Roadside Real Estate plc
Roadside Real Estate plc (BAKBF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BAKBF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Development Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAKBF | $0.27 | +0.00% | 40.7M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CDVM | $0.00 | +0.00% | 270.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SUHJY | $11.68 | -1.93% | 33.7B | 15.12 | $0.77 | +3.95% |
| SUHJF | $11.22 | +0.00% | 32.5B | 14.57 | $0.77 | +4.30% |
| CRBJY | $36.79 | +0.00% | 26.2B | 7.36 | $5.00 | +4.99% |
| CRBJF | $3.60 | +0.00% | 25.7B | 7.20 | $0.50 | +5.18% |
| DWAHY | $34.24 | +3.07% | 21.3B | 9.80 | $3.48 | +1.83% |
| DWAHF | $33.53 | +0.00% | 20.7B | 9.69 | $3.46 | +3.05% |
| CAOVY | $8.65 | -0.23% | 18.9B | 8.65 | $1.00 | +4.09% |
| CAOVF | $1.51 | +0.00% | 16.5B | 7.55 | $0.20 | +5.10% |
Stock Comparison
BAKBF vs CDVM Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, CDVM has a market cap of 270.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while CDVM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDVM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to CDVM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and CDVM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CDVM's competition here
BAKBF vs SUHJY Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, SUHJY has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while SUHJY trades at $11.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUHJY's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to SUHJY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to SUHJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check SUHJY's competition here
BAKBF vs SUHJF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, SUHJF has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while SUHJF trades at $11.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUHJF's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to SUHJF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to SUHJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check SUHJF's competition here
BAKBF vs CRBJY Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, CRBJY has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while CRBJY trades at $36.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRBJY's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to CRBJY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to CRBJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check CRBJY's competition here
BAKBF vs CRBJF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, CRBJF has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while CRBJF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRBJF's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to CRBJF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and CRBJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRBJF's competition here
BAKBF vs DWAHY Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, DWAHY has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while DWAHY trades at $34.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWAHY's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to DWAHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to DWAHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check DWAHY's competition here
BAKBF vs DWAHF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, DWAHF has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while DWAHF trades at $33.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWAHF's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to DWAHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to DWAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check DWAHF's competition here
BAKBF vs CAOVY Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, CAOVY has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while CAOVY trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAOVY's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to CAOVY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and CAOVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CAOVY's competition here
BAKBF vs CAOVF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, CAOVF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while CAOVF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAOVF's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to CAOVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to CAOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check CAOVF's competition here
BAKBF vs CNGKY Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, CNGKY has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while CNGKY trades at $9.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNGKY's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to CNGKY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and CNGKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNGKY's competition here
BAKBF vs CHKGF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, CHKGF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while CHKGF trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHKGF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to CHKGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to CHKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check CHKGF's competition here
BAKBF vs PDGRY Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, PDGRY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while PDGRY trades at $200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDGRY's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to PDGRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to PDGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check PDGRY's competition here
BAKBF vs HKHGF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, HKHGF has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while HKHGF trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKHGF's P/E ratio is -41.83. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to HKHGF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and HKHGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKHGF's competition here
BAKBF vs HNGKY Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, HNGKY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while HNGKY trades at $31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HNGKY's P/E ratio is -39.05. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to HNGKY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to HNGKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check HNGKY's competition here
BAKBF vs SNLAY Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, SNLAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while SNLAY trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNLAY's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to SNLAY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and SNLAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNLAY's competition here
BAKBF vs SNLAF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, SNLAF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while SNLAF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNLAF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to SNLAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to SNLAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check SNLAF's competition here
BAKBF vs DWHHF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, DWHHF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while DWHHF trades at $24.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWHHF's P/E ratio is -13.95. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to DWHHF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to DWHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check DWHHF's competition here
BAKBF vs CTPVF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, CTPVF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while CTPVF trades at $19.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTPVF's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to CTPVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and CTPVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTPVF's competition here
BAKBF vs CHVKF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, CHVKF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while CHVKF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHVKF's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to CHVKF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and CHVKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHVKF's competition here
BAKBF vs WARFF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, WARFF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while WARFF trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WARFF's P/E ratio is -22.08. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to WARFF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to WARFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check WARFF's competition here
BAKBF vs WARFY Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, WARFY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while WARFY trades at $5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WARFY's P/E ratio is -20.48. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to WARFY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and WARFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WARFY's competition here
BAKBF vs LGFRY Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, LGFRY has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while LGFRY trades at $12.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGFRY's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to LGFRY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to LGFRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check LGFRY's competition here
BAKBF vs LNGPF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, LNGPF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while LNGPF trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNGPF's P/E ratio is 5.41. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to LNGPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to LNGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check LNGPF's competition here
BAKBF vs SCCCF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, SCCCF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while SCCCF trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCCCF's P/E ratio is 1.03. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to SCCCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and SCCCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCCCF's competition here
BAKBF vs AYAAF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, AYAAF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while AYAAF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYAAF's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to AYAAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to AYAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check AYAAF's competition here
BAKBF vs CWQXF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, CWQXF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while CWQXF trades at $11.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWQXF's P/E ratio is 19.72. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to CWQXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and CWQXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CWQXF's competition here
BAKBF vs DTCWY Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, DTCWY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while DTCWY trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTCWY's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to DTCWY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to DTCWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check DTCWY's competition here
BAKBF vs CHVKY Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, CHVKY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while CHVKY trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHVKY's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to CHVKY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and CHVKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHVKY's competition here
BAKBF vs SZENF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, SZENF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while SZENF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SZENF's P/E ratio is -70.00. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to SZENF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and SZENF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SZENF's competition here
BAKBF vs CWQXY Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, CWQXY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while CWQXY trades at $19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWQXY's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to CWQXY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to CWQXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check CWQXY's competition here
BAKBF vs UOLGY Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, UOLGY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while UOLGY trades at $21.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UOLGY's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to UOLGY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to UOLGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check UOLGY's competition here
BAKBF vs UOLGF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, UOLGF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while UOLGF trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UOLGF's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to UOLGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and UOLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UOLGF's competition here
BAKBF vs KRYPF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, KRYPF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while KRYPF trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRYPF's P/E ratio is 43.14. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to KRYPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and KRYPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KRYPF's competition here
BAKBF vs CTRYY Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, CTRYY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while CTRYY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTRYY's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to CTRYY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and CTRYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTRYY's competition here
BAKBF vs CDEVY Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, CDEVY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while CDEVY trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDEVY's P/E ratio is 25.82. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to CDEVY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to CDEVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check CDEVY's competition here
BAKBF vs KRYPY Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, KRYPY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while KRYPY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRYPY's P/E ratio is 34.72. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to KRYPY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and KRYPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KRYPY's competition here
BAKBF vs CDEVF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, CDEVF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while CDEVF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDEVF's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to CDEVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and CDEVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CDEVF's competition here
BAKBF vs CFFHF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, CFFHF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while CFFHF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFFHF's P/E ratio is 2.52. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to CFFHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and CFFHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CFFHF's competition here
BAKBF vs BRKFF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, BRKFF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while BRKFF trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRKFF's P/E ratio is 1.85. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to BRKFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and BRKFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRKFF's competition here
BAKBF vs EGRNY Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, EGRNY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while EGRNY trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGRNY's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to EGRNY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and EGRNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EGRNY's competition here
BAKBF vs CAIAF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, CAIAF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while CAIAF trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAIAF's P/E ratio is -38.57. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to CAIAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and CAIAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CAIAF's competition here
BAKBF vs GTWCF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, GTWCF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while GTWCF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTWCF's P/E ratio is 5.65. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to GTWCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to GTWCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check GTWCF's competition here
BAKBF vs SIMEF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, SIMEF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while SIMEF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIMEF's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to SIMEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to SIMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check SIMEF's competition here
BAKBF vs CJNHF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, CJNHF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while CJNHF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CJNHF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to CJNHF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to CJNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check CJNHF's competition here
BAKBF vs ARLLF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, ARLLF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while ARLLF trades at $81.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARLLF's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to ARLLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to ARLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check ARLLF's competition here
BAKBF vs SHMAY Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, SHMAY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while SHMAY trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHMAY's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to SHMAY's ROE of +10.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to SHMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check SHMAY's competition here
BAKBF vs FRSHY Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, FRSHY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while FRSHY trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRSHY's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to FRSHY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and FRSHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRSHY's competition here
BAKBF vs BSPDY Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, BSPDY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while BSPDY trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSPDY's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to BSPDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to BSPDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check BSPDY's competition here
BAKBF vs LDHUF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, LDHUF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while LDHUF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LDHUF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to LDHUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to LDHUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check LDHUF's competition here
BAKBF vs RBLAY Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, RBLAY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while RBLAY trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBLAY's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to RBLAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to RBLAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check RBLAY's competition here
BAKBF vs MGAWF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, MGAWF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while MGAWF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGAWF's P/E ratio is 3.19. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to MGAWF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to MGAWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check MGAWF's competition here
BAKBF vs MGAWY Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, MGAWY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while MGAWY trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGAWY's P/E ratio is 3.19. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to MGAWY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to MGAWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check MGAWY's competition here
BAKBF vs YLDGF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, YLDGF has a market cap of 936.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while YLDGF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YLDGF's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to YLDGF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and YLDGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YLDGF's competition here
BAKBF vs AGPYF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, AGPYF has a market cap of 807.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while AGPYF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGPYF's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to AGPYF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to AGPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check AGPYF's competition here
BAKBF vs SZNTF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, SZNTF has a market cap of 776.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while SZNTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SZNTF's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to SZNTF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to SZNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check SZNTF's competition here
BAKBF vs KWHAF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, KWHAF has a market cap of 756M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while KWHAF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KWHAF's P/E ratio is 23.98. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to KWHAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to KWHAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check KWHAF's competition here
BAKBF vs TIACF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, TIACF has a market cap of 722.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while TIACF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIACF's P/E ratio is -24.64. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to TIACF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and TIACF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TIACF's competition here
BAKBF vs CAOYF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, CAOYF has a market cap of 717.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while CAOYF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAOYF's P/E ratio is 0.65. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to CAOYF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and CAOYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CAOYF's competition here
BAKBF vs YLDGY Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, YLDGY has a market cap of 696.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while YLDGY trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YLDGY's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to YLDGY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to YLDGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check YLDGY's competition here
BAKBF vs PHKIF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, PHKIF has a market cap of 652.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while PHKIF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHKIF's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to PHKIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and PHKIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PHKIF's competition here
BAKBF vs DRUNF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, DRUNF has a market cap of 615.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while DRUNF trades at $15.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRUNF's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to DRUNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to DRUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check DRUNF's competition here
BAKBF vs LPHHF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, LPHHF has a market cap of 608M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while LPHHF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LPHHF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to LPHHF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and LPHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LPHHF's competition here
BAKBF vs CCLHF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, CCLHF has a market cap of 543.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while CCLHF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCLHF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to CCLHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to CCLHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check CCLHF's competition here
BAKBF vs BEIJF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, BEIJF has a market cap of 521.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while BEIJF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEIJF's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to BEIJF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to BEIJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check BEIJF's competition here
BAKBF vs AYAAY Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, AYAAY has a market cap of 459.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while AYAAY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYAAY's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to AYAAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to AYAAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check AYAAY's competition here
BAKBF vs CDCTF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, CDCTF has a market cap of 422.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while CDCTF trades at $12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDCTF's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to CDCTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and CDCTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CDCTF's competition here
BAKBF vs WFICF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, WFICF has a market cap of 420.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while WFICF trades at $13.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WFICF's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to WFICF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to WFICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check WFICF's competition here
BAKBF vs SIOPF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, SIOPF has a market cap of 378.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while SIOPF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIOPF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to SIOPF's ROE of +10.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and SIOPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SIOPF's competition here
BAKBF vs GZUHF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, GZUHF has a market cap of 376.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while GZUHF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GZUHF's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to GZUHF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and GZUHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GZUHF's competition here
BAKBF vs SOLLF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, SOLLF has a market cap of 370.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while SOLLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOLLF's P/E ratio is 4.62. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to SOLLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to SOLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check SOLLF's competition here
BAKBF vs MODVF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, MODVF has a market cap of 312.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while MODVF trades at $10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MODVF's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to MODVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and MODVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MODVF's competition here
BAKBF vs AGPYY Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, AGPYY has a market cap of 250.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while AGPYY trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGPYY's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to AGPYY's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and AGPYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AGPYY's competition here
BAKBF vs SIUDF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, SIUDF has a market cap of 191.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while SIUDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIUDF's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to SIUDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to SIUDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check SIUDF's competition here
BAKBF vs FRTCF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, FRTCF has a market cap of 189.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while FRTCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRTCF's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to FRTCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and FRTCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRTCF's competition here
BAKBF vs KWGPF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, KWGPF has a market cap of 131.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while KWGPF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KWGPF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to KWGPF's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to KWGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check KWGPF's competition here
BAKBF vs GNLAF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, GNLAF has a market cap of 124.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while GNLAF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNLAF's P/E ratio is 4.40. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to GNLAF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and GNLAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNLAF's competition here
BAKBF vs TMPPF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, TMPPF has a market cap of 105.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while TMPPF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMPPF's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to TMPPF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and TMPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TMPPF's competition here
BAKBF vs DRSLF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, DRSLF has a market cap of 78.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while DRSLF trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRSLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to DRSLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and DRSLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DRSLF's competition here
BAKBF vs YUZHF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, YUZHF has a market cap of 74.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while YUZHF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YUZHF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to YUZHF's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and YUZHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YUZHF's competition here
BAKBF vs FHRT Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, FHRT has a market cap of 59.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while FHRT trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FHRT's P/E ratio is 1.44. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to FHRT's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and FHRT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FHRT's competition here
BAKBF vs GCCO Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, GCCO has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while GCCO trades at $1,650.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to GCCO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and GCCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GCCO's competition here
BAKBF vs ILAL Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, ILAL has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while ILAL trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ILAL's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to ILAL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to ILAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check ILAL's competition here
BAKBF vs GZUHY Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, GZUHY has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while GZUHY trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GZUHY's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to GZUHY's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to GZUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check GZUHY's competition here
BAKBF vs KDCCF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, KDCCF has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while KDCCF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KDCCF's P/E ratio is -12.41. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to KDCCF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to KDCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check KDCCF's competition here
BAKBF vs CTRYF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, CTRYF has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while CTRYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTRYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to CTRYF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and CTRYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTRYF's competition here
BAKBF vs SOLLY Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, SOLLY has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while SOLLY trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOLLY's P/E ratio is 27.43. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to SOLLY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to SOLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check SOLLY's competition here
BAKBF vs SRRE Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, SRRE has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while SRRE trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRRE's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to SRRE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to SRRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check SRRE's competition here
BAKBF vs YTRGF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, YTRGF has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while YTRGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YTRGF's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to YTRGF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to YTRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check YTRGF's competition here
BAKBF vs UCASU Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, UCASU has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while UCASU trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UCASU's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to UCASU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to UCASU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check UCASU's competition here
BAKBF vs HIHI Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, HIHI has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while HIHI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HIHI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to HIHI's ROE of +6.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to HIHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check HIHI's competition here
BAKBF vs URBDF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, URBDF has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while URBDF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas URBDF's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to URBDF's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and URBDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check URBDF's competition here
BAKBF vs RGSG Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, RGSG has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while RGSG trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGSG's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to RGSG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and RGSG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RGSG's competition here
BAKBF vs GRLT Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, GRLT has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while GRLT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRLT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to GRLT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to GRLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check GRLT's competition here
BAKBF vs FLLLF Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, FLLLF has a market cap of 267.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while FLLLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLLLF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to FLLLF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and FLLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FLLLF's competition here
BAKBF vs CHIT Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, CHIT has a market cap of 188.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while CHIT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to CHIT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and CHIT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHIT's competition here
BAKBF vs XTRM Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, XTRM has a market cap of 80.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while XTRM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XTRM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to XTRM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and XTRM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XTRM's competition here
BAKBF vs GLCO Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, GLCO has a market cap of 47.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while GLCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to GLCO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and GLCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLCO's competition here
BAKBF vs BAYP Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, BAYP has a market cap of 37.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while BAYP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAYP's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to BAYP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF and BAYP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BAYP's competition here
BAKBF vs BPCP Comparison August 2025
BAKBF plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAKBF stands at 40.7M. In comparison, BPCP has a market cap of 33.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BAKBF is priced at $0.27, while BPCP trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAKBF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BPCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAKBF's ROE is +3.38%, compared to BPCP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAKBF is less volatile compared to BPCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAKBF.Check BPCP's competition here