Alibaba Group Holding Limited

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, MPNGF has a market cap of 101.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while MPNGF trades at $16.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas MPNGF's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MPNGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is less volatile compared to MPNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, MPNGY has a market cap of 101.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while MPNGY trades at $33.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas MPNGY's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MPNGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to MPNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, ANCTF has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while ANCTF trades at $56.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas ANCTF's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ANCTF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is less volatile compared to ANCTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, JDCMF has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while JDCMF trades at $16.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas JDCMF's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JDCMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to JDCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, YAHOY has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while YAHOY trades at $7.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas YAHOY's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YAHOY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to YAHOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, XXLLY has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while XXLLY trades at $739.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas XXLLY's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XXLLY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to XXLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, RKUNY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while RKUNY trades at $5.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas RKUNY's P/E ratio is -8.40. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RKUNY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to RKUNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, RKUNF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while RKUNF trades at $5.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas RKUNF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RKUNF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to RKUNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, NCLTY has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while NCLTY trades at $8.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas NCLTY's P/E ratio is -74.46. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NCLTY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is less volatile compared to NCLTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, NCLTF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while NCLTF trades at $89.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas NCLTF's P/E ratio is -75.44. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NCLTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to NCLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, SNROF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while SNROF trades at $42.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas SNROF's P/E ratio is 35.59. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNROF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to SNROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, MTTRY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while MTTRY trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas MTTRY's P/E ratio is -40.72. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTTRY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to MTTRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, SATLF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while SATLF trades at $10.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas SATLF's P/E ratio is 30.69. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SATLF's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to SATLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, SRTTY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while SRTTY trades at $10.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas SRTTY's P/E ratio is 29.77. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRTTY's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is less volatile compared to SRTTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, MONOY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while MONOY trades at $18.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas MONOY's P/E ratio is 48.42. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MONOY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to MONOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, HKTGF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while HKTGF trades at $215.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas HKTGF's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HKTGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to HKTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, DELHY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while DELHY trades at $3.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas DELHY's P/E ratio is -8.14. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DELHY's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is less volatile compared to DELHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, DLVHF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while DLVHF trades at $25.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas DLVHF's P/E ratio is -7.91. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DLVHF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to DLVHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, ZLDSF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while ZLDSF trades at $30.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas ZLDSF's P/E ratio is 26.90. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZLDSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to ZLDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, ZLNDY has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while ZLNDY trades at $16.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas ZLNDY's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZLNDY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to ZLNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, DFRYF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while DFRYF trades at $56.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas DFRYF's P/E ratio is 64.98. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DFRYF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to DFRYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, CDNAF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while CDNAF trades at $140.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas CDNAF's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDNAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to CDNAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, DUFRY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while DUFRY trades at $5.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas DUFRY's P/E ratio is 59.72. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DUFRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to DUFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, JBHIF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while JBHIF trades at $66.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas JBHIF's P/E ratio is 25.43. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JBHIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to JBHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, PETRY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while PETRY trades at $6.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas PETRY's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PETRY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is less volatile compared to PETRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, ELPQF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while ELPQF trades at $4.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas ELPQF's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELPQF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to ELPQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, CDNTF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while CDNTF trades at $189.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas CDNTF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDNTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to CDNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, ALEGF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while ALEGF trades at $7.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas ALEGF's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALEGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to ALEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, JDDSF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while JDDSF trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas JDDSF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JDDSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to JDDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, MONOF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while MONOF trades at $14.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas MONOF's P/E ratio is 29.49. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MONOF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to MONOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, JDSPY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while JDSPY trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas JDSPY's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JDSPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to JDSPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, JTKWY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while JTKWY trades at $4.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas JTKWY's P/E ratio is -8.12. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JTKWY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to JTKWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, TKAYF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while TKAYF trades at $22.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas TKAYF's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TKAYF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to TKAYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, JUMSY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while JUMSY trades at $32.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas JUMSY's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JUMSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to JUMSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, HNORY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while HNORY trades at $12.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas HNORY's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HNORY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to HNORY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, SDIPF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while SDIPF trades at $9.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas SDIPF's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SDIPF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to SDIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, ZLPSF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while ZLPSF trades at $536.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas ZLPSF's P/E ratio is -623.70. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZLPSF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is less volatile compared to ZLPSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, JUMSF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while JUMSF trades at $27.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas JUMSF's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JUMSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to JUMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, ZOPLY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while ZOPLY trades at $122.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas ZOPLY's P/E ratio is -210.38. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZOPLY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to ZOPLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, DROOF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while DROOF trades at $2.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas DROOF's P/E ratio is 56.88. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DROOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to DROOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, DNLMY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while DNLMY trades at $16.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas DNLMY's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DNLMY's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to DNLMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, MCARY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while MCARY trades at $8.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas MCARY's P/E ratio is 27.48. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MCARY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to MCARY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, MRCIF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while MRCIF trades at $15.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas MRCIF's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MRCIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to MRCIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, FHNGY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while FHNGY trades at $7.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas FHNGY's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHNGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to FHNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, YMDAF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while YMDAF trades at $3.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas YMDAF's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YMDAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to YMDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, GRUPF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while GRUPF trades at $66.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas GRUPF's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GRUPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to GRUPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, GPGNF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while GPGNF trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas GPGNF's P/E ratio is 20.89. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GPGNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to GPGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, WHTPF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while WHTPF trades at $14.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas WHTPF's P/E ratio is 235.67. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WHTPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to WHTPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, PAHGF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while PAHGF trades at $3.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas PAHGF's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAHGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to PAHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, DSITF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while DSITF trades at $1.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas DSITF's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DSITF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to DSITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, MTAGF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while MTAGF trades at $2.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas MTAGF's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTAGF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to MTAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, BTOOY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while BTOOY trades at $3.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas BTOOY's P/E ratio is -23.63. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BTOOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to BTOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, MIZUF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while MIZUF trades at $18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas MIZUF's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MIZUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to MIZUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, LEFUF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while LEFUF trades at $19.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas LEFUF's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LEFUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to LEFUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, MGLUY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while MGLUY trades at $5.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas MGLUY's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MGLUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to MGLUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, MKRMF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while MKRMF trades at $235.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas MKRMF's P/E ratio is -136.63. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MKRMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to MKRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, SCCAF has a market cap of 875M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while SCCAF trades at $25.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas SCCAF's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCCAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to SCCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, FNXTF has a market cap of 750.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while FNXTF trades at $74.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas FNXTF's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FNXTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to FNXTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, THGHY has a market cap of 608.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while THGHY trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas THGHY's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to THGHY's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to THGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, HWGC has a market cap of 596.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while HWGC trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas HWGC's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HWGC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to HWGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, ASOMF has a market cap of 584.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while ASOMF trades at $3.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas ASOMF's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASOMF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to ASOMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, THGPF has a market cap of 535M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while THGPF trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas THGPF's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to THGPF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to THGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, ASOMY has a market cap of 512.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while ASOMY trades at $4.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas ASOMY's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASOMY's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to ASOMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, HLFDY has a market cap of 442.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while HLFDY trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas HLFDY's P/E ratio is -9.64. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HLFDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to HLFDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, CRFCF has a market cap of 413M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while CRFCF trades at $1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas CRFCF's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRFCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to CRFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, KGGNF has a market cap of 397.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while KGGNF trades at $4.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas KGGNF's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KGGNF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to KGGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, SSILF has a market cap of 370.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while SSILF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas SSILF's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSILF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to SSILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, KTYCF has a market cap of 369.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while KTYCF trades at $11.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas KTYCF's P/E ratio is 115.50. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KTYCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to KTYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, HLFDF has a market cap of 364.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while HLFDF trades at $2.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas HLFDF's P/E ratio is -7.95. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HLFDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to HLFDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, GMELF has a market cap of 345.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while GMELF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas GMELF's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GMELF's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to GMELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, BHOOY has a market cap of 302.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while BHOOY trades at $4.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas BHOOY's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BHOOY's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to BHOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, BHHOF has a market cap of 302.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while BHHOF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas BHHOF's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BHHOF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to BHHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, NBRNF has a market cap of 251.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while NBRNF trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas NBRNF's P/E ratio is 53.84. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NBRNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to NBRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, SAXJY has a market cap of 248.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while SAXJY trades at $1.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas SAXJY's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAXJY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to SAXJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, HMAGF has a market cap of 246.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while HMAGF trades at $7.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas HMAGF's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HMAGF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to HMAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, BNNNF has a market cap of 173.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while BNNNF trades at $9.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas BNNNF's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BNNNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to BNNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, HKTVY has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while HKTVY trades at $4.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas HKTVY's P/E ratio is -20.80. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HKTVY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to HKTVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, YUMSF has a market cap of 153M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while YUMSF trades at $1.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas YUMSF's P/E ratio is -27.40. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YUMSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to YUMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, RDBBY has a market cap of 129.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while RDBBY trades at $4.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas RDBBY's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RDBBY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is less volatile compared to RDBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, WCRS has a market cap of 118.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while WCRS trades at $13.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas WCRS's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WCRS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to WCRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, AHAHF has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while AHAHF trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas AHAHF's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AHAHF's ROE of +5.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to AHAHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, IGDFF has a market cap of 77.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while IGDFF trades at $0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas IGDFF's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IGDFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to IGDFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, MHCRF has a market cap of 64.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while MHCRF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas MHCRF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MHCRF's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to MHCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, SPGZ has a market cap of 62.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while SPGZ trades at $21,500.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas SPGZ's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPGZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BABAF has daily volatility of 2.71 and SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, ADBGF has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while ADBGF trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas ADBGF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADBGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to ADBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, ACEHF has a market cap of 59.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while ACEHF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas ACEHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACEHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to ACEHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, PXHI has a market cap of 50.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while PXHI trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas PXHI's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PXHI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to PXHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, IDGBF has a market cap of 50.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while IDGBF trades at $1.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas IDGBF's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IDGBF's ROE of -12.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to IDGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, TWRKF has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while TWRKF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas TWRKF's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TWRKF's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to TWRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, RDBBF has a market cap of 39.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while RDBBF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas RDBBF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RDBBF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to RDBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, GLHD has a market cap of 39.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while GLHD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas GLHD's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLHD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to GLHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, ARTZF has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while ARTZF trades at $7.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas ARTZF's P/E ratio is -44.53. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARTZF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to ARTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, CNVAF has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while CNVAF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas CNVAF's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNVAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to CNVAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, FDIT has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while FDIT trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas FDIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FDIT's ROE of -4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to FDIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, SNHO has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while SNHO trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas SNHO's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNHO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to SNHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, BWTL has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while BWTL trades at $4.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas BWTL's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BWTL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to BWTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, AVDWF has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while AVDWF trades at $0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas AVDWF's P/E ratio is 62.50. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AVDWF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to AVDWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, RLAB has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while RLAB trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas RLAB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RLAB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to RLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.

BABAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABAF stands at 300.1B. In comparison, EMCMF has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, BABAF is priced at $15.73, while EMCMF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas EMCMF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, BABAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EMCMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BABAF is more volatile compared to EMCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABAF.