Brookfield Asset Management Inc.
Brookfield Asset Management Inc. BAMGF Peers
See (BAMGF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAMGF | $12.07 | +0.03% | 86.21B | 4.93 | $2.45 | +4.79% |
| GBLBY | $8.60 | +4.24% | 114.55B | 286.67 | $0.03 | +3.87% |
| IVSXF | $30.20 | N/A | 92.51B | 20.68 | $1.46 | +1.64% |
| IVSBF | $29.57 | +1.20% | 90.58B | 20.25 | $1.46 | +1.67% |
| BKFAF | $8.46 | +0.04% | 86.21B | N/A | N/A | +12.50% |
| BROXF | $13.85 | N/A | 86.21B | N/A | N/A | +8.22% |
| BXDIF | $8.62 | +0.01% | 86.21B | N/A | N/A | +12.45% |
| BAMKF | $12.50 | N/A | 86.21B | 5.11 | $2.45 | +5.50% |
| BKAMF | $14.33 | N/A | 82.82B | N/A | N/A | +9.86% |
| TGOPF | $56.64 | +1.59% | 54.68B | 9.80 | $5.78 | +1.46% |
Stock Comparison
BAMGF vs GBLBY Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, GBLBY has a market cap of 114.55B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while GBLBY trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas GBLBY's P/E ratio is 286.67. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GBLBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to GBLBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs IVSXF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, IVSXF has a market cap of 92.51B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while IVSXF trades at $30.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas IVSXF's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IVSXF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to IVSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs IVSBF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, IVSBF has a market cap of 90.58B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while IVSBF trades at $29.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas IVSBF's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IVSBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to IVSBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs BKFAF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, BKFAF has a market cap of 86.21B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while BKFAF trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas BKFAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKFAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to BKFAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs BROXF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, BROXF has a market cap of 86.21B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while BROXF trades at $13.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas BROXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BROXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to BROXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs BXDIF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, BXDIF has a market cap of 86.21B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while BXDIF trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas BXDIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BXDIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to BXDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs BAMKF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, BAMKF has a market cap of 86.21B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while BAMKF trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas BAMKF's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BAMKF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to BAMKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs BKAMF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, BKAMF has a market cap of 82.82B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while BKAMF trades at $14.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas BKAMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKAMF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to BKAMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs TGOPF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, TGOPF has a market cap of 54.68B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while TGOPF trades at $56.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas TGOPF's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TGOPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to TGOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs TGOPY Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, TGOPY has a market cap of 53.13B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while TGOPY trades at $27.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas TGOPY's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TGOPY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to TGOPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs VNGDF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, VNGDF has a market cap of 42.72B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while VNGDF trades at $108.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas VNGDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VNGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to VNGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs PGPHF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, PGPHF has a market cap of 36.27B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while PGPHF trades at $1,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas PGPHF's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PGPHF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to PGPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs EQBBF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, EQBBF has a market cap of 33.57B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while EQBBF trades at $28.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas EQBBF's P/E ratio is 38.50. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EQBBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to EQBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs LGGNF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, LGGNF has a market cap of 19.09B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while LGGNF trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas LGGNF's P/E ratio is 82.25. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LGGNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to LGGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs IHPCF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, IHPCF has a market cap of 18.85B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while IHPCF trades at $60.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas IHPCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IHPCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to IHPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs BKFPF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, BKFPF has a market cap of 16.80B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while BKFPF trades at $11.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas BKFPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKFPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to BKFPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs IVTBF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, IVTBF has a market cap of 14.98B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while IVTBF trades at $25.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas IVTBF's P/E ratio is 31.65. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IVTBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to IVTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs STMZF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, STMZF has a market cap of 14.91B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while STMZF trades at $12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas STMZF's P/E ratio is -5.76. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STMZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to STMZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs JBARF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, JBARF has a market cap of 14.60B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while JBARF trades at $71.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas JBARF's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JBARF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to JBARF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs AMDUF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, AMDUF has a market cap of 14.39B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while AMDUF trades at $70.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas AMDUF's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMDUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to AMDUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs JBAXY Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, JBAXY has a market cap of 14.21B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while JBAXY trades at $13.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas JBAXY's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JBAXY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to JBAXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs IDTVF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, IDTVF has a market cap of 13.50B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while IDTVF trades at $31.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas IDTVF's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IDTVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to IDTVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs IDDTF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, IDDTF has a market cap of 13.00B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while IDDTF trades at $30.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas IDDTF's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IDDTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to IDDTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs HALFF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, HALFF has a market cap of 12.10B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while HALFF trades at $133.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas HALFF's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HALFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to HALFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs LBGUF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, LBGUF has a market cap of 11.36B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while LBGUF trades at $45.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas LBGUF's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LBGUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to LBGUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs GSCE Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, GSCE has a market cap of 10.59B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while GSCE trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas GSCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GSCE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to GSCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs GBLBF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, GBLBF has a market cap of 9.55B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while GBLBF trades at $79.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas GBLBF's P/E ratio is 233.42. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GBLBF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to GBLBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs PSHZF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, PSHZF has a market cap of 8.99B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while PSHZF trades at $49.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas PSHZF's P/E ratio is 4.08. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSHZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to PSHZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs SBHGF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, SBHGF has a market cap of 8.18B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while SBHGF trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas SBHGF's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SBHGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to SBHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs SFNXF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, SFNXF has a market cap of 7.85B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while SFNXF trades at $237.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas SFNXF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SFNXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to SFNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs HILRX Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, HILRX has a market cap of 7.80B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while HILRX trades at $20.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas HILRX's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HILRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to HILRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs IGIFF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, IGIFF has a market cap of 7.41B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while IGIFF trades at $31.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas IGIFF's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IGIFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to IGIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs ICGUF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, ICGUF has a market cap of 7.35B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while ICGUF trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas ICGUF's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ICGUF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to ICGUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs STJPF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, STJPF has a market cap of 7.19B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while STJPF trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas STJPF's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STJPF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to STJPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs MGPUF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, MGPUF has a market cap of 6.91B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while MGPUF trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas MGPUF's P/E ratio is -14.60. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MGPUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to MGPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs SHNWF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, SHNWF has a market cap of 6.75B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while SHNWF trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas SHNWF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHNWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to SHNWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs IVPEF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, IVPEF has a market cap of 6.69B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while IVPEF trades at $131.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas IVPEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IVPEF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to IVPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs ALITF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, ALITF has a market cap of 6.62B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while ALITF trades at $15.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas ALITF's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALITF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to ALITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs FLIVF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, FLIVF has a market cap of 6.50B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while FLIVF trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas FLIVF's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FLIVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to FLIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs DAXXF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, DAXXF has a market cap of 6.50B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while DAXXF trades at $159.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas DAXXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DAXXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to DAXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs AFOVF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, AFOVF has a market cap of 6.27B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while AFOVF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas AFOVF's P/E ratio is 29.59. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AFOVF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to AFOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs HRGLF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, HRGLF has a market cap of 6.16B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while HRGLF trades at $12.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas HRGLF's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HRGLF's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to HRGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs EUZOF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, EUZOF has a market cap of 5.68B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while EUZOF trades at $82.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas EUZOF's P/E ratio is -84.54. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EUZOF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to EUZOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs CCGDF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, CCGDF has a market cap of 5.67B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while CCGDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas CCGDF's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCGDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to CCGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs HRGLY Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, HRGLY has a market cap of 5.66B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while HRGLY trades at $23.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas HRGLY's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HRGLY's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to HRGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs TTBXF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, TTBXF has a market cap of 5.52B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while TTBXF trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas TTBXF's P/E ratio is 3.05. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TTBXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to TTBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs HSXUF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, HSXUF has a market cap of 5.52B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while HSXUF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas HSXUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HSXUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to HSXUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs ISRPF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, ISRPF has a market cap of 5.46B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while ISRPF trades at $100.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas ISRPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ISRPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to ISRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs ONEXF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, ONEXF has a market cap of 5.26B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while ONEXF trades at $75.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas ONEXF's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ONEXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to ONEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs VUKEF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, VUKEF has a market cap of 4.70B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while VUKEF trades at $46.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas VUKEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VUKEF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to VUKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs REVNF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, REVNF has a market cap of 4.56B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while REVNF trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas REVNF's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to REVNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to REVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs AZIHF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, AZIHF has a market cap of 4.47B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while AZIHF trades at $31.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas AZIHF's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AZIHF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to AZIHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs WNDLF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, WNDLF has a market cap of 4.15B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while WNDLF trades at $97.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas WNDLF's P/E ratio is -29.51. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WNDLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to WNDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs RMGOF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, RMGOF has a market cap of 4.15B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while RMGOF trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas RMGOF's P/E ratio is 100.34. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RMGOF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to RMGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs VONHF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, VONHF has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while VONHF trades at $69.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas VONHF's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VONHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to VONHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs TKKHF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, TKKHF has a market cap of 3.72B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while TKKHF trades at $21.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas TKKHF's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TKKHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to TKKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs RITPF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, RITPF has a market cap of 3.70B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while RITPF trades at $25.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas RITPF's P/E ratio is 3.87. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RITPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to RITPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs AMSPF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, AMSPF has a market cap of 3.62B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while AMSPF trades at $117.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas AMSPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMSPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to AMSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs VGDDF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, VGDDF has a market cap of 3.51B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while VGDDF trades at $110.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas VGDDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VGDDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to VGDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs PVVLF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, PVVLF has a market cap of 3.49B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while PVVLF trades at $47.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas PVVLF's P/E ratio is 119.90. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PVVLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to PVVLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs MEIEF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, MEIEF has a market cap of 3.43B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while MEIEF trades at $6.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas MEIEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MEIEF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to MEIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs SLFPF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, SLFPF has a market cap of 3.35B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while SLFPF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas SLFPF's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SLFPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to SLFPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs SLFPY Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, SLFPY has a market cap of 3.35B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while SLFPY trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas SLFPY's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SLFPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to SLFPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs NINTF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, NINTF has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while NINTF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas NINTF's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NINTF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to NINTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs BBAGF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, BBAGF has a market cap of 2.90B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while BBAGF trades at $37.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas BBAGF's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BBAGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to BBAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs MNKIF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, MNKIF has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while MNKIF trades at $14.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas MNKIF's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MNKIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to MNKIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs BMMWF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, BMMWF has a market cap of 2.82B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while BMMWF trades at $34.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas BMMWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BMMWF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to BMMWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs QUILF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, QUILF has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while QUILF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas QUILF's P/E ratio is -60.58. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QUILF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to QUILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs MERIX Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, MERIX has a market cap of 2.33B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while MERIX trades at $17.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas MERIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MERIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to MERIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs RTBBF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, RTBBF has a market cap of 2.31B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while RTBBF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas RTBBF's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RTBBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to RTBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs TXEMF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, TXEMF has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while TXEMF trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas TXEMF's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TXEMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to TXEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs BZSPF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, BZSPF has a market cap of 2.19B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while BZSPF trades at $60.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas BZSPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BZSPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to BZSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs CRPFY Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, CRPFY has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while CRPFY trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas CRPFY's P/E ratio is 4.05. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRPFY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to CRPFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs CALEF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, CALEF has a market cap of 2.12B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while CALEF trades at $40.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas CALEF's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CALEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to CALEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs ENDTF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, ENDTF has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while ENDTF trades at $10.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas ENDTF's P/E ratio is 3.26. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ENDTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to ENDTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs JTCPF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, JTCPF has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while JTCPF trades at $11.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas JTCPF's P/E ratio is -198.33. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JTCPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to JTCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs WTNTF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, WTNTF has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while WTNTF trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas WTNTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WTNTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to WTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs SFFFF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, SFFFF has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while SFFFF trades at $71.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas SFFFF's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SFFFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to SFFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs IXSRF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, IXSRF has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while IXSRF trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas IXSRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IXSRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to IXSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs FECHF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, FECHF has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while FECHF trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas FECHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FECHF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to FECHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs EHITF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, EHITF has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while EHITF trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas EHITF's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EHITF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to EHITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs FFXDF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, FFXDF has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while FFXDF trades at $16.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas FFXDF's P/E ratio is 55.33. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FFXDF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to FFXDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs ISMCF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, ISMCF has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while ISMCF trades at $596.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas ISMCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ISMCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to ISMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs HCMPX Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, HCMPX has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while HCMPX trades at $16.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas HCMPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HCMPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to HCMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs BHMDF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, BHMDF has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while BHMDF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas BHMDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHMDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to BHMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs AJMPF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, AJMPF has a market cap of 1.43B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while AJMPF trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas AJMPF's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AJMPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to AJMPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs ISCMF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, ISCMF has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while ISCMF trades at $7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas ISCMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ISCMF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to ISCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs PPTTF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, PPTTF has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while PPTTF trades at $12.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas PPTTF's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PPTTF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to PPTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs BWMTF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, BWMTF has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while BWMTF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas BWMTF's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BWMTF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to BWMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs AVGTF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, AVGTF has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while AVGTF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas AVGTF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AVGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to AVGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs RTOBF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, RTOBF has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while RTOBF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas RTOBF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RTOBF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to RTOBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs IHRMF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, IHRMF has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while IHRMF trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas IHRMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IHRMF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to IHRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs CYMBF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, CYMBF has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while CYMBF trades at $52.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas CYMBF's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CYMBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to CYMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs FSEN Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, FSEN has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while FSEN trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas FSEN's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FSEN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is less volatile compared to FSEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs BLGFF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, BLGFF has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while BLGFF trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas BLGFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BLGFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to BLGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs IGBSF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, IGBSF has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while IGBSF trades at $7.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas IGBSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IGBSF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to IGBSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs MGLLF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, MGLLF has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while MGLLF trades at $6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas MGLLF's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MGLLF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to MGLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs CEVIY Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, CEVIY has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while CEVIY trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas CEVIY's P/E ratio is -4.41. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CEVIY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to CEVIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.
BAMGF vs TGONF Comparison
BAMGF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAMGF stands at 86.21B. In comparison, TGONF has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, BAMGF is priced at $12.07, while TGONF trades at $13.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAMGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.93, whereas TGONF's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, BAMGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TGONF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAMGF is more volatile compared to TGONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAMGF.