ANTA Sports Products Limited
ANTA Sports Products Limited ANPDF Peers
See (ANPDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Leisure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANPDF | $12.10 | N/A | 33.58B | 16.13 | $0.75 | +2.50% |
| NCBDY | $15.79 | -3.07% | 40.89B | 17.74 | $0.89 | +0.17% |
| OLCLY | $22.28 | +0.13% | 36.51B | 42.85 | $0.52 | +0.21% |
| ANPDY | $304.07 | +0.63% | 34.16B | 16.35 | $18.60 | +2.49% |
| OLCLF | $18.82 | N/A | 30.85B | 36.19 | $0.52 | +0.26% |
| CUKPF | $16.77 | -26.45% | 23.95B | 10.82 | $1.55 | N/A |
| NCBDF | $35.20 | +3.83% | 22.43B | 19.56 | $1.80 | +1.35% |
| SMNNY | $13.36 | -2.34% | 11.71B | 27.83 | $0.48 | N/A |
| SHMDF | $127.76 | N/A | 11.38B | 22.57 | $5.66 | +1.40% |
| GMWKF | $211.25 | -0.35% | 6.97B | 29.96 | $7.05 | +2.34% |
Stock Comparison
ANPDF vs NCBDY Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, NCBDY has a market cap of 40.89B. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while NCBDY trades at $15.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas NCBDY's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NCBDY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to NCBDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs OLCLY Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, OLCLY has a market cap of 36.51B. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while OLCLY trades at $22.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas OLCLY's P/E ratio is 42.85. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OLCLY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to OLCLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs ANPDY Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, ANPDY has a market cap of 34.16B. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while ANPDY trades at $304.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas ANPDY's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ANPDY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to ANPDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs OLCLF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, OLCLF has a market cap of 30.85B. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while OLCLF trades at $18.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas OLCLF's P/E ratio is 36.19. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OLCLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to OLCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs CUKPF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, CUKPF has a market cap of 23.95B. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while CUKPF trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas CUKPF's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CUKPF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to CUKPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs NCBDF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, NCBDF has a market cap of 22.43B. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while NCBDF trades at $35.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas NCBDF's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NCBDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to NCBDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs SMNNY Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, SMNNY has a market cap of 11.71B. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while SMNNY trades at $13.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas SMNNY's P/E ratio is 27.83. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SMNNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to SMNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs SHMDF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, SHMDF has a market cap of 11.38B. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while SHMDF trades at $127.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas SHMDF's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SHMDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to SHMDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs GMWKF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, GMWKF has a market cap of 6.97B. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while GMWKF trades at $211.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas GMWKF's P/E ratio is 29.96. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GMWKF's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to GMWKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs THUPY Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, THUPY has a market cap of 5.52B. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while THUPY trades at $12.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas THUPY's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to THUPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to THUPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs LNNGY Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, LNNGY has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while LNNGY trades at $51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas LNNGY's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LNNGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to LNNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs LNNGF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, LNNGF has a market cap of 4.89B. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while LNNGF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas LNNGF's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LNNGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to LNNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs YAMCF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, YAMCF has a market cap of 3.63B. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while YAMCF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas YAMCF's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to YAMCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to YAMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs THLPF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, THLPF has a market cap of 3.53B. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while THLPF trades at $32.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas THLPF's P/E ratio is 30.87. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to THLPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to THLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs NINOF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, NINOF has a market cap of 3.16B. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while NINOF trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas NINOF's P/E ratio is 34.29. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NINOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to NINOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs YAMCY Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, YAMCY has a market cap of 3.10B. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while YAMCY trades at $6.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas YAMCY's P/E ratio is 20.67. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to YAMCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to YAMCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs NINOY Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, NINOY has a market cap of 3.10B. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while NINOY trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas NINOY's P/E ratio is 78.67. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NINOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF and NINOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ANPDF vs PRKA Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, PRKA has a market cap of 2.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while PRKA trades at $38.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas PRKA's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PRKA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to PRKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs TCCHF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, TCCHF has a market cap of 2.82B. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while TCCHF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas TCCHF's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TCCHF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF and TCCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ANPDF vs TOMYY Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, TOMYY has a market cap of 2.61B. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while TOMYY trades at $29.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas TOMYY's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TOMYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to TOMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs DTCGF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, DTCGF has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while DTCGF trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas DTCGF's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DTCGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF and DTCGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ANPDF vs SNMSF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, SNMSF has a market cap of 1.87B. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while SNMSF trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas SNMSF's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SNMSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to SNMSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs RNDOF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, RNDOF has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while RNDOF trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas RNDOF's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RNDOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to RNDOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs YONXF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, YONXF has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while YONXF trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas YONXF's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to YONXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to YONXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs BSFFF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, BSFFF has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while BSFFF trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas BSFFF's P/E ratio is 147.43. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BSFFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to BSFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs VVCHF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, VVCHF has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while VVCHF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas VVCHF's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VVCHF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF and VVCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ANPDF vs MPZAF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, MPZAF has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while MPZAF trades at $41.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas MPZAF's P/E ratio is 79.17. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MPZAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to MPZAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs HISJF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, HISJF has a market cap of 978.14M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while HISJF trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas HISJF's P/E ratio is -54.54. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HISJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF and HISJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ANPDF vs HRVFF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, HRVFF has a market cap of 877.91M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while HRVFF trades at $47.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas HRVFF's P/E ratio is 32.19. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HRVFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to HRVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs CLPIF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, CLPIF has a market cap of 855.15M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while CLPIF trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas CLPIF's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CLPIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to CLPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs TNIEF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, TNIEF has a market cap of 787.16M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while TNIEF trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas TNIEF's P/E ratio is 62.73. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TNIEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to TNIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs MPZAY Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, MPZAY has a market cap of 758.71M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while MPZAY trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas MPZAY's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MPZAY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to MPZAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs SHOFF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, SHOFF has a market cap of 728.51M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while SHOFF trades at $13.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas SHOFF's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SHOFF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to SHOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs BTEAF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, BTEAF has a market cap of 678.69M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while BTEAF trades at $8.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas BTEAF's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BTEAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to BTEAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs DRMMF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, DRMMF has a market cap of 581.89M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while DRMMF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas DRMMF's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DRMMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF and DRMMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ANPDF vs UETMF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, UETMF has a market cap of 533.14M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while UETMF trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas UETMF's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to UETMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to UETMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs CTVIF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, CTVIF has a market cap of 498.30M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while CTVIF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas CTVIF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CTVIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to CTVIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs OQLGF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, OQLGF has a market cap of 376.66M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while OQLGF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas OQLGF's P/E ratio is -4.26. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OQLGF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF and OQLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ANPDF vs GYYMF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, GYYMF has a market cap of 352.40M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while GYYMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas GYYMF's P/E ratio is 66.67. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GYYMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF and GYYMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ANPDF vs CLKXF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, CLKXF has a market cap of 311.01M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while CLKXF trades at $12.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas CLKXF's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CLKXF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF and CLKXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ANPDF vs GBBYF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, GBBYF has a market cap of 283.58M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while GBBYF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas GBBYF's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GBBYF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to GBBYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs FOCIF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, FOCIF has a market cap of 215.15M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while FOCIF trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas FOCIF's P/E ratio is 73.40. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FOCIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF and FOCIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ANPDF vs PYHOF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, PYHOF has a market cap of 144.76M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while PYHOF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas PYHOF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PYHOF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to PYHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs RPNMF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, RPNMF has a market cap of 111.19M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while RPNMF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas RPNMF's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RPNMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to RPNMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs CGROF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, CGROF has a market cap of 93.26M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while CGROF trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas CGROF's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CGROF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to CGROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs PMTYF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, PMTYF has a market cap of 75.52M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while PMTYF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas PMTYF's P/E ratio is 6.40. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PMTYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to PMTYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs BOLL Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, BOLL has a market cap of 73.96M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while BOLL trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas BOLL's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BOLL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF and BOLL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ANPDF vs GFIZF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, GFIZF has a market cap of 45.03M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while GFIZF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas GFIZF's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GFIZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF and GFIZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ANPDF vs CNLFF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, CNLFF has a market cap of 39.65M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while CNLFF trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas CNLFF's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CNLFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to CNLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs KENS Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, KENS has a market cap of 22.59M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while KENS trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas KENS's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KENS's ROE of +5.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to KENS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs KICK Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, KICK has a market cap of 16.39M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while KICK trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas KICK's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KICK's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to KICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs DSHK Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, DSHK has a market cap of 11.09M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while DSHK trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas DSHK's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DSHK's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to DSHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs PFFEF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, PFFEF has a market cap of 2.84M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while PFFEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas PFFEF's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PFFEF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF and PFFEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ANPDF vs VIRA Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, VIRA has a market cap of 2.40M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while VIRA trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas VIRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VIRA's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF and VIRA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ANPDF vs TOYRF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, TOYRF has a market cap of 2.12M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while TOYRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas TOYRF's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TOYRF's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF and TOYRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ANPDF vs GTHKF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, GTHKF has a market cap of 1.70M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while GTHKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas GTHKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GTHKF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to GTHKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs QRSM Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, QRSM has a market cap of 1.47M. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while QRSM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas QRSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QRSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF and QRSM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ANPDF vs BTDG Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, BTDG has a market cap of 789920.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while BTDG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas BTDG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BTDG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to BTDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs MSET Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, MSET has a market cap of 500077.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while MSET trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas MSET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MSET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to MSET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs BFXXQ Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, BFXXQ has a market cap of 351796.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while BFXXQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas BFXXQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BFXXQ's ROE of -3.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF and BFXXQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ANPDF vs SPQS Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, SPQS has a market cap of 244436.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while SPQS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas SPQS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SPQS's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF and SPQS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ANPDF vs VMHG Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, VMHG has a market cap of 176578.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while VMHG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas VMHG's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VMHG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to VMHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs TRBX Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, TRBX has a market cap of 162288.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while TRBX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas TRBX's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TRBX's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF and TRBX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ANPDF vs GLFN Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, GLFN has a market cap of 128648.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while GLFN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas GLFN's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GLFN's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF and GLFN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ANPDF vs XFTB Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, XFTB has a market cap of 103861.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while XFTB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas XFTB's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XFTB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to XFTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs BWMG Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, BWMG has a market cap of 87837.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while BWMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas BWMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BWMG's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to BWMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs VTMB Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, VTMB has a market cap of 78341.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while VTMB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas VTMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VTMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to VTMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs ECMH Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, ECMH has a market cap of 69557.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while ECMH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas ECMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ECMH's ROE of -78.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to ECMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs DAAT Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, DAAT has a market cap of 57660.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while DAAT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas DAAT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DAAT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF and DAAT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ANPDF vs ALTD Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, ALTD has a market cap of 49218.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while ALTD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas ALTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ALTD's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF and ALTD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ANPDF vs OMWS Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, OMWS has a market cap of 46300.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while OMWS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas OMWS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OMWS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to OMWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs JMIH Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, JMIH has a market cap of 9975.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while JMIH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas JMIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JMIH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF and JMIH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ANPDF vs LCLP Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, LCLP has a market cap of 1794.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while LCLP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas LCLP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LCLP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF and LCLP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ANPDF vs ROCLF Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, ROCLF has a market cap of 1400.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while ROCLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas ROCLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ROCLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to ROCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.
ANPDF vs PRXIQ Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, PRXIQ has a market cap of 793.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while PRXIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas PRXIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PRXIQ's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF and PRXIQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ANPDF vs BYDC Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, BYDC has a market cap of 201.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while BYDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas BYDC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BYDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF and BYDC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ANPDF vs FTFY Comparison
ANPDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANPDF stands at 33.58B. In comparison, FTFY has a market cap of 3.00. Regarding current trading prices, ANPDF is priced at $12.10, while FTFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANPDF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.13, whereas FTFY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ANPDF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FTFY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANPDF is less volatile compared to FTFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANPDF.