Atlas Copco AB

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, RATIY has a market cap of 209.32B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while RATIY trades at $46.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas RATIY's P/E ratio is 36.82. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RATIY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to RATIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SIEGY has a market cap of 196.35B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SIEGY trades at $125.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SIEGY's P/E ratio is 25.85. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SIEGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SIEGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SMAWF has a market cap of 163.34B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SMAWF trades at $208.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SMAWF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SMAWF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SMAWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SBGSY has a market cap of 136.49B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SBGSY trades at $48.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SBGSY's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SBGSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SBGSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SBGSF has a market cap of 134.07B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SBGSF trades at $239.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SBGSF's P/E ratio is 26.76. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SBGSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SBGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, RCIT has a market cap of 133.07B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while RCIT trades at $2,138.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas RCIT's P/E ratio is -213838.00. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RCIT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to RCIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, ETN has a market cap of 121.28B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while ETN trades at $309.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas ETN's P/E ratio is 31.27. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ETN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to ETN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 82.77B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while PH trades at $647.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 24.94. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, ATLKY has a market cap of 73.72B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while ATLKY trades at $15.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas ATLKY's P/E ratio is 25.19. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ATLKY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to ATLKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, ATLCY has a market cap of 73.62B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while ATLCY trades at $13.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas ATLCY's P/E ratio is 22.12. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ATLCY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to ATLCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, ATLPF has a market cap of 73.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while ATLPF trades at $15.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas ATLPF's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ATLPF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to ATLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 71.06B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while ITW trades at $242.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ITW's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to ITW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SMEGF has a market cap of 68.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SMEGF trades at $85.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SMEGF's P/E ratio is -372.26. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SMEGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SMEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, MHVYF has a market cap of 67.15B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while MHVYF trades at $20.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas MHVYF's P/E ratio is 37.74. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MHVYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to MHVYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SMNEY has a market cap of 67.06B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SMNEY trades at $84.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SMNEY's P/E ratio is -366.52. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SMNEY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SMNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, KNYJY has a market cap of 63.54B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while KNYJY trades at $30.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas KNYJY's P/E ratio is 29.10. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KNYJY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to KNYJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, HWM has a market cap of 63.53B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while HWM trades at $157.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas HWM's P/E ratio is 51.43. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HWM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to HWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 63.31B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while EMR trades at $112.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 31.71. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to EMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 61.34B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while ROP trades at $570.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 41.04. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, WRTBY has a market cap of 54.96B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while WRTBY trades at $3.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas WRTBY's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WRTBY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to WRTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 42.28B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while CMI trades at $306.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to CMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, AME has a market cap of 39.64B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while AME trades at $171.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas AME's P/E ratio is 28.10. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AME's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to AME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 38.28B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while OTIS trades at $96.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SHLRF has a market cap of 33.38B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SHLRF trades at $305.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SHLRF's P/E ratio is 30.87. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SHLRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SHLRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 33.24B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while ROK trades at $294.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 37.18. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to ROK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SHLAF has a market cap of 33.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SHLAF trades at $316.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SHLAF's P/E ratio is 32.45. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SHLAF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SHLAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, KNYJF has a market cap of 32.16B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while KNYJF trades at $62.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas KNYJF's P/E ratio is 29.55. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KNYJF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to KNYJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 31.99B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while IR trades at $79.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 39.25. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, WEGZY has a market cap of 30.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while WEGZY trades at $7.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas WEGZY's P/E ratio is 28.27. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WEGZY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to WEGZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 29.89B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while XYL trades at $122.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 33.10. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to XYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, HWM-P has a market cap of 29.57B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while HWM-P trades at $73.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas HWM-P's P/E ratio is 102.73. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HWM-P's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to HWM-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SDVKF has a market cap of 28.30B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SDVKF trades at $22.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SDVKF's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SDVKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and SDVKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SDVKY has a market cap of 26.76B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SDVKY trades at $21.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SDVKY's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SDVKY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SDVKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 24.15B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while DOV trades at $176.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 23.39. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to DOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, FANUY has a market cap of 23.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while FANUY trades at $12.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas FANUY's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FANUY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to FANUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, FANUF has a market cap of 22.63B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while FANUF trades at $24.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas FANUF's P/E ratio is 22.25. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FANUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to FANUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, NNDNF has a market cap of 21.07B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while NNDNF trades at $18.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas NNDNF's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NNDNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to NNDNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SMECF has a market cap of 20.85B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SMECF trades at $326.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SMECF's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SMECF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SMECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, NJDCY has a market cap of 20.82B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while NJDCY trades at $4.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas NJDCY's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NJDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to NJDCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SMCAY has a market cap of 19.95B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SMCAY trades at $15.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SMCAY's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SMCAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SMCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, WEICF has a market cap of 18.30B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while WEICF trades at $1.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas WEICF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WEICF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to WEICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, ALFVY has a market cap of 17.04B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while ALFVY trades at $41.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas ALFVY's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ALFVY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to ALFVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, ALFVF has a market cap of 16.04B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while ALFVF trades at $38.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas ALFVF's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ALFVF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to ALFVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 15.38B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while PNR trades at $93.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to PNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SIELY has a market cap of 15.31B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SIELY trades at $7.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SIELY's P/E ratio is 182.50. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SIELY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and SIELY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, VWSYF has a market cap of 15.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while VWSYF trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas VWSYF's P/E ratio is 23.80. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VWSYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to VWSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, VWDRY has a market cap of 14.83B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while VWDRY trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas VWDRY's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VWDRY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to VWDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, WEICY has a market cap of 14.35B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while WEICY trades at $11.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas WEICY's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WEICY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and WEICY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SIELF has a market cap of 13.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SIELF trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SIELF's P/E ratio is -34.00. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SIELF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SIELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 13.92B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while GGG trades at $83.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 29.42. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to GGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 13.86B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while IEX trades at $183.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 29.13. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to IEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, GCTAF has a market cap of 12.93B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while GCTAF trades at $14.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas GCTAF's P/E ratio is -7.05. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GCTAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and GCTAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, IHICY has a market cap of 12.87B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while IHICY trades at $21.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas IHICY's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IHICY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and IHICY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, GCTAY has a market cap of 12.77B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while GCTAY trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas GCTAY's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GCTAY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to GCTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 11.28B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while ITT trades at $143.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 22.82. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to ITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, WRTBF has a market cap of 11.04B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while WRTBF trades at $18.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas WRTBF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WRTBF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to WRTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 10.96B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while NDSN trades at $192.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 24.51. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, VACNY has a market cap of 10.91B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while VACNY trades at $36.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas VACNY's P/E ratio is 42.31. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VACNY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to VACNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, IHICF has a market cap of 10.44B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while IHICF trades at $68.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas IHICF's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IHICF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to IHICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, VTTGF has a market cap of 10.22B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while VTTGF trades at $341.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas VTTGF's P/E ratio is 39.66. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VTTGF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to VTTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, GEAGF has a market cap of 10.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while GEAGF trades at $61.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas GEAGF's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GEAGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to GEAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, DFKCY has a market cap of 9.81B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while DFKCY trades at $13.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas DFKCY's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DFKCY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to DFKCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 9.75B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while CR trades at $169.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 34.48. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to CR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 9.70B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while AOS trades at $68.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to AOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, KWHIF has a market cap of 9.60B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while KWHIF trades at $57.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas KWHIF's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KWHIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and KWHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, KWHIY has a market cap of 9.51B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while KWHIY trades at $22.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas KWHIY's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KWHIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to KWHIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, DAIUF has a market cap of 9.25B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while DAIUF trades at $25.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas DAIUF's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DAIUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to DAIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, RTLLF has a market cap of 9.23B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while RTLLF trades at $812.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas RTLLF's P/E ratio is 32.47. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RTLLF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to RTLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SMGZY has a market cap of 9.05B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SMGZY trades at $27.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SMGZY's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SMGZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SMGZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 8.90B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while RRX trades at $134.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to RRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, MLSPF has a market cap of 8.50B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while MLSPF trades at $6.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas MLSPF's P/E ratio is -133.40. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MLSPF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to MLSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, WEGRY has a market cap of 8.24B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while WEGRY trades at $16.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas WEGRY's P/E ratio is 19.75. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WEGRY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to WEGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SMGKF has a market cap of 8.22B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SMGKF trades at $24.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SMGKF's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SMGKF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SMGKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, TBABF has a market cap of 8.13B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while TBABF trades at $40.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas TBABF's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TBABF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to TBABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 8.08B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while DCI trades at $67.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to DCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, WEIGF has a market cap of 7.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while WEIGF trades at $31.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas WEIGF's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WEIGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to WEIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 7.89B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while WTS trades at $236.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to WTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 7.48B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while MIDD trades at $139.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MIDD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, EBCOY has a market cap of 7.31B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while EBCOY trades at $7.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas EBCOY's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EBCOY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to EBCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 7.27B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while GTLS trades at $159.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 31.71. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GTLS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 7.15B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while GNRC trades at $121.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SPXC has a market cap of 6.95B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SPXC trades at $148.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SPXC's P/E ratio is 34.37. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SPXC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SPXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 6.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while PSN trades at $64.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to PSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, JPSWY has a market cap of 6.46B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while JPSWY trades at $21.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas JPSWY's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JPSWY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to JPSWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, FCHRF has a market cap of 6.27B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while FCHRF trades at $76.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas FCHRF's P/E ratio is 28.87. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FCHRF's ROE of +3.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to FCHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, HSHZY has a market cap of 6.26B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while HSHZY trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas HSHZY's P/E ratio is 24.44. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HSHZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and HSHZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 6.24B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while FLS trades at $47.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to FLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, IMIAF has a market cap of 6.07B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while IMIAF trades at $24.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas IMIAF's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IMIAF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and IMIAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SPXSY has a market cap of 6.07B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SPXSY trades at $41.