Azarga Uranium Corp.
Azarga Uranium Corp. AZZ.TO Peers
See (AZZ.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Uranium Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZZ.TO | $0.71 | +7.58% | N/A | -15.11 | -$0.05 | N/A |
| CCO.TO | $73.20 | +1.19% | 31.87B | 128.42 | $0.57 | +0.22% |
| U-UN.TO | $21.58 | +2.47% | 5.86B | -3.35 | -$6.44 | N/A |
| NXE.TO | $7.55 | -0.66% | 4.30B | -44.41 | -$0.17 | N/A |
| DML.TO | $2.07 | -0.48% | 1.86B | -15.92 | -$0.13 | N/A |
| EFR.TO | $6.25 | +0.81% | 1.35B | -10.42 | -$0.60 | N/A |
| FCU.TO | $0.72 | -2.70% | 618.31M | -72.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| URE.TO | $0.99 | +0.51% | 361.17M | -5.50 | -$0.18 | N/A |
| URC.TO | $2.69 | -0.74% | 359.48M | 67.25 | $0.04 | N/A |
| MGA.TO | $0.26 | +1.96% | 96.71M | -5.20 | -$0.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AZZ.TO vs CCO.TO Comparison
AZZ.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZZ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, CCO.TO has a market cap of 31.87B. Regarding current trading prices, AZZ.TO is priced at $0.71, while CCO.TO trades at $73.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZZ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -15.11, whereas CCO.TO's P/E ratio is 128.42. In terms of profitability, AZZ.TO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CCO.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AZZ.TO is more volatile compared to CCO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZZ.TO.
AZZ.TO vs U-UN.TO Comparison
AZZ.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZZ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, U-UN.TO has a market cap of 5.86B. Regarding current trading prices, AZZ.TO is priced at $0.71, while U-UN.TO trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZZ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -15.11, whereas U-UN.TO's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, AZZ.TO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to U-UN.TO's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, AZZ.TO is more volatile compared to U-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZZ.TO.
AZZ.TO vs NXE.TO Comparison
AZZ.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZZ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, NXE.TO has a market cap of 4.30B. Regarding current trading prices, AZZ.TO is priced at $0.71, while NXE.TO trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZZ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -15.11, whereas NXE.TO's P/E ratio is -44.41. In terms of profitability, AZZ.TO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NXE.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AZZ.TO is more volatile compared to NXE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZZ.TO.
AZZ.TO vs DML.TO Comparison
AZZ.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZZ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, DML.TO has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, AZZ.TO is priced at $0.71, while DML.TO trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZZ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -15.11, whereas DML.TO's P/E ratio is -15.92. In terms of profitability, AZZ.TO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DML.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AZZ.TO is more volatile compared to DML.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZZ.TO.
AZZ.TO vs EFR.TO Comparison
AZZ.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZZ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, EFR.TO has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, AZZ.TO is priced at $0.71, while EFR.TO trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZZ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -15.11, whereas EFR.TO's P/E ratio is -10.42. In terms of profitability, AZZ.TO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EFR.TO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AZZ.TO is more volatile compared to EFR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZZ.TO.
AZZ.TO vs FCU.TO Comparison
AZZ.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZZ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, FCU.TO has a market cap of 618.31M. Regarding current trading prices, AZZ.TO is priced at $0.71, while FCU.TO trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZZ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -15.11, whereas FCU.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, AZZ.TO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FCU.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AZZ.TO is more volatile compared to FCU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZZ.TO.
AZZ.TO vs URE.TO Comparison
AZZ.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZZ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, URE.TO has a market cap of 361.17M. Regarding current trading prices, AZZ.TO is priced at $0.71, while URE.TO trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZZ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -15.11, whereas URE.TO's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, AZZ.TO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to URE.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AZZ.TO is more volatile compared to URE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZZ.TO.
AZZ.TO vs URC.TO Comparison
AZZ.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZZ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, URC.TO has a market cap of 359.48M. Regarding current trading prices, AZZ.TO is priced at $0.71, while URC.TO trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZZ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -15.11, whereas URC.TO's P/E ratio is 67.25. In terms of profitability, AZZ.TO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to URC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AZZ.TO is more volatile compared to URC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZZ.TO.
AZZ.TO vs MGA.TO Comparison
AZZ.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZZ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, MGA.TO has a market cap of 96.71M. Regarding current trading prices, AZZ.TO is priced at $0.71, while MGA.TO trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZZ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -15.11, whereas MGA.TO's P/E ratio is -5.20. In terms of profitability, AZZ.TO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MGA.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AZZ.TO is more volatile compared to MGA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZZ.TO.
AZZ.TO vs LUR.CN Comparison
AZZ.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZZ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, LUR.CN has a market cap of 55.47M. Regarding current trading prices, AZZ.TO is priced at $0.71, while LUR.CN trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZZ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -15.11, whereas LUR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, AZZ.TO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LUR.CN's ROE of -7.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AZZ.TO is more volatile compared to LUR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZZ.TO.
AZZ.TO vs WUC.CN Comparison
AZZ.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZZ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, WUC.CN has a market cap of 49.29M. Regarding current trading prices, AZZ.TO is priced at $0.71, while WUC.CN trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZZ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -15.11, whereas WUC.CN's P/E ratio is -3.46. In terms of profitability, AZZ.TO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WUC.CN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AZZ.TO is more volatile compared to WUC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZZ.TO.
AZZ.TO vs CAKE.CN Comparison
AZZ.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZZ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, CAKE.CN has a market cap of 26.24M. Regarding current trading prices, AZZ.TO is priced at $0.71, while CAKE.CN trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZZ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -15.11, whereas CAKE.CN's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, AZZ.TO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CAKE.CN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AZZ.TO is more volatile compared to CAKE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZZ.TO.
AZZ.TO vs API.CN Comparison
AZZ.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZZ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, API.CN has a market cap of 14.53M. Regarding current trading prices, AZZ.TO is priced at $0.71, while API.CN trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZZ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -15.11, whereas API.CN's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, AZZ.TO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to API.CN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AZZ.TO is more volatile compared to API.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZZ.TO.
AZZ.TO vs GREN.CN Comparison
AZZ.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZZ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, GREN.CN has a market cap of 6.41M. Regarding current trading prices, AZZ.TO is priced at $0.71, while GREN.CN trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZZ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -15.11, whereas GREN.CN's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, AZZ.TO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GREN.CN's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, AZZ.TO is more volatile compared to GREN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZZ.TO.
AZZ.TO vs OBRN.CN Comparison
AZZ.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZZ.TO stands at N/A. In comparison, OBRN.CN has a market cap of 928989.00. Regarding current trading prices, AZZ.TO is priced at $0.71, while OBRN.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZZ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -15.11, whereas OBRN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, AZZ.TO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OBRN.CN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AZZ.TO is less volatile compared to OBRN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZZ.TO.