América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V.
América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V. AMOVF Peers
See (AMOVF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMOVF | $1.00 | +0.00% | 66.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| AXTLF | $0.10 | +0.00% | 34.8T | -11.11 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| DTEGY | $36.13 | +0.53% | 177B | 12.80 | $2.82 | +2.76% |
| DTEGF | $36.06 | +0.17% | 176.7B | 12.79 | $2.82 | +2.80% |
| SFTBF | $68.61 | +5.24% | 98B | 12.68 | $5.38 | +0.46% |
| SFTBY | $34.38 | +6.77% | 98B | 12.76 | $2.69 | +0.30% |
| NTTYY | $25.96 | +0.39% | 85.9B | 12.57 | $2.06 | +2.43% |
| NPPXF | $1.03 | +0.00% | 85.6B | 12.94 | $0.08 | +3.46% |
| AMXVF | $1.05 | +7.14% | 73.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SFBQF | $1.53 | +0.66% | 72.6B | 21.79 | $0.07 | +3.88% |
Stock Comparison
AMOVF vs AXTLF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, AXTLF has a market cap of 34.8T. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while AXTLF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXTLF's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to AXTLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF and AXTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AMOVF vs DTEGY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, DTEGY has a market cap of 177B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while DTEGY trades at $36.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTEGY's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to DTEGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to DTEGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs DTEGF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, DTEGF has a market cap of 176.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while DTEGF trades at $36.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTEGF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to DTEGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to DTEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs SFTBF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, SFTBF has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while SFTBF trades at $68.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFTBF's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to SFTBF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to SFTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs SFTBY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, SFTBY has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while SFTBY trades at $34.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFTBY's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to SFTBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to SFTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs NTTYY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, NTTYY has a market cap of 85.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while NTTYY trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTTYY's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to NTTYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to NTTYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs NPPXF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, NPPXF has a market cap of 85.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while NPPXF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPPXF's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to NPPXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF and NPPXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AMOVF vs AMXVF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, AMXVF has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while AMXVF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMXVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to AMXVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to AMXVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs SFBQF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, SFBQF has a market cap of 72.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while SFBQF trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFBQF's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to SFBQF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to SFBQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs KDDIY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, KDDIY has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while KDDIY trades at $16.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KDDIY's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to KDDIY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to KDDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs KDDIF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, KDDIF has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while KDDIF trades at $16.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KDDIF's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to KDDIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF and KDDIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AMOVF vs CLLNY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, CLLNY has a market cap of 54.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while CLLNY trades at $19.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLLNY's P/E ratio is -481.75. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to CLLNY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to CLLNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs SGAPY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, SGAPY has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while SGAPY trades at $29.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGAPY's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to SGAPY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to SGAPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs SNGNF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, SNGNF has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while SNGNF trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNGNF's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to SNGNF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to SNGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs FNCTF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, FNCTF has a market cap of 41.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while FNCTF trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNCTF's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to FNCTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF and FNCTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AMOVF vs TLGPY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, TLGPY has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while TLGPY trades at $16.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLGPY's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TLGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to TLGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs SCMWY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, SCMWY has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while SCMWY trades at $70.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCMWY's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to SCMWY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to SCMWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs TTRAF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, TTRAF has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while TTRAF trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTRAF's P/E ratio is 34.89. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TTRAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to TTRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs SWZCF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, SWZCF has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while SWZCF trades at $681.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWZCF's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to SWZCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to SWZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs TEFOF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, TEFOF has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while TEFOF trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEFOF's P/E ratio is -54.56. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TEFOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to TEFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs VODPF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, VODPF has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while VODPF trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VODPF's P/E ratio is -6.22. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to VODPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF and VODPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AMOVF vs AVIFY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, AVIFY has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while AVIFY trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVIFY's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to AVIFY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF and AVIFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AMOVF vs BTGOF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, BTGOF has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while BTGOF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTGOF's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to BTGOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF and BTGOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AMOVF vs CTOWY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, CTOWY has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while CTOWY trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTOWY's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to CTOWY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to CTOWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs CHWRF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, CHWRF has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while CHWRF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHWRF's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to CHWRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to CHWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs TELNF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, TELNF has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while TELNF trades at $15.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TELNF's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TELNF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to TELNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs TELNY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, TELNY has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while TELNY trades at $15.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TELNY's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TELNY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to TELNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs KKPNY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, KKPNY has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while KKPNY trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKPNY's P/E ratio is 21.22. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to KKPNY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to KKPNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs KKPNF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, KKPNF has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while KKPNF trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKPNF's P/E ratio is 21.07. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to KKPNF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to KKPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs ELMUY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, ELMUY has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while ELMUY trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELMUY's P/E ratio is 21.21. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to ELMUY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to ELMUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs AVIVF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, AVIVF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while AVIVF trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVIVF's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to AVIVF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to AVIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs AVIKF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, AVIKF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while AVIKF trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVIKF's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to AVIKF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to AVIKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs TLKMF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, TLKMF has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while TLKMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLKMF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TLKMF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to TLKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs HLTOY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, HLTOY has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while HLTOY trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLTOY's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to HLTOY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to HLTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs RCIAF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, RCIAF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while RCIAF trades at $30.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCIAF's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to RCIAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to RCIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs SJRWF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, SJRWF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while SJRWF trades at $30.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SJRWF's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to SJRWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF and SJRWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AMOVF vs VDMCY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, VDMCY has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while VDMCY trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDMCY's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to VDMCY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to VDMCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs MTNOY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, MTNOY has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while MTNOY trades at $7.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTNOY's P/E ratio is -27.07. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to MTNOY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to MTNOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs TLSNF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, TLSNF has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while TLSNF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLSNF's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TLSNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF and TLSNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AMOVF vs TLSNY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, TLSNY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while TLSNY trades at $7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLSNY's P/E ratio is 26.37. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TLSNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to TLSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs MTNOF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, MTNOF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while MTNOF trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTNOF's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to MTNOF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to MTNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs LBRDB Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, LBRDB has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while LBRDB trades at $90.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBRDB's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to LBRDB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF and LBRDB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AMOVF vs TCPFF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, TCPFF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while TCPFF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCPFF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TCPFF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to TCPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs BECEF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, BECEF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while BECEF trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BECEF's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to BECEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF and BECEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AMOVF vs BCEPF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, BCEPF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while BCEPF trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCEPF's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to BCEPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF and BCEPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AMOVF vs HKTTF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, HKTTF has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while HKTTF trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKTTF's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to HKTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to HKTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs HKTTY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, HKTTY has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while HKTTY trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKTTY's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to HKTTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to HKTTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs VODAF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, VODAF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while VODAF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VODAF's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to VODAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to VODAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs TIAIY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, TIAIY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while TIAIY trades at $5.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIAIY's P/E ratio is -28.26. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TIAIY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to TIAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs TLTZY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, TLTZY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while TLTZY trades at $7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLTZY's P/E ratio is 24.53. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TLTZY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to TLTZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs BCPPF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, BCPPF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while BCPPF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to BCPPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF and BCPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AMOVF vs TLTZF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, TLTZF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while TLTZF trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLTZF's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TLTZF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to TLTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs AAFRF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, AAFRF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while AAFRF trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAFRF's P/E ratio is 43.67. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to AAFRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF and AAFRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AMOVF vs BCEXF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, BCEXF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while BCEXF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCEXF's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to BCEXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF and BCEXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AMOVF vs TIAOF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, TIAOF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while TIAOF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIAOF's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TIAOF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to TIAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs DIGBF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, DIGBF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while DIGBF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIGBF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to DIGBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF and DIGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AMOVF vs ELMUF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, ELMUF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while ELMUF trades at $54.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELMUF's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to ELMUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to ELMUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs TIAJF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, TIAJF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while TIAJF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIAJF's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TIAJF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF and TIAJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AMOVF vs FRTAY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, FRTAY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while FRTAY trades at $18.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRTAY's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to FRTAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF and FRTAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AMOVF vs TELDF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, TELDF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while TELDF trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TELDF's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TELDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to TELDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs SHNUF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, SHNUF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while SHNUF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHNUF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to SHNUF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to SHNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs TELDY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, TELDY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while TELDY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TELDY's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TELDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to TELDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs AARTY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, AARTY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while AARTY trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AARTY's P/E ratio is 33.58. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to AARTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to AARTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs SOBKY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, SOBKY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while SOBKY trades at $15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOBKY's P/E ratio is 20.28. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to SOBKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to SOBKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs QBCRF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, QBCRF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while QBCRF trades at $30.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QBCRF's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to QBCRF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to QBCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs QBCAF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, QBCAF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while QBCAF trades at $29.