Arizona Sonoran Copper Company Inc.
Arizona Sonoran Copper Company Inc. (ASCUF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ASCUF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Copper Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASCUF | $1.69 | +2.42% | 300.4M | -33.80 | -$0.05 | N/A |
ANFGF | $27.45 | +7.35% | 27.1B | 32.68 | $0.84 | +2.00% |
FQVLF | $16.70 | -1.42% | 13.7B | 66.40 | $0.25 | N/A |
JIAXF | $1.97 | +0.51% | 9.1B | 6.79 | $0.29 | +4.90% |
LUNMF | $10.29 | -1.63% | 8.8B | 85.58 | $0.12 | +2.30% |
KGHPF | $33.99 | +6.22% | 6.8B | 9.04 | $3.76 | N/A |
OZMLF | $19.00 | +0.00% | 6.4B | 46.34 | $0.41 | N/A |
MMLTF | $0.47 | +34.45% | 5.6B | 23.26 | $0.02 | N/A |
CSCCF | $6.33 | +2.43% | 4.8B | 63.29 | $0.10 | N/A |
AIAGY | $55.28 | +10.41% | 4.4B | 5.43 | $9.22 | +1.64% |
Stock Comparison
ASCUF vs ANFGF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, ANFGF has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while ANFGF trades at $27.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas ANFGF's P/E ratio is 32.68. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ANFGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is more volatile compared to ANFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check ANFGF's competition here
ASCUF vs FQVLF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, FQVLF has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while FQVLF trades at $16.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas FQVLF's P/E ratio is 66.40. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FQVLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is less volatile compared to FQVLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check FQVLF's competition here
ASCUF vs JIAXF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, JIAXF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while JIAXF trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas JIAXF's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JIAXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is more volatile compared to JIAXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check JIAXF's competition here
ASCUF vs LUNMF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, LUNMF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while LUNMF trades at $10.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas LUNMF's P/E ratio is 85.58. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LUNMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is less volatile compared to LUNMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check LUNMF's competition here
ASCUF vs KGHPF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, KGHPF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while KGHPF trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas KGHPF's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KGHPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is more volatile compared to KGHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check KGHPF's competition here
ASCUF vs OZMLF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, OZMLF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while OZMLF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas OZMLF's P/E ratio is 46.34. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OZMLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is more volatile compared to OZMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check OZMLF's competition here
ASCUF vs MMLTF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, MMLTF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while MMLTF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas MMLTF's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MMLTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is more volatile compared to MMLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check MMLTF's competition here
ASCUF vs CSCCF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, CSCCF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while CSCCF trades at $6.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas CSCCF's P/E ratio is 63.29. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CSCCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is less volatile compared to CSCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check CSCCF's competition here
ASCUF vs AIAGY Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, AIAGY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while AIAGY trades at $55.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas AIAGY's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AIAGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is more volatile compared to AIAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check AIAGY's competition here
ASCUF vs AIAGF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, AIAGF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while AIAGF trades at $87.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas AIAGF's P/E ratio is 4.73. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AIAGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is more volatile compared to AIAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check AIAGF's competition here
ASCUF vs SFRRF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, SFRRF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while SFRRF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas SFRRF's P/E ratio is 36.84. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SFRRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is more volatile compared to SFRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check SFRRF's competition here
ASCUF vs IPMLF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, IPMLF has a market cap of 465.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while IPMLF trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas IPMLF's P/E ratio is -15.97. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IPMLF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is less volatile compared to IPMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check IPMLF's competition here
ASCUF vs CAMLF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, CAMLF has a market cap of 357.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while CAMLF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas CAMLF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CAMLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is less volatile compared to CAMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check CAMLF's competition here
ASCUF vs ARREF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, ARREF has a market cap of 250.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while ARREF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas ARREF's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ARREF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is less volatile compared to ARREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check ARREF's competition here
ASCUF vs CPPKF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, CPPKF has a market cap of 200.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while CPPKF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas CPPKF's P/E ratio is -8.93. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CPPKF's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is less volatile compared to CPPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check CPPKF's competition here
ASCUF vs AMRZF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, AMRZF has a market cap of 183.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while AMRZF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas AMRZF's P/E ratio is -22.39. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AMRZF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is more volatile compared to AMRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check AMRZF's competition here
ASCUF vs LSANF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, LSANF has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while LSANF trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas LSANF's P/E ratio is 35.20. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LSANF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is less volatile compared to LSANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check LSANF's competition here
ASCUF vs HLGVF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, HLGVF has a market cap of 146.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while HLGVF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas HLGVF's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HLGVF's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is less volatile compared to HLGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check HLGVF's competition here
ASCUF vs CPFXF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, CPFXF has a market cap of 103.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while CPFXF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas CPFXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CPFXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is more volatile compared to CPFXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check CPFXF's competition here
ASCUF vs HDRSF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, HDRSF has a market cap of 63.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while HDRSF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas HDRSF's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HDRSF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is less volatile compared to HDRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check HDRSF's competition here
ASCUF vs HHLKF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, HHLKF has a market cap of 61.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while HHLKF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas HHLKF's P/E ratio is -7.96. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HHLKF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is more volatile compared to HHLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check HHLKF's competition here
ASCUF vs ATCUF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, ATCUF has a market cap of 46.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while ATCUF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas ATCUF's P/E ratio is -24.64. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ATCUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is less volatile compared to ATCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check ATCUF's competition here
ASCUF vs EMTRF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, EMTRF has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while EMTRF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas EMTRF's P/E ratio is -9.25. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EMTRF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is less volatile compared to EMTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check EMTRF's competition here
ASCUF vs CPORF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, CPORF has a market cap of 36.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while CPORF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas CPORF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CPORF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is more volatile compared to CPORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check CPORF's competition here
ASCUF vs CCOXF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, CCOXF has a market cap of 31.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while CCOXF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas CCOXF's P/E ratio is -28.75. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CCOXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is more volatile compared to CCOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check CCOXF's competition here
ASCUF vs NEVDF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, NEVDF has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while NEVDF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas NEVDF's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NEVDF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is less volatile compared to NEVDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check NEVDF's competition here
ASCUF vs CPPMF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, CPPMF has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while CPPMF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas CPPMF's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CPPMF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is less volatile compared to CPPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check CPPMF's competition here
ASCUF vs DRCMF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, DRCMF has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while DRCMF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas DRCMF's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DRCMF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is more volatile compared to DRCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check DRCMF's competition here
ASCUF vs BZDLF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, BZDLF has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while BZDLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas BZDLF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BZDLF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is less volatile compared to BZDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check BZDLF's competition here
ASCUF vs QCCUF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, QCCUF has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while QCCUF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas QCCUF's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to QCCUF's ROE of -2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is more volatile compared to QCCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check QCCUF's competition here
ASCUF vs RKCLF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, RKCLF has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while RKCLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas RKCLF's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RKCLF's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is more volatile compared to RKCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check RKCLF's competition here
ASCUF vs USCUF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, USCUF has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while USCUF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas USCUF's P/E ratio is -9.35. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to USCUF's ROE of -5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is less volatile compared to USCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check USCUF's competition here
ASCUF vs ACMDY Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, ACMDY has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while ACMDY trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas ACMDY's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ACMDY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is more volatile compared to ACMDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check ACMDY's competition here
ASCUF vs PNTZF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, PNTZF has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while PNTZF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas PNTZF's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PNTZF's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is less volatile compared to PNTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check PNTZF's competition here
ASCUF vs AGLAF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, AGLAF has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while AGLAF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas AGLAF's P/E ratio is -10.59. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AGLAF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is more volatile compared to AGLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check AGLAF's competition here
ASCUF vs CPCPF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, CPCPF has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while CPCPF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas CPCPF's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CPCPF's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is more volatile compared to CPCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check CPCPF's competition here
ASCUF vs SLMFF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, SLMFF has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while SLMFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas SLMFF's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SLMFF's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is less volatile compared to SLMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check SLMFF's competition here
ASCUF vs BCUFF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, BCUFF has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while BCUFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas BCUFF's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BCUFF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is more volatile compared to BCUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check BCUFF's competition here
ASCUF vs WCUFF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, WCUFF has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while WCUFF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas WCUFF's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WCUFF's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is less volatile compared to WCUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check WCUFF's competition here
ASCUF vs ANGUF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, ANGUF has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while ANGUF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas ANGUF's P/E ratio is -13.68. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ANGUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is more volatile compared to ANGUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check ANGUF's competition here
ASCUF vs CAEN Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, CAEN has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while CAEN trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas CAEN's P/E ratio is 63.10. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CAEN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is less volatile compared to CAEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check CAEN's competition here
ASCUF vs FVVSF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, FVVSF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while FVVSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas FVVSF's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FVVSF's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is more volatile compared to FVVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check FVVSF's competition here
ASCUF vs BRVRF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, BRVRF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while BRVRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas BRVRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BRVRF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is more volatile compared to BRVRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check BRVRF's competition here
ASCUF vs INUMF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, INUMF has a market cap of 859K. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while INUMF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas INUMF's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to INUMF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is less volatile compared to INUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check INUMF's competition here
ASCUF vs JUBAF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, JUBAF has a market cap of 681K. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while JUBAF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas JUBAF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JUBAF's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is less volatile compared to JUBAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check JUBAF's competition here
ASCUF vs ECMXF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, ECMXF has a market cap of 446.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while ECMXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas ECMXF's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ECMXF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is more volatile compared to ECMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check ECMXF's competition here
ASCUF vs AEOMF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, AEOMF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while AEOMF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas AEOMF's P/E ratio is -10.40. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AEOMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is more volatile compared to AEOMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check AEOMF's competition here
ASCUF vs CROJF Comparison August 2025
ASCUF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASCUF stands at 300.4M. In comparison, CROJF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASCUF is priced at $1.69, while CROJF trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASCUF currently has a P/E ratio of -33.80, whereas CROJF's P/E ratio is -10.81. In terms of profitability, ASCUF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CROJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASCUF is more volatile compared to CROJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASCUF.Check CROJF's competition here