AAK AB (publ.)
AAK AB (publ.) (ARHUF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ARHUF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARHUF | $25.25 | -8.17% | 6.6B | 17.29 | $1.46 | +2.03% |
| NSRGY | $101.94 | -0.02% | 265.1B | 22.62 | $4.51 | +3.32% |
| NSRGF | $100.60 | -1.70% | 263.4B | 22.71 | $4.51 | +3.60% |
| DANOY | $16.37 | +1.68% | 52.4B | 24.80 | $0.66 | +2.86% |
| GPDNF | $79.62 | -0.68% | 51B | 23.70 | $3.36 | +3.06% |
| JBSAY | $13.81 | +3.06% | 30.6B | 6.94 | $1.99 | +7.26% |
| AJINF | $25.38 | -9.55% | 24.4B | 105.75 | $0.24 | +1.18% |
| ASBFF | $27.95 | +0.00% | 19.7B | 14.48 | $1.93 | +3.02% |
| JDEPF | $38.00 | +0.00% | 18.4B | 26.21 | $1.45 | +2.25% |
| ASBFY | $24.65 | +0.69% | 17.4B | 12.97 | $1.90 | +3.07% |
Stock Comparison
ARHUF vs NSRGY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NSRGY has a market cap of 265.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while NSRGY trades at $101.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas NSRGY's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NSRGY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to NSRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check NSRGY's competition here
ARHUF vs NSRGF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NSRGF has a market cap of 263.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while NSRGF trades at $100.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas NSRGF's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NSRGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to NSRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check NSRGF's competition here
ARHUF vs DANOY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, DANOY has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while DANOY trades at $16.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas DANOY's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DANOY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to DANOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check DANOY's competition here
ARHUF vs GPDNF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GPDNF has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while GPDNF trades at $79.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas GPDNF's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GPDNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and GPDNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GPDNF's competition here
ARHUF vs JBSAY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, JBSAY has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while JBSAY trades at $13.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas JBSAY's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JBSAY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to JBSAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check JBSAY's competition here
ARHUF vs AJINF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AJINF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while AJINF trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas AJINF's P/E ratio is 105.75. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AJINF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and AJINF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AJINF's competition here
ARHUF vs ASBFF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ASBFF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while ASBFF trades at $27.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas ASBFF's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ASBFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and ASBFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASBFF's competition here
ARHUF vs JDEPF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, JDEPF has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while JDEPF trades at $38.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas JDEPF's P/E ratio is 26.21. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JDEPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and JDEPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JDEPF's competition here
ARHUF vs ASBFY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ASBFY has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while ASBFY trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas ASBFY's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ASBFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to ASBFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check ASBFY's competition here
ARHUF vs WHGRF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, WHGRF has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while WHGRF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas WHGRF's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WHGRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to WHGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check WHGRF's competition here
ARHUF vs WHGLY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, WHGLY has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while WHGLY trades at $24.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas WHGLY's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WHGLY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to WHGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check WHGLY's competition here
ARHUF vs GRBMF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GRBMF has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while GRBMF trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas GRBMF's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GRBMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and GRBMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GRBMF's competition here
ARHUF vs BMBOY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BMBOY has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while BMBOY trades at $13.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas BMBOY's P/E ratio is 23.12. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BMBOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to BMBOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check BMBOY's competition here
ARHUF vs AJINY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AJINY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while AJINY trades at $27.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas AJINY's P/E ratio is 116.50. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AJINY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to AJINY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check AJINY's competition here
ARHUF vs KRYAF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, KRYAF has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while KRYAF trades at $86.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas KRYAF's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KRYAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to KRYAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check KRYAF's competition here
ARHUF vs ORKLF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ORKLF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while ORKLF trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas ORKLF's P/E ratio is 20.22. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ORKLF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and ORKLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ORKLF's competition here
ARHUF vs KRYAY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, KRYAY has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while KRYAY trades at $79.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas KRYAY's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KRYAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to KRYAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check KRYAY's competition here
ARHUF vs SAPIF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SAPIF has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while SAPIF trades at $30.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas SAPIF's P/E ratio is 26.91. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SAPIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to SAPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check SAPIF's competition here
ARHUF vs ORKLY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ORKLY has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while ORKLY trades at $12.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas ORKLY's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ORKLY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to ORKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check ORKLY's competition here
ARHUF vs SDPNF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SDPNF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while SDPNF trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas SDPNF's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SDPNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to SDPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check SDPNF's competition here
ARHUF vs LOTBY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, LOTBY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while LOTBY trades at $125.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas LOTBY's P/E ratio is 50.66. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LOTBY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to LOTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check LOTBY's competition here
ARHUF vs BRZL Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BRZL has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while BRZL trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas BRZL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BRZL's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to BRZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check BRZL's competition here
ARHUF vs TYCMY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TYCMY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while TYCMY trades at $32.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas TYCMY's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TYCMY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to TYCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check TYCMY's competition here
ARHUF vs TTAZF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TTAZF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while TTAZF trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas TTAZF's P/E ratio is 77.60. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TTAZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and TTAZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TTAZF's competition here
ARHUF vs CIADF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CIADF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while CIADF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas CIADF's P/E ratio is -220.00. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CIADF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and CIADF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CIADF's competition here
ARHUF vs KIKOF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, KIKOF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while KIKOF trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas KIKOF's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KIKOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and KIKOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KIKOF's competition here
ARHUF vs CIADY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CIADY has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while CIADY trades at $20.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas CIADY's P/E ratio is -205.47. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CIADY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to CIADY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check CIADY's competition here
ARHUF vs KIKOY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, KIKOY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while KIKOY trades at $16.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas KIKOY's P/E ratio is 21.41. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KIKOY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and KIKOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KIKOY's competition here
ARHUF vs TSUKF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TSUKF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while TSUKF trades at $77.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas TSUKF's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TSUKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to TSUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check TSUKF's competition here
ARHUF vs TCYMF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TCYMF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while TCYMF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas TCYMF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TCYMF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and TCYMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCYMF's competition here
ARHUF vs WWNTY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, WWNTY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while WWNTY trades at $29.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas WWNTY's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WWNTY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to WWNTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check WWNTY's competition here
ARHUF vs WWNTF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, WWNTF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while WWNTF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas WWNTF's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WWNTF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and WWNTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WWNTF's competition here
ARHUF vs TSUKY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TSUKY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while TSUKY trades at $67.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas TSUKY's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TSUKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to TSUKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check TSUKY's competition here
ARHUF vs MEJHY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MEJHY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while MEJHY trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas MEJHY's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MEJHY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and MEJHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MEJHY's competition here
ARHUF vs DLLFF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, DLLFF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while DLLFF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas DLLFF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DLLFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and DLLFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DLLFF's competition here
ARHUF vs GPAGF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GPAGF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while GPAGF trades at $18.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas GPAGF's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GPAGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and GPAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GPAGF's competition here
ARHUF vs GCHOY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GCHOY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while GCHOY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas GCHOY's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GCHOY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to GCHOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check GCHOY's competition here
ARHUF vs NSLYF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NSLYF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while NSLYF trades at $27.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas NSLYF's P/E ratio is 59.35. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NSLYF's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to NSLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check NSLYF's competition here
ARHUF vs SGLJF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SGLJF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while SGLJF trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas SGLJF's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SGLJF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and SGLJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGLJF's competition here
ARHUF vs NFPDF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NFPDF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while NFPDF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas NFPDF's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NFPDF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to NFPDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check NFPDF's competition here
ARHUF vs MEJHF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MEJHF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while MEJHF trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas MEJHF's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MEJHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to MEJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check MEJHF's competition here
ARHUF vs SMPFF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SMPFF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while SMPFF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas SMPFF's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMPFF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and SMPFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMPFF's competition here
ARHUF vs PIFFY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PIFFY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while PIFFY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas PIFFY's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PIFFY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to PIFFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check PIFFY's competition here
ARHUF vs EMLZF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, EMLZF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while EMLZF trades at $969.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas EMLZF's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EMLZF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to EMLZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check EMLZF's competition here
ARHUF vs GLAPY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GLAPY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while GLAPY trades at $98.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas GLAPY's P/E ratio is 41.80. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GLAPY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and GLAPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLAPY's competition here
ARHUF vs GLAPF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GLAPF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while GLAPF trades at $19.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas GLAPF's P/E ratio is 42.13. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GLAPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and GLAPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLAPF's competition here
ARHUF vs IOIOF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, IOIOF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while IOIOF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas IOIOF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IOIOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and IOIOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IOIOF's competition here
ARHUF vs CFEIY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CFEIY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while CFEIY trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas CFEIY's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CFEIY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and CFEIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CFEIY's competition here
ARHUF vs TATYY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TATYY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while TATYY trades at $19.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas TATYY's P/E ratio is 52.94. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TATYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and TATYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TATYY's competition here
ARHUF vs ACOPF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ACOPF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while ACOPF trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas ACOPF's P/E ratio is 34.44. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ACOPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to ACOPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check ACOPF's competition here
ARHUF vs PIFMF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PIFMF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while PIFMF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas PIFMF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PIFMF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and PIFMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PIFMF's competition here
ARHUF vs NIPMY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NIPMY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while NIPMY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas NIPMY's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NIPMY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and NIPMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NIPMY's competition here
ARHUF vs CHFLF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CHFLF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while CHFLF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas CHFLF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CHFLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to CHFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check CHFLF's competition here
ARHUF vs YMZBY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, YMZBY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while YMZBY trades at $180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas YMZBY's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YMZBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to YMZBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check YMZBY's competition here
ARHUF vs CRWKF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CRWKF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while CRWKF trades at $63.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas CRWKF's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CRWKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to CRWKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check CRWKF's competition here
ARHUF vs NSFMF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NSFMF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while NSFMF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas NSFMF's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NSFMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to NSFMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check NSFMF's competition here
ARHUF vs FPAFF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, FPAFF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while FPAFF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas FPAFF's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FPAFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to FPAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check FPAFF's competition here
ARHUF vs EBRPF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, EBRPF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while EBRPF trades at $21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas EBRPF's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EBRPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and EBRPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EBRPF's competition here
ARHUF vs FPAFY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, FPAFY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while FPAFY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas FPAFY's P/E ratio is 4.45. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FPAFY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to FPAFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check FPAFY's competition here
ARHUF vs TBLMF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TBLMF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while TBLMF trades at $20.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas TBLMF's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TBLMF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to TBLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check TBLMF's competition here
ARHUF vs PIFMY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PIFMY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while PIFMY trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas PIFMY's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PIFMY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to PIFMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check PIFMY's competition here
ARHUF vs NHFOF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NHFOF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while NHFOF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas NHFOF's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NHFOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to NHFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check NHFOF's competition here
ARHUF vs LYSFY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, LYSFY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while LYSFY trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas LYSFY's P/E ratio is 80.77. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LYSFY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and LYSFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LYSFY's competition here
ARHUF vs LYSFF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, LYSFF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while LYSFF trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas LYSFF's P/E ratio is 86.42. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LYSFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to LYSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check LYSFF's competition here
ARHUF vs NCHEY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NCHEY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while NCHEY trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas NCHEY's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NCHEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to NCHEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check NCHEY's competition here
ARHUF vs PRBZF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PRBZF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while PRBZF trades at $67.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas PRBZF's P/E ratio is 62.82. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PRBZF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to PRBZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check PRBZF's competition here
ARHUF vs MRRTY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MRRTY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while MRRTY trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas MRRTY's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MRRTY's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to MRRTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check MRRTY's competition here
ARHUF vs FSRCY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, FSRCY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while FSRCY trades at $184.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas FSRCY's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FSRCY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to FSRCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check FSRCY's competition here
ARHUF vs CBCFF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CBCFF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while CBCFF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas CBCFF's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CBCFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to CBCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check CBCFF's competition here
ARHUF vs FTROF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, FTROF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while FTROF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas FTROF's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FTROF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and FTROF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FTROF's competition here
ARHUF vs EBRPY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, EBRPY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while EBRPY trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas EBRPY's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EBRPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and EBRPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EBRPY's competition here
ARHUF vs NISUY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NISUY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while NISUY trades at $86.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas NISUY's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NISUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and NISUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NISUY's competition here
ARHUF vs MLFNF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MLFNF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while MLFNF trades at $20.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas MLFNF's P/E ratio is 83.92. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MLFNF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to MLFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check MLFNF's competition here
ARHUF vs UVRBF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, UVRBF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while UVRBF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas UVRBF's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UVRBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and UVRBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UVRBF's competition here
ARHUF vs SUEZF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SUEZF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while SUEZF trades at $11.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas SUEZF's P/E ratio is -11.15. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SUEZF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to SUEZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check SUEZF's competition here
ARHUF vs SUEZY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SUEZY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while SUEZY trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas SUEZY's P/E ratio is -10.44. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SUEZY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and SUEZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SUEZY's competition here
ARHUF vs CLBEY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CLBEY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while CLBEY trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas CLBEY's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CLBEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and CLBEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLBEY's competition here
ARHUF vs UVRBY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, UVRBY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while UVRBY trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas UVRBY's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UVRBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and UVRBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UVRBY's competition here
ARHUF vs PFODF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PFODF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while PFODF trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas PFODF's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PFODF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and PFODF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PFODF's competition here
ARHUF vs TATYF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TATYF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while TATYF trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas TATYF's P/E ratio is 52.33. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TATYF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and TATYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TATYF's competition here
ARHUF vs GRPBF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GRPBF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while GRPBF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas GRPBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GRPBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and GRPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GRPBF's competition here
ARHUF vs PRRFY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PRRFY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while PRRFY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas PRRFY's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PRRFY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to PRRFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check PRRFY's competition here
ARHUF vs ARZTY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ARZTY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while ARZTY trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas ARZTY's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ARZTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and ARZTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARZTY's competition here
ARHUF vs ARZTF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ARZTF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while ARZTF trades at $62.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas ARZTF's P/E ratio is 522.33. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ARZTF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and ARZTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARZTF's competition here
ARHUF vs HOFJF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, HOFJF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while HOFJF trades at $19.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas HOFJF's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HOFJF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to HOFJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check HOFJF's competition here
ARHUF vs GNCGF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GNCGF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while GNCGF trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas GNCGF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GNCGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and GNCGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNCGF's competition here
ARHUF vs TBLMY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TBLMY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while TBLMY trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas TBLMY's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TBLMY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and TBLMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TBLMY's competition here
ARHUF vs AVSFY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AVSFY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while AVSFY trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas AVSFY's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AVSFY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and AVSFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AVSFY's competition here
ARHUF vs GNCGY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GNCGY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while GNCGY trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas GNCGY's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GNCGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and GNCGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNCGY's competition here
ARHUF vs YNNHF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, YNNHF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while YNNHF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas YNNHF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YNNHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and YNNHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YNNHF's competition here
ARHUF vs FNEVY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, FNEVY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while FNEVY trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas FNEVY's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNEVY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and FNEVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FNEVY's competition here
ARHUF vs FNEVF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, FNEVF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while FNEVF trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas FNEVF's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNEVF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to FNEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check FNEVF's competition here
ARHUF vs TUFBY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TUFBY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while TUFBY trades at $7.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas TUFBY's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TUFBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and TUFBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TUFBY's competition here
ARHUF vs GUZOF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GUZOF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while GUZOF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas GUZOF's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GUZOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and GUZOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GUZOF's competition here
ARHUF vs HLFGY Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, HLFGY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while HLFGY trades at $15.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas HLFGY's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HLFGY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to HLFGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check HLFGY's competition here
ARHUF vs AKEJF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AKEJF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while AKEJF trades at $37.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas AKEJF's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AKEJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to AKEJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check AKEJF's competition here
ARHUF vs TUFUF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TUFUF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while TUFUF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas TUFUF's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TUFUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to TUFUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check TUFUF's competition here
ARHUF vs JWLLF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, JWLLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while JWLLF trades at $26.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas JWLLF's P/E ratio is 24.68. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JWLLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF is less volatile compared to JWLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHUF.Check JWLLF's competition here
ARHUF vs GBFBF Comparison March 2026
ARHUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHUF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GBFBF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHUF is priced at $25.25, while GBFBF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHUF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas GBFBF's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, ARHUF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GBFBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARHUF and GBFBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBFBF's competition here