BAE Systems plc
BAE Systems plc BAESF Peers
See (BAESF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Aerospace & Defense Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAESF | $22.40 | +1.82% | 65.62B | 26.35 | $0.85 | +1.95% |
| EADSY | $45.03 | +2.32% | 141.81B | 28.32 | $1.59 | +1.62% |
| EADSF | $179.00 | +2.29% | 140.93B | 28.23 | $6.34 | +1.90% |
| SAFRY | $70.44 | +1.05% | 118.66B | -156.53 | -$0.45 | +0.82% |
| SAFRF | $279.70 | +0.32% | 116.57B | -154.53 | -$1.81 | +0.85% |
| RYCEY | $10.77 | +3.36% | 91.10B | 26.92 | $0.40 | +0.53% |
| RYCEF | $10.70 | +2.53% | 90.64B | 26.75 | $0.40 | +0.56% |
| RLLCF | $0.01 | +4.84% | 89.17B | 0.36 | $0.02 | N/A |
| RNMBF | $1,818.00 | +2.02% | 82.74B | 89.96 | $20.21 | +0.35% |
| RNMBY | $362.99 | +1.96% | 78.84B | 89.85 | $4.04 | +0.33% |
Stock Comparison
BAESF vs EADSY Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, EADSY has a market cap of 141.81B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while EADSY trades at $45.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas EADSY's P/E ratio is 28.32. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EADSY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to EADSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs EADSF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, EADSF has a market cap of 140.93B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while EADSF trades at $179.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas EADSF's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EADSF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to EADSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs SAFRY Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, SAFRY has a market cap of 118.66B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while SAFRY trades at $70.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas SAFRY's P/E ratio is -156.53. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SAFRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to SAFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs SAFRF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, SAFRF has a market cap of 116.57B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while SAFRF trades at $279.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas SAFRF's P/E ratio is -154.53. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SAFRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to SAFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs RYCEY Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, RYCEY has a market cap of 91.10B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while RYCEY trades at $10.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas RYCEY's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RYCEY's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to RYCEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs RYCEF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, RYCEF has a market cap of 90.64B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while RYCEF trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas RYCEF's P/E ratio is 26.75. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RYCEF's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to RYCEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs RLLCF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, RLLCF has a market cap of 89.17B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while RLLCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas RLLCF's P/E ratio is 0.36. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RLLCF's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to RLLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs RNMBF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, RNMBF has a market cap of 82.74B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while RNMBF trades at $1,818.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas RNMBF's P/E ratio is 89.96. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RNMBF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to RNMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs RNMBY Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, RNMBY has a market cap of 78.84B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while RNMBY trades at $362.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas RNMBY's P/E ratio is 89.85. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RNMBY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to RNMBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs BAESY Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, BAESY has a market cap of 67.24B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while BAESY trades at $89.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas BAESY's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BAESY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to BAESY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs FINMY Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, FINMY has a market cap of 58.57B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while FINMY trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas FINMY's P/E ratio is 24.19. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FINMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to FINMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs THLLY Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, THLLY has a market cap of 54.95B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while THLLY trades at $53.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas THLLY's P/E ratio is 48.00. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to THLLY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to THLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs THLEF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, THLEF has a market cap of 54.47B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while THLEF trades at $265.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas THLEF's P/E ratio is 47.97. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to THLEF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to THLEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs FINMF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, FINMF has a market cap of 28.62B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while FINMF trades at $49.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas FINMF's P/E ratio is 23.53. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FINMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to FINMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs NSKFF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, NSKFF has a market cap of 27.39B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while NSKFF trades at $155.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas NSKFF's P/E ratio is 55.60. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NSKFF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to NSKFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs DUAVF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, DUAVF has a market cap of 25.80B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while DUAVF trades at $330.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas DUAVF's P/E ratio is 24.83. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DUAVF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to DUAVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs SAABY Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, SAABY has a market cap of 23.54B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while SAABY trades at $21.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas SAABY's P/E ratio is 48.58. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SAABY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to SAABY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs SAABF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, SAABF has a market cap of 22.95B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while SAABF trades at $43.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas SAABF's P/E ratio is 48.32. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SAABF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to SAABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs MTUAY Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, MTUAY has a market cap of 19.94B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while MTUAY trades at $185.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas MTUAY's P/E ratio is 28.42. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MTUAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to MTUAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs MTUAF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, MTUAF has a market cap of 19.25B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while MTUAF trades at $357.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas MTUAF's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MTUAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to MTUAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs SGGKF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, SGGKF has a market cap of 18.53B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while SGGKF trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas SGGKF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SGGKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is less volatile compared to SGGKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs HAGHY Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, HAGHY has a market cap of 17.28B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while HAGHY trades at $37.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas HAGHY's P/E ratio is 71.93. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HAGHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to HAGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs SGGKY Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, SGGKY has a market cap of 16.67B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while SGGKY trades at $53.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas SGGKY's P/E ratio is 31.23. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SGGKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to SGGKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs HNSDF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, HNSDF has a market cap of 9.73B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while HNSDF trades at $84.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas HNSDF's P/E ratio is 80.24. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HNSDF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is less volatile compared to HNSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs BDRAF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, BDRAF has a market cap of 6.41B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while BDRAF trades at $65.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas BDRAF's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BDRAF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to BDRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs YSHLF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, YSHLF has a market cap of 6.40B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while YSHLF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas YSHLF's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to YSHLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is less volatile compared to YSHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs BDRBF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, BDRBF has a market cap of 6.39B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while BDRBF trades at $64.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas BDRBF's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BDRBF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to BDRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs BOMBF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, BOMBF has a market cap of 6.33B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while BOMBF trades at $10.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas BOMBF's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BOMBF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to BOMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs BDRPF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, BDRPF has a market cap of 6.10B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while BDRPF trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas BDRPF's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BDRPF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to BDRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs BDRXF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, BDRXF has a market cap of 6.10B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while BDRXF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas BDRXF's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BDRXF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to BDRXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs ACLLY Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, ACLLY has a market cap of 5.29B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while ACLLY trades at $56.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas ACLLY's P/E ratio is 31.17. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ACLLY's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to ACLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs SMBMY Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, SMBMY has a market cap of 5.18B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while SMBMY trades at $15.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas SMBMY's P/E ratio is 42.46. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SMBMY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is less volatile compared to SMBMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs SMBMF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, SMBMF has a market cap of 5.08B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while SMBMF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas SMBMF's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SMBMF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to SMBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs ACLIF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, ACLIF has a market cap of 4.50B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while ACLIF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas ACLIF's P/E ratio is 26.52. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ACLIF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to ACLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs AVIJF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, AVIJF has a market cap of 4.20B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while AVIJF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas AVIJF's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AVIJF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is less volatile compared to AVIJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs FNCNF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, FNCNF has a market cap of 4.15B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while FNCNF trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas FNCNF's P/E ratio is 85.67. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FNCNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to FNCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs QNTQF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, QNTQF has a market cap of 3.15B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while QNTQF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas QNTQF's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to QNTQF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to QNTQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs QNTQY Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, QNTQY has a market cap of 3.04B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while QNTQY trades at $22.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas QNTQY's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to QNTQY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to QNTQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs MDALF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, MDALF has a market cap of 2.16B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while MDALF trades at $17.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas MDALF's P/E ratio is 39.40. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MDALF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to MDALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs CMGMY Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, CMGMY has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while CMGMY trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas CMGMY's P/E ratio is 29.18. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMGMY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to CMGMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs AUTLF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, AUTLF has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while AUTLF trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas AUTLF's P/E ratio is 67.60. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AUTLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to AUTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs CMGMF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, CMGMF has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while CMGMF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas CMGMF's P/E ratio is 26.25. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMGMF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to CMGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs LSIIF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, LSIIF has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while LSIIF trades at $29.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas LSIIF's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LSIIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is less volatile compared to LSIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs CZGZF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, CZGZF has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while CZGZF trades at $31.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas CZGZF's P/E ratio is 31.80. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CZGZF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to CZGZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs MIESY Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, MIESY has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while MIESY trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas MIESY's P/E ratio is 2.72. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MIESY's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to MIESY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs ATROB Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, ATROB has a market cap of 996.76M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while ATROB trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas ATROB's P/E ratio is -61.41. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ATROB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to ATROB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs GGRGF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, GGRGF has a market cap of 864.83M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while GGRGF trades at $51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas GGRGF's P/E ratio is -212.50. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GGRGF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to GGRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs SNIRF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, SNIRF has a market cap of 823.65M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while SNIRF trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas SNIRF's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNIRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to SNIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs MIESF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, MIESF has a market cap of 744.55M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while MIESF trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas MIESF's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MIESF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to MIESF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs HERXF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, HERXF has a market cap of 736.10M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while HERXF trades at $21.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas HERXF's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HERXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to HERXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs MALJF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, MALJF has a market cap of 650.24M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while MALJF trades at $11.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas MALJF's P/E ratio is 25.29. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MALJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to MALJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs ASTGY Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, ASTGY has a market cap of 562.26M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while ASTGY trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas ASTGY's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ASTGY's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to ASTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs AVNBF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, AVNBF has a market cap of 523.37M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while AVNBF trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas AVNBF's P/E ratio is 176.20. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AVNBF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to AVNBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs JMCCF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, JMCCF has a market cap of 372.22M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while JMCCF trades at $13.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas JMCCF's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JMCCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is less volatile compared to JMCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs FTGFF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, FTGFF has a market cap of 161.36M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while FTGFF trades at $6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas FTGFF's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FTGFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to FTGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs AERG Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, AERG has a market cap of 159.34M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while AERG trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas AERG's P/E ratio is -18.25. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AERG's ROE of -7.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to AERG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs EOPSF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, EOPSF has a market cap of 150.50M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while EOPSF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas EOPSF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EOPSF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to EOPSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs BUKS Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, BUKS has a market cap of 121.19M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while BUKS trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas BUKS's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BUKS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to BUKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs SAFS Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, SAFS has a market cap of 116.09M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while SAFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas SAFS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SAFS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is less volatile compared to SAFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs NORSF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, NORSF has a market cap of 98.74M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while NORSF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas NORSF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NORSF's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to NORSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs CNRD Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, CNRD has a market cap of 61.61M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while CNRD trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas CNRD's P/E ratio is 301.25. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNRD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to CNRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs ACCMF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, ACCMF has a market cap of 55.06M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while ACCMF trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas ACCMF's P/E ratio is -93.45. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ACCMF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is less volatile compared to ACCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs OPXS Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, OPXS has a market cap of 54.08M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while OPXS trades at $7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas OPXS's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OPXS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is less volatile compared to OPXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs TIPGF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, TIPGF has a market cap of 49.80M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while TIPGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas TIPGF's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TIPGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is less volatile compared to TIPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs VLTTF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, VLTTF has a market cap of 42.60M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while VLTTF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas VLTTF's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VLTTF's ROE of -3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to VLTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs STTLF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, STTLF has a market cap of 30.89M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while STTLF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas STTLF's P/E ratio is -19.29. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STTLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to STTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs NRPI Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, NRPI has a market cap of 19.12M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while NRPI trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas NRPI's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NRPI's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is less volatile compared to NRPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs AKRRF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, AKRRF has a market cap of 18.53M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while AKRRF trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas AKRRF's P/E ratio is -76.50. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AKRRF's ROE of +14.61%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to AKRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs OPST Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, OPST has a market cap of 17.46M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while OPST trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas OPST's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OPST's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to OPST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs ETCC Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, ETCC has a market cap of 12.47M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while ETCC trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas ETCC's P/E ratio is -5.74. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ETCC's ROE of +1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to ETCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs MAXQF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, MAXQF has a market cap of 10.56M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while MAXQF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas MAXQF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MAXQF's ROE of +8.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to MAXQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs NEXD Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, NEXD has a market cap of 9.63M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while NEXD trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas NEXD's P/E ratio is -20.37. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NEXD's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to NEXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs FLYLF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, FLYLF has a market cap of 9.45M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while FLYLF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas FLYLF's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FLYLF's ROE of +7.69%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to FLYLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs TIKK Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, TIKK has a market cap of 9.12M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while TIKK trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas TIKK's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TIKK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to TIKK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs XERI Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, XERI has a market cap of 8.56M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while XERI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas XERI's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to XERI's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is less volatile compared to XERI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs SNAVF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, SNAVF has a market cap of 7.07M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while SNAVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas SNAVF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNAVF's ROE of +1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is less volatile compared to SNAVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs OBTEF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, OBTEF has a market cap of 6.59M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while OBTEF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas OBTEF's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OBTEF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is less volatile compared to OBTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs USDR Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, USDR has a market cap of 5.96M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while USDR trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas USDR's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to USDR's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to USDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs MSNVF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, MSNVF has a market cap of 5.59M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while MSNVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas MSNVF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MSNVF's ROE of -20.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is less volatile compared to MSNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs DEWY Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, DEWY has a market cap of 2.42M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while DEWY trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas DEWY's P/E ratio is -6.81. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DEWY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to DEWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs LLLI Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, LLLI has a market cap of 1.16M. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while LLLI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas LLLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LLLI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to LLLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs ADFS Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, ADFS has a market cap of 934200.00. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while ADFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas ADFS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADFS's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to ADFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs PMEA Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, PMEA has a market cap of 752829.00. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while PMEA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas PMEA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PMEA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is less volatile compared to PMEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs HWKE Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, HWKE has a market cap of 500204.00. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while HWKE trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas HWKE's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HWKE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is less volatile compared to HWKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs MDEX Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, MDEX has a market cap of 320620.00. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while MDEX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas MDEX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MDEX's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to MDEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs DLRWF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, DLRWF has a market cap of 272202.00. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while DLRWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas DLRWF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DLRWF's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BAESF has daily volatility of 8.38 and DLRWF has daily volatility of N/A.
BAESF vs RNWR Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, RNWR has a market cap of 139522.00. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while RNWR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas RNWR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RNWR's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to RNWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs CFFMF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, CFFMF has a market cap of 118407.00. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while CFFMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas CFFMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CFFMF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to CFFMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs DSUS Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, DSUS has a market cap of 114300.00. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while DSUS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas DSUS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DSUS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to DSUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs QCKSF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, QCKSF has a market cap of 78899.00. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while QCKSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas QCKSF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to QCKSF's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is less volatile compared to QCKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs UITA Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, UITA has a market cap of 38610.00. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while UITA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas UITA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UITA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to UITA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs EKSN Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, EKSN has a market cap of 20000.00. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while EKSN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas EKSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EKSN's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to EKSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs ASAV Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, ASAV has a market cap of 11935.00. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while ASAV trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas ASAV's P/E ratio is -103.64. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ASAV's ROE of +7.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is more volatile compared to ASAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs LNGT Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, LNGT has a market cap of 11360.00. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while LNGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas LNGT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LNGT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is less volatile compared to LNGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs SDSS Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, SDSS has a market cap of 8263.00. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while SDSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas SDSS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SDSS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is less volatile compared to SDSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs EPEO Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, EPEO has a market cap of 5603.00. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while EPEO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas EPEO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EPEO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is less volatile compared to EPEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs BRSI Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, BRSI has a market cap of 1133.00. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while BRSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas BRSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BRSI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is less volatile compared to BRSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs HSFI Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, HSFI has a market cap of 1104.00. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while HSFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas HSFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HSFI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is less volatile compared to HSFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.
BAESF vs RDEGF Comparison
BAESF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAESF stands at 65.62B. In comparison, RDEGF has a market cap of 1026.00. Regarding current trading prices, BAESF is priced at $22.40, while RDEGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAESF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.35, whereas RDEGF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BAESF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RDEGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAESF is less volatile compared to RDEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAESF.