ATWEC Technologies, Inc.
ATWEC Technologies, Inc. (ATWT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ATWT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Security & Protection Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATWT | $0.00 | +0.00% | 480.3K | -0.35 | -$0.00 | N/A |
| ASAZY | $17.04 | +0.88% | 38.1B | 25.01 | $0.68 | +1.66% |
| ASAZF | $33.72 | -2.03% | 35.5B | 24.61 | $1.37 | +1.64% |
| SOMLF | $36.00 | +0.00% | 15B | 20.45 | $1.76 | +1.84% |
| SCTBY | $14.88 | +3.55% | 8.9B | 15.03 | $0.99 | +2.69% |
| SCTBF | $15.35 | +0.00% | 8.4B | 15.66 | $0.98 | +2.63% |
| SOMLY | $9.10 | -1.09% | 7.6B | 20.65 | $0.44 | +1.00% |
| LOIMF | $39.51 | +0.00% | 2.6B | 16.00 | $2.47 | +3.65% |
| SOHGF | $5.31 | +0.00% | 2.6B | 17.70 | $0.30 | N/A |
| MRLWF | $5.85 | -0.85% | 459.4M | 83.57 | $0.07 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ATWT vs ASAZY Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, ASAZY has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while ASAZY trades at $17.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas ASAZY's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to ASAZY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT is less volatile compared to ASAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATWT.Check ASAZY's competition here
ATWT vs ASAZF Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, ASAZF has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while ASAZF trades at $33.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas ASAZF's P/E ratio is 24.61. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to ASAZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT is less volatile compared to ASAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATWT.Check ASAZF's competition here
ATWT vs SOMLF Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, SOMLF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while SOMLF trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas SOMLF's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to SOMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT and SOMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOMLF's competition here
ATWT vs SCTBY Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, SCTBY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while SCTBY trades at $14.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas SCTBY's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to SCTBY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT and SCTBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCTBY's competition here
ATWT vs SCTBF Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, SCTBF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while SCTBF trades at $15.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas SCTBF's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to SCTBF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT and SCTBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCTBF's competition here
ATWT vs SOMLY Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, SOMLY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while SOMLY trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas SOMLY's P/E ratio is 20.65. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to SOMLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT is less volatile compared to SOMLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATWT.Check SOMLY's competition here
ATWT vs LOIMF Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, LOIMF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while LOIMF trades at $39.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas LOIMF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to LOIMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT and LOIMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LOIMF's competition here
ATWT vs SOHGF Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, SOHGF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while SOHGF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas SOHGF's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to SOHGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT is less volatile compared to SOHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATWT.Check SOHGF's competition here
ATWT vs MRLWF Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, MRLWF has a market cap of 459.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while MRLWF trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas MRLWF's P/E ratio is 83.57. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to MRLWF's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT and MRLWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MRLWF's competition here
ATWT vs CRFQF Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, CRFQF has a market cap of 223.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while CRFQF trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas CRFQF's P/E ratio is 233.00. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to CRFQF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT is less volatile compared to CRFQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATWT.Check CRFQF's competition here
ATWT vs ICTSF Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, ICTSF has a market cap of 147.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while ICTSF trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas ICTSF's P/E ratio is -35.73. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to ICTSF's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT is less volatile compared to ICTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATWT.Check ICTSF's competition here
ATWT vs GKPRF Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, GKPRF has a market cap of 91.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while GKPRF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas GKPRF's P/E ratio is -97.00. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to GKPRF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT is less volatile compared to GKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATWT.Check GKPRF's competition here
ATWT vs RSKIA Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, RSKIA has a market cap of 76.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while RSKIA trades at $15.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas RSKIA's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to RSKIA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT and RSKIA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RSKIA's competition here
ATWT vs WPNNF Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, WPNNF has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while WPNNF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas WPNNF's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to WPNNF's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT is less volatile compared to WPNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATWT.Check WPNNF's competition here
ATWT vs SECUF Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, SECUF has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while SECUF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas SECUF's P/E ratio is -181.04. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to SECUF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT and SECUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SECUF's competition here
ATWT vs PRBCF Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, PRBCF has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while PRBCF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas PRBCF's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to PRBCF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT is less volatile compared to PRBCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATWT.Check PRBCF's competition here
ATWT vs CSTI Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, CSTI has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while CSTI trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas CSTI's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to CSTI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT is less volatile compared to CSTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATWT.Check CSTI's competition here
ATWT vs LDDFF Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, LDDFF has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while LDDFF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas LDDFF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to LDDFF's ROE of +5.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT is less volatile compared to LDDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATWT.Check LDDFF's competition here
ATWT vs VOTDF Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, VOTDF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while VOTDF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas VOTDF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to VOTDF's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT is less volatile compared to VOTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATWT.Check VOTDF's competition here
ATWT vs DADTF Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, DADTF has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while DADTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas DADTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to DADTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT and DADTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DADTF's competition here
ATWT vs PLRTF Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, PLRTF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while PLRTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas PLRTF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to PLRTF's ROE of +5.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT is less volatile compared to PLRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATWT.Check PLRTF's competition here
ATWT vs DTII Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, DTII has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while DTII trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas DTII's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to DTII's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT is less volatile compared to DTII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATWT.Check DTII's competition here
ATWT vs IWAL Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, IWAL has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while IWAL trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas IWAL's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to IWAL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT is less volatile compared to IWAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATWT.Check IWAL's competition here
ATWT vs DIGTF Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, DIGTF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while DIGTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas DIGTF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to DIGTF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT is less volatile compared to DIGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATWT.Check DIGTF's competition here
ATWT vs PTEFF Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, PTEFF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while PTEFF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas PTEFF's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to PTEFF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT is less volatile compared to PTEFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATWT.Check PTEFF's competition here
ATWT vs SSECF Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, SSECF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while SSECF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas SSECF's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to SSECF's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT and SSECF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SSECF's competition here
ATWT vs MACE Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, MACE has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while MACE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas MACE's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to MACE's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT is less volatile compared to MACE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATWT.Check MACE's competition here
ATWT vs ARGL Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, ARGL has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while ARGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas ARGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to ARGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT and ARGL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARGL's competition here
ATWT vs DRNG Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, DRNG has a market cap of 783.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while DRNG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas DRNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to DRNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT is less volatile compared to DRNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATWT.Check DRNG's competition here
ATWT vs WCCP Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, WCCP has a market cap of 719.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while WCCP trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas WCCP's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to WCCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT is less volatile compared to WCCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATWT.Check WCCP's competition here
ATWT vs VCON Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, VCON has a market cap of 570.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while VCON trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas VCON's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to VCON's ROE of -4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT is less volatile compared to VCON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATWT.Check VCON's competition here
ATWT vs LGTT Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, LGTT has a market cap of 384.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while LGTT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas LGTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to LGTT's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT and LGTT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LGTT's competition here
ATWT vs BLPG Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, BLPG has a market cap of 371.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while BLPG trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas BLPG's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to BLPG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT and BLPG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BLPG's competition here
ATWT vs VSYS Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, VSYS has a market cap of 171.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while VSYS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas VSYS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to VSYS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT and VSYS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VSYS's competition here
ATWT vs PSGI Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, PSGI has a market cap of 138K. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while PSGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas PSGI's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to PSGI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT and PSGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PSGI's competition here
ATWT vs SCTY Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, SCTY has a market cap of 112.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while SCTY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas SCTY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to SCTY's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT and SCTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCTY's competition here
ATWT vs GDSI Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, GDSI has a market cap of 95.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while GDSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas GDSI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to GDSI's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT and GDSI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GDSI's competition here
ATWT vs HCGS Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, HCGS has a market cap of 77.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while HCGS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas HCGS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to HCGS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT is less volatile compared to HCGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATWT.Check HCGS's competition here
ATWT vs MIHL Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, MIHL has a market cap of 75.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while MIHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas MIHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to MIHL's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT and MIHL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MIHL's competition here
ATWT vs MGNT Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, MGNT has a market cap of 50K. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while MGNT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas MGNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to MGNT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT and MGNT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MGNT's competition here
ATWT vs ABPR Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, ABPR has a market cap of 49.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while ABPR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas ABPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to ABPR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT and ABPR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABPR's competition here
ATWT vs WOAM Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, WOAM has a market cap of 32.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while WOAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas WOAM's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to WOAM's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT and WOAM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WOAM's competition here
ATWT vs PERL Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, PERL has a market cap of 28.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while PERL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas PERL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to PERL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT and PERL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PERL's competition here
ATWT vs ALXXF Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, ALXXF has a market cap of 26.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while ALXXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas ALXXF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to ALXXF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT is less volatile compared to ALXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATWT.Check ALXXF's competition here
ATWT vs EKCS Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, EKCS has a market cap of 21.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while EKCS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas EKCS's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to EKCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT is less volatile compared to EKCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATWT.Check EKCS's competition here
ATWT vs EBWK Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, EBWK has a market cap of 13.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while EBWK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas EBWK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to EBWK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT and EBWK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EBWK's competition here
ATWT vs SKVY Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, SKVY has a market cap of 12.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while SKVY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas SKVY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to SKVY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT and SKVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKVY's competition here
ATWT vs HWSY Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, HWSY has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while HWSY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas HWSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to HWSY's ROE of +2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT and HWSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HWSY's competition here
ATWT vs CVAS Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, CVAS has a market cap of 7.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while CVAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas CVAS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to CVAS's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT and CVAS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CVAS's competition here
ATWT vs DIRV Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, DIRV has a market cap of 224. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while DIRV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas DIRV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to DIRV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT and DIRV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DIRV's competition here
ATWT vs PWLK Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, PWLK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while PWLK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas PWLK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to PWLK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT and PWLK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PWLK's competition here
ATWT vs VSYM Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, VSYM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while VSYM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas VSYM's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to VSYM's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT and VSYM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VSYM's competition here
ATWT vs HLCN Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, HLCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while HLCN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas HLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to HLCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT and HLCN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HLCN's competition here
ATWT vs GTKP Comparison July 2025
ATWT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATWT stands at 480.3K. In comparison, GTKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATWT is priced at $0.00, while GTKP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATWT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas GTKP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATWT's ROE is -1.37%, compared to GTKP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATWT and GTKP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GTKP's competition here