Loading...

Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc.

ATHR.CNCNQ
Consumer CyclicalAuto - Parts
CA$0.10
CA$-0.01(-5.00%)

Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc. ATHR.CN Peers

See (ATHR.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.

Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry

Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.

SymbolPriceChange %Market CapP/E RatioEPSDividend Yield
ATHR.CNCA$0.10-5.00%5.6M-9.50-CA$0.01N/A
MG.TOCA$49.91-1.09%14.1B9.06CA$5.51+5.41%
LNR.TOCA$62.01-0.96%3.7B14.66CA$4.23+1.67%
UNS.TOCA$47.95-0.02%2.1B24.34CA$1.97N/A
ABCT.TOCA$6.74+0.15%779.6M-11.82-CA$0.57N/A
MRE.TOCA$8.14-0.25%592.5M-10.44-CA$0.78+2.48%
XTC.TOCA$6.64+0.38%254.4M9.62CA$0.69+6.34%
WPRT.TOCA$4.01-0.25%69.5M-4.72-CA$0.85N/A

Stock Comparison

Select a stock to compare (requires JavaScript). Showing default comparison.

ATHR.CN vs MG.TO Comparison

ATHR.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATHR.CN stands at 5.6M. In comparison, MG.TO has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATHR.CN is priced at CA$0.10, while MG.TO trades at CA$49.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATHR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -9.50, whereas MG.TO's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, ATHR.CN's ROE is +1.27%, compared to MG.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATHR.CN is less volatile compared to MG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATHR.CN.

Stock Price Comparison

Loading...

Frequently Asked Questions