AE Holding I, Inc.
AE Holding I, Inc. APLN Peers
See (APLN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APLN | $0.00 | -100.00% | 16 | -0.00 | -$0.00 | N/A |
| SREDY | $21.56 | +100.00% | 9.3B | 10.37 | $2.08 | +2.78% |
| SREDF | $11.37 | +5.77% | 4.9B | 9.17 | $1.24 | +3.81% |
| PHLLF | $3.50 | -2.82% | 3.8B | 4.09 | $0.86 | +15.98% |
| KNKBF | $11.12 | -5.01% | 3.1B | -0.43 | -$25.75 | +19.87% |
| CYLTF | $4.74 | -3.46% | 2.3B | 5.91 | $0.80 | +4.38% |
| HAHRF | $10.24 | +68.70% | 2.1B | N/A | N/A | +5.77% |
| AMLTF | $0.81 | -0.66% | 2B | 20.25 | $0.04 | +4.86% |
| THNVF | $1.08 | N/A | 1.4B | 7.20 | $0.15 | +5.79% |
| THNUY | $9.85 | N/A | 1B | 6.08 | $1.62 | +13.14% |
Stock Comparison
APLN vs SREDY Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, SREDY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while SREDY trades at $21.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SREDY's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to SREDY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, APLN and SREDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
APLN vs SREDF Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, SREDF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while SREDF trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SREDF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to SREDF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, APLN and SREDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
APLN vs PHLLF Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, PHLLF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while PHLLF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PHLLF's P/E ratio is 4.09. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to PHLLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, APLN is less volatile compared to PHLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APLN.
APLN vs KNKBF Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, KNKBF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while KNKBF trades at $11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KNKBF's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to KNKBF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APLN and KNKBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
APLN vs CYLTF Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, CYLTF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while CYLTF trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CYLTF's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to CYLTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, APLN and CYLTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
APLN vs HAHRF Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, HAHRF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while HAHRF trades at $10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HAHRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to HAHRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APLN and HAHRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
APLN vs AMLTF Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, AMLTF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while AMLTF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AMLTF's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to AMLTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APLN and AMLTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
APLN vs THNVF Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, THNVF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while THNVF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas THNVF's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to THNVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APLN and THNVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
APLN vs THNUY Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, THNUY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while THNUY trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas THNUY's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to THNUY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APLN and THNUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
APLN vs GDLC Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, GDLC has a market cap of 703.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while GDLC trades at $44.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GDLC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to GDLC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APLN is less volatile compared to GDLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APLN.
APLN vs TMILF Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, TMILF has a market cap of 322.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while TMILF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TMILF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to TMILF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, APLN and TMILF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
APLN vs MGOM Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, MGOM has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while MGOM trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MGOM's P/E ratio is 1.83. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to MGOM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APLN is less volatile compared to MGOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APLN.
APLN vs MSBM Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, MSBM has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while MSBM trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MSBM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to MSBM's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, APLN is less volatile compared to MSBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APLN.
APLN vs PCTZF Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, PCTZF has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while PCTZF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PCTZF's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to PCTZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APLN and PCTZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
APLN vs NACQF Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, NACQF has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while NACQF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NACQF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to NACQF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APLN is less volatile compared to NACQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APLN.
APLN vs FGCO Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, FGCO has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while FGCO trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FGCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to FGCO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APLN and FGCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
APLN vs FNQQF Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, FNQQF has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while FNQQF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FNQQF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to FNQQF's ROE of +3.86%. Regarding short-term risk, APLN is less volatile compared to FNQQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APLN.
APLN vs RLYNF Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, RLYNF has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while RLYNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RLYNF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to RLYNF's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, APLN is less volatile compared to RLYNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APLN.
APLN vs AQFD Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, AQFD has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while AQFD trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AQFD's P/E ratio is -33.33. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to AQFD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APLN is less volatile compared to AQFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APLN.
APLN vs SPXA Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, SPXA has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while SPXA trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SPXA's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to SPXA's ROE of +174.54%. Regarding short-term risk, APLN is less volatile compared to SPXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APLN.
APLN vs GPLB Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, GPLB has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while GPLB trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GPLB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to GPLB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APLN and GPLB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
APLN vs TMOL Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, TMOL has a market cap of 994.7K. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while TMOL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TMOL's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to TMOL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APLN and TMOL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
APLN vs PGIE Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, PGIE has a market cap of 202.2K. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while PGIE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PGIE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to PGIE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APLN is less volatile compared to PGIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APLN.
APLN vs EWPI Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, EWPI has a market cap of 107.4K. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while EWPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EWPI's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to EWPI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APLN is less volatile compared to EWPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APLN.
APLN vs IMMG Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, IMMG has a market cap of 30.3K. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while IMMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IMMG's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to IMMG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APLN is less volatile compared to IMMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APLN.
APLN vs RNBI Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, RNBI has a market cap of 27.3K. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while RNBI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RNBI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to RNBI's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APLN and RNBI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
APLN vs EURI Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, EURI has a market cap of 25.6K. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while EURI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EURI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to EURI's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, APLN is less volatile compared to EURI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APLN.
APLN vs XYNH Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, XYNH has a market cap of 16K. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while XYNH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas XYNH's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to XYNH's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, APLN is less volatile compared to XYNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APLN.
APLN vs PWEI Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, PWEI has a market cap of 11.3K. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while PWEI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PWEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to PWEI's ROE of -4.39%. Regarding short-term risk, APLN is less volatile compared to PWEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APLN.
APLN vs ARGW Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, ARGW has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while ARGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ARGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to ARGW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APLN is less volatile compared to ARGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APLN.
APLN vs KCPC Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, KCPC has a market cap of 4.5K. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while KCPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KCPC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to KCPC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APLN and KCPC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
APLN vs ODMO Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, ODMO has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while ODMO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ODMO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to ODMO's ROE of +1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, APLN and ODMO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
APLN vs HLOI Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, HLOI has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while HLOI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HLOI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to HLOI's ROE of +36.21%. Regarding short-term risk, APLN is less volatile compared to HLOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APLN.
APLN vs AKSY Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, AKSY has a market cap of 40. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while AKSY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AKSY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to AKSY's ROE of -2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, APLN and AKSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
APLN vs ESQF Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, ESQF has a market cap of 31. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while ESQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ESQF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to ESQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APLN and ESQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
APLN vs AHLD Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, AHLD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while AHLD trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AHLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to AHLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APLN and AHLD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
APLN vs AHCD Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, AHCD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while AHCD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AHCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to AHCD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APLN and AHCD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
APLN vs MGLO Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, MGLO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while MGLO trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MGLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to MGLO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APLN is less volatile compared to MGLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APLN.
APLN vs OGGCS Comparison
APLN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APLN stands at 16. In comparison, OGGCS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, APLN is priced at $0.00, while OGGCS trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APLN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas OGGCS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APLN's ROE is N/A, compared to OGGCS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APLN is less volatile compared to OGGCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APLN.