Archon Corporation
Archon Corporation ARHN Peers
See (ARHN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARHN | $14.00 | +0.00% | 81.1M | -66.67 | -$0.21 | N/A |
| PDYPY | $103.75 | +0.50% | 36.7B | -494.05 | -$0.21 | N/A |
| PDYPF | $205.00 | +1.98% | 36.3B | -476.74 | -$0.43 | N/A |
| ARLUF | $46.19 | +0.00% | 27.6B | 38.48 | $1.15 | +1.26% |
| GXYYY | $23.80 | -0.17% | 20.8B | 18.54 | $1.28 | +2.70% |
| SCHYY | $23.66 | +0.08% | 19.1B | 18.29 | $1.29 | +1.16% |
| GXYEF | $4.37 | -0.68% | 18.3B | 16.72 | $0.25 | +3.07% |
| SCHYF | $2.43 | +0.00% | 18B | 17.08 | $0.13 | +11.26% |
| EVGGF | $87.40 | -1.99% | 17.8B | 12.87 | $6.79 | +3.60% |
| EVVTY | $86.59 | +0.13% | 17.6B | 12.76 | $6.80 | +3.35% |
Stock Comparison
ARHN vs PDYPY Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, PDYPY has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while PDYPY trades at $103.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas PDYPY's P/E ratio is -494.05. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PDYPY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN is less volatile compared to PDYPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHN.
ARHN vs PDYPF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, PDYPF has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while PDYPF trades at $205.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas PDYPF's P/E ratio is -476.74. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PDYPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN is less volatile compared to PDYPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHN.
ARHN vs ARLUF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, ARLUF has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while ARLUF trades at $46.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas ARLUF's P/E ratio is 38.48. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ARLUF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and ARLUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs GXYYY Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, GXYYY has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while GXYYY trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas GXYYY's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GXYYY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN is less volatile compared to GXYYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHN.
ARHN vs SCHYY Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, SCHYY has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while SCHYY trades at $23.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas SCHYY's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SCHYY's ROE of +3.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN is less volatile compared to SCHYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHN.
ARHN vs GXYEF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, GXYEF has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while GXYEF trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas GXYEF's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GXYEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and GXYEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs SCHYF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, SCHYF has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while SCHYF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas SCHYF's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SCHYF's ROE of +3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and SCHYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs EVGGF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, EVGGF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while EVGGF trades at $87.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas EVGGF's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EVGGF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN is less volatile compared to EVGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHN.
ARHN vs EVVTY Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, EVVTY has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while EVVTY trades at $86.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas EVVTY's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EVVTY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN is less volatile compared to EVVTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHN.
ARHN vs GMVHF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, GMVHF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while GMVHF trades at $13.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas GMVHF's P/E ratio is -13.81. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GMVHF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and GMVHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs GRKZF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, GRKZF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while GRKZF trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas GRKZF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GRKZF's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and GRKZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs GMVHY Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, GMVHY has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while GMVHY trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas GMVHY's P/E ratio is -13.55. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GMVHY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN is less volatile compared to GMVHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHN.
ARHN vs GOFPY Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, GOFPY has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while GOFPY trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas GOFPY's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GOFPY's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN is less volatile compared to GOFPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHN.
ARHN vs GIGNF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, GIGNF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while GIGNF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas GIGNF's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GIGNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and GIGNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs PYTCY Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, PYTCY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while PYTCY trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas PYTCY's P/E ratio is 102.27. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PYTCY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and PYTCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs LTRCF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, LTRCF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while LTRCF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas LTRCF's P/E ratio is 25.67. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LTRCF's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and LTRCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs MCHVF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, MCHVF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while MCHVF trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas MCHVF's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MCHVF's ROE of +18.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and MCHVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs GIGNY Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, GIGNY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while GIGNY trades at $28.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas GIGNY's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GIGNY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and GIGNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs LFDJF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, LFDJF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while LFDJF trades at $34.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas LFDJF's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LFDJF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and LFDJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs WYNMF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, WYNMF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while WYNMF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas WYNMF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WYNMF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and WYNMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs WYNMY Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, WYNMY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while WYNMY trades at $8.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas WYNMY's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WYNMY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN is less volatile compared to WYNMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHN.
ARHN vs SKXJF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, SKXJF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while SKXJF trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas SKXJF's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SKXJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and SKXJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs BMRMF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, BMRMF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while BMRMF trades at $118.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas BMRMF's P/E ratio is 22.54. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BMRMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and BMRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs GEBEY Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, GEBEY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while GEBEY trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas GEBEY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GEBEY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and GEBEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs GEBHY Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, GEBHY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while GEBHY trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas GEBHY's P/E ratio is 40.00. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GEBHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN is less volatile compared to GEBHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHN.
ARHN vs GEBHF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, GEBHF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while GEBHF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas GEBHF's P/E ratio is 35.13. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GEBHF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and GEBHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs KNDGF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, KNDGF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while KNDGF trades at $12.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas KNDGF's P/E ratio is 49.04. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KNDGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and KNDGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs GMALF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, GMALF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while GMALF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas GMALF's P/E ratio is 45.06. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GMALF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and GMALF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs NGCRF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, NGCRF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while NGCRF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas NGCRF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NGCRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and NGCRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs NGCRY Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, NGCRY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while NGCRY trades at $27.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas NGCRY's P/E ratio is 22.21. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NGCRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and NGCRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs SJMHF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, SJMHF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while SJMHF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas SJMHF's P/E ratio is -34.34. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SJMHF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and SJMHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs SJMHY Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, SJMHY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while SJMHY trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas SJMHY's P/E ratio is -45.00. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SJMHY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and SJMHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs GMALY Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, GMALY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while GMALY trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas GMALY's P/E ratio is 28.79. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GMALY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and GMALY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs PYTCF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, PYTCF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while PYTCF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas PYTCF's P/E ratio is 21.82. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PYTCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and PYTCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs MDEVY Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, MDEVY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while MDEVY trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas MDEVY's P/E ratio is -12.40. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MDEVY's ROE of -7.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and MDEVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs BVHBB Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, BVHBB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while BVHBB trades at $72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas BVHBB's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BVHBB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and BVHBB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs MDEVF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, MDEVF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while MDEVF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas MDEVF's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MDEVF's ROE of -7.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and MDEVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs TACBY Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, TACBY has a market cap of 972.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while TACBY trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas TACBY's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TACBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and TACBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs TABCF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, TABCF has a market cap of 937.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while TABCF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas TABCF's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TABCF's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and TABCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs BJSAF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, BJSAF has a market cap of 806.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while BJSAF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas BJSAF's P/E ratio is 35.34. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BJSAF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and BJSAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs IRLTY Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, IRLTY has a market cap of 784.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while IRLTY trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas IRLTY's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IRLTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and IRLTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs IRLTF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, IRLTF has a market cap of 664.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while IRLTF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas IRLTF's P/E ratio is 110.00. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IRLTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and IRLTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs BLBRF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, BLBRF has a market cap of 591.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while BLBRF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas BLBRF's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BLBRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and BLBRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs MCHVY Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, MCHVY has a market cap of 575.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while MCHVY trades at $21.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas MCHVY's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MCHVY's ROE of +18.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and MCHVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs RANKF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, RANKF has a market cap of 491.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while RANKF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas RANKF's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RANKF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and RANKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs SKYZF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, SKYZF has a market cap of 463.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while SKYZF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas SKYZF's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SKYZF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and SKYZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs PBTHF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, PBTHF has a market cap of 447.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while PBTHF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas PBTHF's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PBTHF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and PBTHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs PBKOF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, PBKOF has a market cap of 437.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while PBKOF trades at $16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas PBKOF's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PBKOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and PBKOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs EHGRF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, EHGRF has a market cap of 352.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while EHGRF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas EHGRF's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EHGRF's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and EHGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs BYNEF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, BYNEF has a market cap of 346.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while BYNEF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas BYNEF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BYNEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and BYNEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs KMBIF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, KMBIF has a market cap of 345.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while KMBIF trades at $14.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas KMBIF's P/E ratio is 23.76. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KMBIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and KMBIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs AGTEF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, AGTEF has a market cap of 343.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while AGTEF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas AGTEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AGTEF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and AGTEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs EIHDF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, EIHDF has a market cap of 327.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while EIHDF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas EIHDF's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EIHDF's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and EIHDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs AINSF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, AINSF has a market cap of 208.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while AINSF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas AINSF's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AINSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN is less volatile compared to AINSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHN.
ARHN vs GHIFF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, GHIFF has a market cap of 185.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while GHIFF trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas GHIFF's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GHIFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and GHIFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs MALDF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, MALDF has a market cap of 146.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while MALDF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas MALDF's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MALDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and MALDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs PSDMF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, PSDMF has a market cap of 128.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while PSDMF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas PSDMF's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PSDMF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and PSDMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs PMKRF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, PMKRF has a market cap of 124.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while PMKRF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas PMKRF's P/E ratio is -27.08. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PMKRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and PMKRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs PDSSF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, PDSSF has a market cap of 115.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while PDSSF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas PDSSF's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PDSSF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and PDSSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs RCTUF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, RCTUF has a market cap of 94.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while RCTUF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas RCTUF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RCTUF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and RCTUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs GLXZ Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, GLXZ has a market cap of 72.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while GLXZ trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas GLXZ's P/E ratio is -15.11. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GLXZ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN is less volatile compared to GLXZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHN.
ARHN vs CTTMF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, CTTMF has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while CTTMF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas CTTMF's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CTTMF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and CTTMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs TBTC Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, TBTC has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while TBTC trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas TBTC's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TBTC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and TBTC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs JPOTF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, JPOTF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while JPOTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas JPOTF's P/E ratio is -8.90. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JPOTF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN is less volatile compared to JPOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHN.
ARHN vs BRRE Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, BRRE has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while BRRE trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas BRRE's P/E ratio is -780.00. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BRRE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and BRRE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs JKPTF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, JKPTF has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while JKPTF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas JKPTF's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JKPTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and JKPTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs TNTAF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, TNTAF has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while TNTAF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas TNTAF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TNTAF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN is less volatile compared to TNTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHN.
ARHN vs SPOZF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, SPOZF has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while SPOZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas SPOZF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SPOZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and SPOZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs RVLCF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, RVLCF has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while RVLCF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas RVLCF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RVLCF's ROE of +3.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN is less volatile compared to RVLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHN.
ARHN vs NWGIW Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, NWGIW has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while NWGIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas NWGIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NWGIW's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and NWGIW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs CETMF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, CETMF has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while CETMF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas CETMF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CETMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and CETMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs LUKEF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, LUKEF has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while LUKEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas LUKEF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LUKEF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and LUKEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs RYWCF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, RYWCF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while RYWCF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas RYWCF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RYWCF's ROE of +2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and RYWCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs BRVO Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, BRVO has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while BRVO trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas BRVO's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BRVO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and BRVO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs LTFD Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, LTFD has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while LTFD trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas LTFD's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LTFD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and LTFD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs ITMZF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, ITMZF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while ITMZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas ITMZF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ITMZF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN is less volatile compared to ITMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHN.
ARHN vs THRSF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, THRSF has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while THRSF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas THRSF's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to THRSF's ROE of +3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN is less volatile compared to THRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHN.
ARHN vs FCNE Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, FCNE has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while FCNE trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas FCNE's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FCNE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN is less volatile compared to FCNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHN.
ARHN vs RVRVF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, RVRVF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while RVRVF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas RVRVF's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RVRVF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and RVRVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs GMER Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, GMER has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while GMER trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas GMER's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GMER's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN is less volatile compared to GMER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHN.
ARHN vs ELRA Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, ELRA has a market cap of 861.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while ELRA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas ELRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ELRA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN is less volatile compared to ELRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHN.
ARHN vs SWCC Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, SWCC has a market cap of 758.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while SWCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas SWCC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SWCC's ROE of +6.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and SWCC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs FUNFF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, FUNFF has a market cap of 323.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while FUNFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas FUNFF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FUNFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN is less volatile compared to FUNFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHN.
ARHN vs WNRS Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, WNRS has a market cap of 259.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while WNRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas WNRS's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WNRS's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and WNRS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs WPFH Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, WPFH has a market cap of 223.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while WPFH trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas WPFH's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WPFH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and WPFH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs VETIF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, VETIF has a market cap of 102.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while VETIF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas VETIF's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VETIF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and VETIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs ELYS Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, ELYS has a market cap of 59.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while ELYS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas ELYS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ELYS's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and ELYS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs EMBR Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, EMBR has a market cap of 32.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while EMBR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas EMBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EMBR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and EMBR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs EPGG Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, EPGG has a market cap of 29.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while EPGG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas EPGG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EPGG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and EPGG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs NTGL Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, NTGL has a market cap of 18.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while NTGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas NTGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NTGL's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and NTGL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs CGAM Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, CGAM has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while CGAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas CGAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CGAM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and CGAM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs KNBA Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, KNBA has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while KNBA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas KNBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KNBA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and KNBA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs EXPH Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, EXPH has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while EXPH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas EXPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EXPH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and EXPH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs ROBK Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, ROBK has a market cap of 612. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while ROBK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas ROBK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ROBK's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and ROBK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs LTTGF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, LTTGF has a market cap of 128. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while LTTGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas LTTGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LTTGF's ROE of +3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and LTTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs AMRA Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, AMRA has a market cap of 32. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while AMRA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas AMRA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AMRA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and AMRA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs ULSP Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, ULSP has a market cap of 11. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while ULSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas ULSP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ULSP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and ULSP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs MLCOF Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, MLCOF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while MLCOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas MLCOF's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MLCOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and MLCOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ARHN vs GIGI Comparison
ARHN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHN stands at 81.1M. In comparison, GIGI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARHN is priced at $14.00, while GIGI trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHN currently has a P/E ratio of -66.67, whereas GIGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHN's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GIGI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARHN and GIGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).