Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG BAMXF Peers
See (BAMXF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAMXF | $92.00 | +2.38% | 56.97B | 7.74 | $11.88 | +7.02% |
| TOYOF | $18.73 | -2.29% | 244.36B | 7.04 | $2.66 | +3.28% |
| BYDDF | $53.55 | +4.08% | 162.77B | 25.38 | $2.11 | +0.82% |
| BYDDY | $106.87 | +3.81% | 80.19B | 25.15 | $4.25 | +0.80% |
| VWAGY | $11.73 | -1.26% | 58.09B | 5.61 | $2.09 | +9.93% |
| VWAPY | $11.49 | -1.54% | 57.54B | 5.52 | $2.08 | +9.45% |
| MBGYY | $14.93 | -0.27% | 57.50B | 5.85 | $2.55 | +5.55% |
| VLKAF | $115.70 | -2.00% | 57.44B | 5.51 | $20.99 | +9.40% |
| MBGAF | $59.28 | -1.42% | 57.08B | 5.81 | $10.21 | +9.11% |
| BYMOF | $76.11 | N/A | 55.99B | 5.79 | $13.14 | +7.91% |
Stock Comparison
BAMXF vs TOYOF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, TOYOF has a market cap of 244.36B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while TOYOF trades at $18.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas TOYOF's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TOYOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to TOYOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs BYDDF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, BYDDF has a market cap of 162.77B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while BYDDF trades at $53.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas BYDDF's P/E ratio is 25.38. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BYDDF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to BYDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs BYDDY Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, BYDDY has a market cap of 80.19B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while BYDDY trades at $106.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas BYDDY's P/E ratio is 25.15. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BYDDY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to BYDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs VWAGY Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, VWAGY has a market cap of 58.09B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while VWAGY trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas VWAGY's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VWAGY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to VWAGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs VWAPY Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, VWAPY has a market cap of 57.54B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while VWAPY trades at $11.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas VWAPY's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VWAPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to VWAPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs MBGYY Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, MBGYY has a market cap of 57.50B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while MBGYY trades at $14.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas MBGYY's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MBGYY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to MBGYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs VLKAF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, VLKAF has a market cap of 57.44B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while VLKAF trades at $115.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas VLKAF's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLKAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to VLKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs MBGAF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, MBGAF has a market cap of 57.08B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while MBGAF trades at $59.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas MBGAF's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MBGAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to MBGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs BYMOF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, BYMOF has a market cap of 55.99B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while BYMOF trades at $76.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas BYMOF's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BYMOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to BYMOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs VLKPF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, VLKPF has a market cap of 54.52B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while VLKPF trades at $115.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas VLKPF's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLKPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to VLKPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs DRPRF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, DRPRF has a market cap of 49.18B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while DRPRF trades at $53.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas DRPRF's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DRPRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to DRPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs HNDAF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, HNDAF has a market cap of 43.42B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while HNDAF trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas HNDAF's P/E ratio is 6.66. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HNDAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to HNDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs MAHMF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, MAHMF has a market cap of 42.03B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while MAHMF trades at $33.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas MAHMF's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MAHMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to MAHMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs TYIDF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, TYIDF has a market cap of 36.09B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while TYIDF trades at $119.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas TYIDF's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TYIDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to TYIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs HYMTF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, HYMTF has a market cap of 34.86B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while HYMTF trades at $52.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas HYMTF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HYMTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to HYMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs TYIDY Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, TYIDY has a market cap of 33.53B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while TYIDY trades at $111.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas TYIDY's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TYIDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to TYIDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs SZKMF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, SZKMF has a market cap of 24.71B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while SZKMF trades at $12.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas SZKMF's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SZKMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to SZKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs GELYY Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, GELYY has a market cap of 24.60B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while GELYY trades at $48.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas GELYY's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GELYY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to GELYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs GELYF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, GELYF has a market cap of 24.30B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while GELYF trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas GELYF's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GELYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to GELYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs DRPRY Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, DRPRY has a market cap of 24.08B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while DRPRY trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas DRPRY's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DRPRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to DRPRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs SZKMY Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, SZKMY has a market cap of 23.75B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while SZKMY trades at $49.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas SZKMY's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SZKMY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to SZKMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs GWLLF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, GWLLF has a market cap of 23.30B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while GWLLF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas GWLLF's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GWLLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to GWLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs XPNGF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, XPNGF has a market cap of 22.43B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while XPNGF trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas XPNGF's P/E ratio is -28.10. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XPNGF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to XPNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs HYMLF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, HYMLF has a market cap of 22.32B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while HYMLF trades at $89.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas HYMLF's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HYMLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to HYMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs EXXRF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, EXXRF has a market cap of 21.05B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while EXXRF trades at $98.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas EXXRF's P/E ratio is 1.30. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EXXRF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to EXXRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs FOVSY Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, FOVSY has a market cap of 18.97B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while FOVSY trades at $135.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas FOVSY's P/E ratio is 111.71. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FOVSY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to FOVSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs BMWYY Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, BMWYY has a market cap of 18.66B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while BMWYY trades at $29.