Aura Energy Limited

AURA.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AURA.L stands at 79.1M. In comparison, KAP.IL has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AURA.L is priced at £8.00, while KAP.IL trades at £43.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AURA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas KAP.IL's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, AURA.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KAP.IL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AURA.L is more volatile compared to KAP.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURA.L.

AURA.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AURA.L stands at 79.1M. In comparison, KAP.L has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AURA.L is priced at £8.00, while KAP.L trades at £38.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AURA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas KAP.L's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, AURA.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KAP.L's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AURA.L is more volatile compared to KAP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURA.L.

AURA.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AURA.L stands at 79.1M. In comparison, YCA.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AURA.L is priced at £8.00, while YCA.L trades at £523.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AURA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas YCA.L's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, AURA.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to YCA.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AURA.L is more volatile compared to YCA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURA.L.

AURA.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AURA.L stands at 79.1M. In comparison, BKY.L has a market cap of 127.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AURA.L is priced at £8.00, while BKY.L trades at £28.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AURA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas BKY.L's P/E ratio is 4.07. In terms of profitability, AURA.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BKY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AURA.L is more volatile compared to BKY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURA.L.

AURA.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AURA.L stands at 79.1M. In comparison, NEO.L has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, AURA.L is priced at £8.00, while NEO.L trades at £0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AURA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -8.00, whereas NEO.L's P/E ratio is 0.68. In terms of profitability, AURA.L's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NEO.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AURA.L is less volatile compared to NEO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AURA.L.