a market cap of 864.83M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while GGRGF trades at $51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGRGF's P/E ratio is -212.50. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GGRGF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to GGRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs SNIRF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, SNIRF has a market cap of 823.65M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while SNIRF trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNIRF's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNIRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to SNIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs MIESF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, MIESF has a market cap of 744.56M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while MIESF trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIESF's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MIESF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to MIESF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs HERXF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, HERXF has a market cap of 736.10M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while HERXF trades at $21.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HERXF's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HERXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to HERXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs MALJF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, MALJF has a market cap of 650.81M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while MALJF trades at $11.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MALJF's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MALJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to MALJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs ASTGY Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, ASTGY has a market cap of 562.26M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while ASTGY trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASTGY's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASTGY's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to ASTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs AVNBF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, AVNBF has a market cap of 523.37M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while AVNBF trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVNBF's P/E ratio is 176.20. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AVNBF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to AVNBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs JMCCF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, JMCCF has a market cap of 372.22M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while JMCCF trades at $13.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JMCCF's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JMCCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to JMCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs AERG Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, AERG has a market cap of 224.79M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while AERG trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AERG's P/E ratio is -25.75. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AERG's ROE of -7.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to AERG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs FTGFF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, FTGFF has a market cap of 158.84M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while FTGFF trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTGFF's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FTGFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to FTGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs EOPSF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, EOPSF has a market cap of 150.50M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while EOPSF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EOPSF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EOPSF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to EOPSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs SAFS Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, SAFS has a market cap of 116.09M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while SAFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAFS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAFS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to SAFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs BUKS Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, BUKS has a market cap of 111.63M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while BUKS trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BUKS's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BUKS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to BUKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs NORSF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, NORSF has a market cap of 90.31M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while NORSF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NORSF's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NORSF's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to NORSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs CNRD Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, CNRD has a market cap of 61.61M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while CNRD trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNRD's P/E ratio is 301.25. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNRD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to CNRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs OPXS Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, OPXS has a market cap of 56.69M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while OPXS trades at $8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPXS's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OPXS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to OPXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs ACCMF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, ACCMF has a market cap of 55.06M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while ACCMF trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACCMF's P/E ratio is -93.45. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACCMF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to ACCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs TIPGF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, TIPGF has a market cap of 49.80M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while TIPGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIPGF's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TIPGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is less volatile compared to TIPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs VLTTF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, VLTTF has a market cap of 42.60M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while VLTTF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLTTF's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLTTF's ROE of -3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to VLTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs STTLF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, STTLF has a market cap of 30.89M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while STTLF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STTLF's P/E ratio is -19.29. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STTLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to STTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs NRPI Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, NRPI has a market cap of 21.74M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while NRPI trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRPI's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NRPI's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to NRPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs AKRRF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, AKRRF has a market cap of 18.53M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while AKRRF trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKRRF's P/E ratio is -76.50. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AKRRF's ROE of +14.61%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to AKRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs OPST Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, OPST has a market cap of 17.46M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while OPST trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPST's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OPST's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to OPST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs ETCC Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, ETCC has a market cap of 12.47M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while ETCC trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETCC's P/E ratio is -5.74. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ETCC's ROE of +1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to ETCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs MAXQF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, MAXQF has a market cap of 11.30M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while MAXQF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAXQF's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAXQF's ROE of +8.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to MAXQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs NEXD Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, NEXD has a market cap of 9.63M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while NEXD trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEXD's P/E ratio is -20.37. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEXD's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to NEXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs FLYLF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, FLYLF has a market cap of 9.45M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while FLYLF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLYLF's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FLYLF's ROE of +7.69%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to FLYLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs TIKK Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, TIKK has a market cap of 9.28M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while TIKK trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIKK's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TIKK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to TIKK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs XERI Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, XERI has a market cap of 8.89M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while XERI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XERI's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XERI's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to XERI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs SNAVF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, SNAVF has a market cap of 7.07M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while SNAVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNAVF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNAVF's ROE of +1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to SNAVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs OBTEF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, OBTEF has a market cap of 6.59M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while OBTEF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OBTEF's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OBTEF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to OBTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs USDR Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, USDR has a market cap of 5.96M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while USDR trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USDR's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USDR's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to USDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs MSNVF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, MSNVF has a market cap of 5.59M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while MSNVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSNVF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MSNVF's ROE of -20.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is less volatile compared to MSNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs DEWY Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, DEWY has a market cap of 2.42M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while DEWY trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DEWY's P/E ratio is -6.81. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DEWY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to DEWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs LLLI Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, LLLI has a market cap of 1.16M. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while LLLI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LLLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LLLI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to LLLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs PMEA Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, PMEA has a market cap of 752829.00. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while PMEA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMEA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PMEA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to PMEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs HWKE Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, HWKE has a market cap of 496286.00. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while HWKE trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWKE's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HWKE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to HWKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs MDEX Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, MDEX has a market cap of 320620.00. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while MDEX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDEX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MDEX's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to MDEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs DLRWF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, DLRWF has a market cap of 272202.00. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while DLRWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLRWF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DLRWF's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BANT has daily volatility of 198.01 and DLRWF has daily volatility of N/A.
BANT vs RNWR Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, RNWR has a market cap of 139522.00. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while RNWR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNWR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RNWR's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to RNWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs CFFMF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, CFFMF has a market cap of 118407.00. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while CFFMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFFMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFFMF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to CFFMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs DSUS Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, DSUS has a market cap of 114300.00. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while DSUS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSUS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DSUS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to DSUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs QCKSF Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, QCKSF has a market cap of 78899.00. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while QCKSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QCKSF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QCKSF's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to QCKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs UITA Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, UITA has a market cap of 38610.00. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while UITA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UITA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UITA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to UITA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs EKSN Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, EKSN has a market cap of 20000.00. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while EKSN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EKSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EKSN's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to EKSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs ASAV Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, ASAV has a market cap of 11935.00. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while ASAV trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASAV's P/E ratio is -103.64. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASAV's ROE of +7.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to ASAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs LNGT Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, LNGT has a market cap of 11360.00. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while LNGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNGT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LNGT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to LNGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs ADFS Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, ADFS has a market cap of 9342.00. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while ADFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADFS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADFS's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to ADFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs SDSS Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, SDSS has a market cap of 8263.00. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while SDSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDSS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SDSS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to SDSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs EPEO Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, EPEO has a market cap of 5603.00. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while EPEO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPEO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EPEO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to EPEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs BRSI Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, BRSI has a market cap of 1133.00. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while BRSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRSI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to BRSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.
BANT vs HSFI Comparison
BANT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BANT stands at 54.00. In comparison, HSFI has a market cap of 1104.00. Regarding current trading prices, BANT is priced at $0.00, while HSFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BANT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BANT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HSFI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BANT is more volatile compared to HSFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BANT.