Armada Mercantile Ltd.
Armada Mercantile Ltd. ARM.CN Peers
See (ARM.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARM.CN | $0.33 | +3.13% | 6.92M | -33.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| GS.NE | $29.76 | +2.34% | 259.75B | 13.78 | $2.16 | +2.72% |
| GLXY.TO | $29.39 | +3.52% | 10.27B | 38.67 | $0.76 | N/A |
| HUT.TO | $23.01 | +6.09% | 2.40B | 4.90 | $4.70 | N/A |
| DEFI.NE | $5.78 | -2.86% | 1.89B | -44.46 | -$0.13 | N/A |
| CF.TO | $9.28 | +1.92% | 950.96M | -25.76 | -$0.36 | +3.67% |
| CF-PC.TO | $22.52 | -1.23% | 921.56M | 10.43 | $2.16 | +3.67% |
| BITF.TO | $1.58 | +1.94% | 800.91M | -8.78 | -$0.18 | N/A |
| HODL.CN | $4.18 | +5.56% | 640.18M | 104.50 | $0.04 | N/A |
| PNP.TO | $22.58 | +1.30% | 211.96M | 6.64 | $3.40 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ARM.CN vs GS.NE Comparison
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 6.92M. In comparison, GS.NE has a market cap of 259.75B. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at $0.33, while GS.NE trades at $29.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -33.00, whereas GS.NE's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GS.NE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is less volatile compared to GS.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.
ARM.CN vs GLXY.TO Comparison
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 6.92M. In comparison, GLXY.TO has a market cap of 10.27B. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at $0.33, while GLXY.TO trades at $29.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -33.00, whereas GLXY.TO's P/E ratio is 38.67. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GLXY.TO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is less volatile compared to GLXY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.
ARM.CN vs HUT.TO Comparison
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 6.92M. In comparison, HUT.TO has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at $0.33, while HUT.TO trades at $23.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -33.00, whereas HUT.TO's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HUT.TO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is less volatile compared to HUT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.
ARM.CN vs DEFI.NE Comparison
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 6.92M. In comparison, DEFI.NE has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at $0.33, while DEFI.NE trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -33.00, whereas DEFI.NE's P/E ratio is -44.46. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DEFI.NE's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is less volatile compared to DEFI.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.
ARM.CN vs CF.TO Comparison
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 6.92M. In comparison, CF.TO has a market cap of 950.96M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at $0.33, while CF.TO trades at $9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -33.00, whereas CF.TO's P/E ratio is -25.76. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CF.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is less volatile compared to CF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.
ARM.CN vs CF-PC.TO Comparison
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 6.92M. In comparison, CF-PC.TO has a market cap of 921.56M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at $0.33, while CF-PC.TO trades at $22.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -33.00, whereas CF-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CF-PC.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is more volatile compared to CF-PC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.
ARM.CN vs BITF.TO Comparison
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 6.92M. In comparison, BITF.TO has a market cap of 800.91M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at $0.33, while BITF.TO trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -33.00, whereas BITF.TO's P/E ratio is -8.78. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BITF.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is less volatile compared to BITF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.
ARM.CN vs HODL.CN Comparison
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 6.92M. In comparison, HODL.CN has a market cap of 640.18M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at $0.33, while HODL.CN trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -33.00, whereas HODL.CN's P/E ratio is 104.50. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HODL.CN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is less volatile compared to HODL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.
ARM.CN vs PNP.TO Comparison
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 6.92M. In comparison, PNP.TO has a market cap of 211.96M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at $0.33, while PNP.TO trades at $22.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -33.00, whereas PNP.TO's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PNP.TO's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is less volatile compared to PNP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.
ARM.CN vs RICH.CN Comparison
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 6.92M. In comparison, RICH.CN has a market cap of 142.73M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at $0.33, while RICH.CN trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -33.00, whereas RICH.CN's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RICH.CN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is more volatile compared to RICH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.
ARM.CN vs CXI.TO Comparison
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 6.92M. In comparison, CXI.TO has a market cap of 128.17M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at $0.33, while CXI.TO trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -33.00, whereas CXI.TO's P/E ratio is 40.10. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CXI.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is more volatile compared to CXI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.
ARM.CN vs XAU.TO Comparison
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 6.92M. In comparison, XAU.TO has a market cap of 108.96M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at $0.33, while XAU.TO trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -33.00, whereas XAU.TO's P/E ratio is -4.09. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -0.01%, compared to XAU.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is more volatile compared to XAU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.
ARM.CN vs BIGG.CN Comparison
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 6.92M. In comparison, BIGG.CN has a market cap of 56.92M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at $0.33, while BIGG.CN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -33.00, whereas BIGG.CN's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BIGG.CN's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is less volatile compared to BIGG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.
ARM.CN vs FRNT.V Comparison
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 6.92M. In comparison, FRNT.V has a market cap of 15.97M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at $0.33, while FRNT.V trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -33.00, whereas FRNT.V's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FRNT.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is less volatile compared to FRNT.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.
ARM.CN vs HOLD.NE Comparison
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 6.92M. In comparison, HOLD.NE has a market cap of 11.79M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at $0.33, while HOLD.NE trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -33.00, whereas HOLD.NE's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HOLD.NE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is less volatile compared to HOLD.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.
ARM.CN vs SPIR.CN Comparison
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 6.92M. In comparison, SPIR.CN has a market cap of 9.93M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at $0.33, while SPIR.CN trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -33.00, whereas SPIR.CN's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SPIR.CN's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is less volatile compared to SPIR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.
ARM.CN vs BTC.CN Comparison
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 6.92M. In comparison, BTC.CN has a market cap of 9.16M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at $0.33, while BTC.CN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -33.00, whereas BTC.CN's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BTC.CN's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is less volatile compared to BTC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.
ARM.CN vs CODE.CN Comparison
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 6.92M. In comparison, CODE.CN has a market cap of 4.75M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at $0.33, while CODE.CN trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -33.00, whereas CODE.CN's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CODE.CN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is more volatile compared to CODE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.
ARM.CN vs GBC.CN Comparison
ARM.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARM.CN stands at 6.92M. In comparison, GBC.CN has a market cap of 2.81M. Regarding current trading prices, ARM.CN is priced at $0.33, while GBC.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARM.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -33.00, whereas GBC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, ARM.CN's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GBC.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARM.CN is more volatile compared to GBC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARM.CN.