América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V.
América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V. AMXVF Peers
See (AMXVF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMXVF | $1.05 | +7.14% | 73.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| AXTLF | $0.10 | +0.00% | 34.8T | -11.11 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| DTEGF | $36.17 | -2.59% | 176.4B | 12.77 | $2.82 | +2.80% |
| DTEGY | $36.14 | -2.47% | 176.1B | 12.74 | $2.82 | +2.76% |
| SFTBF | $68.28 | +11.19% | 93.7B | 12.12 | $5.38 | +0.46% |
| SFTBY | $34.33 | +4.39% | 92.1B | 11.99 | $2.69 | +0.30% |
| NTTYY | $25.93 | -0.74% | 85.7B | 12.54 | $2.06 | +2.43% |
| NPPXF | $1.04 | -3.72% | 85.2B | 12.88 | $0.08 | +3.46% |
| SFBQF | $1.54 | +1.32% | 72.4B | 19.00 | $0.08 | +3.88% |
| AMOVF | $1.00 | +0.00% | 66.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AMXVF vs AXTLF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, AXTLF has a market cap of 34.8T. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while AXTLF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXTLF's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to AXTLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to AXTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs DTEGF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, DTEGF has a market cap of 176.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while DTEGF trades at $36.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTEGF's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to DTEGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to DTEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs DTEGY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, DTEGY has a market cap of 176.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while DTEGY trades at $36.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTEGY's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to DTEGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to DTEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs SFTBF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, SFTBF has a market cap of 93.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while SFTBF trades at $68.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFTBF's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to SFTBF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to SFTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs SFTBY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, SFTBY has a market cap of 92.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while SFTBY trades at $34.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFTBY's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to SFTBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to SFTBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs NTTYY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, NTTYY has a market cap of 85.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while NTTYY trades at $25.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTTYY's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to NTTYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to NTTYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs NPPXF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, NPPXF has a market cap of 85.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while NPPXF trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPPXF's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to NPPXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to NPPXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs SFBQF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, SFBQF has a market cap of 72.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while SFBQF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFBQF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to SFBQF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to SFBQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs AMOVF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, AMOVF has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while AMOVF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMOVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to AMOVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to AMOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs KDDIY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, KDDIY has a market cap of 66.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while KDDIY trades at $16.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KDDIY's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to KDDIY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to KDDIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs KDDIF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, KDDIF has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while KDDIF trades at $16.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KDDIF's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to KDDIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to KDDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs CLLNY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, CLLNY has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while CLLNY trades at $19.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLLNY's P/E ratio is -477.75. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to CLLNY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to CLLNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs SNGNF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, SNGNF has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while SNGNF trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNGNF's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to SNGNF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to SNGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs SGAPY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, SGAPY has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while SGAPY trades at $29.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGAPY's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to SGAPY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to SGAPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs FNCTF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, FNCTF has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while FNCTF trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNCTF's P/E ratio is 18.15. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to FNCTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to FNCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs TLGPY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, TLGPY has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while TLGPY trades at $15.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLGPY's P/E ratio is 34.19. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TLGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to TLGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs SCMWY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, SCMWY has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while SCMWY trades at $70.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCMWY's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to SCMWY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to SCMWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs TTRAF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, TTRAF has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while TTRAF trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTRAF's P/E ratio is 34.87. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TTRAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to TTRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs SWZCF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, SWZCF has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while SWZCF trades at $681.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWZCF's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to SWZCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is less volatile compared to SWZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs TEFOF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, TEFOF has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while TEFOF trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEFOF's P/E ratio is -54.56. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TEFOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is less volatile compared to TEFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs AVIFY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, AVIFY has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while AVIFY trades at $8.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVIFY's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to AVIFY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to AVIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs BTGOF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, BTGOF has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while BTGOF trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTGOF's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to BTGOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to BTGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs CTOWY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, CTOWY has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while CTOWY trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTOWY's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to CTOWY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to CTOWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs CHWRF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, CHWRF has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while CHWRF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHWRF's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to CHWRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to CHWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs VODPF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, VODPF has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while VODPF trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VODPF's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to VODPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to VODPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs TELNF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, TELNF has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while TELNF trades at $15.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TELNF's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TELNF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to TELNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs TELNY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, TELNY has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while TELNY trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TELNY's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TELNY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to TELNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs KKPNF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, KKPNF has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while KKPNF trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKPNF's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to KKPNF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to KKPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs KKPNY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, KKPNY has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while KKPNY trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKPNY's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to KKPNY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to KKPNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs ELMUY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, ELMUY has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while ELMUY trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELMUY's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to ELMUY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to ELMUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs AVIVF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, AVIVF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while AVIVF trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVIVF's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to AVIVF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to AVIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs AVIKF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, AVIKF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while AVIKF trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVIKF's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to AVIKF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is less volatile compared to AVIKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs TLKMF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, TLKMF has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while TLKMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLKMF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TLKMF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to TLKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs HLTOY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, HLTOY has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while HLTOY trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLTOY's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to HLTOY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to HLTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs RCIAF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, RCIAF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while RCIAF trades at $30.