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas BMWYY's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BMWYY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to BMWYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs RNLSY Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, RNLSY has a market cap of 15.68B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while RNLSY trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas RNLSY's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RNLSY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to RNLSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs RNSDF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, RNSDF has a market cap of 14.56B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while RNSDF trades at $50.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas RNSDF's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RNSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to RNSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs FUJHF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, FUJHF has a market cap of 13.95B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while FUJHF trades at $19.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas FUJHF's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FUJHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to FUJHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs GWLLY Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, GWLLY has a market cap of 13.61B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while GWLLY trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas GWLLY's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GWLLY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to GWLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs FUJHY Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, FUJHY has a market cap of 13.34B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while FUJHY trades at $9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas FUJHY's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FUJHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to FUJHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs POAHF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, POAHF has a market cap of 13.01B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while POAHF trades at $43.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas POAHF's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to POAHF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to POAHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs YAMHY Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, YAMHY has a market cap of 12.72B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while YAMHY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas YAMHY's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YAMHY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to YAMHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs ISUZF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, ISUZF has a market cap of 9.24B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while ISUZF trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas ISUZF's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ISUZF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to ISUZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs ISUZY Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, ISUZY has a market cap of 9.06B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while ISUZY trades at $12.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas ISUZY's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ISUZY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to ISUZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs GNZUF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, GNZUF has a market cap of 8.98B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while GNZUF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas GNZUF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GNZUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to GNZUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs NSANF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, NSANF has a market cap of 8.77B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while NSANF trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas NSANF's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NSANF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to NSANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs NIOIF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, NIOIF has a market cap of 8.23B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while NIOIF trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas NIOIF's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NIOIF's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to NIOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs NSANY Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, NSANY has a market cap of 8.17B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while NSANY trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas NSANY's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NSANY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to NSANY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs JCYGY Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, JCYGY has a market cap of 7.81B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while JCYGY trades at $39.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas JCYGY's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JCYGY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to JCYGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs YAMHF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, YAMHF has a market cap of 7.46B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while YAMHF trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas YAMHF's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YAMHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to YAMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs YMHAY Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, YMHAY has a market cap of 7.17B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while YMHAY trades at $14.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas YMHAY's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YMHAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to YMHAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs JCYCF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, JCYCF has a market cap of 7.07B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while JCYCF trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas JCYCF's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JCYCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to JCYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs POAHY Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, POAHY has a market cap of 6.48B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while POAHY trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas POAHY's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to POAHY's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to POAHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs VLVOF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, VLVOF has a market cap of 6.04B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while VLVOF trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas VLVOF's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLVOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to VLVOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs VLVCY Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, VLVCY has a market cap of 5.89B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while VLVCY trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas VLVCY's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLVCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to VLVCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs IVCGF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, IVCGF has a market cap of 4.86B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while IVCGF trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas IVCGF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IVCGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to IVCGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs DNFGY Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, DNFGY has a market cap of 4.52B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while DNFGY trades at $26.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas DNFGY's P/E ratio is 532.20. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DNFGY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to DNFGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs DNFGF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, DNFGF has a market cap of 4.29B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while DNFGF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas DNFGF's P/E ratio is -7.43. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DNFGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to DNFGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs MMTOF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, MMTOF has a market cap of 3.97B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while MMTOF trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas MMTOF's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MMTOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to MMTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs YADGF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, YADGF has a market cap of 3.95B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while YADGF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas YADGF's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YADGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to YADGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs MZDAF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, MZDAF has a market cap of 3.94B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while MZDAF trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas MZDAF's P/E ratio is 5.04. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MZDAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to MZDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs MZDAY Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, MZDAY has a market cap of 3.62B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while MZDAY trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas MZDAY's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MZDAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to MZDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs SMEBF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, SMEBF has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while SMEBF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas SMEBF's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SMEBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to SMEBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs BCCMY Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, BCCMY has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while BCCMY trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas BCCMY's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCCMY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to BCCMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs BMCLF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, BMCLF has a market cap of 2.03B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while BMCLF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas BMCLF's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BMCLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to BMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs HINOY Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, HINOY has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while HINOY trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas HINOY's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HINOY's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to HINOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs BCAUF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, BCAUF has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while BCAUF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas BCAUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCAUF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to BCAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs HINOF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, HINOF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while HINOF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas HINOF's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HINOF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to HINOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs NFYEF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, NFYEF has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while NFYEF trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas NFYEF's P/E ratio is -339.33. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NFYEF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to NFYEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs AMGDF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, AMGDF has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while AMGDF trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas AMGDF's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMGDF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to AMGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs ARGGY Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, ARGGY has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while ARGGY trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas ARGGY's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARGGY's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to ARGGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs NSNHF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, NSNHF has a market cap of 866.90M. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while NSNHF trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas NSNHF's P/E ratio is 640.00. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NSNHF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to NSNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs PIAGF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, PIAGF has a market cap of 714.23M. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while PIAGF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas PIAGF's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PIAGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to PIAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs KRSOF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, KRSOF has a market cap of 444.60M. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while KRSOF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas KRSOF's P/E ratio is 49.40. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KRSOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to KRSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs RIDEQ Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, RIDEQ has a market cap of 27.28M. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while RIDEQ trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas RIDEQ's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RIDEQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to RIDEQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs FHYDF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, FHYDF has a market cap of 25.71M. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while FHYDF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas FHYDF's P/E ratio is -5.82. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FHYDF's ROE of +3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to FHYDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs SEVCF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, SEVCF has a market cap of 21.50M. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while SEVCF trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas SEVCF's P/E ratio is 3.57. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SEVCF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to SEVCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs NRDE Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, NRDE has a market cap of 21.41M. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while NRDE trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas NRDE's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NRDE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to NRDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs ELMSQ Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, ELMSQ has a market cap of 12.40M. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while ELMSQ trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas ELMSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELMSQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to ELMSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs ELMWQ Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, ELMWQ has a market cap of 8.68M. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while ELMWQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas ELMWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELMWQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to ELMWQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs LFEV Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, LFEV has a market cap of 4.20M. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while LFEV trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas LFEV's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LFEV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to LFEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs GKIT Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, GKIT has a market cap of 3.81M. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while GKIT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas GKIT's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GKIT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to GKIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs EVTGF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, EVTGF has a market cap of 1.42M. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while EVTGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas EVTGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EVTGF's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to EVTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs FSRNQ Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, FSRNQ has a market cap of 1.06M. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while FSRNQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas FSRNQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FSRNQ's ROE of -3.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to FSRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs ELEK Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, ELEK has a market cap of 831513.00. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while ELEK trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas ELEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELEK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to ELEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs ELCR Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, ELCR has a market cap of 681583.00. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while ELCR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas ELCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELCR's ROE of +3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to ELCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs TUGAF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, TUGAF has a market cap of 386816.00. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while TUGAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas TUGAF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TUGAF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to TUGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs RONN Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, RONN has a market cap of 228179.00. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while RONN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas RONN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RONN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to RONN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs GACR Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, GACR has a market cap of 104560.00. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while GACR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas GACR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GACR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to GACR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs CSBI Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, CSBI has a market cap of 32318.00. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while CSBI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas CSBI's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSBI's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is less volatile compared to CSBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs ELIO Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, ELIO has a market cap of 14196.00. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while ELIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas ELIO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELIO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to ELIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs NVYAF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, NVYAF has a market cap of 8693.00. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while NVYAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas NVYAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NVYAF's ROE of -16.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to NVYAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs ARVLF Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, ARVLF has a market cap of 5513.00. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while ARVLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas ARVLF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARVLF's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to ARVLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.
BAMXF vs NDVR Comparison
BAMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMXF stands at 56.97B. In comparison, NDVR has a market cap of 892.00. Regarding current trading prices, BAMXF is priced at $92.00, while NDVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.74, whereas NDVR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, BAMXF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NDVR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMXF is more volatile compared to NDVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMXF.