Armada Mercantile Ltd.
Armada Mercantile Ltd. (ARM.CN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ARM.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARM.CN | CA$0.24 | -2.04% | 5M | -1.00 | -CA$0.24 | N/A |
| GS.NE | CA$40.37 | +4.67% | 320B | 15.74 | CA$2.47 | +1.95% |
| GLXY.TO | CA$28.26 | -4.69% | 11B | -33.64 | -CA$0.84 | N/A |
| HUT.TO | CA$64.26 | -2.34% | 6.6B | -20.18 | -CA$2.95 | N/A |
| BITF.TO | CA$2.72 | -0.73% | 1.4B | -14.22 | -CA$0.18 | N/A |
| CF.TO | CA$11.86 | +3.49% | 1.2B | -5.30 | -CA$2.18 | +2.97% |
| CF-PC.TO | CA$24.68 | +1.52% | 1.1B | 11.34 | CA$2.16 | +2.97% |
| DEFI.NE | CA$0.77 | +13.24% | 231.2M | 71.00 | CA$0.01 | N/A |
| XAU.TO | CA$16.49 | +1.23% | 203.5M | 4.84 | CA$3.33 | N/A |
| CXI.TO | CA$25.25 | +4.43% | 148M | 7.71 | CA$3.21 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ARM.CN vs GS.NE Comparison April 2026
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 5M. In comparison, GS.NE has a market cap of 320B. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at CA$0.24, while GS.NE trades at CA$40.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GS.NE's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -3.16%, compared to GS.NE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is less volatile compared to GS.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.Check GS.NE's competition here
ARM.CN vs GLXY.TO Comparison April 2026
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 5M. In comparison, GLXY.TO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at CA$0.24, while GLXY.TO trades at CA$28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GLXY.TO's P/E ratio is -33.64. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -3.16%, compared to GLXY.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is less volatile compared to GLXY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.Check GLXY.TO's competition here
ARM.CN vs HUT.TO Comparison April 2026
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 5M. In comparison, HUT.TO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at CA$0.24, while HUT.TO trades at CA$64.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas HUT.TO's P/E ratio is -20.18. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -3.16%, compared to HUT.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is less volatile compared to HUT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.Check HUT.TO's competition here
ARM.CN vs BITF.TO Comparison April 2026
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 5M. In comparison, BITF.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at CA$0.24, while BITF.TO trades at CA$2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BITF.TO's P/E ratio is -14.22. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -3.16%, compared to BITF.TO's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is less volatile compared to BITF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.Check BITF.TO's competition here
ARM.CN vs CF.TO Comparison April 2026
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 5M. In comparison, CF.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at CA$0.24, while CF.TO trades at CA$11.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CF.TO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -3.16%, compared to CF.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is less volatile compared to CF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.Check CF.TO's competition here
ARM.CN vs CF-PC.TO Comparison April 2026
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 5M. In comparison, CF-PC.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at CA$0.24, while CF-PC.TO trades at CA$24.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CF-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -3.16%, compared to CF-PC.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is less volatile compared to CF-PC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.Check CF-PC.TO's competition here
ARM.CN vs DEFI.NE Comparison April 2026
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 5M. In comparison, DEFI.NE has a market cap of 231.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at CA$0.24, while DEFI.NE trades at CA$0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas DEFI.NE's P/E ratio is 71.00. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -3.16%, compared to DEFI.NE's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is less volatile compared to DEFI.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.Check DEFI.NE's competition here
ARM.CN vs XAU.TO Comparison April 2026
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 5M. In comparison, XAU.TO has a market cap of 203.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at CA$0.24, while XAU.TO trades at CA$16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas XAU.TO's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -3.16%, compared to XAU.TO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is less volatile compared to XAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.Check XAU.TO's competition here
ARM.CN vs CXI.TO Comparison April 2026
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 5M. In comparison, CXI.TO has a market cap of 148M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at CA$0.24, while CXI.TO trades at CA$25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CXI.TO's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -3.16%, compared to CXI.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is less volatile compared to CXI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.Check CXI.TO's competition here
ARM.CN vs RICH.CN Comparison April 2026
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 5M. In comparison, RICH.CN has a market cap of 142.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at CA$0.24, while RICH.CN trades at CA$2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas RICH.CN's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -3.16%, compared to RICH.CN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN and RICH.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RICH.CN's competition here
ARM.CN vs PNP.TO Comparison April 2026
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 5M. In comparison, PNP.TO has a market cap of 79.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at CA$0.24, while PNP.TO trades at CA$8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PNP.TO's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -3.16%, compared to PNP.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is less volatile compared to PNP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.Check PNP.TO's competition here
ARM.CN vs BIGG.CN Comparison April 2026
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 5M. In comparison, BIGG.CN has a market cap of 56.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at CA$0.24, while BIGG.CN trades at CA$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BIGG.CN's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -3.16%, compared to BIGG.CN's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is less volatile compared to BIGG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.Check BIGG.CN's competition here
ARM.CN vs HODL.CN Comparison April 2026
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 5M. In comparison, HODL.CN has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at CA$0.24, while HODL.CN trades at CA$1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas HODL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -3.16%, compared to HODL.CN's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is less volatile compared to HODL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.Check HODL.CN's competition here
ARM.CN vs BIGG.V Comparison April 2026
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 5M. In comparison, BIGG.V has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at CA$0.24, while BIGG.V trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BIGG.V's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -3.16%, compared to BIGG.V's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN and BIGG.V have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BIGG.V's competition here
ARM.CN vs BTC.CN Comparison April 2026
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 5M. In comparison, BTC.CN has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at CA$0.24, while BTC.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BTC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -3.16%, compared to BTC.CN's ROE of -2.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is less volatile compared to BTC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.Check BTC.CN's competition here
ARM.CN vs FRNT.V Comparison April 2026
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 5M. In comparison, FRNT.V has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at CA$0.24, while FRNT.V trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FRNT.V's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -3.16%, compared to FRNT.V's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is less volatile compared to FRNT.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.Check FRNT.V's competition here
ARM.CN vs SATO.V Comparison April 2026
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 5M. In comparison, SATO.V has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at CA$0.24, while SATO.V trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SATO.V's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -3.16%, compared to SATO.V's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is less volatile compared to SATO.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.Check SATO.V's competition here
ARM.CN vs SIX.CN Comparison April 2026
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 5M. In comparison, SIX.CN has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at CA$0.24, while SIX.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SIX.CN's P/E ratio is 1.13. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -3.16%, compared to SIX.CN's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN and SIX.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SIX.CN's competition here
ARM.CN vs MATA.V Comparison April 2026
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 5M. In comparison, MATA.V has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at CA$0.24, while MATA.V trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MATA.V's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -3.16%, compared to MATA.V's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN and MATA.V have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MATA.V's competition here
ARM.CN vs HOLD.NE Comparison April 2026
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 5M. In comparison, HOLD.NE has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at CA$0.24, while HOLD.NE trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas HOLD.NE's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -3.16%, compared to HOLD.NE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is less volatile compared to HOLD.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.Check HOLD.NE's competition here
ARM.CN vs CODE.CN Comparison April 2026
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 5M. In comparison, CODE.CN has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at CA$0.24, while CODE.CN trades at CA$1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CODE.CN's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -3.16%, compared to CODE.CN's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN and CODE.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CODE.CN's competition here
ARM.CN vs GBC.CN Comparison April 2026
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 5M. In comparison, GBC.CN has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at CA$0.24, while GBC.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GBC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -3.16%, compared to GBC.CN's ROE of -1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN and GBC.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBC.CN's competition here
ARM.CN vs SPIR.CN Comparison April 2026
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 5M. In comparison, SPIR.CN has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at CA$0.24, while SPIR.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SPIR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -3.16%, compared to SPIR.CN's ROE of +33.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN and SPIR.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPIR.CN's competition here
ARM.CN vs BKMT.V Comparison April 2026
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 5M. In comparison, BKMT.V has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at CA$0.24, while BKMT.V trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BKMT.V's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -3.16%, compared to BKMT.V's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is less volatile compared to BKMT.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.Check BKMT.V's competition here
ARM.CN vs FXC.TO Comparison April 2026
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 5M. In comparison, FXC.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at CA$0.24, while FXC.TO trades at CA$5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FXC.TO's P/E ratio is -73.86. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -3.16%, compared to FXC.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN and FXC.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FXC.TO's competition here