City of London Investment Trust (The) PLC
City of London Investment Trust (The) PLC (BA69.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BA69.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BA69.L | £87.96 | +0.00% | 43.4B | N/A | N/A | +6.82% |
| STJ.L | £1,353.00 | +3.40% | 6.9B | 13.81 | £0.94 | +1.02% |
| BA47.L | £295.00 | +0.00% | 1.5B | N/A | N/A | +6.78% |
| FGEN.L | £82.60 | -1.55% | 521.8M | -41.55 | -£0.02 | +9.39% |
| CTYA.L | £95.00 | +0.00% | 468.8M | N/A | N/A | +4.42% |
| TMIP.L | £62.00 | +1.64% | 201.4M | -3.39 | -£0.18 | +14.12% |
| 3LVO.L | £3,627.50 | +4.45% | 198.4M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| GMP.L | £9.05 | +0.00% | 62.7M | N/A | N/A | +1.99% |
| AEEE.L | £0.65 | +0.00% | 52.9M | N/A | N/A | +66.69% |
| OFG.L | £84.50 | +0.00% | 45.6M | -42.25 | -£0.02 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BA69.L vs STJ.L Comparison August 2025
BA69.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BA69.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, STJ.L has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BA69.L is priced at £87.96, while STJ.L trades at £1,353.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BA69.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STJ.L's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, BA69.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STJ.L's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BA69.L is less volatile compared to STJ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BA69.L.Check STJ.L's competition here
BA69.L vs BA47.L Comparison August 2025
BA69.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BA69.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, BA47.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BA69.L is priced at £87.96, while BA47.L trades at £295.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BA69.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BA47.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BA69.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BA47.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BA69.L and BA47.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BA47.L's competition here
BA69.L vs FGEN.L Comparison August 2025
BA69.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BA69.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, FGEN.L has a market cap of 521.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BA69.L is priced at £87.96, while FGEN.L trades at £82.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BA69.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGEN.L's P/E ratio is -41.55. In terms of profitability, BA69.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FGEN.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BA69.L is less volatile compared to FGEN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BA69.L.Check FGEN.L's competition here
BA69.L vs CTYA.L Comparison August 2025
BA69.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BA69.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, CTYA.L has a market cap of 468.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BA69.L is priced at £87.96, while CTYA.L trades at £95.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BA69.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTYA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BA69.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTYA.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BA69.L is less volatile compared to CTYA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BA69.L.Check CTYA.L's competition here
BA69.L vs TMIP.L Comparison August 2025
BA69.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BA69.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, TMIP.L has a market cap of 201.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BA69.L is priced at £87.96, while TMIP.L trades at £62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BA69.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMIP.L's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, BA69.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TMIP.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BA69.L is less volatile compared to TMIP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BA69.L.Check TMIP.L's competition here
BA69.L vs 3LVO.L Comparison August 2025
BA69.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BA69.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, 3LVO.L has a market cap of 198.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BA69.L is priced at £87.96, while 3LVO.L trades at £3,627.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BA69.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3LVO.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BA69.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3LVO.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BA69.L is less volatile compared to 3LVO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BA69.L.Check 3LVO.L's competition here
BA69.L vs GMP.L Comparison August 2025
BA69.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BA69.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, GMP.L has a market cap of 62.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BA69.L is priced at £87.96, while GMP.L trades at £9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BA69.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BA69.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GMP.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BA69.L and GMP.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GMP.L's competition here
BA69.L vs AEEE.L Comparison August 2025
BA69.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BA69.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, AEEE.L has a market cap of 52.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BA69.L is priced at £87.96, while AEEE.L trades at £0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BA69.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEEE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BA69.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEEE.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BA69.L and AEEE.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AEEE.L's competition here
BA69.L vs OFG.L Comparison August 2025
BA69.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BA69.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, OFG.L has a market cap of 45.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BA69.L is priced at £87.96, while OFG.L trades at £84.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BA69.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OFG.L's P/E ratio is -42.25. In terms of profitability, BA69.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OFG.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BA69.L and OFG.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OFG.L's competition here
BA69.L vs ONWD.L Comparison August 2025
BA69.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BA69.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, ONWD.L has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, BA69.L is priced at £87.96, while ONWD.L trades at £127.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BA69.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONWD.L's P/E ratio is 22.87. In terms of profitability, BA69.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ONWD.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BA69.L is less volatile compared to ONWD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BA69.L.Check ONWD.L's competition here
BA69.L vs RNEP.L Comparison August 2025
BA69.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BA69.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, RNEP.L has a market cap of 26.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BA69.L is priced at £87.96, while RNEP.L trades at £18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BA69.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNEP.L's P/E ratio is 4.61. In terms of profitability, BA69.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RNEP.L's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BA69.L and RNEP.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RNEP.L's competition here
BA69.L vs 3SVO.L Comparison August 2025
BA69.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BA69.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, 3SVO.L has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BA69.L is priced at £87.96, while 3SVO.L trades at £719.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BA69.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3SVO.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BA69.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3SVO.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BA69.L is less volatile compared to 3SVO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BA69.L.Check 3SVO.L's competition here
BA69.L vs GVCT.L Comparison August 2025
BA69.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BA69.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, GVCT.L has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BA69.L is priced at £87.96, while GVCT.L trades at £92.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BA69.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GVCT.L's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, BA69.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GVCT.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BA69.L and GVCT.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GVCT.L's competition here
BA69.L vs SELK.L Comparison August 2025
BA69.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BA69.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, SELK.L has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BA69.L is priced at £87.96, while SELK.L trades at £2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BA69.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SELK.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BA69.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SELK.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BA69.L and SELK.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SELK.L's competition here
BA69.L vs 3LPA.L Comparison August 2025
BA69.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BA69.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, 3LPA.L has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BA69.L is priced at £87.96, while 3LPA.L trades at £910.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BA69.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3LPA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BA69.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3LPA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BA69.L is less volatile compared to 3LPA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BA69.L.Check 3LPA.L's competition here
BA69.L vs PGV.L Comparison August 2025
BA69.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BA69.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, PGV.L has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BA69.L is priced at £87.96, while PGV.L trades at £100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BA69.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGV.L's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, BA69.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PGV.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BA69.L and PGV.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PGV.L's competition here
BA69.L vs 3LNI.L Comparison August 2025
BA69.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BA69.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, 3LNI.L has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BA69.L is priced at £87.96, while 3LNI.L trades at £27.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BA69.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3LNI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BA69.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3LNI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BA69.L is less volatile compared to 3LNI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BA69.L.Check 3LNI.L's competition here
BA69.L vs TAB.L Comparison August 2025
BA69.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BA69.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, TAB.L has a market cap of 902K. Regarding current trading prices, BA69.L is priced at £87.96, while TAB.L trades at £1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BA69.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAB.L's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, BA69.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TAB.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BA69.L and TAB.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TAB.L's competition here
BA69.L vs SDVP.L Comparison August 2025
BA69.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BA69.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, SDVP.L has a market cap of 66.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BA69.L is priced at £87.96, while SDVP.L trades at £133.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BA69.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDVP.L's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, BA69.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SDVP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BA69.L and SDVP.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SDVP.L's competition here
BA69.L vs SWC.L Comparison August 2025
BA69.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BA69.L stands at 43.4B. In comparison, SWC.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BA69.L is priced at £87.96, while SWC.L trades at £158.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BA69.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWC.L's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, BA69.L's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWC.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BA69.L is less volatile compared to SWC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BA69.L.Check SWC.L's competition here