Altius Renewable Royalties Corp.
Altius Renewable Royalties Corp. (ATRWF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ATRWF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Renewable Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATRWF | $8.50 | N/A | 262.5M | -425.00 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| FOJCY | $3.60 | -5.26% | 82.1B | 13.07 | $0.28 | +12.13% |
| CZAVF | $60.10 | +0.00% | 32.3B | 23.12 | $2.60 | +3.69% |
| OEZVF | $78.47 | +0.00% | 27.3B | 13.14 | $5.97 | +4.05% |
| OEZVY | $15.39 | -2.22% | 26.5B | 13.19 | $1.19 | +4.09% |
| DOGEF | $47.58 | -0.72% | 20B | 116.04 | $0.41 | N/A |
| DNNGY | $15.80 | -1.92% | 20B | 113.21 | $0.14 | N/A |
| TKECY | $4.00 | +0.00% | 19.7B | 18.18 | $0.22 | N/A |
| CEZYY | $18.00 | -0.28% | 19.3B | 15.65 | $1.15 | N/A |
| FOJCF | $19.30 | +0.00% | 17.3B | 14.09 | $1.37 | +11.31% |
Stock Comparison
ATRWF vs FOJCY Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, FOJCY has a market cap of 82.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while FOJCY trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas FOJCY's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FOJCY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to FOJCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check FOJCY's competition here
ATRWF vs CZAVF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, CZAVF has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while CZAVF trades at $60.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas CZAVF's P/E ratio is 23.12. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CZAVF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to CZAVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check CZAVF's competition here
ATRWF vs OEZVF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, OEZVF has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while OEZVF trades at $78.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas OEZVF's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to OEZVF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to OEZVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check OEZVF's competition here
ATRWF vs OEZVY Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, OEZVY has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while OEZVY trades at $15.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas OEZVY's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to OEZVY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and OEZVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OEZVY's competition here
ATRWF vs DOGEF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, DOGEF has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while DOGEF trades at $47.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas DOGEF's P/E ratio is 116.04. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DOGEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and DOGEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DOGEF's competition here
ATRWF vs DNNGY Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, DNNGY has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while DNNGY trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas DNNGY's P/E ratio is 113.21. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DNNGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to DNNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check DNNGY's competition here
ATRWF vs TKECY Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, TKECY has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while TKECY trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas TKECY's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TKECY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to TKECY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check TKECY's competition here
ATRWF vs CEZYY Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, CEZYY has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while CEZYY trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas CEZYY's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CEZYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and CEZYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CEZYY's competition here
ATRWF vs FOJCF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, FOJCF has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while FOJCF trades at $19.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas FOJCF's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FOJCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to FOJCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check FOJCF's competition here
ATRWF vs CLPXF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, CLPXF has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while CLPXF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas CLPXF's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CLPXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to CLPXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check CLPXF's competition here
ATRWF vs KAEPY Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, KAEPY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while KAEPY trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas KAEPY's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KAEPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to KAEPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check KAEPY's competition here
ATRWF vs KAEPF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, KAEPF has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while KAEPF trades at $12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas KAEPF's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KAEPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to KAEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check KAEPF's competition here
ATRWF vs EDRVF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, EDRVF has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while EDRVF trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas EDRVF's P/E ratio is -18.73. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EDRVF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and EDRVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EDRVF's competition here
ATRWF vs MDDNF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, MDDNF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while MDDNF trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas MDDNF's P/E ratio is 114.26. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MDDNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to MDDNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check MDDNF's competition here
ATRWF vs CLPXY Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, CLPXY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while CLPXY trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas CLPXY's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CLPXY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and CLPXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLPXY's competition here
ATRWF vs BRENF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, BRENF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while BRENF trades at $17.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas BRENF's P/E ratio is -34.11. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BRENF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to BRENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check BRENF's competition here
ATRWF vs NOSPF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, NOSPF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while NOSPF trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas NOSPF's P/E ratio is 76.36. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NOSPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to NOSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check NOSPF's competition here
ATRWF vs COENF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, COENF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while COENF trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas COENF's P/E ratio is 33.65. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to COENF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to COENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check COENF's competition here
ATRWF vs TKECF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, TKECF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while TKECF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas TKECF's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TKECF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to TKECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check TKECF's competition here
ATRWF vs MGHTF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, MGHTF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while MGHTF trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas MGHTF's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MGHTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to MGHTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check MGHTF's competition here
ATRWF vs IFUUF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, IFUUF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while IFUUF trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas IFUUF's P/E ratio is -28.42. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IFUUF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to IFUUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check IFUUF's competition here
ATRWF vs TEPCF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, TEPCF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while TEPCF trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas TEPCF's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TEPCF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and TEPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TEPCF's competition here
ATRWF vs AGQPF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, AGQPF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while AGQPF trades at $14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas AGQPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AGQPF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and AGQPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AGQPF's competition here
ATRWF vs PUPOF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, PUPOF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while PUPOF trades at $11.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas PUPOF's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PUPOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to PUPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check PUPOF's competition here
ATRWF vs NPIFF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, NPIFF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while NPIFF trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas NPIFF's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NPIFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to NPIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check NPIFF's competition here
ATRWF vs DRXGY Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, DRXGY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while DRXGY trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas DRXGY's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DRXGY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and DRXGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DRXGY's competition here
ATRWF vs DRXGF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, DRXGF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while DRXGF trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas DRXGF's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DRXGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to DRXGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check DRXGF's competition here
ATRWF vs TEPCY Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, TEPCY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while TEPCY trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas TEPCY's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TEPCY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to TEPCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check TEPCY's competition here
ATRWF vs EDRWY Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, EDRWY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while EDRWY trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas EDRWY's P/E ratio is 5.03. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EDRWY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and EDRWY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EDRWY's competition here
ATRWF vs CPOIF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, CPOIF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while CPOIF trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas CPOIF's P/E ratio is 459.09. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CPOIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to CPOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check CPOIF's competition here
ATRWF vs EPWDF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, EPWDF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while EPWDF trades at $15.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas EPWDF's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EPWDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to EPWDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check EPWDF's competition here
ATRWF vs TREAY Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, TREAY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while TREAY trades at $43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas TREAY's P/E ratio is 31.62. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TREAY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to TREAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check TREAY's competition here
ATRWF vs TRSWF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, TRSWF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while TRSWF trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas TRSWF's P/E ratio is 41.59. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TRSWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to TRSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check TRSWF's competition here
ATRWF vs BRLXF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, BRLXF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while BRLXF trades at $23.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas BRLXF's P/E ratio is 295.38. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BRLXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and BRLXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRLXF's competition here
ATRWF vs CGKEF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, CGKEF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while CGKEF trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas CGKEF's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CGKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to CGKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check CGKEF's competition here
ATRWF vs INGXF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, INGXF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while INGXF trades at $10.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas INGXF's P/E ratio is 72.18. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to INGXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and INGXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INGXF's competition here
ATRWF vs ALRCF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, ALRCF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while ALRCF trades at $27.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas ALRCF's P/E ratio is 29.69. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ALRCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and ALRCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALRCF's competition here
ATRWF vs CGKEY Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, CGKEY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while CGKEY trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas CGKEY's P/E ratio is 2.62. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CGKEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to CGKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check CGKEY's competition here
ATRWF vs TREAF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, TREAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while TREAF trades at $13.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas TREAF's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TREAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and TREAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TREAF's competition here
ATRWF vs STECF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, STECF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while STECF trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas STECF's P/E ratio is 5.59. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to STECF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to STECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check STECF's competition here
ATRWF vs FSGCY Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, FSGCY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while FSGCY trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas FSGCY's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FSGCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to FSGCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check FSGCY's competition here
ATRWF vs ENGDF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, ENGDF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while ENGDF trades at $36.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas ENGDF's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ENGDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to ENGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check ENGDF's competition here
ATRWF vs SEYMF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, SEYMF has a market cap of 984.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while SEYMF trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas SEYMF's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SEYMF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to SEYMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check SEYMF's competition here
ATRWF vs VLTAF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, VLTAF has a market cap of 924.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while VLTAF trades at $7.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas VLTAF's P/E ratio is -39.25. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VLTAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to VLTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check VLTAF's competition here
ATRWF vs ERXCF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, ERXCF has a market cap of 544.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while ERXCF trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas ERXCF's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ERXCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and ERXCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ERXCF's competition here
ATRWF vs CWPWF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, CWPWF has a market cap of 397.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while CWPWF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas CWPWF's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CWPWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and CWPWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CWPWF's competition here
ATRWF vs LGSXY Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, LGSXY has a market cap of 391.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while LGSXY trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas LGSXY's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LGSXY's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to LGSXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check LGSXY's competition here
ATRWF vs PVLTF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, PVLTF has a market cap of 361.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while PVLTF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas PVLTF's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PVLTF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to PVLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check PVLTF's competition here
ATRWF vs OKEPF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, OKEPF has a market cap of 361.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while OKEPF trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas OKEPF's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to OKEPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to OKEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check OKEPF's competition here
ATRWF vs ENLTF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, ENLTF has a market cap of 264.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while ENLTF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas ENLTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ENLTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to ENLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check ENLTF's competition here
ATRWF vs SMTLD Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, SMTLD has a market cap of 198.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while SMTLD trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas SMTLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SMTLD's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to SMTLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check SMTLD's competition here
ATRWF vs RAMPF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, RAMPF has a market cap of 186M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while RAMPF trades at $8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas RAMPF's P/E ratio is -15.80. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RAMPF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and RAMPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RAMPF's competition here
ATRWF vs SVMRF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, SVMRF has a market cap of 137.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while SVMRF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas SVMRF's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SVMRF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and SVMRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SVMRF's competition here
ATRWF vs IESVF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, IESVF has a market cap of 134.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while IESVF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas IESVF's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IESVF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and IESVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IESVF's competition here
ATRWF vs PHNGF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, PHNGF has a market cap of 131.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while PHNGF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas PHNGF's P/E ratio is -10.83. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PHNGF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and PHNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PHNGF's competition here
ATRWF vs TDWRF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, TDWRF has a market cap of 70.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while TDWRF trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas TDWRF's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TDWRF's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and TDWRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TDWRF's competition here
ATRWF vs SMTLF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, SMTLF has a market cap of 60.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while SMTLF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas SMTLF's P/E ratio is -6.52. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SMTLF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to SMTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check SMTLF's competition here
ATRWF vs SKPGF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, SKPGF has a market cap of 56.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while SKPGF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas SKPGF's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SKPGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and SKPGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKPGF's competition here
ATRWF vs AZREF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, AZREF has a market cap of 48.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while AZREF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas AZREF's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AZREF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and AZREF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZREF's competition here
ATRWF vs WEGYF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, WEGYF has a market cap of 45.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while WEGYF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas WEGYF's P/E ratio is 3.48. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WEGYF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to WEGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check WEGYF's competition here
ATRWF vs GIPIF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, GIPIF has a market cap of 45.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while GIPIF trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas GIPIF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GIPIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to GIPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check GIPIF's competition here
ATRWF vs WNDW Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, WNDW has a market cap of 36.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while WNDW trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas WNDW's P/E ratio is -13.74. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WNDW's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to WNDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check WNDW's competition here
ATRWF vs SMAYF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, SMAYF has a market cap of 30.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while SMAYF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas SMAYF's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SMAYF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to SMAYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check SMAYF's competition here
ATRWF vs CWGYF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, CWGYF has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while CWGYF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas CWGYF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CWGYF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and CWGYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CWGYF's competition here
ATRWF vs CLMOF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, CLMOF has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while CLMOF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas CLMOF's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CLMOF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to CLMOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check CLMOF's competition here
ATRWF vs SHUNF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, SHUNF has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while SHUNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas SHUNF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SHUNF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to SHUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check SHUNF's competition here
ATRWF vs PHIXF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, PHIXF has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while PHIXF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas PHIXF's P/E ratio is 0.30. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PHIXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and PHIXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PHIXF's competition here
ATRWF vs CLNV Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, CLNV has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while CLNV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas CLNV's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CLNV's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to CLNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check CLNV's competition here
ATRWF vs RROYF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, RROYF has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while RROYF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas RROYF's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RROYF's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and RROYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RROYF's competition here
ATRWF vs AZLOF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, AZLOF has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while AZLOF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas AZLOF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AZLOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and AZLOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZLOF's competition here
ATRWF vs GEBRF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, GEBRF has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while GEBRF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas GEBRF's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GEBRF's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and GEBRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GEBRF's competition here
ATRWF vs AWSL Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, AWSL has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while AWSL trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas AWSL's P/E ratio is -6.37. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AWSL's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to AWSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check AWSL's competition here
ATRWF vs MOTNF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, MOTNF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while MOTNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas MOTNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MOTNF's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to MOTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check MOTNF's competition here
ATRWF vs FNEC Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, FNEC has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while FNEC trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas FNEC's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FNEC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and FNEC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FNEC's competition here
