archTIS Limited
archTIS Limited ARHLF Peers
See (ARHLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARHLF | $0.06 | +56.01% | 62.7M | -5.71 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| SAPGF | $301.04 | -0.01% | 351.2B | 52.45 | $5.74 | +1.67% |
| CNSWF | $3,621.62 | +1.44% | 76.7B | 103.06 | $35.14 | +0.14% |
| OBIIF | $127.00 | +225.64% | 55.9B | 124.51 | $1.02 | +0.36% |
| DASTF | $37.10 | +0.11% | 48.7B | 35.67 | $1.04 | +1.50% |
| DASTY | $36.87 | -0.27% | 48.4B | 35.80 | $1.03 | +1.48% |
| INVUP | $25.98 | -0.08% | 48.3B | -1732.00 | -$0.02 | +15.64% |
| WIGBY | $76.36 | +3.91% | 25.3B | 127.27 | $0.60 | +0.17% |
| WTCHF | $75.39 | +0.00% | 25B | 125.65 | $0.60 | +0.14% |
| DIDIY | $5.36 | +4.28% | 25B | 67.00 | $0.08 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ARHLF vs SAPGF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, SAPGF has a market cap of 351.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while SAPGF trades at $301.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas SAPGF's P/E ratio is 52.45. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SAPGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to SAPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs CNSWF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, CNSWF has a market cap of 76.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while CNSWF trades at $3,621.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas CNSWF's P/E ratio is 103.06. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CNSWF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to CNSWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs OBIIF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, OBIIF has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while OBIIF trades at $127.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas OBIIF's P/E ratio is 124.51. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to OBIIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is less volatile compared to OBIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs DASTF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, DASTF has a market cap of 48.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while DASTF trades at $37.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas DASTF's P/E ratio is 35.67. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to DASTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to DASTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs DASTY Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, DASTY has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while DASTY trades at $36.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas DASTY's P/E ratio is 35.80. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to DASTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to DASTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs INVUP Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, INVUP has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while INVUP trades at $25.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas INVUP's P/E ratio is -1732.00. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to INVUP's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to INVUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs WIGBY Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, WIGBY has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while WIGBY trades at $76.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas WIGBY's P/E ratio is 127.27. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to WIGBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to WIGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs WTCHF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, WTCHF has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while WTCHF trades at $75.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas WTCHF's P/E ratio is 125.65. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to WTCHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to WTCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs DIDIY Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, DIDIY has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while DIDIY trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas DIDIY's P/E ratio is 67.00. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to DIDIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to DIDIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs XROLF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, XROLF has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while XROLF trades at $118.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas XROLF's P/E ratio is 135.63. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to XROLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to XROLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs NEMKY Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, NEMKY has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while NEMKY trades at $29.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas NEMKY's P/E ratio is 83.28. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to NEMKY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to NEMKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs SGGEF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, SGGEF has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while SGGEF trades at $17.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas SGGEF's P/E ratio is 36.79. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SGGEF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to SGGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs SGPYY Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, SGPYY has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while SGPYY trades at $66.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas SGPYY's P/E ratio is 35.91. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SGPYY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to SGPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs OCLCF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, OCLCF has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while OCLCF trades at $114.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas OCLCF's P/E ratio is 34.65. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to OCLCF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to OCLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs NEMTF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, NEMTF has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while NEMTF trades at $125.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas NEMTF's P/E ratio is 70.23. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to NEMTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to NEMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs LQAVF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, LQAVF has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while LQAVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas LQAVF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to LQAVF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is less volatile compared to LQAVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs NCSYF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, NCSYF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while NCSYF trades at $160.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas NCSYF's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to NCSYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to NCSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs KGDEY Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, KGDEY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while KGDEY trades at $189.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas KGDEY's P/E ratio is -332.63. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to KGDEY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to KGDEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs ALMFF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, ALMFF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while ALMFF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas ALMFF's P/E ratio is 92.31. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ALMFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to ALMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs HOILF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, HOILF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while HOILF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas HOILF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to HOILF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to HOILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs TMNSF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, TMNSF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while TMNSF trades at $80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas TMNSF's P/E ratio is 33.47. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to TMNSF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to TMNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs TMSNY Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, TMSNY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while TMSNY trades at $71.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas TMSNY's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to TMSNY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to TMSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs LIFX Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, LIFX has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while LIFX trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas LIFX's P/E ratio is 544.25. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to LIFX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to LIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs THNOF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, THNOF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while THNOF trades at $14.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas THNOF's P/E ratio is 55.44. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to THNOF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is less volatile compared to THNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs SRBEF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, SRBEF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while SRBEF trades at $292.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas SRBEF's P/E ratio is -90.89. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SRBEF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to SRBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs FNOXF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, FNOXF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while FNOXF trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas FNOXF's P/E ratio is 55.54. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to FNOXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to FNOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs ASOZF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, ASOZF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while ASOZF trades at $63.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas ASOZF's P/E ratio is 30.43. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ASOZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to ASOZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs SMCYY Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, SMCYY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while SMCYY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas SMCYY's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SMCYY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to SMCYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs KXSCF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, KXSCF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while KXSCF trades at $144.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas KXSCF's P/E ratio is 436.55. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to KXSCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to KXSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs SICRF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, SICRF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while SICRF trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas SICRF's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SICRF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to SICRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs ASOZY Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, ASOZY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while ASOZY trades at $52.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas ASOZY's P/E ratio is 24.97. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ASOZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to ASOZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs ZEUCF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, ZEUCF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while ZEUCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas ZEUCF's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ZEUCF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to ZEUCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs ISDSF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, ISDSF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while ISDSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas ISDSF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ISDSF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is less volatile compared to ISDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs WEMXF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, WEMXF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while WEMXF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas WEMXF's P/E ratio is -7.45. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to WEMXF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to WEMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs TMVWF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, TMVWF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while TMVWF trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas TMVWF's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to TMVWF's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to TMVWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs UBMRF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, UBMRF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while UBMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas UBMRF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to UBMRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to UBMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs KHOTF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, KHOTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while KHOTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas KHOTF's P/E ratio is 360.00. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to KHOTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to KHOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs TMVWY Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, TMVWY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while TMVWY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas TMVWY's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to TMVWY's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to TMVWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs QTGPF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, QTGPF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while QTGPF trades at $65.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas QTGPF's P/E ratio is 26.21. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to QTGPF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to QTGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs ESKEF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, ESKEF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while ESKEF trades at $280.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas ESKEF's P/E ratio is 97.01. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ESKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to ESKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs FREKF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, FREKF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while FREKF trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas FREKF's P/E ratio is -20.83. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to FREKF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to FREKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs TMOAY Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, TMOAY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while TMOAY trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas TMOAY's P/E ratio is -58.60. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to TMOAY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to TMOAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs BCTCF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, BCTCF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while BCTCF trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas BCTCF's P/E ratio is 228.00. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to BCTCF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is less volatile compared to BCTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs SWONF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, SWONF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while SWONF trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas SWONF's P/E ratio is -907.00. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SWONF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to SWONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs MAGTF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, MAGTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while MAGTF trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas MAGTF's P/E ratio is 354.22. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to MAGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to MAGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs IPEU Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, IPEU has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while IPEU trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas IPEU's P/E ratio is 0.77. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to IPEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to IPEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs KNNNF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, KNNNF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while KNNNF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas KNNNF's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to KNNNF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to KNNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs VOBIF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, VOBIF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while VOBIF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas VOBIF's P/E ratio is 49.50. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to VOBIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to VOBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs GBGPF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, GBGPF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while GBGPF trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas GBGPF's P/E ratio is 91.00. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to GBGPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to GBGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs LTTHF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, LTTHF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while LTTHF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas LTTHF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to LTTHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to LTTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs ESIGF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, ESIGF has a market cap of 952.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while ESIGF trades at $166.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas ESIGF's P/E ratio is -725.00. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ESIGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to ESIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs EGHSF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, EGHSF has a market cap of 936.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while EGHSF trades at $16.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas EGHSF's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to EGHSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to EGHSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs TTMZF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, TTMZF has a market cap of 874.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while TTMZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas TTMZF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to TTMZF's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to TTMZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs BTRCF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, BTRCF has a market cap of 824.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while BTRCF trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas BTRCF's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to BTRCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to BTRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs BHPA Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, BHPA has a market cap of 820.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while BHPA trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas BHPA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to BHPA's ROE of -3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is less volatile compared to BHPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs SLVFF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, SLVFF has a market cap of 723.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while SLVFF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas SLVFF's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SLVFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to SLVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs XMMRF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, XMMRF has a market cap of 631.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while XMMRF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas XMMRF's P/E ratio is -68.00. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to XMMRF's ROE of -4.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is less volatile compared to XMMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs MENXF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, MENXF has a market cap of 604.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while MENXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas MENXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to MENXF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to MENXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs TMOAF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, TMOAF has a market cap of 547.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while TMOAF trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas TMOAF's P/E ratio is -49.44. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to TMOAF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to TMOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs NXLLF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, NXLLF has a market cap of 545.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while NXLLF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas NXLLF's P/E ratio is 165.00. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to NXLLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to NXLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs NPACY Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, NPACY has a market cap of 525.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while NPACY trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas NPACY's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to NPACY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to NPACY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs RWWI Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, RWWI has a market cap of 503.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while RWWI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas RWWI's P/E ratio is 32.61. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to RWWI's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to RWWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs PSSWF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, PSSWF has a market cap of 503.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while PSSWF trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas PSSWF's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to PSSWF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to PSSWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs NSWEF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, NSWEF has a market cap of 480.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while NSWEF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas NSWEF's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to NSWEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to NSWEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs CHNVF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, CHNVF has a market cap of 469.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while CHNVF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas CHNVF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CHNVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to CHNVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs BRDLF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, BRDLF has a market cap of 456.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while BRDLF trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas BRDLF's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to BRDLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to BRDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs NPACF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, NPACF has a market cap of 444.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while NPACF trades at $13.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas NPACF's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to NPACF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is less volatile compared to NPACF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs CMDXF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, CMDXF has a market cap of 438.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while CMDXF trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas CMDXF's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CMDXF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to CMDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs BVSFF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, BVSFF has a market cap of 436.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while BVSFF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas BVSFF's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to BVSFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to BVSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs BLKLF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, BLKLF has a market cap of 428M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while BLKLF trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas BLKLF's P/E ratio is -72.51. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to BLKLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to BLKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs TCYSF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, TCYSF has a market cap of 418.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while TCYSF trades at $28.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas TCYSF's P/E ratio is 128.18. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to TCYSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to TCYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs IQGLF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, IQGLF has a market cap of 415.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while IQGLF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas IQGLF's P/E ratio is -300.00. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to IQGLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to IQGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs RPGHF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, RPGHF has a market cap of 373M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while RPGHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas RPGHF's P/E ratio is 56.33. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to RPGHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to RPGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs LCHTF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, LCHTF has a market cap of 366.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while LCHTF trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas LCHTF's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to LCHTF's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is less volatile compared to LCHTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs RTME Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, RTME has a market cap of 363.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while RTME trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas RTME's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to RTME's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to RTME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs JAPPF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, JAPPF has a market cap of 350.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while JAPPF trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas JAPPF's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to JAPPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to JAPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs ELMFF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, ELMFF has a market cap of 335.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while ELMFF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas ELMFF's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ELMFF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to ELMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs ABXXF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, ABXXF has a market cap of 315.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while ABXXF trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas ABXXF's P/E ratio is -8.45. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ABXXF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to ABXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs PLDIF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, PLDIF has a market cap of 313.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while PLDIF trades at $7.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas PLDIF's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to PLDIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to PLDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs PXPHF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, PXPHF has a market cap of 305.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while PXPHF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas PXPHF's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to PXPHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to PXPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs RLLMF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, RLLMF has a market cap of 305.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while RLLMF trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas RLLMF's P/E ratio is 206.00. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to RLLMF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to RLLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs PTRRF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, PTRRF has a market cap of 297.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while PTRRF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas PTRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to PTRRF's ROE of +2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is less volatile compared to PTRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs IVUFF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, IVUFF has a market cap of 296M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while IVUFF trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas IVUFF's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to IVUFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to IVUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs CIGMF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, CIGMF has a market cap of 295.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while CIGMF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas CIGMF's P/E ratio is -155.00. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CIGMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to CIGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs DOTDF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, DOTDF has a market cap of 283.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while DOTDF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas DOTDF's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to DOTDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to DOTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs EXMXF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, EXMXF has a market cap of 272.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while EXMXF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas EXMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to EXMXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to EXMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs KWIK Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, KWIK has a market cap of 272.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while KWIK trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas KWIK's P/E ratio is -4.37. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to KWIK's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is less volatile compared to KWIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs LOQPF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, LOQPF has a market cap of 270M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while LOQPF trades at $6.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas LOQPF's P/E ratio is 30.77. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to LOQPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to LOQPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs MCAP Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, MCAP has a market cap of 266.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while MCAP trades at $11.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas MCAP's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to MCAP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to MCAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs BAINF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, BAINF has a market cap of 229.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while BAINF trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas BAINF's P/E ratio is 99.50. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to BAINF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to BAINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs DAHLF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, DAHLF has a market cap of 216.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while DAHLF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas DAHLF's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to DAHLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to DAHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs SMTEF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, SMTEF has a market cap of 215M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while SMTEF trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas SMTEF's P/E ratio is -8.97. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SMTEF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to SMTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs FXSRF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, FXSRF has a market cap of 204.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while FXSRF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas FXSRF's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to FXSRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to FXSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs FBSFF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, FBSFF has a market cap of 192.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while FBSFF trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas FBSFF's P/E ratio is 19.04. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to FBSFF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to FBSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs WONDF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, WONDF has a market cap of 170.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while WONDF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas WONDF's P/E ratio is -12.81. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to WONDF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to WONDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs NEOJF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, NEOJF has a market cap of 161.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while NEOJF trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas NEOJF's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to NEOJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to NEOJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs SYZLF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, SYZLF has a market cap of 154.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while SYZLF trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas SYZLF's P/E ratio is -164.87. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SYZLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to SYZLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs EXSPF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, EXSPF has a market cap of 152.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while EXSPF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas EXSPF's P/E ratio is -9.24. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to EXSPF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is more volatile compared to EXSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.
ARHLF vs CBSZF Comparison
ARHLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHLF stands at 62.7M. In comparison, CBSZF has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHLF is priced at $0.06, while CBSZF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHLF currently has a P/E ratio of -5.71, whereas CBSZF's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, ARHLF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CBSZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHLF is less volatile compared to CBSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHLF.