Andean Precious Metals Corp.
Andean Precious Metals Corp. ANPMF Peers
See (ANPMF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Silver Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANPMF | $1.92 | +5.27% | 283.3M | 8.71 | $0.22 | N/A |
| DSVSF | $2.49 | -3.49% | 2B | -49.80 | -$0.05 | N/A |
| AYASF | $10.23 | -2.85% | 1.3B | -78.69 | -$0.13 | N/A |
| DOLLF | $2.61 | -4.40% | 207.5M | -13.05 | -$0.20 | N/A |
| BADEF | $0.48 | +1.11% | 126M | -9.64 | -$0.05 | N/A |
| SLVMF | $0.06 | +8.04% | 107.7M | -6.05 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| GSVRF | $0.18 | -5.09% | 84.3M | -8.93 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| SZSMF | $0.22 | +0.61% | 78.4M | 0.53 | $0.42 | N/A |
| APGOF | $0.31 | -5.38% | 74.1M | -15.29 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| SLVRF | $0.20 | -0.69% | 54M | -20.09 | -$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ANPMF vs DSVSF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 283.3M. In comparison, DSVSF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.92, while DSVSF trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas DSVSF's P/E ratio is -49.80. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DSVSF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is less volatile compared to DSVSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs AYASF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 283.3M. In comparison, AYASF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.92, while AYASF trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas AYASF's P/E ratio is -78.69. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AYASF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is less volatile compared to AYASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs DOLLF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 283.3M. In comparison, DOLLF has a market cap of 207.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.92, while DOLLF trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas DOLLF's P/E ratio is -13.05. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DOLLF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is less volatile compared to DOLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs BADEF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 283.3M. In comparison, BADEF has a market cap of 126M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.92, while BADEF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas BADEF's P/E ratio is -9.64. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BADEF's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to BADEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs SLVMF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 283.3M. In comparison, SLVMF has a market cap of 107.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.92, while SLVMF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas SLVMF's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SLVMF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to SLVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs GSVRF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 283.3M. In comparison, GSVRF has a market cap of 84.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.92, while GSVRF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas GSVRF's P/E ratio is -8.93. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GSVRF's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is less volatile compared to GSVRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs SZSMF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 283.3M. In comparison, SZSMF has a market cap of 78.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.92, while SZSMF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas SZSMF's P/E ratio is 0.53. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SZSMF's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to SZSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs APGOF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 283.3M. In comparison, APGOF has a market cap of 74.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.92, while APGOF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas APGOF's P/E ratio is -15.29. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to APGOF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is less volatile compared to APGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs SLVRF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 283.3M. In comparison, SLVRF has a market cap of 54M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.92, while SLVRF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas SLVRF's P/E ratio is -20.09. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SLVRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is less volatile compared to SLVRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs KOOYF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 283.3M. In comparison, KOOYF has a market cap of 52.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.92, while KOOYF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas KOOYF's P/E ratio is -16.86. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KOOYF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is less volatile compared to KOOYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs ISVLF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 283.3M. In comparison, ISVLF has a market cap of 50.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.92, while ISVLF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas ISVLF's P/E ratio is -18.80. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ISVLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is less volatile compared to ISVLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs BHLL Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 283.3M. In comparison, BHLL has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.92, while BHLL trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas BHLL's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BHLL's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is less volatile compared to BHLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs KUYAF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 283.3M. In comparison, KUYAF has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.92, while KUYAF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas KUYAF's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KUYAF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to KUYAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs SVBRF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 283.3M. In comparison, SVBRF has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.92, while SVBRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas SVBRF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SVBRF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is less volatile compared to SVBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs AZASF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 283.3M. In comparison, AZASF has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.92, while AZASF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas AZASF's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AZASF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to AZASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs RSNVF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 283.3M. In comparison, RSNVF has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.92, while RSNVF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas RSNVF's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RSNVF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is less volatile compared to RSNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs NVDSF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 283.3M. In comparison, NVDSF has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.92, while NVDSF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas NVDSF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NVDSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is less volatile compared to NVDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs MISVF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 283.3M. In comparison, MISVF has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.92, while MISVF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas MISVF's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MISVF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is less volatile compared to MISVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs ZCTSF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 283.3M. In comparison, ZCTSF has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.92, while ZCTSF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas ZCTSF's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZCTSF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is less volatile compared to ZCTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs KLSVF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 283.3M. In comparison, KLSVF has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.92, while KLSVF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas KLSVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KLSVF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is less volatile compared to KLSVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs RSMXF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 283.3M. In comparison, RSMXF has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.92, while RSMXF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas RSMXF's P/E ratio is -4.85. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RSMXF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to RSMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs AUNFF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 283.3M. In comparison, AUNFF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.92, while AUNFF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas AUNFF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AUNFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to AUNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs HAMRF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 283.3M. In comparison, HAMRF has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.92, while HAMRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas HAMRF's P/E ratio is -4.88. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HAMRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is less volatile compared to HAMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs SVROF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 283.3M. In comparison, SVROF has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.92, while SVROF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas SVROF's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SVROF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is less volatile compared to SVROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs SBUM Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 283.3M. In comparison, SBUM has a market cap of 839.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.92, while SBUM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas SBUM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SBUM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to SBUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs VINS Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 283.3M. In comparison, VINS has a market cap of 781.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.92, while VINS trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas VINS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VINS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to VINS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs SVTNF Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 283.3M. In comparison, SVTNF has a market cap of 376.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.92, while SVTNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas SVTNF's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SVTNF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is less volatile compared to SVTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs TNRI Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 283.3M. In comparison, TNRI has a market cap of 23.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.92, while TNRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas TNRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TNRI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to TNRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs ISLV Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 283.3M. In comparison, ISLV has a market cap of 3.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.92, while ISLV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas ISLV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ISLV's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is more volatile compared to ISLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs ASLM Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 283.3M. In comparison, ASLM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.92, while ASLM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas ASLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ASLM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is less volatile compared to ASLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.
ANPMF vs CHMN Comparison
ANPMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPMF stands at 283.3M. In comparison, CHMN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ANPMF is priced at $1.92, while CHMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas CHMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANPMF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CHMN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANPMF is less volatile compared to CHMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPMF.