Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BAM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAM | $63.02 | -0.27% | 101.6B | 46.34 | $1.36 | +2.59% |
| VOO | $585.58 | +0.40% | 1.5T | 27.78 | $21.07 | +1.18% |
| VFINX | $589.96 | +0.47% | 1.5T | 27.67 | $21.24 | +1.18% |
| VITSX | $152.68 | +0.41% | 1.3T | 26.89 | $5.65 | +1.32% |
| VTSAX | $152.65 | +0.40% | 1.3T | 26.89 | $5.65 | +1.18% |
| FXAIX | $221.98 | +0.47% | 665.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VTI | $313.69 | +0.45% | 650.5B | 27.03 | $11.61 | +1.18% |
| IVV | $640.06 | +0.39% | 644.7B | 27.53 | $23.25 | +1.25% |
| SPY | $637.10 | +0.42% | 584.6B | 27.54 | $23.13 | +1.12% |
| VXUS | $70.48 | -0.16% | 516.9B | 16.89 | $4.17 | +2.77% |
Stock Comparison
BAM vs VOO Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VOO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while VOO trades at $585.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas VOO's P/E ratio is 27.78. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to VOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check VOO's competition here
BAM vs VFINX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VFINX has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while VFINX trades at $589.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas VFINX's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VFINX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to VFINX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check VFINX's competition here
BAM vs VITSX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VITSX has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while VITSX trades at $152.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas VITSX's P/E ratio is 26.89. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VITSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to VITSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check VITSX's competition here
BAM vs VTSAX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VTSAX has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while VTSAX trades at $152.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas VTSAX's P/E ratio is 26.89. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VTSAX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to VTSAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check VTSAX's competition here
BAM vs FXAIX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, FXAIX has a market cap of 665.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while FXAIX trades at $221.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas FXAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FXAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to FXAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check FXAIX's competition here
BAM vs VTI Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VTI has a market cap of 650.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while VTI trades at $313.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas VTI's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to VTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check VTI's competition here
BAM vs IVV Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, IVV has a market cap of 644.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while IVV trades at $640.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas IVV's P/E ratio is 27.53. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IVV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to IVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check IVV's competition here
BAM vs SPY Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, SPY has a market cap of 584.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while SPY trades at $637.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas SPY's P/E ratio is 27.54. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SPY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to SPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check SPY's competition here
BAM vs VXUS Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VXUS has a market cap of 516.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while VXUS trades at $70.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas VXUS's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VXUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to VXUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check VXUS's competition here
BAM vs VTSNX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VTSNX has a market cap of 510.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while VTSNX trades at $151.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas VTSNX's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VTSNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to VTSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check VTSNX's competition here
BAM vs VMCPX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VMCPX has a market cap of 361.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while VMCPX trades at $390.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas VMCPX's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VMCPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to VMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check VMCPX's competition here
BAM vs VIMAX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VIMAX has a market cap of 331.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while VIMAX trades at $358.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas VIMAX's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VIMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to VIMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check VIMAX's competition here
BAM vs VIIIX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VIIIX has a market cap of 321.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while VIIIX trades at $519.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas VIIIX's P/E ratio is 27.64. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VIIIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to VIIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check VIIIX's competition here
BAM vs VINIX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VINIX has a market cap of 321.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while VINIX trades at $519.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas VINIX's P/E ratio is 27.64. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VINIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to VINIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check VINIX's competition here
BAM vs RGAGX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, RGAGX has a market cap of 298.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while RGAGX trades at $84.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas RGAGX's P/E ratio is 30.94. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RGAGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to RGAGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check RGAGX's competition here
BAM vs GAFFX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, GAFFX has a market cap of 298.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while GAFFX trades at $84.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas GAFFX's P/E ratio is 32.68. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to GAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check GAFFX's competition here
BAM vs AGTHX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, AGTHX has a market cap of 297.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while AGTHX trades at $84.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas AGTHX's P/E ratio is 32.65. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AGTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to AGTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check AGTHX's competition here
BAM vs GFAFX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, GFAFX has a market cap of 294.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while GFAFX trades at $83.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas GFAFX's P/E ratio is 32.65. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GFAFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to GFAFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check GFAFX's competition here
BAM vs RGABX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, RGABX has a market cap of 264.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while RGABX trades at $74.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas RGABX's P/E ratio is 32.57. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RGABX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to RGABX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check RGABX's competition here
BAM vs RGAAX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, RGAAX has a market cap of 260B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while RGAAX trades at $73.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas RGAAX's P/E ratio is 32.57. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RGAAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to RGAAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check RGAAX's competition here
BAM vs GFACX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, GFACX has a market cap of 253.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while GFACX trades at $71.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas GFACX's P/E ratio is 32.57. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GFACX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to GFACX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check GFACX's competition here
BAM vs ABALX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, ABALX has a market cap of 251.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while ABALX trades at $37.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas ABALX's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ABALX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to ABALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check ABALX's competition here
BAM vs AMBFX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, AMBFX has a market cap of 251.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while AMBFX trades at $37.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas AMBFX's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AMBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to AMBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check AMBFX's competition here
BAM vs RLBGX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, RLBGX has a market cap of 251.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while RLBGX trades at $37.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas RLBGX's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RLBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to RLBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check RLBGX's competition here
BAM vs BALFX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, BALFX has a market cap of 251.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while BALFX trades at $37.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas BALFX's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BALFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to BALFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check BALFX's competition here
BAM vs AFMBX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, AFMBX has a market cap of 251B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while AFMBX trades at $37.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas AFMBX's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AFMBX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to AFMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check AFMBX's competition here
BAM vs VDIPX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VDIPX has a market cap of 232.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while VDIPX trades at $29.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas VDIPX's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VDIPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to VDIPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check VDIPX's competition here
BAM vs VTMNX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VTMNX has a market cap of 230.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while VTMNX trades at $18.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas VTMNX's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VTMNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to VTMNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check VTMNX's competition here
BAM vs VEA Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VEA has a market cap of 230.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while VEA trades at $58.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas VEA's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VEA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to VEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check VEA's competition here
BAM vs QQQ Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, QQQ has a market cap of 222.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while QQQ trades at $566.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas QQQ's P/E ratio is 34.05. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QQQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to QQQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check QQQ's competition here
BAM vs VB Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VB has a market cap of 217.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while VB trades at $246.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas VB's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to VB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check VB's competition here
BAM vs BX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, BX has a market cap of 211.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while BX trades at $178.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas BX's P/E ratio is 48.15. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BX's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is less volatile compared to BX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check BX's competition here
BAM vs VTV Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VTV has a market cap of 198.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while VTV trades at $180.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas VTV's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to VTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check VTV's competition here
BAM vs VO Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VO has a market cap of 195.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while VO trades at $289.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas VO's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to VO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check VO's competition here
BAM vs C-PN Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, C-PN has a market cap of 177.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while C-PN trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas C-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to C-PN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to C-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check C-PN's competition here
BAM vs BLK Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, BLK has a market cap of 174B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while BLK trades at $1,123.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas BLK's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BLK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to BLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check BLK's competition here
BAM vs FCNKX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, FCNKX has a market cap of 166.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while FCNKX trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas FCNKX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FCNKX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to FCNKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check FCNKX's competition here
BAM vs FCNTX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, FCNTX has a market cap of 166.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while FCNTX trades at $23.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas FCNTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FCNTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to FCNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check FCNTX's competition here
BAM vs AICCX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, AICCX has a market cap of 166.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while AICCX trades at $64.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas AICCX's P/E ratio is 29.79. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AICCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to AICCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check AICCX's competition here
BAM vs RICAX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, RICAX has a market cap of 165.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while RICAX trades at $64.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas RICAX's P/E ratio is 29.79. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RICAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to RICAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check RICAX's competition here
BAM vs RICBX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, RICBX has a market cap of 165.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while RICBX trades at $64.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas RICBX's P/E ratio is 28.79. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RICBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to RICBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check RICBX's competition here
BAM vs AIVSX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, AIVSX has a market cap of 165.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while AIVSX trades at $65.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas AIVSX's P/E ratio is 29.82. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AIVSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to AIVSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check AIVSX's competition here
BAM vs AICFX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, AICFX has a market cap of 165.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while AICFX trades at $64.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas AICFX's P/E ratio is 29.81. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AICFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to AICFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check AICFX's competition here
BAM vs FCTDX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, FCTDX has a market cap of 163.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while FCTDX trades at $18.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas FCTDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FCTDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to FCTDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check FCTDX's competition here
BAM vs NPFFX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, NPFFX has a market cap of 155.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while NPFFX trades at $70.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas NPFFX's P/E ratio is 28.64. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NPFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to NPFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check NPFFX's competition here
BAM vs FNPFX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, FNPFX has a market cap of 155.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while FNPFX trades at $71.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas FNPFX's P/E ratio is 26.15. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FNPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to FNPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check FNPFX's competition here
BAM vs RNPGX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, RNPGX has a market cap of 155.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while RNPGX trades at $71.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas RNPGX's P/E ratio is 26.15. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RNPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to RNPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check RNPGX's competition here
BAM vs ANWPX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, ANWPX has a market cap of 155B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while ANWPX trades at $71.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas ANWPX's P/E ratio is 28.65. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ANWPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to ANWPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check ANWPX's competition here
BAM vs AFIFX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, AFIFX has a market cap of 152.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while AFIFX trades at $89.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas AFIFX's P/E ratio is 27.89. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AFIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to AFIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check AFIFX's competition here
BAM vs CFNAX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, CFNAX has a market cap of 152.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while CFNAX trades at $89.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas CFNAX's P/E ratio is 26.87. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CFNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to CFNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check CFNAX's competition here
BAM vs ANCFX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, ANCFX has a market cap of 152.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while ANCFX trades at $89.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas ANCFX's P/E ratio is 26.87. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ANCFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to ANCFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check ANCFX's competition here
BAM vs AWSHX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, AWSHX has a market cap of 146.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while AWSHX trades at $65.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas AWSHX's P/E ratio is 25.70. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AWSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to AWSHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check AWSHX's competition here
BAM vs RWMFX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, RWMFX has a market cap of 146.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while RWMFX trades at $65.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas RWMFX's P/E ratio is 25.73. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RWMFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to RWMFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check RWMFX's competition here
BAM vs FWMIX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, FWMIX has a market cap of 146.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while FWMIX trades at $65.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas FWMIX's P/E ratio is 25.70. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FWMIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to FWMIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check FWMIX's competition here
BAM vs CWMAX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, CWMAX has a market cap of 145.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while CWMAX trades at $65.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas CWMAX's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CWMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to CWMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check CWMAX's competition here
BAM vs WSHFX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, WSHFX has a market cap of 145.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while WSHFX trades at $64.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas WSHFX's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WSHFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to WSHFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check WSHFX's competition here
BAM vs WSHCX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, WSHCX has a market cap of 143.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while WSHCX trades at $64.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas WSHCX's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WSHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to WSHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check WSHCX's competition here
BAM vs RWMBX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, RWMBX has a market cap of 142.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while RWMBX trades at $63.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas RWMBX's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RWMBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to RWMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check RWMBX's competition here
BAM vs IEFA Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, IEFA has a market cap of 141.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while IEFA trades at $84.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas IEFA's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IEFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to IEFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check IEFA's competition here
BAM vs KKR Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, KKR has a market cap of 135.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while KKR trades at $152.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas KKR's P/E ratio is 65.90. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KKR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is less volatile compared to KKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check KKR's competition here
BAM vs RERGX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, RERGX has a market cap of 134.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while RERGX trades at $61.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas RERGX's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RERGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to RERGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check RERGX's competition here
BAM vs AEPGX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, AEPGX has a market cap of 134.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while AEPGX trades at $61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas AEPGX's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AEPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to AEPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check AEPGX's competition here
BAM vs AEGFX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, AEGFX has a market cap of 134.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while AEGFX trades at $61.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas AEGFX's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AEGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to AEGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check AEGFX's competition here
BAM vs AEPFX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, AEPFX has a market cap of 134B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while AEPFX trades at $61.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas AEPFX's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AEPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to AEPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check AEPFX's competition here
BAM vs RERHX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, RERHX has a market cap of 134B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while RERHX trades at $61.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas RERHX's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RERHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to RERHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check RERHX's competition here
BAM vs AGG Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, AGG has a market cap of 127.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while AGG trades at $98.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas AGG's P/E ratio is 125.61. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AGG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to AGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check AGG's competition here
BAM vs IWF Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, IWF has a market cap of 124.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while IWF trades at $439.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas IWF's P/E ratio is 38.60. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IWF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to IWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check IWF's competition here
BAM vs VWENX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VWENX has a market cap of 114.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while VWENX trades at $79.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas VWENX's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VWENX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to VWENX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check VWENX's competition here
BAM vs VWELX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VWELX has a market cap of 114.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while VWELX trades at $45.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas VWELX's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VWELX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to VWELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check VWELX's competition here
BAM vs JLGMX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, JLGMX has a market cap of 114B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while JLGMX trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas JLGMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JLGMX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to JLGMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check JLGMX's competition here
BAM vs JLGRX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, JLGRX has a market cap of 114B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while JLGRX trades at $89.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas JLGRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JLGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to JLGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check JLGRX's competition here
BAM vs SEEGX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, SEEGX has a market cap of 114B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while SEEGX trades at $86.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas SEEGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SEEGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to SEEGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check SEEGX's competition here
BAM vs VSCIX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VSCIX has a market cap of 113.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while VSCIX trades at $118.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas VSCIX's P/E ratio is 20.28. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VSCIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to VSCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check VSCIX's competition here
BAM vs NAESX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, NAESX has a market cap of 113.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while NAESX trades at $118.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas NAESX's P/E ratio is 20.28. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NAESX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to NAESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check NAESX's competition here
