Arrival

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, TOYOF has a market cap of 242.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while TOYOF trades at $18.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOYOF's P/E ratio is 8.45. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to TOYOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to TOYOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check TOYOF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, BYDDF has a market cap of 134.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while BYDDF trades at $14.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYDDF's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to BYDDF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to BYDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check BYDDF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, BYDDY has a market cap of 133.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while BYDDY trades at $14.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYDDY's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to BYDDY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to BYDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check BYDDY's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, BAMXF has a market cap of 64.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while BAMXF trades at $104.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAMXF's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to BAMXF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to BAMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check BAMXF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, BYMOF has a market cap of 63.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while BYMOF trades at $91.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYMOF's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to BYMOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to BYMOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check BYMOF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, MBGAF has a market cap of 60.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while MBGAF trades at $62.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBGAF's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to MBGAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to MBGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check MBGAF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, MBGYY has a market cap of 60.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while MBGYY trades at $15.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBGYY's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to MBGYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to MBGYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check MBGYY's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, VLKAF has a market cap of 60.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while VLKAF trades at $119.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLKAF's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to VLKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to VLKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check VLKAF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, VWAGY has a market cap of 59.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while VWAGY trades at $11.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWAGY's P/E ratio is 6.12. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to VWAGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to VWAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check VWAGY's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, VLKPF has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while VLKPF trades at $117.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLKPF's P/E ratio is 6.02. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to VLKPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to VLKPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check VLKPF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, VWAPY has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while VWAPY trades at $11.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWAPY's P/E ratio is 5.98. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to VWAPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to VWAPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check VWAPY's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, DRPRF has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while DRPRF trades at $54.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRPRF's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to DRPRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to DRPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check DRPRF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, DRPRY has a market cap of 48.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while DRPRY trades at $5.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRPRY's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to DRPRY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to DRPRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check DRPRY's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, MAHMF has a market cap of 47.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while MAHMF trades at $38.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAHMF's P/E ratio is 27.29. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to MAHMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to MAHMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check MAHMF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, HNDAF has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while HNDAF trades at $10.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HNDAF's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to HNDAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to HNDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check HNDAF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, HYMTF has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while HYMTF trades at $51.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMTF's P/E ratio is 2.99. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to HYMTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to HYMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check HYMTF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, TYIDY has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while TYIDY trades at $110.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYIDY's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to TYIDY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to TYIDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check TYIDY's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, TYIDF has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while TYIDF trades at $106.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYIDF's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to TYIDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to TYIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check TYIDF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, GWLLF has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while GWLLF trades at $2.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWLLF's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to GWLLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to GWLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check GWLLF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, GELYF has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while GELYF trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GELYF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to GELYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to GELYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check GELYF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, GELYY has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while GELYY trades at $50.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GELYY's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to GELYY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to GELYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check GELYY's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, SZKMY has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while SZKMY trades at $53.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SZKMY's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to SZKMY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to SZKMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check SZKMY's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, SZKMF has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while SZKMF trades at $13.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SZKMF's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to SZKMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to SZKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check SZKMF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, HYMLF has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while HYMLF trades at $89.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMLF's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to HYMLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to HYMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check HYMLF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, EXXRF has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while EXXRF trades at $104.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXXRF's P/E ratio is 1.33. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to EXXRF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to EXXRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check EXXRF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, GWLLY has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while GWLLY trades at $23.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWLLY's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to GWLLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to GWLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check GWLLY's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, XPNGF has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while XPNGF trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPNGF's P/E ratio is -27.03. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to XPNGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to XPNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check XPNGF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, BMWYY has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while BMWYY trades at $29.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMWYY's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to BMWYY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to BMWYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check BMWYY's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, FUJHF has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while FUJHF trades at $20.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUJHF's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to FUJHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to FUJHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check FUJHF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, FUJHY has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while FUJHY trades at $9.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUJHY's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to FUJHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to FUJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check FUJHY's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, POAHY has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while POAHY trades at $4.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POAHY's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to POAHY's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to POAHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check POAHY's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, POAHF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while POAHF trades at $43.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POAHF's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to POAHF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to POAHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check POAHF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, YAMHY has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while YAMHY trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YAMHY's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to YAMHY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to YAMHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check YAMHY's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, NIOIF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while NIOIF trades at $5.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIOIF's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to NIOIF's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to NIOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check NIOIF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, RNSDF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while RNSDF trades at $36.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNSDF's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to RNSDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to RNSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check RNSDF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, RNLSY has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while RNLSY trades at $7.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNLSY's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to RNLSY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to RNLSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check RNLSY's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, ISUZY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while ISUZY trades at $13.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISUZY's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to ISUZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to ISUZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check ISUZY's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, GNZUF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while GNZUF trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNZUF's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to GNZUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to GNZUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check GNZUF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, JCYGY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while JCYGY trades at $44.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCYGY's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to JCYGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to JCYGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check JCYGY's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, JCYCF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while JCYCF trades at $21.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCYCF's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to JCYCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to JCYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check JCYCF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, ISUZF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while ISUZF trades at $11.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISUZF's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to ISUZF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to ISUZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check ISUZF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, NSANY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while NSANY trades at $4.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSANY's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to NSANY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to NSANY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check NSANY's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, YMHAY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while YMHAY trades at $14.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YMHAY's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to YMHAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to YMHAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check YMHAY's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, NSANF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while NSANF trades at $2.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSANF's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to NSANF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to NSANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check NSANF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, YAMHF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while YAMHF trades at $7.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YAMHF's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to YAMHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to YAMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check YAMHF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, VLVOF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while VLVOF trades at $2.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLVOF's P/E ratio is 219.00. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to VLVOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to VLVOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check VLVOF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, DNFGF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while DNFGF trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNFGF's P/E ratio is -9.29. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to DNFGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to DNFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check DNFGF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, VLVCY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while VLVCY trades at $4.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLVCY's P/E ratio is 139.83. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to VLVCY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to VLVCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check VLVCY's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, IVCGF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while IVCGF trades at $21.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVCGF's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to IVCGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to IVCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check IVCGF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, DNFGY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while DNFGY trades at $32.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNFGY's P/E ratio is 650.00. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to DNFGY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to DNFGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check DNFGY's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, YADGF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while YADGF trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YADGF's P/E ratio is 24.17. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to YADGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to YADGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check YADGF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, MZDAY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while MZDAY trades at $3.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MZDAY's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to MZDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to MZDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check MZDAY's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, MZDAF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while MZDAF trades at $6.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MZDAF's P/E ratio is 5.20. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to MZDAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to MZDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check MZDAF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, MMTOF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while MMTOF trades at $2.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMTOF's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to MMTOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to MMTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check MMTOF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, SMEBF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while SMEBF trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMEBF's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to SMEBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to SMEBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check SMEBF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, BCCMY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while BCCMY trades at $2.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCCMY's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to BCCMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to BCCMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check BCCMY's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, BCAUF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while BCAUF trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCAUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to BCAUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to BCAUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check BCAUF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, BMCLF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while BMCLF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMCLF's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to BMCLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to BMCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check BMCLF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, NFYEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while NFYEF trades at $13.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFYEF's P/E ratio is -9.73. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to NFYEF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to NFYEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check NFYEF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, HINOF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while HINOF trades at $2.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HINOF's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to HINOF's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to HINOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check HINOF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, HINOY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while HINOY trades at $22.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HINOY's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to HINOY's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to HINOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check HINOY's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, AMGDF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while AMGDF trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMGDF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to AMGDF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to AMGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check AMGDF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, FOVSY has a market cap of 912.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while FOVSY trades at $13.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOVSY's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to FOVSY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to FOVSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check FOVSY's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, ARGGY has a market cap of 887.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while ARGGY trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARGGY's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to ARGGY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to ARGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check ARGGY's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, ELMWQ has a market cap of 868.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while ELMWQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELMWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to ELMWQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to ELMWQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check ELMWQ's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, NSNHF has a market cap of 866.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while NSNHF trades at $6.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSNHF's P/E ratio is 640.00. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to NSNHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to NSNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check NSNHF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, PIAGF has a market cap of 836.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while PIAGF trades at $2.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIAGF's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to PIAGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to PIAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check PIAGF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, KRSOF has a market cap of 444.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while KRSOF trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRSOF's P/E ratio is 49.40. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to KRSOF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to KRSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check KRSOF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, FHYDF has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while FHYDF trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FHYDF's P/E ratio is -8.31. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to FHYDF's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to FHYDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check FHYDF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, RIDEQ has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while RIDEQ trades at $1.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIDEQ's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to RIDEQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to RIDEQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check RIDEQ's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, NRDE has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while NRDE trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRDE's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to NRDE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to NRDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check NRDE's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, ELMSQ has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while ELMSQ trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELMSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to ELMSQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to ELMSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check ELMSQ's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, SEVCF has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while SEVCF trades at $5.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEVCF's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to SEVCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to SEVCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check SEVCF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, LFEV has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while LFEV trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFEV's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to LFEV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to LFEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check LFEV's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, EVTGF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while EVTGF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVTGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to EVTGF's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to EVTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check EVTGF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, TUGAF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while TUGAF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUGAF's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to TUGAF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to TUGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check TUGAF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, FSRNQ has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while FSRNQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSRNQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to FSRNQ's ROE of -4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to FSRNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check FSRNQ's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, ELCR has a market cap of 681.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while ELCR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to ELCR's ROE of +3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF and ELCR have similar daily volatility (196.04).Check ELCR's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, GKIT has a market cap of 587.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while GKIT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GKIT's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to GKIT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to GKIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check GKIT's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, ELEK has a market cap of 465.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while ELEK trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to ELEK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to ELEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check ELEK's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, RONN has a market cap of 228.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while RONN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RONN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to RONN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to RONN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check RONN's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, GACR has a market cap of 104.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while GACR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GACR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to GACR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to GACR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check GACR's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, CSBI has a market cap of 15.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while CSBI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSBI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to CSBI's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to CSBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check CSBI's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, ELIO has a market cap of 14.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while ELIO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELIO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to ELIO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to ELIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check ELIO's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, NVYAF has a market cap of 8.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while NVYAF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVYAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to NVYAF's ROE of -16.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to NVYAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check NVYAF's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, NDVR has a market cap of 892. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while NDVR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NDVR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to NDVR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to NDVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check NDVR's competition here

ARVLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ARVLF stands at 1.8K. In comparison, DDAIF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARVLF is priced at $0.00, while DDAIF trades at $62.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ARVLF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DDAIF's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, ARVLF's ROE is -1.77%, compared to DDAIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARVLF is more volatile compared to DDAIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVLF.Check DDAIF's competition here