ATRWF vs NKWFF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, NKWFF has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while NKWFF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas NKWFF's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NKWFF's ROE of -8.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to NKWFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check NKWFF's competition here
ATRWF vs VGREF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, VGREF has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while VGREF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas VGREF's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VGREF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and VGREF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VGREF's competition here
ATRWF vs ASRE Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, ASRE has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while ASRE trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas ASRE's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ASRE's ROE of -7.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to ASRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check ASRE's competition here
ATRWF vs PRHL Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, PRHL has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while PRHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas PRHL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PRHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and PRHL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRHL's competition here
ATRWF vs VXIT Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, VXIT has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while VXIT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas VXIT's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VXIT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to VXIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check VXIT's competition here
ATRWF vs TNSTF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, TNSTF has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while TNSTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas TNSTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TNSTF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and TNSTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TNSTF's competition here
ATRWF vs ALKHF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, ALKHF has a market cap of 804.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while ALKHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas ALKHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ALKHF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to ALKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check ALKHF's competition here
ATRWF vs NEVE Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, NEVE has a market cap of 746.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while NEVE trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas NEVE's P/E ratio is -31.25. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NEVE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and NEVE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NEVE's competition here
ATRWF vs GSFI Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, GSFI has a market cap of 654.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while GSFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas GSFI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GSFI's ROE of +7.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and GSFI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GSFI's competition here
ATRWF vs ENCVF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, ENCVF has a market cap of 630.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while ENCVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas ENCVF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ENCVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to ENCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check ENCVF's competition here
ATRWF vs PWCO Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, PWCO has a market cap of 610K. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while PWCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas PWCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PWCO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to PWCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check PWCO's competition here
ATRWF vs MMMW Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, MMMW has a market cap of 470.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while MMMW trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas MMMW's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MMMW's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to MMMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check MMMW's competition here
ATRWF vs IICN Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, IICN has a market cap of 143.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while IICN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas IICN's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IICN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to IICN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check IICN's competition here
ATRWF vs VSPC Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, VSPC has a market cap of 141.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while VSPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas VSPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VSPC's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to VSPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check VSPC's competition here
ATRWF vs GEECF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, GEECF has a market cap of 94.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while GEECF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas GEECF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GEECF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to GEECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check GEECF's competition here
ATRWF vs ETRXF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, ETRXF has a market cap of 66.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while ETRXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas ETRXF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ETRXF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to ETRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check ETRXF's competition here
ATRWF vs PSPW Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, PSPW has a market cap of 54.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while PSPW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas PSPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PSPW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and PSPW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PSPW's competition here
ATRWF vs TPII Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, TPII has a market cap of 37.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while TPII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas TPII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TPII's ROE of -22.88%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and TPII have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TPII's competition here
ATRWF vs CPWR Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, CPWR has a market cap of 36.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while CPWR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas CPWR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CPWR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and CPWR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CPWR's competition here
ATRWF vs ARSC Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, ARSC has a market cap of 22.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while ARSC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas ARSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ARSC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and ARSC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARSC's competition here
ATRWF vs QSPW Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, QSPW has a market cap of 15.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while QSPW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas QSPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to QSPW's ROE of -96.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF is less volatile compared to QSPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATRWF.Check QSPW's competition here
ATRWF vs ZHYLF Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, ZHYLF has a market cap of 15.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while ZHYLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas ZHYLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ZHYLF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and ZHYLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZHYLF's competition here
ATRWF vs VENG Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, VENG has a market cap of 12.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while VENG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas VENG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VENG's ROE of -8.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and VENG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VENG's competition here
ATRWF vs VCII Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, VCII has a market cap of 11.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while VCII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas VCII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VCII's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and VCII have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VCII's competition here
ATRWF vs CGEI Comparison July 2025
ATRWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATRWF stands at 262.5M. In comparison, CGEI has a market cap of 9.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ATRWF is priced at $8.50, while CGEI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATRWF currently has a P/E ratio of -425.00, whereas CGEI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ATRWF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CGEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATRWF and CGEI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CGEI's competition here