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QBCAF's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to QBCAF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF and QBCAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AMOVF vs HLTOF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, HLTOF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while HLTOF trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLTOF's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to HLTOF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to HLTOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs MYTEF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, MYTEF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while MYTEF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYTEF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to MYTEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to MYTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs MAXSF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, MAXSF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while MAXSF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAXSF's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to MAXSF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF and MAXSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AMOVF vs TKAGY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, TKAGY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while TKAGY trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKAGY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TKAGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF and TKAGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AMOVF vs PCCWY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, PCCWY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while PCCWY trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCCWY's P/E ratio is -130.90. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to PCCWY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to PCCWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs PCWLF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, PCWLF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while PCWLF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCWLF's P/E ratio is -63.45. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to PCWLF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF and PCWLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AMOVF vs PHTCF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, PHTCF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while PHTCF trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHTCF's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to PHTCF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF and PHTCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AMOVF vs TRKNY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, TRKNY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while TRKNY trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRKNY's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TRKNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to TRKNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs UDIRF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, UDIRF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while UDIRF trades at $27.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UDIRF's P/E ratio is -75.92. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to UDIRF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to UDIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs GTMEY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, GTMEY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while GTMEY trades at $32.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTMEY's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to GTMEY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF and GTMEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AMOVF vs AXXTF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, AXXTF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while AXXTF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXXTF's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to AXXTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to AXXTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs BZQIY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, BZQIY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while BZQIY trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZQIY's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to BZQIY's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to BZQIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs TCMFF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, TCMFF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while TCMFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCMFF's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TCMFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF and TCMFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AMOVF vs FRTAF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, FRTAF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while FRTAF trades at $33.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRTAF's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to FRTAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to FRTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs BZQIF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, BZQIF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while BZQIF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZQIF's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to BZQIF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to BZQIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs CUCSF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, CUCSF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while CUCSF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUCSF's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to CUCSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to CUCSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs TFAOF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, TFAOF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while TFAOF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TFAOF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TFAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF and TFAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AMOVF vs IIJIF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, IIJIF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while IIJIF trades at $20.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIJIF's P/E ratio is 26.50. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to IIJIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF and IIJIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AMOVF vs IIJIY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, IIJIY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while IIJIY trades at $39.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIJIY's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to IIJIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to IIJIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs PTITF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, PTITF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while PTITF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTITF's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTITF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF and PTITF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AMOVF vs MICCF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, MICCF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while MICCF trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MICCF's P/E ratio is 70.96. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to MICCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF and MICCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AMOVF vs BGAOY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, BGAOY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while BGAOY trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGAOY's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to BGAOY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to BGAOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs TACYY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, TACYY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while TACYY trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TACYY's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TACYY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF and TACYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AMOVF vs CUCSY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, CUCSY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while CUCSY trades at $10.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUCSY's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to CUCSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to CUCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs TRKNF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, TRKNF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while TRKNF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRKNF's P/E ratio is 39.93. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TRKNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to TRKNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs BGAOF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, BGAOF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while BGAOF trades at $8.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGAOF's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to BGAOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to BGAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs TLGHY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, TLGHY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while TLGHY trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLGHY's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to TLGHY's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF and TLGHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AMOVF vs PTTWF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, PTTWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while PTTWF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTTWF's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTTWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to PTTWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs SPKKY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, SPKKY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while SPKKY trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPKKY's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to SPKKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to SPKKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs GMOYF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, GMOYF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while GMOYF trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMOYF's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to GMOYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to GMOYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs CLCMF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, CLCMF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while CLCMF trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLCMF's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to CLCMF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to CLCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs CHRUF Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, CHRUF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while CHRUF trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHRUF's P/E ratio is -535.00. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to CHRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF is less volatile compared to CHRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMOVF.
AMOVF vs PTXKY Comparison
AMOVF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMOVF stands at 66.6B. In comparison, PTXKY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMOVF is priced at $1.00, while PTXKY trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMOVF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTXKY's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, AMOVF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTXKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMOVF and PTXKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).