Amazon.com, Inc.
Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN.NE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AMZN.NE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN.NE | CA$26.68 | -0.37% | 3.4T | 44.47 | CA$0.60 | N/A |
| ATD.TO | CA$69.60 | -0.14% | 66B | 18.51 | CA$3.76 | +1.09% |
| CTC.TO | CA$249.00 | +0.00% | 9.5B | 16.98 | CA$14.66 | +4.57% |
| CTC-A.TO | CA$169.50 | -0.35% | 9.4B | 11.56 | CA$14.66 | +4.57% |
| PET.TO | CA$37.93 | -1.04% | 2.6B | 28.31 | CA$1.34 | +1.21% |
| LNF.TO | CA$30.46 | -0.07% | 2.1B | 13.02 | CA$2.34 | +2.61% |
| ZZZ.TO | CA$35.00 | +0.03% | 1.2B | 16.83 | CA$2.08 | +0.68% |
| KITS.TO | CA$16.54 | -3.44% | 531.2M | 150.36 | CA$0.11 | N/A |
| GBT.TO | CA$12.75 | -3.56% | 407.4M | 14.01 | CA$0.91 | +2.80% |
| IDG.TO | CA$2.50 | +0.40% | 69.2M | -0.84 | -CA$2.99 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AMZN.NE vs ATD.TO Comparison August 2025
AMZN.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN.NE stands at 3.4T. In comparison, ATD.TO has a market cap of 66B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN.NE is priced at CA$26.68, while ATD.TO trades at CA$69.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.47, whereas ATD.TO's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, AMZN.NE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ATD.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN.NE is less volatile compared to ATD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.NE.Check ATD.TO's competition here
AMZN.NE vs CTC.TO Comparison August 2025
AMZN.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN.NE stands at 3.4T. In comparison, CTC.TO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN.NE is priced at CA$26.68, while CTC.TO trades at CA$249.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.47, whereas CTC.TO's P/E ratio is 16.98. In terms of profitability, AMZN.NE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CTC.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN.NE is more volatile compared to CTC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.NE.Check CTC.TO's competition here
AMZN.NE vs CTC-A.TO Comparison August 2025
AMZN.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN.NE stands at 3.4T. In comparison, CTC-A.TO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN.NE is priced at CA$26.68, while CTC-A.TO trades at CA$169.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.47, whereas CTC-A.TO's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, AMZN.NE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CTC-A.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN.NE is less volatile compared to CTC-A.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.NE.Check CTC-A.TO's competition here
AMZN.NE vs PET.TO Comparison August 2025
AMZN.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN.NE stands at 3.4T. In comparison, PET.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN.NE is priced at CA$26.68, while PET.TO trades at CA$37.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.47, whereas PET.TO's P/E ratio is 28.31. In terms of profitability, AMZN.NE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PET.TO's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN.NE is less volatile compared to PET.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.NE.Check PET.TO's competition here
AMZN.NE vs LNF.TO Comparison August 2025
AMZN.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN.NE stands at 3.4T. In comparison, LNF.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN.NE is priced at CA$26.68, while LNF.TO trades at CA$30.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.47, whereas LNF.TO's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, AMZN.NE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LNF.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN.NE is more volatile compared to LNF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.NE.Check LNF.TO's competition here
AMZN.NE vs ZZZ.TO Comparison August 2025
AMZN.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN.NE stands at 3.4T. In comparison, ZZZ.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN.NE is priced at CA$26.68, while ZZZ.TO trades at CA$35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.47, whereas ZZZ.TO's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, AMZN.NE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ZZZ.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN.NE is more volatile compared to ZZZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.NE.Check ZZZ.TO's competition here
AMZN.NE vs KITS.TO Comparison August 2025
AMZN.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN.NE stands at 3.4T. In comparison, KITS.TO has a market cap of 531.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN.NE is priced at CA$26.68, while KITS.TO trades at CA$16.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.47, whereas KITS.TO's P/E ratio is 150.36. In terms of profitability, AMZN.NE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KITS.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN.NE is less volatile compared to KITS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.NE.Check KITS.TO's competition here
AMZN.NE vs GBT.TO Comparison August 2025
AMZN.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN.NE stands at 3.4T. In comparison, GBT.TO has a market cap of 407.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN.NE is priced at CA$26.68, while GBT.TO trades at CA$12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.47, whereas GBT.TO's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, AMZN.NE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GBT.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN.NE is less volatile compared to GBT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.NE.Check GBT.TO's competition here
AMZN.NE vs IDG.TO Comparison August 2025
AMZN.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN.NE stands at 3.4T. In comparison, IDG.TO has a market cap of 69.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN.NE is priced at CA$26.68, while IDG.TO trades at CA$2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.47, whereas IDG.TO's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, AMZN.NE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IDG.TO's ROE of -12.64%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN.NE is more volatile compared to IDG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.NE.Check IDG.TO's competition here
AMZN.NE vs NTAR.CN Comparison August 2025
AMZN.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN.NE stands at 3.4T. In comparison, NTAR.CN has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN.NE is priced at CA$26.68, while NTAR.CN trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.47, whereas NTAR.CN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, AMZN.NE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NTAR.CN's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN.NE is less volatile compared to NTAR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.NE.Check NTAR.CN's competition here
AMZN.NE vs AMB.CN Comparison August 2025
AMZN.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN.NE stands at 3.4T. In comparison, AMB.CN has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN.NE is priced at CA$26.68, while AMB.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.47, whereas AMB.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, AMZN.NE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AMB.CN's ROE of -2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN.NE is more volatile compared to AMB.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.NE.Check AMB.CN's competition here
AMZN.NE vs CCR.CN Comparison August 2025
AMZN.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN.NE stands at 3.4T. In comparison, CCR.CN has a market cap of 666.5K. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN.NE is priced at CA$26.68, while CCR.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.47, whereas CCR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, AMZN.NE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CCR.CN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN.NE is more volatile compared to CCR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.NE.Check CCR.CN's competition here
AMZN.NE vs LXR.TO Comparison August 2025
AMZN.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN.NE stands at 3.4T. In comparison, LXR.TO has a market cap of 457.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN.NE is priced at CA$26.68, while LXR.TO trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.47, whereas LXR.TO's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, AMZN.NE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LXR.TO's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN.NE is less volatile compared to LXR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.NE.Check LXR.TO's competition here
AMZN.NE vs VEGA.CN Comparison August 2025
AMZN.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN.NE stands at 3.4T. In comparison, VEGA.CN has a market cap of 359.4K. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN.NE is priced at CA$26.68, while VEGA.CN trades at CA$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.47, whereas VEGA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, AMZN.NE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VEGA.CN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN.NE is more volatile compared to VEGA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.NE.Check VEGA.CN's competition here
AMZN.NE vs CLIQ.TO Comparison August 2025
AMZN.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMZN.NE stands at 3.4T. In comparison, CLIQ.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMZN.NE is priced at CA$26.68, while CLIQ.TO trades at CA$9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMZN.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.47, whereas CLIQ.TO's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, AMZN.NE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CLIQ.TO's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, AMZN.NE is less volatile compared to CLIQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMZN.NE.Check CLIQ.TO's competition here