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SPXSY's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SPXSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SPXSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SULZF has a market cap of 6.04B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SULZF trades at $178.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SULZF's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SULZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SULZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, YOKEY has a market cap of 6.02B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while YOKEY trades at $46.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas YOKEY's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to YOKEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and YOKEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SPXSF has a market cap of 5.90B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SPXSF trades at $80.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SPXSF's P/E ratio is 23.28. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SPXSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and SPXSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 5.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while JBTM trades at $112.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is -78.64. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JBTM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, EBCOF has a market cap of 5.54B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while EBCOF trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas EBCOF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EBCOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to EBCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, VLMTY has a market cap of 5.48B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while VLMTY trades at $29.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas VLMTY's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VLMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and VLMTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 5.34B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while GTES trades at $20.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to GTES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, DNGFF has a market cap of 5.30B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while DNGFF trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas DNGFF's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DNGFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to DNGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 5.22B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while CSWI trades at $311.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 37.41. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, HAIIF has a market cap of 5.16B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while HAIIF trades at $3.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas HAIIF's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HAIIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and HAIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, YOKEF has a market cap of 4.94B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while YOKEF trades at $19.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas YOKEF's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to YOKEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to YOKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, HSHIF has a market cap of 4.69B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while HSHIF trades at $33.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas HSHIF's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HSHIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to HSHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, YMATF has a market cap of 4.64B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while YMATF trades at $8.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas YMATF's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to YMATF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to YMATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, XJNGF has a market cap of 4.63B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while XJNGF trades at $0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas XJNGF's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to XJNGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to XJNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, VOYJF has a market cap of 4.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while VOYJF trades at $24.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas VOYJF's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VOYJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and VOYJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SFSLF has a market cap of 4.40B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SFSLF trades at $112.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SFSLF's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SFSLF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and SFSLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, KRNNF has a market cap of 4.24B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while KRNNF trades at $134.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas KRNNF's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KRNNF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to KRNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, FLUIF has a market cap of 4.09B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while FLUIF trades at $21.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas FLUIF's P/E ratio is 26.30. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FLUIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to FLUIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, NRXXY has a market cap of 4.07B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while NRXXY trades at $8.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas NRXXY's P/E ratio is 430.00. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NRXXY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to NRXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, ATSAF has a market cap of 4.06B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while ATSAF trades at $44.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas ATSAF's P/E ratio is 37.82. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ATSAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and ATSAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.05B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while AIMC trades at $61.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 3.99B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while JBT trades at $125.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JBT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to JBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 3.96B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while FELE trades at $86.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 22.69. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to FELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, BCHHF has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while BCHHF trades at $380.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas BCHHF's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BCHHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to BCHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 3.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while MWA trades at $24.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to MWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, JGHAF has a market cap of 3.82B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while JGHAF trades at $36.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas JGHAF's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JGHAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and JGHAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 3.69B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while MIR trades at $16.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is -327.60. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MIR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to MIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 3.67B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while NPO trades at $174.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 43.48. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to NPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 3.57B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while KAI trades at $303.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 32.22. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to KAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, MRRLF has a market cap of 3.55B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while MRRLF trades at $4.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas MRRLF's P/E ratio is 235.50. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MRRLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to MRRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, MICLF has a market cap of 3.54B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while MICLF trades at $36.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas MICLF's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MICLF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to MICLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, NRDXF has a market cap of 3.48B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while NRDXF trades at $14.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas NRDXF's P/E ratio is 294.00. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NRDXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to NRDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, AALBF has a market cap of 3.34B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while AALBF trades at $30.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas AALBF's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AALBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to AALBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, CYJBF has a market cap of 3.32B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while CYJBF trades at $51.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas CYJBF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CYJBF's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to CYJBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, RTOXF has a market cap of 3.28B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while RTOXF trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas RTOXF's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RTOXF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to RTOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, NGKIF has a market cap of 3.22B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while NGKIF trades at $10.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas NGKIF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NGKIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to NGKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, KUKAF has a market cap of 3.10B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while KUKAF trades at $77.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas KUKAF's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KUKAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and KUKAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while CXT trades at $52.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to CXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, FJTCY has a market cap of 3.01B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while FJTCY trades at $38.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas FJTCY's P/E ratio is 32.69. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FJTCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to FJTCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, FLIDF has a market cap of 2.96B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while FLIDF trades at $52.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas FLIDF's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FLIDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to FLIDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, AMDWF has a market cap of 2.89B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while AMDWF trades at $9.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas AMDWF's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AMDWF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to AMDWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, THKLY has a market cap of 2.87B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while THKLY trades at $11.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas THKLY's P/E ratio is 39.33. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to THKLY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to THKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SOHVF has a market cap of 2.82B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SOHVF trades at $23.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SOHVF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SOHVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and SOHVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, FLIDY has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while FLIDY trades at $4.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas FLIDY's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FLIDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to FLIDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 2.73B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while GTLS-PB trades at $59.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, THKLF has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while THKLF trades at $21.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas THKLF's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to THKLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to THKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while ATS trades at $25.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is 39.69. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ATS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to ATS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, HSYDF has a market cap of 2.49B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while HSYDF trades at $26.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas HSYDF's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HSYDF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to HSYDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SOHVY has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SOHVY trades at $5.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SOHVY's P/E ratio is 508.50. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SOHVY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SOHVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, IRRHF has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while IRRHF trades at $2,943.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas IRRHF's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IRRHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and IRRHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, B has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while B trades at $47.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas B's P/E ratio is -60.87. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to B's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, MIURF has a market cap of 2.41B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while MIURF trades at $20.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas MIURF's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MIURF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and MIURF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, JGHHY has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while JGHHY trades at $4.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas JGHHY's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JGHHY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and JGHHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 2.35B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while EPAC trades at $43.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 26.78. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, NCTKF has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while NCTKF trades at $18.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas NCTKF's P/E ratio is 30.55. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NCTKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and NCTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.12B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while CFX trades at $39.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to CFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, KRDXF has a market cap of 2.09B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while KRDXF trades at $271.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas KRDXF's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KRDXF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to KRDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, KRNTY has a market cap of 2.09B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while KRNTY trades at $66.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas KRNTY's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KRNTY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to KRNTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, MLSYY has a market cap of 2.01B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while MLSYY trades at $5.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas MLSYY's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MLSYY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and MLSYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, NCTKY has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while NCTKY trades at $8.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas NCTKY's P/E ratio is 26.77. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NCTKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to NCTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, ENOV has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while ENOV trades at $33.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas ENOV's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ENOV's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to ENOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SXI trades at $153.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, UCIX has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while UCIX trades at $3.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas UCIX's P/E ratio is -7.65. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to UCIX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and UCIX have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, PFFVF has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while PFFVF trades at $172.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas PFFVF's P/E ratio is 39.85. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PFFVF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to PFFVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, ECTXF has a market cap of 1.66B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while ECTXF trades at $5.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas ECTXF's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ECTXF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to ECTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, FMMFF has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while FMMFF trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas FMMFF's P/E ratio is 23.61. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FMMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to FMMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, DUERF has a market cap of 1.51B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while DUERF trades at $21.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas DUERF's P/E ratio is 22.19. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DUERF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to DUERF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, XMTR has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while XMTR trades at $30.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas XMTR's P/E ratio is -30.81. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to XMTR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to XMTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, OERLF has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while OERLF trades at $4.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas OERLF's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OERLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to OERLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, ATCD has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while ATCD trades at $1,250.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas ATCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ATCD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and ATCD have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while HI trades at $20.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas HI's P/E ratio is -5.39. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to HI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SIUAF has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SIUAF trades at $57.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SIUAF's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SIUAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SIUAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while TNC trades at $72.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 20.19. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to TNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, BYPLF has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while BYPLF trades at $6.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas BYPLF's P/E ratio is 48.86. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BYPLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to BYPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, CIR has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while CIR trades at $56.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas CIR's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CIR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to CIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, UHOIF has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while UHOIF trades at $12.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas UHOIF's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to UHOIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to UHOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while HLIO trades at $31.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 984.73M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while GRC trades at $37.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to GRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, THR has a market cap of 964.55M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while THR trades at $28.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas THR's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to THR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to THR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, MAOIF has a market cap of 956.37M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while MAOIF trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas MAOIF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MAOIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to MAOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, CHRHF has a market cap of 894.34M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while CHRHF trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas CHRHF's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CHRHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to CHRHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, NNE has a market cap of 891.97M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while NNE trades at $24.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas NNE's P/E ratio is -57.29. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NNE's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to NNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 869.83M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while KRNT trades at $19.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is -54.83. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, MCRUF has a market cap of 869.47M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while MCRUF trades at $3.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas MCRUF's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MCRUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and MCRUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, AMDLY has a market cap of 860.77M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while AMDLY trades at $42.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas AMDLY's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AMDLY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and AMDLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, AMSC has a market cap of 852.33M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while AMSC trades at $21.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas AMSC's P/E ratio is 240.00. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AMSC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to AMSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SISXF has a market cap of 841.84M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SISXF trades at $11.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SISXF's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SISXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SISXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, IMDXF has a market cap of 818.95M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while IMDXF trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas IMDXF's P/E ratio is 40.00. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IMDXF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to IMDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, GLYYY has a market cap of 818.03M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while GLYYY trades at $14.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas GLYYY's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GLYYY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and GLYYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 698.53M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while PSIX trades at $30.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, CCNTF has a market cap of 686.76M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while CCNTF trades at $18.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas CCNTF's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CCNTF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to CCNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, NLFKF has a market cap of 684.92M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while NLFKF trades at $33.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas NLFKF's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NLFKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and NLFKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, CYD has a market cap of 649.07M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while CYD trades at $17.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas CYD's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CYD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to CYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, KMAAF has a market cap of 626.13M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while KMAAF trades at $122.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas KMAAF's P/E ratio is -167.40. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KMAAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to KMAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, DEUZF has a market cap of 610.55M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while DEUZF trades at $4.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas DEUZF's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DEUZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and DEUZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, WHTAF has a market cap of 535.37M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while WHTAF trades at $40.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas WHTAF's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WHTAF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to WHTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SHKBF has a market cap of 535.07M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SHKBF trades at $19.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SHKBF's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SHKBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SHKBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, NHOXF has a market cap of 521.46M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while NHOXF trades at $14.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas NHOXF's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NHOXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and NHOXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, DAWIF has a market cap of 503.51M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while DAWIF trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas DAWIF's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DAWIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to DAWIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, TSHMY has a market cap of 483.49M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while TSHMY trades at $10.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas TSHMY's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TSHMY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to TSHMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SUZRY has a market cap of 446.58M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SUZRY trades at $13.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SUZRY's P/E ratio is 73.22. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SUZRY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and SUZRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, NLLSF has a market cap of 441.13M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while NLLSF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas NLLSF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NLLSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to NLLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, HBGRF has a market cap of 435.20M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while HBGRF trades at $1.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas HBGRF's P/E ratio is -10.21. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HBGRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to HBGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 425.27M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SERV trades at $7.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -6.97. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SERV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, TPLKF has a market cap of 418.36M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while TPLKF trades at $19.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas TPLKF's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TPLKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and TPLKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, YMFCF has a market cap of 417.59M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while YMFCF trades at $5.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas YMFCF's P/E ratio is 39.21. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to YMFCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and YMFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, FKSHF has a market cap of 413.58M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while FKSHF trades at $19.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas FKSHF's P/E ratio is 6.84. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FKSHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to FKSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, BLDP has a market cap of 404.77M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while BLDP trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas BLDP's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BLDP's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to BLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, KMRCF has a market cap of 403.76M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while KMRCF trades at $7.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas KMRCF's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KMRCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to KMRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 380.29M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while GHM trades at $34.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 42.02. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to GHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, VAQTF has a market cap of 370.93M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while VAQTF trades at $25.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas VAQTF's P/E ratio is -15.25. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VAQTF's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and VAQTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SLGRF has a market cap of 370.19M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SLGRF trades at $11.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SLGRF's P/E ratio is -10.35. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SLGRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and SLGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, NLLSY has a market cap of 367.61M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while NLLSY trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas NLLSY's P/E ratio is -7.41. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NLLSY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to NLLSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SILDF has a market cap of 366.82M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SILDF trades at $6.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SILDF's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SILDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SILDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SSMFF has a market cap of 357.02M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SSMFF trades at $20.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SSMFF's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SSMFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SSMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, FLLHF has a market cap of 350.22M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while FLLHF trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas FLLHF's P/E ratio is -6.11. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FLLHF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to FLLHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.69M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while BGRY trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, DURYY has a market cap of 338.40M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while DURYY trades at $4.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas DURYY's P/E ratio is 24.45. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DURYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to DURYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, ENGPF has a market cap of 322.22M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while ENGPF trades at $1.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas ENGPF's P/E ratio is 2.54. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ENGPF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and ENGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SEIGY has a market cap of 316.83M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SEIGY trades at $3.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SEIGY's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SEIGY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and SEIGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, ADERY has a market cap of 316.46M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while ADERY trades at $55.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas ADERY's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ADERY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to ADERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 315.13M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while LXFR trades at $11.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SIMA has a market cap of 311.27M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SIMA trades at $10.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SIMA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SIMA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SIMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 311.21M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while OFLX trades at $30.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, HBGRY has a market cap of 310.42M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while HBGRY trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas HBGRY's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HBGRY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to HBGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, FEIOF has a market cap of 309.82M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while FEIOF trades at $21.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas FEIOF's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FEIOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to FEIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, HCAI has a market cap of 299.23M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while HCAI trades at $8.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas HCAI's P/E ratio is 88.70. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HCAI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to HCAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SEIGF has a market cap of 298.93M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SEIGF trades at $14.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SEIGF's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SEIGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SEIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, ITMPF has a market cap of 291.71M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while ITMPF trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas ITMPF's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ITMPF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and ITMPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SKLUY has a market cap of 291.17M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SKLUY trades at $29.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SKLUY's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SKLUY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and SKLUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 278.19M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while PKOH trades at $19.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 6.13. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, VLNSF has a market cap of 254.93M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while VLNSF trades at $11.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas VLNSF's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VLNSF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to VLNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 253.88M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while BW-PA trades at $2.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, XRTEF has a market cap of 244.59M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while XRTEF trades at $1.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas XRTEF's P/E ratio is -7.71. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to XRTEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and XRTEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, AUUMF has a market cap of 227.37M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while AUUMF trades at $15.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas AUUMF's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AUUMF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and AUUMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 226.16M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while RR trades at $1.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -16.42. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to RR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, CHSTF has a market cap of 212.59M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while CHSTF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas CHSTF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CHSTF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and CHSTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, CHHGF has a market cap of 211.23M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while CHHGF trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas CHHGF's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CHHGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to CHHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, LPKFF has a market cap of 193.03M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while LPKFF trades at $7.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas LPKFF's P/E ratio is -131.33. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LPKFF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to LPKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, TKOLF has a market cap of 192.59M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while TKOLF trades at $12.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas TKOLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TKOLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and TKOLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, AITLF has a market cap of 170.52M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while AITLF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas AITLF's P/E ratio is -10.96. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AITLF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to AITLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SKUYF has a market cap of 168.26M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SKUYF trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SKUYF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SKUYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SKUYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, AMROF has a market cap of 151.82M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while AMROF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas AMROF's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AMROF's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to AMROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 147.92M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while NPWR trades at $1.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NPWR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, CIHPF has a market cap of 141.26M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while CIHPF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas CIHPF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CIHPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and CIHPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, CRAWA has a market cap of 141.00M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while CRAWA trades at $50.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas CRAWA's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CRAWA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to CRAWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, OPTZF has a market cap of 139.69M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while OPTZF trades at $4.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas OPTZF's P/E ratio is -47.24. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OPTZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and OPTZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 116.15M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while TAYD trades at $37.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 114.55M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SHMD trades at $2.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, AFGVF has a market cap of 112.94M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while AFGVF trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas AFGVF's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AFGVF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to AFGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 104.07M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while HUHU trades at $4.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -49.15. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HUHU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SCTTF has a market cap of 102.76M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SCTTF trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SCTTF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SCTTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SCTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, WFF has a market cap of 101.38M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while WFF trades at $4.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas WFF's P/E ratio is 203.17. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to WFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 99.88M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while TWIN trades at $7.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TWIN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 97.00M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while HURC trades at $14.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -5.02. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to HURC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, HYPRF has a market cap of 82.41M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while HYPRF trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas HYPRF's P/E ratio is -4.15. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HYPRF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to HYPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, JUKIY has a market cap of 68.39M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while JUKIY trades at $2.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas JUKIY's P/E ratio is -3.03. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JUKIY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and JUKIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 67.96M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while PYR trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to PYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, BYYLF has a market cap of 61.82M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while BYYLF trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas BYYLF's P/E ratio is -6.17. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BYYLF's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to BYYLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, DYFSF has a market cap of 52.29M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while DYFSF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas DYFSF's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DYFSF's ROE of +29.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to DYFSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, AFGVY has a market cap of 51.48M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while AFGVY trades at $1.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas AFGVY's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AFGVY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to AFGVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 49.02M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while BW trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to BW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, AFTC has a market cap of 43.11M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while AFTC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas AFTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AFTC's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to AFTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, TPIC has a market cap of 42.33M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while TPIC trades at $0.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas TPIC's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TPIC's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to TPIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, LASE has a market cap of 42.13M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while LASE trades at $2.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas LASE's P/E ratio is -7.76. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LASE's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to LASE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, EDEYF has a market cap of 39.87M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while EDEYF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas EDEYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EDEYF's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to EDEYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, BRRN has a market cap of 37.80M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while BRRN trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas BRRN's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BRRN's ROE of +2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and BRRN have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, ITGMF has a market cap of 36.96M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while ITGMF trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas ITGMF's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ITGMF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to ITGMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 36.16M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while BWEN trades at $1.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is 32.40. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BWEN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, AUSI has a market cap of 32.88M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while AUSI trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas AUSI's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AUSI's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to AUSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, AQUEF has a market cap of 26.99M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while AQUEF trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas AQUEF's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AQUEF's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to AQUEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, LBGJ has a market cap of 26.85M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while LBGJ trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas LBGJ's P/E ratio is -20.71. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LBGJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to LBGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, GTEC has a market cap of 26.24M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while GTEC trades at $1.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas GTEC's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GTEC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to GTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, MPHYF has a market cap of 24.78M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while MPHYF trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas MPHYF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MPHYF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and MPHYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, NWVCF has a market cap of 24.62M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while NWVCF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas NWVCF's P/E ratio is -22.16. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NWVCF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to NWVCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SGTSY has a market cap of 24.20M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SGTSY trades at $1.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SGTSY's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SGTSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SGTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, TOOD has a market cap of 23.64M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while TOOD trades at $24.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas TOOD's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TOOD's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and TOOD have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, CETY has a market cap of 21.70M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while CETY trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas CETY's P/E ratio is -4.56. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CETY's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to CETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, CVV has a market cap of 19.54M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while CVV trades at $2.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas CVV's P/E ratio is -10.14. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CVV's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to CVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, INLF has a market cap of 16.82M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while INLF trades at $1.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas INLF's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to INLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to INLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, APGI has a market cap of 14.57M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while APGI trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas APGI's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to APGI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to APGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, REOP has a market cap of 13.69M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while REOP trades at $30.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas REOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to REOP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to REOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, NXHSF has a market cap of 12.15M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while NXHSF trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas NXHSF's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NXHSF's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to NXHSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, TPCFF has a market cap of 9.71M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while TPCFF trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas TPCFF's P/E ratio is -34.00. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TPCFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to TPCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 9.11M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SHMDW trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, CVAT has a market cap of 7.39M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while CVAT trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas CVAT's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CVAT's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to CVAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, BURU has a market cap of 7.13M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while BURU trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas BURU's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BURU's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to BURU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, CGRN has a market cap of 6.79M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while CGRN trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas CGRN's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CGRN's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to CGRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, JCSE has a market cap of 6.76M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while JCSE trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas JCSE's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JCSE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to JCSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, CHSTY has a market cap of 6.65M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while CHSTY trades at $2.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas CHSTY's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CHSTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and CHSTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, ALKFF has a market cap of 5.10M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while ALKFF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas ALKFF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ALKFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and ALKFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, MVAC has a market cap of 4.62M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while MVAC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas MVAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MVAC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and MVAC have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, ROSN has a market cap of 3.99M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while ROSN trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas ROSN's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ROSN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to ROSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, BURUD has a market cap of 3.44M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while BURUD trades at $3.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas BURUD's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BURUD's ROE of +3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to BURUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, GLKFF has a market cap of 3.22M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while GLKFF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas GLKFF's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GLKFF's ROE of +1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to GLKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, AATGF has a market cap of 2.90M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while AATGF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas AATGF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AATGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to AATGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, PRPI has a market cap of 2.84M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while PRPI trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas PRPI's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PRPI's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and PRPI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, CNGA has a market cap of 2.04M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while CNGA trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas CNGA's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CNGA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and CNGA have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 1.98M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SHPW trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and SHPW have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, XCH has a market cap of 1.94M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while XCH trades at $1.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas XCH's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to XCH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to XCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, QIND has a market cap of 1.69M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while QIND trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas QIND's P/E ratio is 0.12. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to QIND's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to QIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, TBUIF has a market cap of 1.56M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while TBUIF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas TBUIF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TBUIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and TBUIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, RCHN has a market cap of 1.53M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while RCHN trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas RCHN's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RCHN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to RCHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, PYBX has a market cap of 1.34M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while PYBX trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas PYBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PYBX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to PYBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, EDHD has a market cap of 1.21M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while EDHD trades at $201.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas EDHD's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EDHD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and EDHD have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, NRBT has a market cap of 1.03M. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while NRBT trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas NRBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NRBT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to NRBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, BONL has a market cap of 961400.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while BONL trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas BONL's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BONL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and BONL have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, BRBL has a market cap of 946908.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while BRBL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas BRBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BRBL's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and BRBL have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, NMHI has a market cap of 592043.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while NMHI trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas NMHI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NMHI's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to NMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, WPUR has a market cap of 572344.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while WPUR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas WPUR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WPUR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and WPUR have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, INOH has a market cap of 556213.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while INOH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas INOH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to INOH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and INOH have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, ATVK has a market cap of 490582.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while ATVK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas ATVK's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ATVK's ROE of +3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and ATVK have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, JKSM has a market cap of 365504.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while JKSM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas JKSM's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JKSM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to JKSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, MGTC has a market cap of 234420.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while MGTC trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas MGTC's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MGTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to MGTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, TECFF has a market cap of 216547.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while TECFF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas TECFF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TECFF's ROE of -5.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to TECFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, BBRW has a market cap of 158475.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while BBRW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas BBRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BBRW's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and BBRW have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, PRHB has a market cap of 150000.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while PRHB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas PRHB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PRHB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to PRHB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, DLPX has a market cap of 137040.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while DLPX trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas DLPX's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DLPX's ROE of -4.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and DLPX have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, PRAC has a market cap of 123660.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while PRAC trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas PRAC's P/E ratio is 0.75. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PRAC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to PRAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, AACS has a market cap of 115781.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while AACS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas AACS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AACS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to AACS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, RVTI has a market cap of 76435.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while RVTI trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas RVTI's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RVTI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to RVTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, TXMC has a market cap of 28858.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while TXMC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas TXMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TXMC's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to TXMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, LTHUQ has a market cap of 20324.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while LTHUQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas LTHUQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LTHUQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to LTHUQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, MEGH has a market cap of 19304.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while MEGH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas MEGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MEGH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and MEGH have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, NMHIW has a market cap of 16323.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while NMHIW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas NMHIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NMHIW's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and NMHIW have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, RGUS has a market cap of 12139.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while RGUS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas RGUS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RGUS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and RGUS have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, AFRMF has a market cap of 8982.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while AFRMF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas AFRMF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AFRMF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to AFRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, HYHY has a market cap of 8901.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while HYHY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas HYHY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HYHY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and HYHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, RUNI has a market cap of 8304.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while RUNI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas RUNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RUNI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to RUNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, TSSP has a market cap of 6800.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while TSSP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas TSSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TSSP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to TSSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, XEBEQ has a market cap of 6189.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while XEBEQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas XEBEQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to XEBEQ's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to XEBEQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, PMXX has a market cap of 4725.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while PMXX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas PMXX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PMXX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to PMXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, ESNC has a market cap of 4085.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while ESNC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas ESNC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ESNC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to ESNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, INVI has a market cap of 3568.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while INVI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas INVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to INVI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to INVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, AENG has a market cap of 3386.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while AENG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas AENG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AENG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and AENG have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, RKIGF has a market cap of 3310.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while RKIGF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas RKIGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RKIGF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to RKIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, ARTR has a market cap of 3225.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while ARTR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas ARTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ARTR's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to ARTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, ASPW has a market cap of 2098.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while ASPW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas ASPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ASPW's ROE of +4.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to ASPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, GFCI has a market cap of 1063.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while GFCI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas GFCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GFCI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to GFCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, TCGN has a market cap of 581.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while TCGN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas TCGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TCGN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and TCGN have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, TFRY has a market cap of 500.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while TFRY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas TFRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TFRY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to TFRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, ENCR has a market cap of 426.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while ENCR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas ENCR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ENCR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and ENCR have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, COCM has a market cap of 200.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while COCM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas COCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to COCM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to COCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, TOSYY has a market cap of 119.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while TOSYY trades at $14.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas TOSYY's P/E ratio is -74.60. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TOSYY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to TOSYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, HIMR has a market cap of 50.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while HIMR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas HIMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HIMR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to HIMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, XLWH has a market cap of 34.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while XLWH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas XLWH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to XLWH's ROE of -9.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to XLWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, ELGT has a market cap of 9.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while ELGT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas ELGT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ELGT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and ELGT have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SIDGQ has a market cap of 8.00. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SIDGQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SIDGQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SIDGQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and SIDGQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, EVTN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while EVTN trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas EVTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EVTN's ROE of +11.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to EVTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, KUKAY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while KUKAY trades at $78.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas KUKAY's P/E ratio is 50.32. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KUKAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and KUKAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, RAVN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while RAVN trades at $58.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas RAVN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RAVN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to RAVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, IMIAY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while IMIAY trades at $35.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas IMIAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IMIAY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and IMIAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, HUZNF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while HUZNF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas HUZNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HUZNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and HUZNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, ZGBEF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while ZGBEF trades at $84.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas ZGBEF's P/E ratio is 28.42. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ZGBEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and ZGBEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, CFXA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while CFXA trades at $177.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas CFXA's P/E ratio is 248.89. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CFXA's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to CFXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, PHGD comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while PHGD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas PHGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PHGD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and PHGD have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, NFPC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while NFPC trades at $18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas NFPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NFPC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to NFPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, FLXQF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while FLXQF trades at $5.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas FLXQF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FLXQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF and FLXQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, RWCI comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while RWCI trades at $14.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas RWCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RWCI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to RWCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, SBLUY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while SBLUY trades at $10.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SBLUY's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SBLUY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to SBLUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, BGRYW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while BGRYW trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas BGRYW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BGRYW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to BGRYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.

ATLFF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATLFF stands at 89.20B. In comparison, WBT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ATLFF is priced at $17.00, while WBT trades at $24.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATLFF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas WBT's P/E ratio is 47.08. In terms of profitability, ATLFF's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WBT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ATLFF is less volatile compared to WBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATLFF.