Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG (BAMXF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BAMXF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAMXF | $101.15 | -1.69% | 63.2B | 7.62 | $13.51 | +4.67% |
| GELYY | $50.79 | +1.60% | 515B | 12.18 | $4.17 | +1.65% |
| TOYOF | $24.30 | +1.12% | 310.3B | 12.80 | $1.86 | +2.68% |
| BYDDF | $12.54 | +0.88% | 119B | 63.14 | $0.20 | +1.46% |
| BYDDY | $12.49 | +0.64% | 113.4B | 62.98 | $0.20 | +1.46% |
| MBGAF | $69.18 | -0.70% | 66.8B | 9.03 | $7.69 | +6.98% |
| MBGYY | $17.15 | -1.38% | 66B | 8.92 | $1.92 | +6.96% |
| BYMOF | $102.02 | +8.56% | 63.5B | 7.55 | $13.51 | +4.96% |
| VLKAF | $117.52 | -0.06% | 59.4B | 7.45 | $15.91 | +5.93% |
| VWAGY | $12.01 | -0.69% | 59.2B | 7.42 | $1.59 | +6.04% |
Stock Comparison
BAMXF vs GELYY Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, GELYY has a market cap of 515B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while GELYY trades at $50.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas GELYY's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GELYY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to GELYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check GELYY's competition here
BAMXF vs TOYOF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, TOYOF has a market cap of 310.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while TOYOF trades at $24.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas TOYOF's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TOYOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to TOYOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check TOYOF's competition here
BAMXF vs BYDDF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, BYDDF has a market cap of 119B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while BYDDF trades at $12.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas BYDDF's P/E ratio is 63.14. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BYDDF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to BYDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check BYDDF's competition here
BAMXF vs BYDDY Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, BYDDY has a market cap of 113.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while BYDDY trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas BYDDY's P/E ratio is 62.98. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BYDDY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to BYDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check BYDDY's competition here
BAMXF vs MBGAF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, MBGAF has a market cap of 66.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while MBGAF trades at $69.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas MBGAF's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MBGAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to MBGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check MBGAF's competition here
BAMXF vs MBGYY Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, MBGYY has a market cap of 66B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while MBGYY trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas MBGYY's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MBGYY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to MBGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check MBGYY's competition here
BAMXF vs BYMOF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, BYMOF has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while BYMOF trades at $102.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas BYMOF's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BYMOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and BYMOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BYMOF's competition here
BAMXF vs VLKAF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, VLKAF has a market cap of 59.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while VLKAF trades at $117.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas VLKAF's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLKAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to VLKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check VLKAF's competition here
BAMXF vs VWAGY Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, VWAGY has a market cap of 59.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while VWAGY trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas VWAGY's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VWAGY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to VWAGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check VWAGY's competition here
BAMXF vs VWAPY Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, VWAPY has a market cap of 59B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while VWAPY trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas VWAPY's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VWAPY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to VWAPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check VWAPY's competition here
BAMXF vs VLKPF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, VLKPF has a market cap of 58.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while VLKPF trades at $120.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas VLKPF's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLKPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to VLKPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check VLKPF's competition here
BAMXF vs HNDAF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, HNDAF has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while HNDAF trades at $10.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas HNDAF's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HNDAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to HNDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check HNDAF's competition here
BAMXF vs MAHMF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, MAHMF has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while MAHMF trades at $39.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas MAHMF's P/E ratio is 28.42. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MAHMF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and MAHMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MAHMF's competition here
BAMXF vs DRPRF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, DRPRF has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while DRPRF trades at $49.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas DRPRF's P/E ratio is 40.00. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DRPRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and DRPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DRPRF's competition here
BAMXF vs DRPRY Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, DRPRY has a market cap of 43.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while DRPRY trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas DRPRY's P/E ratio is 39.66. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DRPRY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to DRPRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check DRPRY's competition here
BAMXF vs HYMTF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, HYMTF has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while HYMTF trades at $51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas HYMTF's P/E ratio is 2.99. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HYMTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to HYMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check HYMTF's competition here
BAMXF vs TYIDY Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, TYIDY has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while TYIDY trades at $129.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas TYIDY's P/E ratio is 29.21. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TYIDY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to TYIDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check TYIDY's competition here
BAMXF vs TYIDF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, TYIDF has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while TYIDF trades at $125.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas TYIDF's P/E ratio is 28.78. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TYIDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and TYIDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TYIDF's competition here
BAMXF vs SZKMY Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, SZKMY has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while SZKMY trades at $61.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas SZKMY's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SZKMY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to SZKMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check SZKMY's competition here
BAMXF vs SZKMF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, SZKMF has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while SZKMF trades at $15.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas SZKMF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SZKMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to SZKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check SZKMF's competition here
BAMXF vs GELYF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, GELYF has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while GELYF trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas GELYF's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GELYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to GELYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check GELYF's competition here
BAMXF vs GELHY Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, GELHY has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while GELHY trades at $43.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas GELHY's P/E ratio is 10.20. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GELHY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to GELHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check GELHY's competition here
BAMXF vs HYMLF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, HYMLF has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while HYMLF trades at $89.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas HYMLF's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HYMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and HYMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HYMLF's competition here
BAMXF vs GWLLF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, GWLLF has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while GWLLF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas GWLLF's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GWLLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and GWLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GWLLF's competition here
BAMXF vs BMWYY Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, BMWYY has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while BMWYY trades at $29.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas BMWYY's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BMWYY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to BMWYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check BMWYY's competition here
BAMXF vs XPNGF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, XPNGF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while XPNGF trades at $9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas XPNGF's P/E ratio is -28.27. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XPNGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and XPNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XPNGF's competition here
BAMXF vs EXXRF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, EXXRF has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while EXXRF trades at $85.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas EXXRF's P/E ratio is -24.14. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EXXRF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to EXXRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check EXXRF's competition here
BAMXF vs GWLLY Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, GWLLY has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while GWLLY trades at $18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas GWLLY's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GWLLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and GWLLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GWLLY's competition here
BAMXF vs FUJHY Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, FUJHY has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while FUJHY trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas FUJHY's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FUJHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to FUJHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check FUJHY's competition here
BAMXF vs POAHF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, POAHF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while POAHF trades at $43.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas POAHF's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to POAHF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and POAHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check POAHF's competition here
BAMXF vs POAHY Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, POAHY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while POAHY trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas POAHY's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to POAHY's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to POAHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check POAHY's competition here
BAMXF vs YAMHY Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, YAMHY has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while YAMHY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas YAMHY's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YAMHY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to YAMHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check YAMHY's competition here
BAMXF vs FUJHF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, FUJHF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while FUJHF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas FUJHF's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FUJHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and FUJHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FUJHF's competition here
BAMXF vs ISUZY Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, ISUZY has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while ISUZY trades at $18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ISUZY's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ISUZY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to ISUZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check ISUZY's competition here
BAMXF vs DNFGF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, DNFGF has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while DNFGF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas DNFGF's P/E ratio is -140.00. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DNFGF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and DNFGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DNFGF's competition here
BAMXF vs GNZUF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, GNZUF has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while GNZUF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas GNZUF's P/E ratio is -9.80. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GNZUF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and GNZUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNZUF's competition here
BAMXF vs RNLSY Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, RNLSY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while RNLSY trades at $7.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas RNLSY's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RNLSY's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to RNLSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check RNLSY's competition here
BAMXF vs RNSDF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, RNSDF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while RNSDF trades at $37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas RNSDF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RNSDF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and RNSDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RNSDF's competition here
BAMXF vs JCYCF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, JCYCF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while JCYCF trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas JCYCF's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JCYCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and JCYCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JCYCF's competition here
BAMXF vs NIOIF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, NIOIF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while NIOIF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas NIOIF's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NIOIF's ROE of -11.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and NIOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NIOIF's competition here
BAMXF vs ISUZF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, ISUZF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while ISUZF trades at $15.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ISUZF's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ISUZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and ISUZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ISUZF's competition here
BAMXF vs JCYGY Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, JCYGY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while JCYGY trades at $51.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas JCYGY's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JCYGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and JCYGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JCYGY's competition here
BAMXF vs NSANF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, NSANF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while NSANF trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas NSANF's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NSANF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to NSANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check NSANF's competition here
BAMXF vs NSANY Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, NSANY has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while NSANY trades at $5.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas NSANY's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NSANY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to NSANY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check NSANY's competition here
BAMXF vs DNFGY Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, DNFGY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while DNFGY trades at $56.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas DNFGY's P/E ratio is -113.28. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DNFGY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and DNFGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DNFGY's competition here
BAMXF vs VLVOF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, VLVOF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while VLVOF trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas VLVOF's P/E ratio is 278.00. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLVOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and VLVOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VLVOF's competition here
BAMXF vs VLVCY Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, VLVCY has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while VLVCY trades at $5.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas VLVCY's P/E ratio is 544.00. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLVCY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and VLVCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VLVCY's competition here
BAMXF vs YMHAY Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, YMHAY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while YMHAY trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas YMHAY's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YMHAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to YMHAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check YMHAY's competition here
BAMXF vs YAMHF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, YAMHF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while YAMHF trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas YAMHF's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YAMHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and YAMHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YAMHF's competition here
BAMXF vs IVCGF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, IVCGF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while IVCGF trades at $22.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas IVCGF's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IVCGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and IVCGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IVCGF's competition here
BAMXF vs MZDAY Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, MZDAY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while MZDAY trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas MZDAY's P/E ratio is 25.18. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MZDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to MZDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check MZDAY's competition here
BAMXF vs MZDAF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, MZDAF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while MZDAF trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas MZDAF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MZDAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and MZDAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MZDAF's competition here
BAMXF vs YADGF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, YADGF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while YADGF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas YADGF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YADGF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and YADGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YADGF's competition here
BAMXF vs MMTOF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, MMTOF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while MMTOF trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas MMTOF's P/E ratio is -138.00. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MMTOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and MMTOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MMTOF's competition here
BAMXF vs SMEBF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, SMEBF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while SMEBF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas SMEBF's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SMEBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and SMEBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMEBF's competition here
BAMXF vs BCAUF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, BCAUF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while BCAUF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas BCAUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCAUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to BCAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check BCAUF's competition here
BAMXF vs BCCMY Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, BCCMY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while BCCMY trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas BCCMY's P/E ratio is -18.08. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCCMY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and BCCMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCCMY's competition here
BAMXF vs BMCLF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, BMCLF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while BMCLF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas BMCLF's P/E ratio is -22.80. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BMCLF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and BMCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BMCLF's competition here
BAMXF vs HINOY Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, HINOY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while HINOY trades at $31.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas HINOY's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HINOY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and HINOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HINOY's competition here
BAMXF vs NFYEF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, NFYEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while NFYEF trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas NFYEF's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NFYEF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to NFYEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check NFYEF's competition here
BAMXF vs HINOF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, HINOF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while HINOF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas HINOF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HINOF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and HINOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HINOF's competition here
BAMXF vs FOVSY Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, FOVSY has a market cap of 936.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while FOVSY trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas FOVSY's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FOVSY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and FOVSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FOVSY's competition here
BAMXF vs NSNHF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, NSNHF has a market cap of 922.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while NSNHF trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas NSNHF's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NSNHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and NSNHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSNHF's competition here
BAMXF vs ELMWQ Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, ELMWQ has a market cap of 868.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while ELMWQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ELMWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELMWQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and ELMWQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELMWQ's competition here
BAMXF vs AMGDF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, AMGDF has a market cap of 809.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while AMGDF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas AMGDF's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMGDF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to AMGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check AMGDF's competition here
BAMXF vs ARGGY Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, ARGGY has a market cap of 766.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while ARGGY trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ARGGY's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARGGY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to ARGGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check ARGGY's competition here
BAMXF vs PIAGF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, PIAGF has a market cap of 740.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while PIAGF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas PIAGF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PIAGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and PIAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PIAGF's competition here
BAMXF vs KRSOF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, KRSOF has a market cap of 444.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while KRSOF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas KRSOF's P/E ratio is 49.40. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KRSOF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and KRSOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KRSOF's competition here
BAMXF vs RIDEQ Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, RIDEQ has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while RIDEQ trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas RIDEQ's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RIDEQ's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to RIDEQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check RIDEQ's competition here
BAMXF vs NRDE Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, NRDE has a market cap of 26.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while NRDE trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas NRDE's P/E ratio is -7.17. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NRDE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to NRDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check NRDE's competition here
BAMXF vs FHYDF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, FHYDF has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while FHYDF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas FHYDF's P/E ratio is -10.55. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FHYDF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to FHYDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check FHYDF's competition here
BAMXF vs LFEV Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, LFEV has a market cap of 17M. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while LFEV trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas LFEV's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LFEV's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to LFEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check LFEV's competition here
BAMXF vs ELMSQ Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, ELMSQ has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while ELMSQ trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ELMSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELMSQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to ELMSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check ELMSQ's competition here
BAMXF vs SEVCF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, SEVCF has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while SEVCF trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas SEVCF's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SEVCF's ROE of -1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to SEVCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check SEVCF's competition here
BAMXF vs CSBI Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, CSBI has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while CSBI trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas CSBI's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSBI's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and CSBI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSBI's competition here
BAMXF vs EVTGF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, EVTGF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while EVTGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas EVTGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EVTGF's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to EVTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check EVTGF's competition here
BAMXF vs FSRNQ Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, FSRNQ has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while FSRNQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas FSRNQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FSRNQ's ROE of -4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to FSRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check FSRNQ's competition here
BAMXF vs ELCR Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, ELCR has a market cap of 681.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while ELCR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ELCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELCR's ROE of +3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and ELCR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELCR's competition here
BAMXF vs TUGAF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, TUGAF has a market cap of 495.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while TUGAF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas TUGAF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TUGAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and TUGAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TUGAF's competition here
BAMXF vs GKIT Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, GKIT has a market cap of 494.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while GKIT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas GKIT's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GKIT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and GKIT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GKIT's competition here
BAMXF vs RONN Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, RONN has a market cap of 397.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while RONN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas RONN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RONN's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and RONN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RONN's competition here
BAMXF vs ELEK Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, ELEK has a market cap of 332.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while ELEK trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ELEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELEK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and ELEK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELEK's competition here
BAMXF vs BINI Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, BINI has a market cap of 278.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while BINI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas BINI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BINI's ROE of +5.98%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to BINI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check BINI's competition here
BAMXF vs GACR Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, GACR has a market cap of 104.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while GACR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas GACR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GACR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and GACR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GACR's competition here
BAMXF vs EGOXF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, EGOXF has a market cap of 9.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while EGOXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas EGOXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EGOXF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and EGOXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EGOXF's competition here
BAMXF vs ELIO Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, ELIO has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while ELIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ELIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELIO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and ELIO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELIO's competition here
BAMXF vs ARVLF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, ARVLF has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while ARVLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ARVLF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARVLF's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and ARVLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARVLF's competition here
BAMXF vs NDVR Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, NDVR has a market cap of 892. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while NDVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas NDVR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NDVR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and NDVR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NDVR's competition here
BAMXF vs NVYAF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, NVYAF has a market cap of 869. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while NVYAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas NVYAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NVYAF's ROE of -16.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF and NVYAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NVYAF's competition here
BAMXF vs DDAIF Comparison February 2026
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 63.2B. In comparison, DDAIF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $101.15, while DDAIF trades at $62.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas DDAIF's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DDAIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to DDAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.Check DDAIF's competition here