A.G. BARR p.l.c.
A.G. BARR p.l.c. (BAGFF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BAGFF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAGFF | $6.60 | +0.00% | 734.2M | 18.86 | $0.35 | +3.38% |
| NNFSF | $5.03 | +0.00% | 56.6B | 33.53 | $0.15 | +2.08% |
| CCHGY | $53.43 | -1.37% | 19.4B | 20.21 | $2.64 | +2.10% |
| CCHBF | $52.98 | +0.63% | 19.3B | 20.07 | $2.64 | +2.37% |
| EMBVF | $10.30 | -0.87% | 17.5B | 15.15 | $0.68 | +3.01% |
| ITONF | $61.41 | +0.00% | 12.8B | 87.73 | $0.70 | +0.62% |
| BTVCY | $29.51 | +0.00% | 7.3B | 23.99 | $1.23 | +2.03% |
| YKLTF | $17.79 | +0.00% | 5.1B | 17.44 | $1.02 | +1.27% |
| YKLTY | $8.65 | -7.09% | 5.1B | 16.96 | $0.51 | +1.45% |
| COCSF | $8.55 | +0.03% | 4.5B | 23.11 | $0.37 | +4.03% |
Stock Comparison
BAGFF vs NNFSF Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, NNFSF has a market cap of 56.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while NNFSF trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas NNFSF's P/E ratio is 33.53. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NNFSF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and NNFSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NNFSF's competition here
BAGFF vs CCHGY Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, CCHGY has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while CCHGY trades at $53.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas CCHGY's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CCHGY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF is less volatile compared to CCHGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAGFF.Check CCHGY's competition here
BAGFF vs CCHBF Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, CCHBF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while CCHBF trades at $52.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas CCHBF's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CCHBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and CCHBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CCHBF's competition here
BAGFF vs EMBVF Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, EMBVF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while EMBVF trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas EMBVF's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EMBVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF is less volatile compared to EMBVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAGFF.Check EMBVF's competition here
BAGFF vs ITONF Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, ITONF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while ITONF trades at $61.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas ITONF's P/E ratio is 87.73. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ITONF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF is less volatile compared to ITONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAGFF.Check ITONF's competition here
BAGFF vs BTVCY Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, BTVCY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while BTVCY trades at $29.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas BTVCY's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BTVCY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and BTVCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BTVCY's competition here
BAGFF vs YKLTF Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, YKLTF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while YKLTF trades at $17.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas YKLTF's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YKLTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF is less volatile compared to YKLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAGFF.Check YKLTF's competition here
BAGFF vs YKLTY Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, YKLTY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while YKLTY trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas YKLTY's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YKLTY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and YKLTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YKLTY's competition here
BAGFF vs COCSF Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, COCSF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while COCSF trades at $8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas COCSF's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COCSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF is less volatile compared to COCSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAGFF.Check COCSF's competition here
BAGFF vs BTVCF Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, BTVCF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while BTVCF trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas BTVCF's P/E ratio is 26.89. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BTVCF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF is less volatile compared to BTVCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAGFF.Check BTVCF's competition here
BAGFF vs UNPSF Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, UNPSF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while UNPSF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas UNPSF's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UNPSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and UNPSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UNPSF's competition here
BAGFF vs CCOJY Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, CCOJY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while CCOJY trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas CCOJY's P/E ratio is 105.71. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CCOJY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and CCOJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CCOJY's competition here
BAGFF vs CCOJF Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, CCOJF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while CCOJF trades at $12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas CCOJF's P/E ratio is 67.79. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CCOJF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and CCOJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CCOJF's competition here
BAGFF vs ITOEF Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, ITOEF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while ITOEF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas ITOEF's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ITOEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and ITOEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ITOEF's competition here
BAGFF vs YNAJF Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, YNAJF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while YNAJF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas YNAJF's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YNAJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and YNAJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YNAJF's competition here
BAGFF vs OSOPF Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, OSOPF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while OSOPF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas OSOPF's P/E ratio is 31.57. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OSOPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and OSOPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OSOPF's competition here
BAGFF vs FQVTF Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, FQVTF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while FQVTF trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas FQVTF's P/E ratio is 47.50. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FQVTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF is less volatile compared to FQVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAGFF.Check FQVTF's competition here
BAGFF vs LSDAF Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, LSDAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while LSDAF trades at $157.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas LSDAF's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LSDAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and LSDAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LSDAF's competition here
BAGFF vs NJMVF Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, NJMVF has a market cap of 698M. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while NJMVF trades at $19.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas NJMVF's P/E ratio is 106.06. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NJMVF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and NJMVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NJMVF's competition here
BAGFF vs HAATF Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, HAATF has a market cap of 194.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while HAATF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas HAATF's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HAATF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF is less volatile compared to HAATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAGFF.Check HAATF's competition here
BAGFF vs UPCHY Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, UPCHY has a market cap of 50.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while UPCHY trades at $116.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas UPCHY's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UPCHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and UPCHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UPCHY's competition here
BAGFF vs CHFHY Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, CHFHY has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while CHFHY trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas CHFHY's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHFHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and CHFHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHFHY's competition here
BAGFF vs PDPG Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, PDPG has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while PDPG trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas PDPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PDPG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF is less volatile compared to PDPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAGFF.Check PDPG's competition here
BAGFF vs JSDA Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, JSDA has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while JSDA trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas JSDA's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JSDA's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF is less volatile compared to JSDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAGFF.Check JSDA's competition here
BAGFF vs MOJO Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, MOJO has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while MOJO trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas MOJO's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MOJO's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF is less volatile compared to MOJO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAGFF.Check MOJO's competition here
BAGFF vs HIRU Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, HIRU has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while HIRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas HIRU's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HIRU's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF is less volatile compared to HIRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAGFF.Check HIRU's competition here
BAGFF vs KRTL Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, KRTL has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while KRTL trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas KRTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KRTL's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF is less volatile compared to KRTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAGFF.Check KRTL's competition here
BAGFF vs RVBR Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, RVBR has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while RVBR trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas RVBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RVBR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF is less volatile compared to RVBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAGFF.Check RVBR's competition here
BAGFF vs FLWBF Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, FLWBF has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while FLWBF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas FLWBF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLWBF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF is less volatile compared to FLWBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAGFF.Check FLWBF's competition here
BAGFF vs APRU Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, APRU has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while APRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas APRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APRU's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF is less volatile compared to APRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAGFF.Check APRU's competition here
BAGFF vs DRNK Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, DRNK has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while DRNK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas DRNK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DRNK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and DRNK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DRNK's competition here
BAGFF vs PLVFF Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, PLVFF has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while PLVFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas PLVFF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLVFF's ROE of -4.78%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and PLVFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PLVFF's competition here
BAGFF vs RMHB Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, RMHB has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while RMHB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas RMHB's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RMHB's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF is less volatile compared to RMHB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAGFF.Check RMHB's competition here
BAGFF vs PURT Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, PURT has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while PURT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas PURT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PURT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF is less volatile compared to PURT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAGFF.Check PURT's competition here
BAGFF vs AQPW Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, AQPW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while AQPW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas AQPW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AQPW's ROE of -7.72%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and AQPW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AQPW's competition here
BAGFF vs INKW Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, INKW has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while INKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas INKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INKW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and INKW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INKW's competition here
BAGFF vs ALKM Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, ALKM has a market cap of 864.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while ALKM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas ALKM's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALKM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and ALKM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALKM's competition here
BAGFF vs FBEC Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, FBEC has a market cap of 585.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while FBEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas FBEC's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FBEC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and FBEC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FBEC's competition here
BAGFF vs ASII Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, ASII has a market cap of 530.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while ASII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas ASII's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASII's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and ASII have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASII's competition here
BAGFF vs FMBV Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, FMBV has a market cap of 509.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while FMBV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas FMBV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FMBV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF is less volatile compared to FMBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAGFF.Check FMBV's competition here
BAGFF vs HSEEF Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, HSEEF has a market cap of 415.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while HSEEF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas HSEEF's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HSEEF's ROE of +5.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF is less volatile compared to HSEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAGFF.Check HSEEF's competition here
BAGFF vs VGID Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, VGID has a market cap of 378.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while VGID trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas VGID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VGID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and VGID have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VGID's competition here
BAGFF vs DNDT Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, DNDT has a market cap of 337.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while DNDT trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas DNDT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DNDT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and DNDT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DNDT's competition here
BAGFF vs NTEI Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, NTEI has a market cap of 272K. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while NTEI trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas NTEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTEI's ROE of -3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and NTEI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NTEI's competition here
BAGFF vs KGKG Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, KGKG has a market cap of 245.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while KGKG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas KGKG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KGKG's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF is less volatile compared to KGKG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAGFF.Check KGKG's competition here
BAGFF vs FHBC Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, FHBC has a market cap of 199.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while FHBC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas FHBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHBC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and FHBC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FHBC's competition here
BAGFF vs HFBG Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, HFBG has a market cap of 197K. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while HFBG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas HFBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HFBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and HFBG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HFBG's competition here
BAGFF vs DNAX Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, DNAX has a market cap of 171.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while DNAX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas DNAX's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DNAX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and DNAX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DNAX's competition here
BAGFF vs GHMP Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, GHMP has a market cap of 155.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while GHMP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas GHMP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GHMP's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and GHMP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GHMP's competition here
BAGFF vs MLHC Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, MLHC has a market cap of 120K. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while MLHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas MLHC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MLHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF is less volatile compared to MLHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAGFF.Check MLHC's competition here
BAGFF vs TBEV Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, TBEV has a market cap of 79.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while TBEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas TBEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TBEV's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and TBEV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TBEV's competition here
BAGFF vs EQLB Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, EQLB has a market cap of 57.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while EQLB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas EQLB's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EQLB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and EQLB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EQLB's competition here
BAGFF vs BBDA Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, BBDA has a market cap of 28.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while BBDA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas BBDA's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBDA's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF is less volatile compared to BBDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAGFF.Check BBDA's competition here
BAGFF vs NBVG Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, NBVG has a market cap of 25.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while NBVG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas NBVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NBVG's ROE of -3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF is less volatile compared to NBVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAGFF.Check NBVG's competition here
BAGFF vs STZU Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, STZU has a market cap of 22.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while STZU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas STZU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STZU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF is less volatile compared to STZU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAGFF.Check STZU's competition here
BAGFF vs PPBV Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, PPBV has a market cap of 22.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while PPBV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas PPBV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PPBV's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and PPBV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PPBV's competition here
BAGFF vs FGFT Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, FGFT has a market cap of 22.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while FGFT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas FGFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FGFT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and FGFT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FGFT's competition here
BAGFF vs BGEM Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, BGEM has a market cap of 15.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while BGEM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas BGEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BGEM's ROE of -3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and BGEM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BGEM's competition here
BAGFF vs BVNNF Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, BVNNF has a market cap of 12.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while BVNNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas BVNNF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BVNNF's ROE of +6.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and BVNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BVNNF's competition here
BAGFF vs KRED Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, KRED has a market cap of 2.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while KRED trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas KRED's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KRED's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF is less volatile compared to KRED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAGFF.Check KRED's competition here
BAGFF vs SWRI Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, SWRI has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while SWRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas SWRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWRI's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and SWRI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWRI's competition here
BAGFF vs HKBV Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, HKBV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while HKBV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas HKBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HKBV's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF is less volatile compared to HKBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAGFF.Check HKBV's competition here
BAGFF vs MCHA Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, MCHA has a market cap of 505. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while MCHA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas MCHA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MCHA's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and MCHA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCHA's competition here
BAGFF vs AQUI Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, AQUI has a market cap of 20. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while AQUI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas AQUI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AQUI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and AQUI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AQUI's competition here
BAGFF vs ABVG Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, ABVG has a market cap of 3. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while ABVG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas ABVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABVG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and ABVG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABVG's competition here
BAGFF vs GGGRF Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, GGGRF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while GGGRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas GGGRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GGGRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and GGGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GGGRF's competition here
BAGFF vs RMIL Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, RMIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while RMIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas RMIL's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RMIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF is less volatile compared to RMIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAGFF.Check RMIL's competition here
BAGFF vs CLCL Comparison July 2025
BAGFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAGFF stands at 734.2M. In comparison, CLCL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BAGFF is priced at $6.60, while CLCL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAGFF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.86, whereas CLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAGFF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLCL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAGFF and CLCL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLCL's competition here