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCIAF's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to RCIAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to RCIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs VDMCY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, VDMCY has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while VDMCY trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDMCY's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to VDMCY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to VDMCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs SJRWF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, SJRWF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while SJRWF trades at $30.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SJRWF's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to SJRWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to SJRWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs TLSNF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, TLSNF has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while TLSNF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLSNF's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TLSNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to TLSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs TLSNY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, TLSNY has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while TLSNY trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLSNY's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TLSNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to TLSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs MTNOY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, MTNOY has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while MTNOY trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTNOY's P/E ratio is -25.72. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to MTNOY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to MTNOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs MTNOF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, MTNOF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while MTNOF trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTNOF's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to MTNOF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to MTNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs LBRDB Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, LBRDB has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while LBRDB trades at $90.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBRDB's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to LBRDB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to LBRDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs HKTTY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, HKTTY has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while HKTTY trades at $16.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKTTY's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to HKTTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to HKTTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs BCEPF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, BCEPF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while BCEPF trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCEPF's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to BCEPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to BCEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs TCPFF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, TCPFF has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while TCPFF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCPFF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TCPFF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is less volatile compared to TCPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs HKTTF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, HKTTF has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while HKTTF trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKTTF's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to HKTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to HKTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs VODAF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, VODAF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while VODAF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VODAF's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to VODAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is less volatile compared to VODAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs BECEF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, BECEF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while BECEF trades at $11.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BECEF's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to BECEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to BECEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs TIAIY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, TIAIY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while TIAIY trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIAIY's P/E ratio is -27.84. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TIAIY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to TIAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs BCPPF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, BCPPF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while BCPPF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to BCPPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to BCPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs TLTZY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, TLTZY has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while TLTZY trades at $7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLTZY's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TLTZY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to TLTZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs TLTZF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, TLTZF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while TLTZF trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLTZF's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TLTZF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is less volatile compared to TLTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs AAFRF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, AAFRF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while AAFRF trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAFRF's P/E ratio is 43.50. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to AAFRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is less volatile compared to AAFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs BCEXF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, BCEXF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while BCEXF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCEXF's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to BCEXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to BCEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs TIAOF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, TIAOF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while TIAOF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIAOF's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TIAOF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to TIAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs DIGBF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, DIGBF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while DIGBF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIGBF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to DIGBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to DIGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs ELMUF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, ELMUF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while ELMUF trades at $54.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELMUF's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to ELMUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to ELMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs TIAJF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, TIAJF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while TIAJF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIAJF's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TIAJF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to TIAJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs FRTAY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, FRTAY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while FRTAY trades at $18.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRTAY's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to FRTAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to FRTAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs TELDF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, TELDF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while TELDF trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TELDF's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TELDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to TELDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs SHNUF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, SHNUF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while SHNUF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHNUF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to SHNUF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is less volatile compared to SHNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs TELDY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, TELDY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while TELDY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TELDY's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TELDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to TELDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs AARTY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, AARTY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while AARTY trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AARTY's P/E ratio is 33.58. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to AARTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to AARTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs SOBKY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, SOBKY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while SOBKY trades at $15.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOBKY's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to SOBKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to SOBKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs QBCRF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, QBCRF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while QBCRF trades at $30.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QBCRF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to QBCRF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to QBCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs QBCAF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, QBCAF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while QBCAF trades at $29.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QBCAF's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to QBCAF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to QBCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs HLTOF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, HLTOF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while HLTOF trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLTOF's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to HLTOF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to HLTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs MYTEF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, MYTEF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while MYTEF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYTEF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to MYTEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to MYTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs MAXSF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, MAXSF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while MAXSF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAXSF's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to MAXSF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to MAXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs PCWLF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, PCWLF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while PCWLF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCWLF's P/E ratio is -66.52. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to PCWLF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to PCWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs TKAGY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, TKAGY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while TKAGY trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKAGY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TKAGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to TKAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs PCCWY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, PCCWY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while PCCWY trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCCWY's P/E ratio is -130.10. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to PCCWY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to PCCWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs PHTCF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, PHTCF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while PHTCF trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHTCF's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to PHTCF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to PHTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs TRKNY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, TRKNY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while TRKNY trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRKNY's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TRKNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is less volatile compared to TRKNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs UDIRF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, UDIRF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while UDIRF trades at $27.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UDIRF's P/E ratio is -75.92. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to UDIRF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is less volatile compared to UDIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs GTMEY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, GTMEY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while GTMEY trades at $32.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTMEY's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to GTMEY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to GTMEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs AXXTF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, AXXTF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while AXXTF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXXTF's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to AXXTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to AXXTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs BZQIY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, BZQIY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while BZQIY trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZQIY's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to BZQIY's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to BZQIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs TCMFF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, TCMFF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while TCMFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCMFF's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TCMFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to TCMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs FRTAF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, FRTAF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while FRTAF trades at $33.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRTAF's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to FRTAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is less volatile compared to FRTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs BZQIF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, BZQIF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while BZQIF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZQIF's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to BZQIF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to BZQIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs CUCSF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, CUCSF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while CUCSF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUCSF's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to CUCSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to CUCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs TFAOF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, TFAOF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while TFAOF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TFAOF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TFAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to TFAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs IIJIY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, IIJIY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while IIJIY trades at $39.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIJIY's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to IIJIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to IIJIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs IIJIF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, IIJIF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while IIJIF trades at $20.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIJIF's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to IIJIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to IIJIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs PTITF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, PTITF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while PTITF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTITF's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTITF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to PTITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs MICCF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, MICCF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while MICCF trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MICCF's P/E ratio is 70.96. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to MICCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to MICCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs BGAOY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, BGAOY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while BGAOY trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGAOY's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to BGAOY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to BGAOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs TACYY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, TACYY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while TACYY trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TACYY's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TACYY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to TACYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs CUCSY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, CUCSY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while CUCSY trades at $10.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUCSY's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to CUCSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is less volatile compared to CUCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs TRKNF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, TRKNF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while TRKNF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRKNF's P/E ratio is 39.93. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TRKNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to TRKNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs BGAOF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, BGAOF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while BGAOF trades at $8.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGAOF's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to BGAOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is less volatile compared to BGAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs TLGHY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, TLGHY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while TLGHY trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLGHY's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TLGHY's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to TLGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs PTXKY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, PTXKY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while PTXKY trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTXKY's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTXKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to PTXKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs PTTWF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, PTTWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while PTTWF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTTWF's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTTWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is less volatile compared to PTTWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs NZTCF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, NZTCF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while NZTCF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NZTCF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to NZTCF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to NZTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs SPKKY Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, SPKKY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while SPKKY trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPKKY's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to SPKKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to SPKKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs GMOYF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, GMOYF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while GMOYF trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMOYF's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to GMOYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is more volatile compared to GMOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.
AMXVF vs CLCMF Comparison
AMXVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMXVF stands at 73.6B. In comparison, CLCMF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMXVF is priced at $1.05, while CLCMF trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMXVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLCMF's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, AMXVF's ROE is N/A, compared to CLCMF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AMXVF is less volatile compared to CLCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMXVF.