ApartmentLove Inc.

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, TCEHY has a market cap of 604.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while TCEHY trades at $66.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas TCEHY's P/E ratio is 20.82. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to TCEHY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to TCEHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check TCEHY's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, TCTZF has a market cap of 603.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while TCTZF trades at $66.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas TCTZF's P/E ratio is 20.78. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to TCTZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to TCTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check TCTZF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, PROSY has a market cap of 115.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while PROSY trades at $10.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas PROSY's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to PROSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to PROSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check PROSY's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, PROSF has a market cap of 113.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while PROSF trades at $51.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas PROSF's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to PROSF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to PROSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check PROSF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, BAIDF has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while BAIDF trades at $16.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas BAIDF's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to BAIDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and BAIDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BAIDF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, NAPRF has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while NAPRF trades at $56.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas NAPRF's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to NAPRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and NAPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NAPRF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, KUASF has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while KUASF trades at $8.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas KUASF's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to KUASF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and KUASF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KUASF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, KSHTY has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while KSHTY trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas KSHTY's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to KSHTY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to KSHTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check KSHTY's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, YAHOF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while YAHOF trades at $2.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas YAHOF's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to YAHOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and YAHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YAHOF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, NHNCF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while NHNCF trades at $115.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas NHNCF's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to NHNCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to NHNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check NHNCF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, RPGRF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while RPGRF trades at $124.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas RPGRF's P/E ratio is 40.54. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to RPGRF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and RPGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RPGRF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, RPGRY has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while RPGRY trades at $28.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas RPGRY's P/E ratio is 35.55. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to RPGRY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to RPGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check RPGRY's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, ADEVF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while ADEVF trades at $11.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas ADEVF's P/E ratio is -80.57. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to ADEVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and ADEVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADEVF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, ADEVY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while ADEVY trades at $4.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas ADEVY's P/E ratio is -66.57. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to ADEVY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and ADEVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADEVY's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, NPSNY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while NPSNY trades at $11.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas NPSNY's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to NPSNY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to NPSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check NPSNY's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, CSXXY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while CSXXY trades at $31.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas CSXXY's P/E ratio is 31.87. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to CSXXY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and CSXXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSXXY's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, ATDRY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while ATDRY trades at $1.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas ATDRY's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to ATDRY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to ATDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check ATDRY's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, SKLTF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while SKLTF trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas SKLTF's P/E ratio is -93.75. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to SKLTF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and SKLTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKLTF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, ATDRF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while ATDRF trades at $6.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas ATDRF's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to ATDRF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to ATDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check ATDRF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, CHLLF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while CHLLF trades at $4.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas CHLLF's P/E ratio is 238.93. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to CHLLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to CHLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check CHLLF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, RTMVF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while RTMVF trades at $5.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas RTMVF's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to RTMVF's ROE of +2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and RTMVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTMVF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, RTMVY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while RTMVY trades at $11.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas RTMVY's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to RTMVY's ROE of +1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to RTMVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check RTMVY's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, MEIUF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while MEIUF trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas MEIUF's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to MEIUF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and MEIUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MEIUF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, KKKUF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while KKKUF trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas KKKUF's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to KKKUF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and KKKUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KKKUF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, DHGAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while DHGAF trades at $2.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas DHGAF's P/E ratio is 50.80. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to DHGAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to DHGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check DHGAF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, HMNTY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while HMNTY trades at $13.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas HMNTY's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to HMNTY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and HMNTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HMNTY's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, PRSNF has a market cap of 869.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while PRSNF trades at $2.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas PRSNF's P/E ratio is -31.50. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to PRSNF's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to PRSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check PRSNF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, MLRYY has a market cap of 524M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while MLRYY trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas MLRYY's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to MLRYY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and MLRYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLRYY's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, XINXF has a market cap of 509.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while XINXF trades at $76.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas XINXF's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to XINXF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and XINXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XINXF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, ADBMF has a market cap of 371.7M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while ADBMF trades at $22.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas ADBMF's P/E ratio is 56.74. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to ADBMF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and ADBMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADBMF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, WNWSF has a market cap of 335M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while WNWSF trades at $15.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas WNWSF's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to WNWSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to WNWSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check WNWSF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, ZGXNF has a market cap of 304.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while ZGXNF trades at $3.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas ZGXNF's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to ZGXNF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to ZGXNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check ZGXNF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, FRRGF has a market cap of 239.7M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while FRRGF trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas FRRGF's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to FRRGF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and FRRGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRRGF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, MECVF has a market cap of 186.9M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while MECVF trades at $4.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas MECVF's P/E ratio is -17.71. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to MECVF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and MECVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MECVF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, NXCLF has a market cap of 153.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while NXCLF trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas NXCLF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to NXCLF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and NXCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NXCLF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, UUMMF has a market cap of 152.9M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while UUMMF trades at $7.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas UUMMF's P/E ratio is 40.52. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to UUMMF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and UUMMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UUMMF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, TGRVF has a market cap of 129.6M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while TGRVF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas TGRVF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to TGRVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and TGRVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TGRVF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, RSTN has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while RSTN trades at $3.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas RSTN's P/E ratio is -10.16. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to RSTN's ROE of -3.62%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to RSTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check RSTN's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, ZMDTF has a market cap of 73M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while ZMDTF trades at $0.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas ZMDTF's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to ZMDTF's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to ZMDTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check ZMDTF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, CPADF has a market cap of 71.6M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while CPADF trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas CPADF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to CPADF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to CPADF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check CPADF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, CKPDY has a market cap of 67.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while CKPDY trades at $0.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas CKPDY's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to CKPDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and CKPDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CKPDY's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, OPNDF has a market cap of 60.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while OPNDF trades at $1.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas OPNDF's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to OPNDF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and OPNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OPNDF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, PXSTF has a market cap of 49.9M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while PXSTF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas PXSTF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to PXSTF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to PXSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check PXSTF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, MSEZ has a market cap of 45.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while MSEZ trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas MSEZ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to MSEZ's ROE of -13.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and MSEZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MSEZ's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, RDLYF has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while RDLYF trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas RDLYF's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to RDLYF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and RDLYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RDLYF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, NIROF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while NIROF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas NIROF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to NIROF's ROE of +2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and NIROF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NIROF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, SABOF has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while SABOF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas SABOF's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to SABOF's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and SABOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SABOF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, BBUZ has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while BBUZ trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas BBUZ's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to BBUZ's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to BBUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check BBUZ's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, HYPPF has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while HYPPF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas HYPPF's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to HYPPF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and HYPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HYPPF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, DGTHF has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while DGTHF trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas DGTHF's P/E ratio is -4.63. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to DGTHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and DGTHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DGTHF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, BBTVF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while BBTVF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas BBTVF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to BBTVF's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to BBTVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check BBTVF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, EGLXF has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while EGLXF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas EGLXF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to EGLXF's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to EGLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check EGLXF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, QQQFF has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while QQQFF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas QQQFF's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to QQQFF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and QQQFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QQQFF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, LTCP has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while LTCP trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas LTCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to LTCP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and LTCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LTCP's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, FMHS has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while FMHS trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas FMHS's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to FMHS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to FMHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check FMHS's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, GIFX has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while GIFX trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas GIFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to GIFX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to GIFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check GIFX's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, SEEK has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while SEEK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas SEEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to SEEK's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and SEEK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SEEK's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, NUGL has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while NUGL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas NUGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to NUGL's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to NUGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check NUGL's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, GOGY has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while GOGY trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas GOGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to GOGY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to GOGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check GOGY's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, YOOIF has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while YOOIF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas YOOIF's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to YOOIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and YOOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YOOIF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, LBUY has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while LBUY trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas LBUY's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to LBUY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to LBUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check LBUY's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, BMTM has a market cap of 892.2K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while BMTM trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas BMTM's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to BMTM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and BMTM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BMTM's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, MRPT has a market cap of 826.2K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while MRPT trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas MRPT's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to MRPT's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and MRPT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MRPT's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, MRNJ has a market cap of 762.3K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while MRNJ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas MRNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to MRNJ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to MRNJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check MRNJ's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, SFUNY has a market cap of 722.9K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while SFUNY trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas SFUNY's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to SFUNY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to SFUNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check SFUNY's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, SPFYF has a market cap of 722.8K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while SPFYF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas SPFYF's P/E ratio is 1.59. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to SPFYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to SPFYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check SPFYF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, ILIM has a market cap of 684.3K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while ILIM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas ILIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to ILIM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to ILIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check ILIM's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, OOOOF has a market cap of 599.9K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while OOOOF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas OOOOF's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to OOOOF's ROE of +12.28%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to OOOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check OOOOF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, CYAP has a market cap of 598.1K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while CYAP trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas CYAP's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to CYAP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and CYAP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYAP's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, VMSI has a market cap of 578.2K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while VMSI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas VMSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to VMSI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to VMSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check VMSI's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, LHGI has a market cap of 576.3K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while LHGI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas LHGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to LHGI's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and LHGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LHGI's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, RBDC has a market cap of 505.2K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while RBDC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas RBDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to RBDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to RBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check RBDC's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, LKST has a market cap of 243.7K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while LKST trades at $4.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas LKST's P/E ratio is -7.47. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to LKST's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to LKST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check LKST's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, KIWB has a market cap of 137.7K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while KIWB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas KIWB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to KIWB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and KIWB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KIWB's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, ZONX has a market cap of 60.4K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while ZONX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas ZONX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to ZONX's ROE of +28.49%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to ZONX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check ZONX's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, OTTV has a market cap of 47.6K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while OTTV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas OTTV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to OTTV's ROE of +1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and OTTV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OTTV's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, QTTOY has a market cap of 42.9K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while QTTOY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas QTTOY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to QTTOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and QTTOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QTTOY's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, SLNM has a market cap of 31.6K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while SLNM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas SLNM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to SLNM's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and SLNM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SLNM's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, RWRDP has a market cap of 30K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while RWRDP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas RWRDP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to RWRDP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to RWRDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check RWRDP's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, HUTN has a market cap of 25.2K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while HUTN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas HUTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to HUTN's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and HUTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HUTN's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, DELCF has a market cap of 17.6K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while DELCF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas DELCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to DELCF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to DELCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check DELCF's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, MDAW has a market cap of 14.9K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while MDAW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas MDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to MDAW's ROE of +7.14%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and MDAW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MDAW's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, BTIM has a market cap of 12.1K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while BTIM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas BTIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to BTIM's ROE of +2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to BTIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check BTIM's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, REDFY has a market cap of 11.9K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while REDFY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas REDFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to REDFY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and REDFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check REDFY's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, CRTDW has a market cap of 6K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while CRTDW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas CRTDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to CRTDW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and CRTDW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRTDW's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, PIKL has a market cap of 5.7K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while PIKL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas PIKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to PIKL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and PIKL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PIKL's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, ISHM has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while ISHM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas ISHM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to ISHM's ROE of -9.54%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and ISHM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ISHM's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, SHGY has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while SHGY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas SHGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to SHGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and SHGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHGY's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, LOCM has a market cap of 4.9K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while LOCM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas LOCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to LOCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and LOCM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LOCM's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, ROII has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while ROII trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas ROII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to ROII's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and ROII have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ROII's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, LOVLQ has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while LOVLQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas LOVLQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to LOVLQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to LOVLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check LOVLQ's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, ZZLL has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while ZZLL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas ZZLL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to ZZLL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to ZZLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check ZZLL's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, FRFR has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while FRFR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas FRFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to FRFR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and FRFR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRFR's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, INTH has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while INTH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas INTH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to INTH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and INTH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INTH's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, DATI has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while DATI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas DATI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to DATI's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to DATI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check DATI's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, ABBY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while ABBY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas ABBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to ABBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF is less volatile compared to ABBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APMLF.Check ABBY's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, RAIO has a market cap of 891. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while RAIO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas RAIO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to RAIO's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and RAIO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RAIO's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, YITD has a market cap of 800. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while YITD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas YITD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to YITD's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and YITD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YITD's competition here

APMLF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, APMLF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, CYZN has a market cap of 279. Regarding current trading prices, APMLF is priced at $0.12, while CYZN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

APMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas CYZN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, APMLF's ROE is +36.79%, compared to CYZN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APMLF and CYZN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYZN's competition here