Aurelius Minerals Inc.
Aurelius Minerals Inc. AURQF Peers
See (AURQF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AURQF | $0.00 | N/A | 1.1B | -0.01 | -$0.10 | N/A |
| ZIJMF | $2.58 | -1.15% | 72.9B | 13.58 | $0.19 | +2.05% |
| OPYGY | $21.00 | N/A | 28.4B | 2.50 | $8.39 | +4.14% |
| NESRF | $15.27 | +9.49% | 21.8B | 28.82 | $0.53 | +1.39% |
| GFIOF | $24.03 | N/A | 21.5B | 17.41 | $1.38 | +2.27% |
| NSTYY | $12.40 | +25.38% | 14.3B | 33.51 | $0.37 | +1.41% |
| HCHDY | $27.14 | N/A | 14B | 12.92 | $2.10 | N/A |
| NCMGY | $15.59 | +2.84% | 13.9B | 17.92 | $0.87 | N/A |
| NCMGF | $15.20 | -2.53% | 13.6B | 17.47 | $0.87 | N/A |
| LUGDF | $54.11 | +0.80% | 13.1B | 24.37 | $2.22 | +2.91% |
Stock Comparison
AURQF vs ZIJMF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ZIJMF has a market cap of 72.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while ZIJMF trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ZIJMF's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to ZIJMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to ZIJMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs OPYGY Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, OPYGY has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while OPYGY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OPYGY's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to OPYGY's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF and OPYGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AURQF vs NESRF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NESRF has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while NESRF trades at $15.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NESRF's P/E ratio is 28.82. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to NESRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to NESRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs GFIOF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GFIOF has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while GFIOF trades at $24.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GFIOF's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to GFIOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to GFIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs NSTYY Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NSTYY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while NSTYY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NSTYY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to NSTYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF and NSTYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AURQF vs HCHDY Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HCHDY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while HCHDY trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HCHDY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to HCHDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF and HCHDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AURQF vs NCMGY Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NCMGY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while NCMGY trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NCMGY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to NCMGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to NCMGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs NCMGF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NCMGF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while NCMGF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NCMGF's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to NCMGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to NCMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs LUGDF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, LUGDF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while LUGDF trades at $54.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LUGDF's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to LUGDF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to LUGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs CAHPF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CAHPF has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while CAHPF trades at $6.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CAHPF's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to CAHPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to CAHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs KOZAY Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KOZAY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while KOZAY trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KOZAY's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to KOZAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to KOZAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs HGMCF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HGMCF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while HGMCF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HGMCF's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to HGMCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF and HGMCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AURQF vs ZHAOF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ZHAOF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while ZHAOF trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ZHAOF's P/E ratio is 50.40. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to ZHAOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to ZHAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs EDVMF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EDVMF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while EDVMF trades at $32.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EDVMF's P/E ratio is -79.37. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to EDVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to EDVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs AULGF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AULGF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while AULGF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AULGF's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to AULGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF and AULGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AURQF vs SBYSF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SBYSF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while SBYSF trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SBYSF's P/E ratio is -12.64. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to SBYSF's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF and SBYSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AURQF vs ARGTF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ARGTF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while ARGTF trades at $19.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ARGTF's P/E ratio is -279.07. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to ARGTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to ARGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs DGMLF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DGMLF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while DGMLF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DGMLF's P/E ratio is -154.50. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to DGMLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to DGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs OCANF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, OCANF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while OCANF trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OCANF's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to OCANF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to OCANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs ZIJMY Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ZIJMY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while ZIJMY trades at $51.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ZIJMY's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to ZIJMY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to ZIJMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs PMNXF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PMNXF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while PMNXF trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PMNXF's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to PMNXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to PMNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs TORXF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TORXF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while TORXF trades at $35.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TORXF's P/E ratio is 23.76. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to TORXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to TORXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs GRLGF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GRLGF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while GRLGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GRLGF's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to GRLGF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF and GRLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AURQF vs KNTNF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KNTNF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while KNTNF trades at $11.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KNTNF's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to KNTNF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to KNTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs ELKMF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ELKMF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while ELKMF trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ELKMF's P/E ratio is 27.33. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to ELKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to ELKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs DPMLF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DPMLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while DPMLF trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DPMLF's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to DPMLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to DPMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs CRNLF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CRNLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while CRNLF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CRNLF's P/E ratio is 46.15. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to CRNLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF and CRNLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AURQF vs RGRNF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RGRNF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while RGRNF trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RGRNF's P/E ratio is -331.00. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to RGRNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to RGRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs GSISF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GSISF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while GSISF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GSISF's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to GSISF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF and GSISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AURQF vs WDOFF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WDOFF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while WDOFF trades at $14.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WDOFF's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to WDOFF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to WDOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs CELTF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CELTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while CELTF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CELTF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to CELTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF and CELTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AURQF vs RMLRF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RMLRF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while RMLRF trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RMLRF's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to RMLRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF and RMLRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AURQF vs REDLF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, REDLF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while REDLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas REDLF's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to REDLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to REDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs ORAAF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ORAAF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while ORAAF trades at $27.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ORAAF's P/E ratio is -21.02. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to ORAAF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to ORAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs CXBMF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CXBMF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while CXBMF trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CXBMF's P/E ratio is 31.86. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to CXBMF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to CXBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs WFRSF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WFRSF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while WFRSF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WFRSF's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to WFRSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF and WFRSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AURQF vs EOGSF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EOGSF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while EOGSF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EOGSF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to EOGSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to EOGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs HCHDF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HCHDF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while HCHDF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HCHDF's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to HCHDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to HCHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs DRDGF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DRDGF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while DRDGF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DRDGF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to DRDGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to DRDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs OBNNF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, OBNNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while OBNNF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OBNNF's P/E ratio is -351.00. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to OBNNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to OBNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs PAFRF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PAFRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while PAFRF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PAFRF's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to PAFRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to PAFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs MWSNF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MWSNF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while MWSNF trades at $4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MWSNF's P/E ratio is -79.46. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to MWSNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to MWSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs MAUTF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MAUTF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while MAUTF trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MAUTF's P/E ratio is -15.18. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to MAUTF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to MAUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs RUPRF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RUPRF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while RUPRF trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RUPRF's P/E ratio is -214.50. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to RUPRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to RUPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs SNWGF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SNWGF has a market cap of 931.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while SNWGF trades at $5.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SNWGF's P/E ratio is -41.36. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to SNWGF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to SNWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs SVLKF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SVLKF has a market cap of 927.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while SVLKF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SVLKF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to SVLKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF and SVLKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AURQF vs BELGF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BELGF has a market cap of 924M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while BELGF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BELGF's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to BELGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF and BELGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AURQF vs SGSVF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SGSVF has a market cap of 880.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while SGSVF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SGSVF's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to SGSVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to SGSVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs KRRGF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KRRGF has a market cap of 862.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while KRRGF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KRRGF's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to KRRGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to KRRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs RMGGF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RMGGF has a market cap of 787.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while RMGGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RMGGF's P/E ratio is -37.00. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to RMGGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF and RMGGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AURQF vs PDIYF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PDIYF has a market cap of 694.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while PDIYF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PDIYF's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to PDIYF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to PDIYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs WTGRF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WTGRF has a market cap of 677.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while WTGRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WTGRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to WTGRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to WTGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs RGDFF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RGDFF has a market cap of 676.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while RGDFF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RGDFF's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to RGDFF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to RGDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs RMGGY Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RMGGY has a market cap of 608.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while RMGGY trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RMGGY's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to RMGGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to RMGGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs MNSAF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MNSAF has a market cap of 563.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while MNSAF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MNSAF's P/E ratio is 5.22. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to MNSAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to MNSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs ORZCF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ORZCF has a market cap of 546.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while ORZCF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ORZCF's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to ORZCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to ORZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs GUYGF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GUYGF has a market cap of 545.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while GUYGF trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GUYGF's P/E ratio is -75.67. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to GUYGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to GUYGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs ASGOF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ASGOF has a market cap of 544.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while ASGOF trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ASGOF's P/E ratio is -7.76. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to ASGOF's ROE of -22.71%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to ASGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs NVMLF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NVMLF has a market cap of 512.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while NVMLF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NVMLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to NVMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to NVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs ECRTF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ECRTF has a market cap of 483.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while ECRTF trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ECRTF's P/E ratio is -10.81. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to ECRTF's ROE of -6.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to ECRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs RSRBF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RSRBF has a market cap of 480.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while RSRBF trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RSRBF's P/E ratio is 83.04. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to RSRBF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF and RSRBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AURQF vs ARNGF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ARNGF has a market cap of 468.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while ARNGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ARNGF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to ARNGF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to ARNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs RIOFF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RIOFF has a market cap of 414.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while RIOFF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RIOFF's P/E ratio is 97.60. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to RIOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to RIOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs THXPF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, THXPF has a market cap of 398.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while THXPF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas THXPF's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to THXPF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF and THXPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AURQF vs LMGDF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, LMGDF has a market cap of 382.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while LMGDF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LMGDF's P/E ratio is -7.03. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to LMGDF's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to LMGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs PROBF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PROBF has a market cap of 371.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while PROBF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PROBF's P/E ratio is -15.17. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to PROBF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to PROBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs RMLFF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RMLFF has a market cap of 369.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while RMLFF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RMLFF's P/E ratio is -7.49. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to RMLFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to RMLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs MNDJF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MNDJF has a market cap of 366M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while MNDJF trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MNDJF's P/E ratio is 6.55. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to MNDJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to MNDJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs KSKGF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KSKGF has a market cap of 360.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while KSKGF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KSKGF's P/E ratio is 2.55. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to KSKGF's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to KSKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs TPRXF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TPRXF has a market cap of 343.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while TPRXF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TPRXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to TPRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to TPRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs MAKOF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MAKOF has a market cap of 311.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while MAKOF trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MAKOF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to MAKOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to MAKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs ALKEF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ALKEF has a market cap of 300.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while ALKEF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ALKEF's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to ALKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to ALKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs FDMIF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FDMIF has a market cap of 294M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while FDMIF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FDMIF's P/E ratio is -30.88. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to FDMIF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to FDMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs OGNRF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, OGNRF has a market cap of 288.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while OGNRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OGNRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to OGNRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to OGNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs ELEMF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ELEMF has a market cap of 282.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while ELEMF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ELEMF's P/E ratio is 57.50. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to ELEMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to ELEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs MGDPF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MGDPF has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while MGDPF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MGDPF's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to MGDPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to MGDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs OSIIF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, OSIIF has a market cap of 254.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while OSIIF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OSIIF's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to OSIIF's ROE of +4.74%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF and OSIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AURQF vs ERRSF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ERRSF has a market cap of 250.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while ERRSF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ERRSF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to ERRSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to ERRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs STPGF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, STPGF has a market cap of 248.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while STPGF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas STPGF's P/E ratio is 5.18. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to STPGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to STPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs OMGGF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, OMGGF has a market cap of 245.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while OMGGF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OMGGF's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to OMGGF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to OMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs HSTXF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HSTXF has a market cap of 229.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while HSTXF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HSTXF's P/E ratio is 3.82. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to HSTXF's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to HSTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs WRLGF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WRLGF has a market cap of 228.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while WRLGF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WRLGF's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to WRLGF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to WRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs STBMF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, STBMF has a market cap of 227.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while STBMF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas STBMF's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to STBMF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF and STBMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AURQF vs JAGGF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, JAGGF has a market cap of 226.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while JAGGF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas JAGGF's P/E ratio is -35.75. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to JAGGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to JAGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs GDRZF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GDRZF has a market cap of 220.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while GDRZF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GDRZF's P/E ratio is -19.50. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to GDRZF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to GDRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs SRBIF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SRBIF has a market cap of 214.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while SRBIF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SRBIF's P/E ratio is 5.33. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to SRBIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to SRBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs AGXKF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AGXKF has a market cap of 196.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while AGXKF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AGXKF's P/E ratio is -11.47. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to AGXKF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to AGXKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs SAAGF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SAAGF has a market cap of 193.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while SAAGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SAAGF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to SAAGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF and SAAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AURQF vs CNLMF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CNLMF has a market cap of 193.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while CNLMF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CNLMF's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to CNLMF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to CNLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs DCCNF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DCCNF has a market cap of 182.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while DCCNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DCCNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to DCCNF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF and DCCNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AURQF vs THSGF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, THSGF has a market cap of 182.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while THSGF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas THSGF's P/E ratio is 38.50. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to THSGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to THSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs CNMXF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CNMXF has a market cap of 179.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while CNMXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CNMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to CNMXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to CNMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs MAIFF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MAIFF has a market cap of 178M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while MAIFF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MAIFF's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to MAIFF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to MAIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs GGAZF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GGAZF has a market cap of 157.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while GGAZF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GGAZF's P/E ratio is -7.30. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to GGAZF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to GGAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs FFMGF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FFMGF has a market cap of 156.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while FFMGF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FFMGF's P/E ratio is -14.49. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to FFMGF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to FFMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs EEYMF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EEYMF has a market cap of 156.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while EEYMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EEYMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to EEYMF's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF and EEYMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AURQF vs SITKF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SITKF has a market cap of 148.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while SITKF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SITKF's P/E ratio is -41.25. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to SITKF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to SITKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.
AURQF vs NVOOF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NVOOF has a market cap of 142.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while NVOOF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NVOOF's P/E ratio is -10.64. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to NVOOF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF and NVOOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AURQF vs DNGDF Comparison
AURQF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AURQF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DNGDF has a market cap of 141.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AURQF is priced at $0.00, while DNGDF trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AURQF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DNGDF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, AURQF's ROE is -2.20%, compared to DNGDF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AURQF is less volatile compared to DNGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURQF.