ATAC Resources Ltd.
ATAC Resources Ltd. ATADF Peers
See (ATADF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATADF | $0.09 | -5.69% | 20.6M | -4.64 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| ZIJMF | $2.54 | -1.55% | 71.7B | 13.37 | $0.19 | +2.07% |
| OPYGY | $21.00 | N/A | 28.4B | 2.50 | $8.39 | +4.17% |
| GFIOF | $24.03 | N/A | 21.5B | 17.41 | $1.38 | +2.27% |
| NESRF | $14.62 | -4.26% | 20.9B | 27.59 | $0.53 | +1.46% |
| NSTYY | $12.40 | +25.38% | 14.3B | 33.51 | $0.37 | +1.40% |
| HCHDY | $27.14 | N/A | 14B | 12.92 | $2.10 | N/A |
| NCMGY | $15.59 | +2.84% | 13.9B | 17.92 | $0.87 | N/A |
| NCMGF | $15.20 | -2.53% | 13.6B | 17.47 | $0.87 | N/A |
| LUGDF | $53.04 | -2.43% | 12.8B | 23.89 | $2.22 | +2.95% |
Stock Comparison
ATADF vs ZIJMF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, ZIJMF has a market cap of 71.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while ZIJMF trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas ZIJMF's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to ZIJMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to ZIJMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs OPYGY Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, OPYGY has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while OPYGY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas OPYGY's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to OPYGY's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to OPYGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs GFIOF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, GFIOF has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while GFIOF trades at $24.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas GFIOF's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to GFIOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to GFIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs NESRF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, NESRF has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while NESRF trades at $14.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas NESRF's P/E ratio is 27.59. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to NESRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is less volatile compared to NESRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs NSTYY Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, NSTYY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while NSTYY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas NSTYY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to NSTYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to NSTYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs HCHDY Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, HCHDY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while HCHDY trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas HCHDY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to HCHDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to HCHDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs NCMGY Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, NCMGY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while NCMGY trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas NCMGY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to NCMGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to NCMGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs NCMGF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, NCMGF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while NCMGF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas NCMGF's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to NCMGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to NCMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs LUGDF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, LUGDF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while LUGDF trades at $53.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas LUGDF's P/E ratio is 23.89. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to LUGDF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to LUGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs KOZAY Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, KOZAY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while KOZAY trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas KOZAY's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to KOZAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is less volatile compared to KOZAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs CAHPF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, CAHPF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while CAHPF trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas CAHPF's P/E ratio is 24.20. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to CAHPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is less volatile compared to CAHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs HGMCF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, HGMCF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while HGMCF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas HGMCF's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to HGMCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to HGMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs AURQF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, AURQF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while AURQF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas AURQF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to AURQF's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is less volatile compared to AURQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs AULGF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, AULGF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while AULGF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas AULGF's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to AULGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to AULGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs EDVMF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, EDVMF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while EDVMF trades at $31.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas EDVMF's P/E ratio is -74.26. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to EDVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to EDVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs ZHAOF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, ZHAOF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while ZHAOF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas ZHAOF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to ZHAOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to ZHAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs SBYSF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, SBYSF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while SBYSF trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas SBYSF's P/E ratio is -11.93. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to SBYSF's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to SBYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs ARGTF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, ARGTF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while ARGTF trades at $19.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas ARGTF's P/E ratio is -281.29. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to ARGTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to ARGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs DGMLF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, DGMLF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while DGMLF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas DGMLF's P/E ratio is -165.00. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to DGMLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to DGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs OCANF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, OCANF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while OCANF trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas OCANF's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to OCANF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to OCANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs ZIJMY Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, ZIJMY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while ZIJMY trades at $50.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas ZIJMY's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to ZIJMY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to ZIJMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs PMNXF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, PMNXF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while PMNXF trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas PMNXF's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to PMNXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to PMNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs GRLGF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, GRLGF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while GRLGF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas GRLGF's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to GRLGF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to GRLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs TORXF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, TORXF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while TORXF trades at $34.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas TORXF's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to TORXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to TORXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs KNTNF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, KNTNF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while KNTNF trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas KNTNF's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to KNTNF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to KNTNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs DPMLF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, DPMLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while DPMLF trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas DPMLF's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to DPMLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to DPMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs RGRNF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, RGRNF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while RGRNF trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas RGRNF's P/E ratio is -347.00. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to RGRNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to RGRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs CRNLF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, CRNLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while CRNLF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas CRNLF's P/E ratio is 46.15. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to CRNLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to CRNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs GSISF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, GSISF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while GSISF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas GSISF's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to GSISF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to GSISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs CELTF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, CELTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while CELTF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas CELTF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to CELTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to CELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs RMLRF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, RMLRF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while RMLRF trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas RMLRF's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to RMLRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to RMLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs WDOFF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, WDOFF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while WDOFF trades at $14.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas WDOFF's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to WDOFF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to WDOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs REDLF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, REDLF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while REDLF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas REDLF's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to REDLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is less volatile compared to REDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs ORAAF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, ORAAF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while ORAAF trades at $27.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas ORAAF's P/E ratio is -21.47. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to ORAAF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to ORAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs ELKMF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, ELKMF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while ELKMF trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas ELKMF's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to ELKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to ELKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs WFRSF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, WFRSF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while WFRSF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas WFRSF's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to WFRSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to WFRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs CXBMF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, CXBMF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while CXBMF trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas CXBMF's P/E ratio is 31.05. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to CXBMF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to CXBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs EOGSF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, EOGSF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while EOGSF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas EOGSF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to EOGSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is less volatile compared to EOGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs HCHDF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, HCHDF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while HCHDF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas HCHDF's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to HCHDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to HCHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs PAFRF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, PAFRF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while PAFRF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas PAFRF's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to PAFRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to PAFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs OBNNF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, OBNNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while OBNNF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas OBNNF's P/E ratio is -351.00. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to OBNNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to OBNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs MWSNF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, MWSNF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while MWSNF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas MWSNF's P/E ratio is -80.42. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to MWSNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to MWSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs MAUTF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, MAUTF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while MAUTF trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas MAUTF's P/E ratio is -15.41. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to MAUTF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to MAUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs LECBF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, LECBF has a market cap of 996.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while LECBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas LECBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to LECBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is less volatile compared to LECBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs DRDGF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, DRDGF has a market cap of 983.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while DRDGF trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas DRDGF's P/E ratio is 10.36. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to DRDGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to DRDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs RUPRF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, RUPRF has a market cap of 968.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while RUPRF trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas RUPRF's P/E ratio is -206.97. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to RUPRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to RUPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs BELGF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, BELGF has a market cap of 929.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while BELGF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas BELGF's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to BELGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to BELGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs SVLKF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, SVLKF has a market cap of 927.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while SVLKF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas SVLKF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to SVLKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to SVLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs SNWGF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, SNWGF has a market cap of 927.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while SNWGF trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas SNWGF's P/E ratio is -41.18. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to SNWGF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to SNWGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs SGSVF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, SGSVF has a market cap of 880.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while SGSVF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas SGSVF's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to SGSVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to SGSVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs KRRGF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, KRRGF has a market cap of 862.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while KRRGF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas KRRGF's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to KRRGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to KRRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs RMGGF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, RMGGF has a market cap of 787.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while RMGGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas RMGGF's P/E ratio is -37.00. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to RMGGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to RMGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs PDIYF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, PDIYF has a market cap of 733.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while PDIYF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas PDIYF's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to PDIYF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is less volatile compared to PDIYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs WTGRF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, WTGRF has a market cap of 677.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while WTGRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas WTGRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to WTGRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to WTGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs RGDFF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, RGDFF has a market cap of 676.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while RGDFF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas RGDFF's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to RGDFF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to RGDFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs GUYGF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, GUYGF has a market cap of 553.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while GUYGF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas GUYGF's P/E ratio is -76.55. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to GUYGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to GUYGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs MNSAF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, MNSAF has a market cap of 539.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while MNSAF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas MNSAF's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to MNSAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is less volatile compared to MNSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs ORZCF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, ORZCF has a market cap of 525.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while ORZCF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas ORZCF's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to ORZCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to ORZCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs RMGGY Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, RMGGY has a market cap of 517.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while RMGGY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas RMGGY's P/E ratio is -18.69. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to RMGGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to RMGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs ASGOF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, ASGOF has a market cap of 516.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while ASGOF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas ASGOF's P/E ratio is -7.36. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to ASGOF's ROE of -22.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to ASGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs NVMLF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, NVMLF has a market cap of 512.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while NVMLF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas NVMLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to NVMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is less volatile compared to NVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs ARNGF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, ARNGF has a market cap of 468.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while ARNGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas ARNGF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to ARNGF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to ARNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs ECRTF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, ECRTF has a market cap of 467M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while ECRTF trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas ECRTF's P/E ratio is -10.44. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to ECRTF's ROE of -6.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to ECRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs RSRBF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, RSRBF has a market cap of 465M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while RSRBF trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas RSRBF's P/E ratio is 80.33. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to RSRBF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to RSRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs OSKA Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, OSKA has a market cap of 461.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while OSKA trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas OSKA's P/E ratio is -15.91. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to OSKA's ROE of -36.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is less volatile compared to OSKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs RMLFF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, RMLFF has a market cap of 412.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while RMLFF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas RMLFF's P/E ratio is -8.37. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to RMLFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is less volatile compared to RMLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs PNGZF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, PNGZF has a market cap of 411M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while PNGZF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas PNGZF's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to PNGZF's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is less volatile compared to PNGZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs RIOFF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, RIOFF has a market cap of 395.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while RIOFF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas RIOFF's P/E ratio is 93.03. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to RIOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is less volatile compared to RIOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs LMGDF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, LMGDF has a market cap of 385.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while LMGDF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas LMGDF's P/E ratio is -7.09. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to LMGDF's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to LMGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs THXPF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, THXPF has a market cap of 379.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while THXPF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas THXPF's P/E ratio is 3.36. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to THXPF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is less volatile compared to THXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs PROBF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, PROBF has a market cap of 367.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while PROBF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas PROBF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to PROBF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to PROBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs MNDJF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, MNDJF has a market cap of 355M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while MNDJF trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas MNDJF's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to MNDJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to MNDJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs TPRXF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, TPRXF has a market cap of 343.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while TPRXF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas TPRXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to TPRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is less volatile compared to TPRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs MAKOF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, MAKOF has a market cap of 310.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while MAKOF trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas MAKOF's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to MAKOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to MAKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs ALKEF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, ALKEF has a market cap of 300.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while ALKEF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas ALKEF's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to ALKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is less volatile compared to ALKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs ELEMF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, ELEMF has a market cap of 294.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while ELEMF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas ELEMF's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to ELEMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is less volatile compared to ELEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs OGNRF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, OGNRF has a market cap of 286.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while OGNRF trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas OGNRF's P/E ratio is 142.00. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to OGNRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to OGNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs TGMGF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, TGMGF has a market cap of 283M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while TGMGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas TGMGF's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to TGMGF's ROE of -7.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is less volatile compared to TGMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs FDMIF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, FDMIF has a market cap of 279.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while FDMIF trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas FDMIF's P/E ratio is -29.37. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to FDMIF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to FDMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs MGDPF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, MGDPF has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while MGDPF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas MGDPF's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to MGDPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is less volatile compared to MGDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs KSKGF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, KSKGF has a market cap of 260.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while KSKGF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas KSKGF's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to KSKGF's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to KSKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs OMGGF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, OMGGF has a market cap of 256.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while OMGGF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas OMGGF's P/E ratio is -20.93. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to OMGGF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to OMGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs OSIIF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, OSIIF has a market cap of 254.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while OSIIF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas OSIIF's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to OSIIF's ROE of +4.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to OSIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs ERRSF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, ERRSF has a market cap of 250.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while ERRSF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas ERRSF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to ERRSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is less volatile compared to ERRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs STPGF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, STPGF has a market cap of 250.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while STPGF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas STPGF's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to STPGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to STPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs GDRZF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, GDRZF has a market cap of 232.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while GDRZF trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas GDRZF's P/E ratio is -20.60. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to GDRZF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is less volatile compared to GDRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs HSTXF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, HSTXF has a market cap of 228M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while HSTXF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas HSTXF's P/E ratio is 3.80. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to HSTXF's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to HSTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs STBMF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, STBMF has a market cap of 227.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while STBMF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas STBMF's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to STBMF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to STBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs JAGGF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, JAGGF has a market cap of 224.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while JAGGF trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas JAGGF's P/E ratio is -35.42. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to JAGGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to JAGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs SRBIF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, SRBIF has a market cap of 221.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while SRBIF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas SRBIF's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to SRBIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to SRBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs WRLGF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, WRLGF has a market cap of 217.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while WRLGF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas WRLGF's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to WRLGF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is less volatile compared to WRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs ATLDF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, ATLDF has a market cap of 208.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while ATLDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas ATLDF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to ATLDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is less volatile compared to ATLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs AGXKF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, AGXKF has a market cap of 196.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while AGXKF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas AGXKF's P/E ratio is -11.47. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to AGXKF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to AGXKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs SAAGF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, SAAGF has a market cap of 193.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while SAAGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas SAAGF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to SAAGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to SAAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs CNLMF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, CNLMF has a market cap of 193.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while CNLMF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas CNLMF's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to CNLMF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to CNLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs THSGF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, THSGF has a market cap of 188.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while THSGF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas THSGF's P/E ratio is 39.77. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to THSGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to THSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs DCCNF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, DCCNF has a market cap of 182.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while DCCNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas DCCNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to DCCNF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is more volatile compared to DCCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs CNMXF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, CNMXF has a market cap of 179.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while CNMXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas CNMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to CNMXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is less volatile compared to CNMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.
ATADF vs MAIFF Comparison
ATADF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATADF stands at 20.6M. In comparison, MAIFF has a market cap of 170.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ATADF is priced at $0.09, while MAIFF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATADF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.64, whereas MAIFF's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, ATADF's ROE is N/A, compared to MAIFF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ATADF is less volatile compared to MAIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATADF.