BASE, Inc.
BASE, Inc. (BAINF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BAINF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAINF | $2.27 | +0.00% | 261.2M | 113.50 | $0.02 | N/A |
| SAPGF | $271.02 | +0.61% | 316.2B | 42.03 | $6.46 | +0.97% |
| CNSWF | $3,299.84 | +3.63% | 69.9B | 109.03 | $30.25 | +0.12% |
| INVUP | $26.01 | +0.00% | 48.2B | -1734.00 | -$0.02 | +12.50% |
| DASTY | $31.73 | +1.89% | 41.7B | 32.03 | $0.99 | +0.93% |
| DASTF | $31.50 | -2.03% | 41.6B | 31.82 | $0.99 | +0.90% |
| DIDIY | $5.86 | -5.94% | 28.6B | 73.63 | $0.08 | N/A |
| WIGBY | $75.98 | +0.00% | 25.2B | 126.63 | $0.60 | +0.17% |
| WTCHF | $73.00 | +0.00% | 24.2B | 119.67 | $0.61 | +0.18% |
| NEMTF | $162.73 | +0.00% | 18.8B | 85.65 | $1.90 | +0.39% |
Stock Comparison
BAINF vs SAPGF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, SAPGF has a market cap of 316.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while SAPGF trades at $271.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas SAPGF's P/E ratio is 42.03. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SAPGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to SAPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check SAPGF's competition here
BAINF vs CNSWF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, CNSWF has a market cap of 69.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while CNSWF trades at $3,299.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas CNSWF's P/E ratio is 109.03. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CNSWF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to CNSWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check CNSWF's competition here
BAINF vs INVUP Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, INVUP has a market cap of 48.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while INVUP trades at $26.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas INVUP's P/E ratio is -1734.00. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INVUP's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to INVUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check INVUP's competition here
BAINF vs DASTY Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, DASTY has a market cap of 41.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while DASTY trades at $31.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas DASTY's P/E ratio is 32.03. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DASTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to DASTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check DASTY's competition here
BAINF vs DASTF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, DASTF has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while DASTF trades at $31.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas DASTF's P/E ratio is 31.82. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DASTF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to DASTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check DASTF's competition here
BAINF vs DIDIY Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, DIDIY has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while DIDIY trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas DIDIY's P/E ratio is 73.63. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DIDIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to DIDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check DIDIY's competition here
BAINF vs WIGBY Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, WIGBY has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while WIGBY trades at $75.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas WIGBY's P/E ratio is 126.63. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WIGBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to WIGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check WIGBY's competition here
BAINF vs WTCHF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, WTCHF has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while WTCHF trades at $73.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas WTCHF's P/E ratio is 119.67. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WTCHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to WTCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check WTCHF's competition here
BAINF vs NEMTF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, NEMTF has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while NEMTF trades at $162.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas NEMTF's P/E ratio is 85.65. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NEMTF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to NEMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check NEMTF's competition here
BAINF vs XROLF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, XROLF has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while XROLF trades at $110.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas XROLF's P/E ratio is 127.53. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to XROLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to XROLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check XROLF's competition here
BAINF vs NEMKY Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, NEMKY has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while NEMKY trades at $27.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas NEMKY's P/E ratio is 73.16. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NEMKY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to NEMKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check NEMKY's competition here
BAINF vs OBIIF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, OBIIF has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while OBIIF trades at $34.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas OBIIF's P/E ratio is 34.85. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OBIIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to OBIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check OBIIF's competition here
BAINF vs SGPYY Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, SGPYY has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while SGPYY trades at $59.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas SGPYY's P/E ratio is 32.03. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SGPYY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to SGPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check SGPYY's competition here
BAINF vs SGGEF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, SGGEF has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while SGGEF trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas SGGEF's P/E ratio is 32.38. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SGGEF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to SGGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check SGGEF's competition here
BAINF vs OCLCF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, OCLCF has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while OCLCF trades at $108.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas OCLCF's P/E ratio is 33.93. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OCLCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to OCLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check OCLCF's competition here
BAINF vs NCSYF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, NCSYF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while NCSYF trades at $137.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas NCSYF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NCSYF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to NCSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check NCSYF's competition here
BAINF vs KGDEY Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, KGDEY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while KGDEY trades at $191.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas KGDEY's P/E ratio is -1915.35. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KGDEY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to KGDEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check KGDEY's competition here
BAINF vs LIFX Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, LIFX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while LIFX trades at $26.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas LIFX's P/E ratio is 201.77. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LIFX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to LIFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check LIFX's competition here
BAINF vs TMSNY Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, TMSNY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while TMSNY trades at $90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas TMSNY's P/E ratio is 37.68. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TMSNY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to TMSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check TMSNY's competition here
BAINF vs ALMFF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, ALMFF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while ALMFF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas ALMFF's P/E ratio is 92.31. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALMFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to ALMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check ALMFF's competition here
BAINF vs TMNSF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, TMNSF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while TMNSF trades at $91.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas TMNSF's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TMNSF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to TMNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check TMNSF's competition here
BAINF vs FNOXF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, FNOXF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while FNOXF trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas FNOXF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FNOXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to FNOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check FNOXF's competition here
BAINF vs HOILF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, HOILF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while HOILF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas HOILF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HOILF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to HOILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check HOILF's competition here
BAINF vs THNOF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, THNOF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while THNOF trades at $14.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas THNOF's P/E ratio is 55.44. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to THNOF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to THNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check THNOF's competition here
BAINF vs ASOZF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, ASOZF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while ASOZF trades at $63.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas ASOZF's P/E ratio is 29.72. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ASOZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to ASOZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check ASOZF's competition here
BAINF vs SMCYY Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, SMCYY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while SMCYY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas SMCYY's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SMCYY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to SMCYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check SMCYY's competition here
BAINF vs SRBEF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, SRBEF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while SRBEF trades at $243.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas SRBEF's P/E ratio is -121.87. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SRBEF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to SRBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check SRBEF's competition here
BAINF vs SICRF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, SICRF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while SICRF trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas SICRF's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SICRF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to SICRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check SICRF's competition here
BAINF vs KXSCF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, KXSCF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while KXSCF trades at $141.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas KXSCF's P/E ratio is 164.16. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KXSCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to KXSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check KXSCF's competition here
BAINF vs ASOZY Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, ASOZY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while ASOZY trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas ASOZY's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ASOZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to ASOZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check ASOZY's competition here
BAINF vs UBMRF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, UBMRF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while UBMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas UBMRF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UBMRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to UBMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check UBMRF's competition here
BAINF vs KHOTF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, KHOTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while KHOTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas KHOTF's P/E ratio is 360.00. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KHOTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to KHOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check KHOTF's competition here
BAINF vs SWONF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, SWONF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while SWONF trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas SWONF's P/E ratio is -808.00. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SWONF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to SWONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check SWONF's competition here
BAINF vs TMVWF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, TMVWF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while TMVWF trades at $10.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas TMVWF's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TMVWF's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to TMVWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check TMVWF's competition here
BAINF vs BCTCF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, BCTCF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while BCTCF trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas BCTCF's P/E ratio is 228.00. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BCTCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to BCTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check BCTCF's competition here
BAINF vs IDXAF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, IDXAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while IDXAF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas IDXAF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IDXAF's ROE of -3.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to IDXAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check IDXAF's competition here
BAINF vs ESKEF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, ESKEF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while ESKEF trades at $280.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas ESKEF's P/E ratio is 97.01. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ESKEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to ESKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check ESKEF's competition here
BAINF vs TMVWY Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, TMVWY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while TMVWY trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas TMVWY's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TMVWY's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to TMVWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check TMVWY's competition here
BAINF vs VOBIF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, VOBIF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while VOBIF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas VOBIF's P/E ratio is 65.70. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VOBIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to VOBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check VOBIF's competition here
BAINF vs IPEU Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, IPEU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while IPEU trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas IPEU's P/E ratio is 0.92. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IPEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to IPEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check IPEU's competition here
BAINF vs TMOAY Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, TMOAY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while TMOAY trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas TMOAY's P/E ratio is -20.13. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TMOAY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to TMOAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check TMOAY's competition here
BAINF vs WEMXF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, WEMXF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while WEMXF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas WEMXF's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WEMXF's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to WEMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check WEMXF's competition here
BAINF vs QTGPF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, QTGPF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while QTGPF trades at $54.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas QTGPF's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to QTGPF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to QTGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check QTGPF's competition here
BAINF vs MAGTF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, MAGTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while MAGTF trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas MAGTF's P/E ratio is 354.22. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MAGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to MAGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check MAGTF's competition here
BAINF vs MVVYF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, MVVYF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while MVVYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas MVVYF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MVVYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to MVVYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check MVVYF's competition here
BAINF vs FREKF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, FREKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while FREKF trades at $20.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas FREKF's P/E ratio is 126.06. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FREKF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to FREKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check FREKF's competition here
BAINF vs KNNNF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, KNNNF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while KNNNF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas KNNNF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KNNNF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to KNNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check KNNNF's competition here
BAINF vs ZEUCF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, ZEUCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while ZEUCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas ZEUCF's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ZEUCF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to ZEUCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check ZEUCF's competition here
BAINF vs LTTHF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, LTTHF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while LTTHF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas LTTHF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LTTHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to LTTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check LTTHF's competition here
BAINF vs ESIGF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, ESIGF has a market cap of 952.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while ESIGF trades at $166.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas ESIGF's P/E ratio is -725.00. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ESIGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to ESIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check ESIGF's competition here
BAINF vs GBGPF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, GBGPF has a market cap of 951.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while GBGPF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas GBGPF's P/E ratio is 77.00. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GBGPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to GBGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check GBGPF's competition here
BAINF vs EGHSF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, EGHSF has a market cap of 908.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while EGHSF trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas EGHSF's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EGHSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to EGHSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check EGHSF's competition here
BAINF vs BTRCF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, BTRCF has a market cap of 837.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while BTRCF trades at $13.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas BTRCF's P/E ratio is 25.02. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BTRCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to BTRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check BTRCF's competition here
BAINF vs BHPA Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, BHPA has a market cap of 820.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while BHPA trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas BHPA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BHPA's ROE of -8.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to BHPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check BHPA's competition here
BAINF vs NPACY Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, NPACY has a market cap of 763.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while NPACY trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas NPACY's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NPACY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to NPACY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check NPACY's competition here
BAINF vs TMOAF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, TMOAF has a market cap of 759M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while TMOAF trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas TMOAF's P/E ratio is -21.03. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TMOAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to TMOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check TMOAF's competition here
BAINF vs SLVFF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, SLVFF has a market cap of 723.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while SLVFF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas SLVFF's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SLVFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to SLVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check SLVFF's competition here
BAINF vs CHNVF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, CHNVF has a market cap of 678.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while CHNVF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas CHNVF's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CHNVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to CHNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check CHNVF's competition here
BAINF vs TTMZF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, TTMZF has a market cap of 652.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while TTMZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas TTMZF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TTMZF's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to TTMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check TTMZF's competition here
BAINF vs XMMRF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, XMMRF has a market cap of 631.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while XMMRF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas XMMRF's P/E ratio is -68.00. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to XMMRF's ROE of -4.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to XMMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check XMMRF's competition here
BAINF vs PXPHF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, PXPHF has a market cap of 620M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while PXPHF trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas PXPHF's P/E ratio is 37.81. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PXPHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to PXPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check PXPHF's competition here
BAINF vs NPACF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, NPACF has a market cap of 610.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while NPACF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas NPACF's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NPACF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to NPACF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check NPACF's competition here
BAINF vs NXLLF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, NXLLF has a market cap of 513.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while NXLLF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas NXLLF's P/E ratio is 155.00. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NXLLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to NXLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check NXLLF's competition here
BAINF vs RWWI Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, RWWI has a market cap of 497.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while RWWI trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas RWWI's P/E ratio is 32.89. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RWWI's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to RWWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check RWWI's competition here
BAINF vs ABXXF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, ABXXF has a market cap of 487.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while ABXXF trades at $14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas ABXXF's P/E ratio is -11.16. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ABXXF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to ABXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check ABXXF's competition here
BAINF vs NSWEF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, NSWEF has a market cap of 480.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while NSWEF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas NSWEF's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NSWEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to NSWEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check NSWEF's competition here
BAINF vs BRDLF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, BRDLF has a market cap of 457.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while BRDLF trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas BRDLF's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BRDLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to BRDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check BRDLF's competition here
BAINF vs BVSFF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, BVSFF has a market cap of 435.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while BVSFF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas BVSFF's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BVSFF's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to BVSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check BVSFF's competition here
BAINF vs BLKLF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, BLKLF has a market cap of 420.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while BLKLF trades at $4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas BLKLF's P/E ratio is -83.00. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BLKLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to BLKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check BLKLF's competition here
BAINF vs IQGLF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, IQGLF has a market cap of 415.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while IQGLF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas IQGLF's P/E ratio is -300.00. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IQGLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to IQGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check IQGLF's competition here
BAINF vs TCYSF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, TCYSF has a market cap of 402.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while TCYSF trades at $27.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas TCYSF's P/E ratio is 123.45. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TCYSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to TCYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check TCYSF's competition here
BAINF vs LCHTF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, LCHTF has a market cap of 386.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while LCHTF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas LCHTF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LCHTF's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to LCHTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check LCHTF's competition here
BAINF vs CMDXF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, CMDXF has a market cap of 383.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while CMDXF trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas CMDXF's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMDXF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to CMDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check CMDXF's competition here
BAINF vs RPGHF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, RPGHF has a market cap of 373M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while RPGHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas RPGHF's P/E ratio is 56.33. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RPGHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to RPGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check RPGHF's competition here
BAINF vs PSSWF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, PSSWF has a market cap of 368.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while PSSWF trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas PSSWF's P/E ratio is -475.85. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PSSWF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to PSSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check PSSWF's competition here
BAINF vs RTME Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, RTME has a market cap of 363.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while RTME trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas RTME's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RTME's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to RTME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check RTME's competition here
BAINF vs ELMFF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, ELMFF has a market cap of 335.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while ELMFF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas ELMFF's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ELMFF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to ELMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check ELMFF's competition here
BAINF vs JAPPF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, JAPPF has a market cap of 317.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while JAPPF trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas JAPPF's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JAPPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to JAPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check JAPPF's competition here
BAINF vs DOTDF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, DOTDF has a market cap of 316.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while DOTDF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas DOTDF's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DOTDF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to DOTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check DOTDF's competition here
BAINF vs RLLMF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, RLLMF has a market cap of 310.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while RLLMF trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas RLLMF's P/E ratio is -69.83. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RLLMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to RLLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check RLLMF's competition here
BAINF vs PLDIF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, PLDIF has a market cap of 307.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while PLDIF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas PLDIF's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PLDIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to PLDIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check PLDIF's competition here
BAINF vs IVUFF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, IVUFF has a market cap of 296M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while IVUFF trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas IVUFF's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IVUFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to IVUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check IVUFF's competition here
BAINF vs CIGMF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, CIGMF has a market cap of 295.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while CIGMF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas CIGMF's P/E ratio is -155.00. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CIGMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to CIGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check CIGMF's competition here
BAINF vs EXMXF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, EXMXF has a market cap of 272.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while EXMXF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas EXMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EXMXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to EXMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check EXMXF's competition here
BAINF vs MCAP Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, MCAP has a market cap of 271.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while MCAP trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas MCAP's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MCAP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to MCAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check MCAP's competition here
BAINF vs LOQPF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, LOQPF has a market cap of 264.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while LOQPF trades at $6.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas LOQPF's P/E ratio is 30.77. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LOQPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to LOQPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check LOQPF's competition here
BAINF vs SMTEF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, SMTEF has a market cap of 253.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while SMTEF trades at $6.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas SMTEF's P/E ratio is -10.57. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SMTEF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to SMTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check SMTEF's competition here
BAINF vs DAHLF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, DAHLF has a market cap of 216.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while DAHLF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas DAHLF's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DAHLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to DAHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check DAHLF's competition here
BAINF vs EXSPF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, EXSPF has a market cap of 206.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while EXSPF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas EXSPF's P/E ratio is -11.56. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EXSPF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to EXSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check EXSPF's competition here
BAINF vs FXSRF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, FXSRF has a market cap of 204.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while FXSRF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas FXSRF's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FXSRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to FXSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check FXSRF's competition here
BAINF vs FBSFF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, FBSFF has a market cap of 194M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while FBSFF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas FBSFF's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FBSFF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to FBSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check FBSFF's competition here
BAINF vs WONDF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, WONDF has a market cap of 164.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while WONDF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas WONDF's P/E ratio is -8.24. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WONDF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to WONDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check WONDF's competition here
BAINF vs NEOJF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, NEOJF has a market cap of 161.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while NEOJF trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas NEOJF's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NEOJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to NEOJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check NEOJF's competition here
BAINF vs IARGF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, IARGF has a market cap of 152.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while IARGF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas IARGF's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IARGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to IARGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check IARGF's competition here
BAINF vs CBSZF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, CBSZF has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while CBSZF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas CBSZF's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CBSZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to CBSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check CBSZF's competition here
BAINF vs FHGDF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, FHGDF has a market cap of 152.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while FHGDF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas FHGDF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FHGDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is less volatile compared to FHGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check FHGDF's competition here
BAINF vs TCIIF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, TCIIF has a market cap of 148.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while TCIIF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas TCIIF's P/E ratio is 250.00. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TCIIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to TCIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check TCIIF's competition here
BAINF vs DFORF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, DFORF has a market cap of 142.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while DFORF trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas DFORF's P/E ratio is 27.77. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DFORF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to DFORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check DFORF's competition here
BAINF vs WECMF Comparison August 2025
BAINF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAINF stands at 261.2M. In comparison, WECMF has a market cap of 137.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAINF is priced at $2.27, while WECMF trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAINF currently has a P/E ratio of 113.50, whereas WECMF's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, BAINF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WECMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAINF is more volatile compared to WECMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAINF.Check WECMF's competition here