BAM vs FSKAX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, FSKAX has a market cap of 111.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while FSKAX trades at $175.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas FSKAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FSKAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to FSKAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check FSKAX's competition here
BAM vs BN Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, BN has a market cap of 111.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while BN trades at $67.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas BN's P/E ratio is 233.12. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is less volatile compared to BN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check BN's competition here
BAM vs VTTHX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VTTHX has a market cap of 110.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while VTTHX trades at $26.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas VTTHX's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VTTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to VTTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check VTTHX's competition here
BAM vs VITAX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VITAX has a market cap of 110.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while VITAX trades at $352.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas VITAX's P/E ratio is 40.46. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VITAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to VITAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check VITAX's competition here
BAM vs VGT Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VGT has a market cap of 110B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while VGT trades at $688.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas VGT's P/E ratio is 40.62. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to VGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check VGT's competition here
BAM vs VUG Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VUG has a market cap of 109.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while VUG trades at $454.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas VUG's P/E ratio is 40.28. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to VUG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check VUG's competition here
BAM vs VIG Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VIG has a market cap of 109.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while VIG trades at $209.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas VIG's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VIG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to VIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check VIG's competition here
BAM vs VDADX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VDADX has a market cap of 108.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while VDADX trades at $56.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas VDADX's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VDADX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to VDADX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check VDADX's competition here
BAM vs TBCIX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, TBCIX has a market cap of 103.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while TBCIX trades at $207.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas TBCIX's P/E ratio is 39.25. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TBCIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to TBCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check TBCIX's competition here
BAM vs TRBCX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, TRBCX has a market cap of 103B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while TRBCX trades at $206.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas TRBCX's P/E ratio is 37.49. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TRBCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to TRBCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check TRBCX's competition here
BAM vs VTHRX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VTHRX has a market cap of 102.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while VTHRX trades at $41.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas VTHRX's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VTHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to VTHRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check VTHRX's competition here
BAM vs VFORX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VFORX has a market cap of 99.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while VFORX trades at $47.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas VFORX's P/E ratio is 21.10. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VFORX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to VFORX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check VFORX's competition here
BAM vs PABGX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, PABGX has a market cap of 99.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while PABGX trades at $198.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas PABGX's P/E ratio is 37.48. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PABGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to PABGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check PABGX's competition here
BAM vs VTIVX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VTIVX has a market cap of 99B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while VTIVX trades at $33.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas VTIVX's P/E ratio is 21.24. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VTIVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to VTIVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check VTIVX's competition here
BAM vs IJH Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, IJH has a market cap of 98.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while IJH trades at $64.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas IJH's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IJH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to IJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check IJH's competition here
BAM vs DODGX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, DODGX has a market cap of 95.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while DODGX trades at $275.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas DODGX's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DODGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to DODGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check DODGX's competition here
BAM vs RAFFX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, RAFFX has a market cap of 93.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while RAFFX trades at $46.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas RAFFX's P/E ratio is 33.83. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to RAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check RAFFX's competition here
BAM vs RRBGX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, RRBGX has a market cap of 92.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while RRBGX trades at $185.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas RRBGX's P/E ratio is 39.17. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RRBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to RRBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check RRBGX's competition here
BAM vs VIEIX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VIEIX has a market cap of 91.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while VIEIX trades at $152.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas VIEIX's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VIEIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to VIEIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check VIEIX's competition here
BAM vs PRUFX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, PRUFX has a market cap of 90.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while PRUFX trades at $114.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas PRUFX's P/E ratio is 40.72. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PRUFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to PRUFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check PRUFX's competition here
BAM vs VEMAX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VEMAX has a market cap of 90.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while VEMAX trades at $42.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas VEMAX's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VEMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to VEMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check VEMAX's competition here
BAM vs PRGFX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, PRGFX has a market cap of 89.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while PRGFX trades at $114.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas PRGFX's P/E ratio is 40.08. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PRGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to PRGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check PRGFX's competition here
BAM vs AMCPX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, AMCPX has a market cap of 88.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while AMCPX trades at $45.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas AMCPX's P/E ratio is 34.21. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AMCPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to AMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check AMCPX's competition here
BAM vs AMPFX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, AMPFX has a market cap of 87.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while AMPFX trades at $44.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas AMPFX's P/E ratio is 33.83. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AMPFX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to AMPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check AMPFX's competition here
BAM vs DODFX Comparison July 2025
BAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAM stands at 101.6B. In comparison, DODFX has a market cap of 86.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAM is priced at $63.02, while DODFX trades at $62.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAM currently has a P/E ratio of 46.34, whereas DODFX's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, BAM's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DODFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAM is more volatile compared to DODFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAM.Check DODFX's competition here