AMAYA Global Holdings Corp.
AMAYA Global Holdings Corp. (AYAG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AYAG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consulting Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AYAG | $3.00 | +0.00% | 423M | 4.29 | $0.70 | N/A |
| EXPGY | $34.82 | +0.06% | 32.1B | 23.71 | $1.48 | +1.81% |
| EXPGF | $34.66 | +0.92% | 31.7B | 23.90 | $1.45 | +1.83% |
| SGSOF | $125.00 | +0.00% | 24.1B | 30.56 | $4.09 | +2.90% |
| SGSOY | $12.08 | +0.00% | 23.3B | 26.84 | $0.45 | +3.19% |
| BVVBY | $64.85 | +0.00% | 14.5B | 18.94 | $3.44 | +3.26% |
| BVRDF | $32.23 | -2.76% | 14.3B | 18.74 | $1.72 | +3.29% |
| CPBLF | $16.10 | +0.00% | 8.2B | 42.37 | $0.38 | +1.69% |
| BYCRF | $42.33 | +0.00% | 6.4B | 29.19 | $1.45 | +1.39% |
| DKSHF | $70.01 | +0.00% | 4.5B | 17.95 | $3.90 | +3.81% |
Stock Comparison
AYAG vs EXPGY Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, EXPGY has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while EXPGY trades at $34.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas EXPGY's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EXPGY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG is less volatile compared to EXPGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYAG.Check EXPGY's competition here
AYAG vs EXPGF Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, EXPGF has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while EXPGF trades at $34.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas EXPGF's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EXPGF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG and EXPGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EXPGF's competition here
AYAG vs SGSOF Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, SGSOF has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while SGSOF trades at $125.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas SGSOF's P/E ratio is 30.56. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SGSOF's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG and SGSOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGSOF's competition here
AYAG vs SGSOY Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, SGSOY has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while SGSOY trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas SGSOY's P/E ratio is 26.84. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SGSOY's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG is less volatile compared to SGSOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYAG.Check SGSOY's competition here
AYAG vs BVVBY Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, BVVBY has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while BVVBY trades at $64.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas BVVBY's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BVVBY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG is less volatile compared to BVVBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYAG.Check BVVBY's competition here
AYAG vs BVRDF Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, BVRDF has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while BVRDF trades at $32.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas BVRDF's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BVRDF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG and BVRDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BVRDF's competition here
AYAG vs CPBLF Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, CPBLF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while CPBLF trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas CPBLF's P/E ratio is 42.37. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CPBLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG and CPBLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CPBLF's competition here
AYAG vs BYCRF Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, BYCRF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while BYCRF trades at $42.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas BYCRF's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BYCRF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG and BYCRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BYCRF's competition here
AYAG vs DKSHF Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, DKSHF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while DKSHF trades at $70.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas DKSHF's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DKSHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG and DKSHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DKSHF's competition here
AYAG vs IPSOF Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, IPSOF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while IPSOF trades at $65.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas IPSOF's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IPSOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG is less volatile compared to IPSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYAG.Check IPSOF's competition here
AYAG vs WPFH Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, WPFH has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while WPFH trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas WPFH's P/E ratio is -4.36. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WPFH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG is less volatile compared to WPFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYAG.Check WPFH's competition here
AYAG vs BGPBF Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, BGPBF has a market cap of 433M. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while BGPBF trades at $23.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas BGPBF's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BGPBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG and BGPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BGPBF's competition here
AYAG vs RCDOF Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, RCDOF has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while RCDOF trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas RCDOF's P/E ratio is -274.20. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RCDOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG is less volatile compared to RCDOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYAG.Check RCDOF's competition here
AYAG vs GLCP Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, GLCP has a market cap of 154.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while GLCP trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas GLCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GLCP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG and GLCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLCP's competition here
AYAG vs EUBG Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, EUBG has a market cap of 124M. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while EUBG trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas EUBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EUBG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG is less volatile compared to EUBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYAG.Check EUBG's competition here
AYAG vs FLCX Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, FLCX has a market cap of 74.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while FLCX trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas FLCX's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FLCX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG and FLCX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FLCX's competition here
AYAG vs KMNCF Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, KMNCF has a market cap of 70.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while KMNCF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas KMNCF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KMNCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG and KMNCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KMNCF's competition here
AYAG vs MANOF Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, MANOF has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while MANOF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas MANOF's P/E ratio is 38.00. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MANOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG and MANOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MANOF's competition here
AYAG vs DFCO Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, DFCO has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while DFCO trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas DFCO's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DFCO's ROE of +2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG is less volatile compared to DFCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYAG.Check DFCO's competition here
AYAG vs GPLS Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, GPLS has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while GPLS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas GPLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GPLS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG and GPLS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GPLS's competition here
AYAG vs GTVH Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, GTVH has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while GTVH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas GTVH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GTVH's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG is less volatile compared to GTVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYAG.Check GTVH's competition here
AYAG vs AIMH Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, AIMH has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while AIMH trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas AIMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AIMH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG is less volatile compared to AIMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYAG.Check AIMH's competition here
AYAG vs INTO Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, INTO has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while INTO trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas INTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to INTO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG and INTO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INTO's competition here
AYAG vs VIZC Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, VIZC has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while VIZC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas VIZC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VIZC's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG and VIZC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VIZC's competition here
AYAG vs BLDV Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, BLDV has a market cap of 974.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while BLDV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas BLDV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BLDV's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG is less volatile compared to BLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYAG.Check BLDV's competition here
AYAG vs QPRC Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, QPRC has a market cap of 693.7K. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while QPRC trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas QPRC's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to QPRC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG and QPRC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QPRC's competition here
AYAG vs ADHC Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, ADHC has a market cap of 620.3K. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while ADHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas ADHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ADHC's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG is less volatile compared to ADHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYAG.Check ADHC's competition here
AYAG vs AERS Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, AERS has a market cap of 539.5K. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while AERS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas AERS's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AERS's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG and AERS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AERS's competition here
AYAG vs ENCC Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, ENCC has a market cap of 447.8K. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while ENCC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas ENCC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ENCC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG is less volatile compared to ENCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYAG.Check ENCC's competition here
AYAG vs SGDH Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, SGDH has a market cap of 247.9K. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while SGDH trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas SGDH's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SGDH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG is less volatile compared to SGDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYAG.Check SGDH's competition here
AYAG vs DCAC Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, DCAC has a market cap of 174.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while DCAC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas DCAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DCAC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG and DCAC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DCAC's competition here
AYAG vs MRDH Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, MRDH has a market cap of 172.8K. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while MRDH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas MRDH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MRDH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG and MRDH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MRDH's competition here
AYAG vs LGBS Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, LGBS has a market cap of 140.4K. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while LGBS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas LGBS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LGBS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG and LGBS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LGBS's competition here
AYAG vs PCHK Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, PCHK has a market cap of 120K. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while PCHK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas PCHK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PCHK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG and PCHK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PCHK's competition here
AYAG vs SYNJ Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, SYNJ has a market cap of 101.9K. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while SYNJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas SYNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SYNJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG is less volatile compared to SYNJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYAG.Check SYNJ's competition here
AYAG vs DEQI Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, DEQI has a market cap of 92.8K. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while DEQI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas DEQI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DEQI's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG and DEQI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DEQI's competition here
AYAG vs MSYN Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, MSYN has a market cap of 87.5K. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while MSYN trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas MSYN's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MSYN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG is less volatile compared to MSYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYAG.Check MSYN's competition here
AYAG vs ITEC Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, ITEC has a market cap of 72K. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while ITEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas ITEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ITEC's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG is less volatile compared to ITEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYAG.Check ITEC's competition here
AYAG vs CSLI Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, CSLI has a market cap of 64.9K. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while CSLI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas CSLI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CSLI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG and CSLI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSLI's competition here
AYAG vs AMMJ Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, AMMJ has a market cap of 55.7K. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while AMMJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas AMMJ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AMMJ's ROE of -3.91%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG and AMMJ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMMJ's competition here
AYAG vs STWC Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, STWC has a market cap of 35.4K. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while STWC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas STWC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to STWC's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG is less volatile compared to STWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AYAG.Check STWC's competition here
AYAG vs FUGI Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, FUGI has a market cap of 24.3K. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while FUGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas FUGI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FUGI's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG and FUGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FUGI's competition here
AYAG vs HDST Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, HDST has a market cap of 141. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while HDST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas HDST's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HDST's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG and HDST have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HDST's competition here
AYAG vs ISAT Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, ISAT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while ISAT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas ISAT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ISAT's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG and ISAT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ISAT's competition here
AYAG vs GLSEF Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, GLSEF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while GLSEF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas GLSEF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GLSEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG and GLSEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLSEF's competition here
AYAG vs RPSGF Comparison February 2026
AYAG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AYAG stands at 423M. In comparison, RPSGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AYAG is priced at $3.00, while RPSGF trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AYAG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.29, whereas RPSGF's P/E ratio is 62.25. In terms of profitability, AYAG's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RPSGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AYAG and RPSGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RPSGF's competition here