Andean Precious Metals Corp.
Andean Precious Metals Corp. ANPMF Peers
See (ANPMF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Silver Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANPMF | $1.35 | -6.05% | 201.45M | 11.25 | $0.12 | N/A |
| DSVSF | $1.78 | -9.55% | 1.41B | -44.37 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| AYASF | $7.25 | +1.19% | 948.23M | -36.25 | -$0.20 | N/A |
| DOLLF | $2.61 | -4.40% | 207.55M | -13.05 | -$0.20 | N/A |
| BADEF | $0.48 | -2.24% | 125.02M | -8.06 | -$0.06 | N/A |
| SLVMF | $0.07 | N/A | 124.58M | -7.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| SZSMF | $0.22 | +0.61% | 78.43M | 0.53 | $0.42 | N/A |
| GSVRF | $0.12 | +0.04% | 56.69M | -3.00 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| APGOF | $0.23 | -4.36% | 55.22M | -11.40 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| SLVRF | $0.18 | -2.23% | 47.11M | -17.52 | -$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ANPMF vs DSVSF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 201.45M. In comparison, DSVSF has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.35, while DSVSF trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas DSVSF's P/E ratio is -44.37. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DSVSF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to DSVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs AYASF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 201.45M. In comparison, AYASF has a market cap of 948.23M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.35, while AYASF trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas AYASF's P/E ratio is -36.25. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AYASF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to AYASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs DOLLF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 201.45M. In comparison, DOLLF has a market cap of 207.55M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.35, while DOLLF trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas DOLLF's P/E ratio is -13.05. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DOLLF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is less volatile compared to DOLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs BADEF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 201.45M. In comparison, BADEF has a market cap of 125.02M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.35, while BADEF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas BADEF's P/E ratio is -8.06. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BADEF's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to BADEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs SLVMF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 201.45M. In comparison, SLVMF has a market cap of 124.58M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.35, while SLVMF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas SLVMF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SLVMF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to SLVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs SZSMF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 201.45M. In comparison, SZSMF has a market cap of 78.43M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.35, while SZSMF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas SZSMF's P/E ratio is 0.53. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SZSMF's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to SZSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs GSVRF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 201.45M. In comparison, GSVRF has a market cap of 56.69M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.35, while GSVRF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas GSVRF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GSVRF's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to GSVRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs APGOF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 201.45M. In comparison, APGOF has a market cap of 55.22M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.35, while APGOF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas APGOF's P/E ratio is -11.40. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to APGOF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to APGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs SLVRF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 201.45M. In comparison, SLVRF has a market cap of 47.11M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.35, while SLVRF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas SLVRF's P/E ratio is -17.52. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SLVRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to SLVRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs KOOYF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 201.45M. In comparison, KOOYF has a market cap of 38.91M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.35, while KOOYF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas KOOYF's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KOOYF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to KOOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs BHLL Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 201.45M. In comparison, BHLL has a market cap of 37.74M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.35, while BHLL trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas BHLL's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BHLL's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to BHLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs ISVLF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 201.45M. In comparison, ISVLF has a market cap of 32.71M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.35, while ISVLF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas ISVLF's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ISVLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to ISVLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs SVBRF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 201.45M. In comparison, SVBRF has a market cap of 26.27M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.35, while SVBRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas SVBRF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SVBRF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is less volatile compared to SVBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs KUYAF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 201.45M. In comparison, KUYAF has a market cap of 21.65M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.35, while KUYAF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas KUYAF's P/E ratio is -4.06. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KUYAF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to KUYAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs AZASF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 201.45M. In comparison, AZASF has a market cap of 20.00M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.35, while AZASF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas AZASF's P/E ratio is -20.66. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AZASF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to AZASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs NVDSF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 201.45M. In comparison, NVDSF has a market cap of 18.48M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.35, while NVDSF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas NVDSF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NVDSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is less volatile compared to NVDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs RSNVF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 201.45M. In comparison, RSNVF has a market cap of 12.12M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.35, while RSNVF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas RSNVF's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RSNVF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is less volatile compared to RSNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs MISVF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 201.45M. In comparison, MISVF has a market cap of 8.94M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.35, while MISVF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas MISVF's P/E ratio is -7.32. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MISVF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to MISVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs ZCTSF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 201.45M. In comparison, ZCTSF has a market cap of 6.57M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.35, while ZCTSF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas ZCTSF's P/E ratio is 0.90. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZCTSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to ZCTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs KLSVF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 201.45M. In comparison, KLSVF has a market cap of 5.38M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.35, while KLSVF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas KLSVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KLSVF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is less volatile compared to KLSVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs RSMXF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 201.45M. In comparison, RSMXF has a market cap of 3.67M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.35, while RSMXF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas RSMXF's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RSMXF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to RSMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs AUNFF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 201.45M. In comparison, AUNFF has a market cap of 3.49M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.35, while AUNFF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas AUNFF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AUNFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to AUNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs HAMRF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 201.45M. In comparison, HAMRF has a market cap of 1.88M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.35, while HAMRF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas HAMRF's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HAMRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to HAMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs SVROF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 201.45M. In comparison, SVROF has a market cap of 1.73M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.35, while SVROF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas SVROF's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SVROF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is less volatile compared to SVROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs SBUM Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 201.45M. In comparison, SBUM has a market cap of 1.18M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.35, while SBUM trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas SBUM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SBUM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to SBUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs VINS Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 201.45M. In comparison, VINS has a market cap of 1.12M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.35, while VINS trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas VINS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VINS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to VINS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs SVTNF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 201.45M. In comparison, SVTNF has a market cap of 376860.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.35, while SVTNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas SVTNF's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SVTNF's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is less volatile compared to SVTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs TNRI Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 201.45M. In comparison, TNRI has a market cap of 23405.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.35, while TNRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas TNRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNRI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to TNRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs ISLV Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 201.45M. In comparison, ISLV has a market cap of 3794.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.35, while ISLV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas ISLV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ISLV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to ISLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.