Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd.
Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. BADFF Peers
See (BADFF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BADFF | $28.96 | N/A | 984.77M | 20.11 | $1.44 | +1.80% |
| FLRAP | $1,763.28 | +4.69% | 251.48B | -735.01 | -$2.40 | N/A |
| ACSAY | $12.83 | +0.35% | 81.69B | 17.81 | $0.72 | N/A |
| BOUYY | $8.51 | +2.81% | 80.26B | 13.51 | $0.63 | +2.74% |
| VCISY | $34.58 | +0.67% | 78.37B | 14.59 | $2.37 | +3.33% |
| VCISF | $138.33 | -1.90% | 77.88B | 14.52 | $9.53 | +3.46% |
| LTOUF | $37.00 | -17.78% | 50.88B | 30.83 | $1.20 | +0.91% |
| WSPOF | $187.99 | +0.90% | 24.53B | 47.83 | $3.93 | +0.57% |
| CRWOF | $0.44 | -8.28% | 17.60B | 3.16 | $0.14 | +47.93% |
| ACSAF | $63.85 | +0.39% | 16.27B | 18.30 | $3.49 | +3.22% |
Stock Comparison
BADFF vs FLRAP Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, FLRAP has a market cap of 251.48B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while FLRAP trades at $1,763.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas FLRAP's P/E ratio is -735.01. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FLRAP's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to FLRAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs ACSAY Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, ACSAY has a market cap of 81.69B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while ACSAY trades at $12.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas ACSAY's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ACSAY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to ACSAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs BOUYY Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, BOUYY has a market cap of 80.26B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while BOUYY trades at $8.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas BOUYY's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BOUYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to BOUYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs VCISY Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, VCISY has a market cap of 78.37B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while VCISY trades at $34.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas VCISY's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VCISY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to VCISY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs VCISF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, VCISF has a market cap of 77.88B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while VCISF trades at $138.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas VCISF's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VCISF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and VCISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs LTOUF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, LTOUF has a market cap of 50.88B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while LTOUF trades at $37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas LTOUF's P/E ratio is 30.83. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LTOUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and LTOUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs WSPOF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, WSPOF has a market cap of 24.53B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while WSPOF trades at $187.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas WSPOF's P/E ratio is 47.83. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WSPOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and WSPOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs CRWOF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, CRWOF has a market cap of 17.60B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while CRWOF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas CRWOF's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CRWOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to CRWOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs ACSAF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, ACSAF has a market cap of 16.27B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while ACSAF trades at $63.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas ACSAF's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ACSAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and ACSAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs HOCFF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, HOCFF has a market cap of 13.89B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while HOCFF trades at $184.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas HOCFF's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HOCFF's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and HOCFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs BOUYF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, BOUYF has a market cap of 13.80B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while BOUYF trades at $36.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas BOUYF's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BOUYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to BOUYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs EFGSY Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, EFGSY has a market cap of 13.08B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while EFGSY trades at $28.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas EFGSY's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EFGSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to EFGSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs EFGSF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, EFGSF has a market cap of 12.88B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while EFGSF trades at $139.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas EFGSF's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EFGSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and EFGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs OBYCF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, OBYCF has a market cap of 10.99B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while OBYCF trades at $15.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas OBYCF's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OBYCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to OBYCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs STBBF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, STBBF has a market cap of 10.66B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while STBBF trades at $92.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas STBBF's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STBBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to STBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs KAJMY Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, KAJMY has a market cap of 10.33B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while KAJMY trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas KAJMY's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KAJMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to KAJMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs TISCY Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, TISCY has a market cap of 9.90B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while TISCY trades at $13.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas TISCY's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TISCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to TISCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs KAJMF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, KAJMF has a market cap of 9.74B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while KAJMF trades at $20.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas KAJMF's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KAJMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to KAJMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs SNCAF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, SNCAF has a market cap of 9.50B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while SNCAF trades at $54.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas SNCAF's P/E ratio is 46.84. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SNCAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and SNCAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs SKBSY Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, SKBSY has a market cap of 8.62B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while SKBSY trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas SKBSY's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SKBSY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to SKBSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs AVHNF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, AVHNF has a market cap of 8.17B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while AVHNF trades at $250.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas AVHNF's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AVHNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and AVHNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs ACXIF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, ACXIF has a market cap of 7.55B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while ACXIF trades at $138.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas ACXIF's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ACXIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to ACXIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs SKSBF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, SKSBF has a market cap of 7.29B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while SKSBF trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas SKSBF's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SKSBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and SKSBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs TISCF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, TISCF has a market cap of 6.64B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while TISCF trades at $37.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas TISCF's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TISCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and TISCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs CCOHF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, CCOHF has a market cap of 5.97B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while CCOHF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas CCOHF's P/E ratio is 4.71. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CCOHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to CCOHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs EKIVF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, EKIVF has a market cap of 5.97B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while EKIVF trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas EKIVF's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EKIVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to EKIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs BCKIF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, BCKIF has a market cap of 5.87B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while BCKIF trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas BCKIF's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BCKIF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and BCKIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs BCKIY Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, BCKIY has a market cap of 5.62B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while BCKIY trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas BCKIY's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BCKIY's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to BCKIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs AVHNY Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, AVHNY has a market cap of 5.56B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while AVHNY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas AVHNY's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AVHNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to AVHNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs SHMUY Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, SHMUY has a market cap of 4.48B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while SHMUY trades at $25.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas SHMUY's P/E ratio is 61.64. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHMUY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to SHMUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs ARCAY Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, ARCAY has a market cap of 4.47B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while ARCAY trades at $49.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas ARCAY's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARCAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to ARCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs PUODY Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, PUODY has a market cap of 4.23B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while PUODY trades at $222.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas PUODY's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PUODY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and PUODY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs RBWNY Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, RBWNY has a market cap of 4.15B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while RBWNY trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas RBWNY's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RBWNY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and RBWNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs ARCVF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, ARCVF has a market cap of 4.14B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while ARCVF trades at $46.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas ARCVF's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARCVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to ARCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs SHMUF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, SHMUF has a market cap of 4.02B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while SHMUF trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas SHMUF's P/E ratio is 581.60. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHMUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to SHMUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs ABGOF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, ABGOF has a market cap of 3.87B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while ABGOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas ABGOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ABGOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to ABGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs AGOAF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, AGOAF has a market cap of 3.87B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while AGOAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas AGOAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AGOAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to AGOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs NWSGY Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, NWSGY has a market cap of 3.85B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while NWSGY trades at $9.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas NWSGY's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NWSGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to NWSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs IMPJY Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, IMPJY has a market cap of 3.84B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while IMPJY trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas IMPJY's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IMPJY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to IMPJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs NWSZF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, NWSZF has a market cap of 3.82B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while NWSZF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas NWSZF's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NWSZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to NWSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs PYOIF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, PYOIF has a market cap of 3.77B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while PYOIF trades at $8.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas PYOIF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PYOIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to PYOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs BAFBF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, BAFBF has a market cap of 3.45B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while BAFBF trades at $6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas BAFBF's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BAFBF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and BAFBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs BFLBY Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, BFLBY has a market cap of 3.25B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while BFLBY trades at $17.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas BFLBY's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BFLBY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and BFLBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs BFLBF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, BFLBF has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while BFLBF trades at $83.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas BFLBF's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BFLBF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to BFLBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs SENGF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, SENGF has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while SENGF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas SENGF's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SENGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to SENGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs OPMXF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, OPMXF has a market cap of 2.87B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while OPMXF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas OPMXF's P/E ratio is 90.00. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OPMXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to OPMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs PYYIF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, PYYIF has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while PYYIF trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas PYYIF's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PYYIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and PYYIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs BAFYY Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, BAFYY has a market cap of 2.55B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while BAFYY trades at $9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas BAFYY's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BAFYY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to BAFYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs SYRVF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, SYRVF has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while SYRVF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas SYRVF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SYRVF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to SYRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs PTJSY Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, PTJSY has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while PTJSY trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas PTJSY's P/E ratio is 3.73. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PTJSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to PTJSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs JGCCF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, JGCCF has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while JGCCF trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas JGCCF's P/E ratio is -40.48. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JGCCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to JGCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs AFXXF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, AFXXF has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while AFXXF trades at $18.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas AFXXF's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFXXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to AFXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs JGCCY Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, JGCCY has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while JGCCY trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas JGCCY's P/E ratio is -12.73. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JGCCY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and JGCCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs GKTRF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, GKTRF has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while GKTRF trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas GKTRF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GKTRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to GKTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs PTJSF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, PTJSF has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while PTJSF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas PTJSF's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PTJSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to PTJSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs SKBNF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, SKBNF has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while SKBNF trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas SKBNF's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SKBNF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to SKBNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs PNOCF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, PNOCF has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while PNOCF trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas PNOCF's P/E ratio is 50.91. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PNOCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and PNOCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs AGRUF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, AGRUF has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while AGRUF trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas AGRUF's P/E ratio is 34.05. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AGRUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and AGRUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs TNISY Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, TNISY has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while TNISY trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas TNISY's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TNISY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to TNISY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs TNISF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, TNISF has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while TNISF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas TNISF's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TNISF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and TNISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs KLRGF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, KLRGF has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while KLRGF trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas KLRGF's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KLRGF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and KLRGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs HAZAF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, HAZAF has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while HAZAF trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas HAZAF's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HAZAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to HAZAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs KBAGF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, KBAGF has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while KBAGF trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas KBAGF's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KBAGF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and KBAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs BIRDF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, BIRDF has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while BIRDF trades at $18.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas BIRDF's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BIRDF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and BIRDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs CKOCF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, CKOCF has a market cap of 946.42M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while CKOCF trades at $17.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas CKOCF's P/E ratio is -20.81. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CKOCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and CKOCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs MOPHY Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, MOPHY has a market cap of 933.98M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while MOPHY trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas MOPHY's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MOPHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and MOPHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs ELLKY Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, ELLKY has a market cap of 924.08M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while ELLKY trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas ELLKY's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ELLKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to ELLKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs ELWSF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, ELWSF has a market cap of 843.90M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while ELWSF trades at $62.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas ELWSF's P/E ratio is -33.48. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ELWSF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to ELWSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs AEGXF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, AEGXF has a market cap of 833.64M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while AEGXF trades at $13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas AEGXF's P/E ratio is -12.74. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AEGXF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and AEGXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs KIERF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, KIERF has a market cap of 786.99M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while KIERF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas KIERF's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KIERF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to KIERF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs YITYY Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, YITYY has a market cap of 622.55M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while YITYY trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas YITYY's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YITYY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and YITYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs RNWHF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, RNWHF has a market cap of 585.76M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while RNWHF trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas RNWHF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RNWHF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and RNWHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs TKFHY Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, TKFHY has a market cap of 558.98M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while TKFHY trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas TKFHY's P/E ratio is -15.95. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TKFHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to TKFHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs ELLKF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, ELLKF has a market cap of 555.84M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while ELLKF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas ELLKF's P/E ratio is 6.40. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ELLKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to ELLKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs SLAAF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, SLAAF has a market cap of 554.89M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while SLAAF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas SLAAF's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SLAAF's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to SLAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs CHYCY Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, CHYCY has a market cap of 505.28M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while CHYCY trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas CHYCY's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHYCY's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to CHYCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs CHYCF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, CHYCF has a market cap of 479.37M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while CHYCF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas CHYCF's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHYCF's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and CHYCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs OBSJF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, OBSJF has a market cap of 473.11M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while OBSJF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas OBSJF's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OBSJF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to OBSJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs YRCCF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, YRCCF has a market cap of 399.91M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while YRCCF trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas YRCCF's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YRCCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to YRCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs LYOPF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, LYOPF has a market cap of 284.33M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while LYOPF trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas LYOPF's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LYOPF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to LYOPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs BRAGF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, BRAGF has a market cap of 279.31M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while BRAGF trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas BRAGF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BRAGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to BRAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs CSGQF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, CSGQF has a market cap of 258.94M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while CSGQF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas CSGQF's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CSGQF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and CSGQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs HUKEF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, HUKEF has a market cap of 220.28M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while HUKEF trades at $7.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas HUKEF's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HUKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to HUKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs DBMG Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, DBMG has a market cap of 165.80M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while DBMG trades at $43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas DBMG's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DBMG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and DBMG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs BILBF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, BILBF has a market cap of 68.58M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while BILBF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas BILBF's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BILBF's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and BILBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs BRANF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, BRANF has a market cap of 55.55M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while BRANF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas BRANF's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BRANF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and BRANF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs KNNKF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, KNNKF has a market cap of 51.64M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while KNNKF trades at $12.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas KNNKF's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KNNKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and KNNKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs APEUF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, APEUF has a market cap of 34.39M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while APEUF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas APEUF's P/E ratio is 54.46. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to APEUF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to APEUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs MLLUY Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, MLLUY has a market cap of 28.35M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while MLLUY trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas MLLUY's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MLLUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to MLLUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs MURSF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, MURSF has a market cap of 23.46M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while MURSF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas MURSF's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MURSF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and MURSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs MRCR Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, MRCR has a market cap of 16.56M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while MRCR trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas MRCR's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MRCR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to MRCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs LOUIF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, LOUIF has a market cap of 10.13M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while LOUIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas LOUIF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LOUIF's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and LOUIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs COLDF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, COLDF has a market cap of 6.64M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while COLDF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas COLDF's P/E ratio is 1.42. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to COLDF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to COLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs GRHI Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, GRHI has a market cap of 6.19M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while GRHI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas GRHI's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GRHI's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to GRHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs ETWLF Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, ETWLF has a market cap of 2.12M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while ETWLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas ETWLF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ETWLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and ETWLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs CIPI Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, CIPI has a market cap of 1.57M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while CIPI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas CIPI's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CIPI's ROE of +8.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to CIPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs SODE Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, SODE has a market cap of 1.34M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while SODE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas SODE's P/E ratio is -7.30. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SODE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF and SODE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
BADFF vs PMDP Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, PMDP has a market cap of 1.30M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while PMDP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas PMDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PMDP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to PMDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.
BADFF vs RELT Comparison
BADFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BADFF stands at 984.77M. In comparison, RELT has a market cap of 1.17M. Regarding current trading prices, BADFF is priced at $28.96, while RELT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BADFF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.11, whereas RELT's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, BADFF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RELT's ROE of +19.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BADFF is less volatile compared to RELT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BADFF.