A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S
A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S AMKBY Peers
See (AMKBY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Marine Shipping Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMKBY | $10.66 | +0.19% | 32.3B | 4.75 | $2.25 | +7.60% |
| CICOY | $9.55 | +0.59% | 34.5B | 4.45 | $2.15 | +10.97% |
| AMKAF | $2,100.00 | +4.90% | 33.3B | 4.67 | $449.96 | +7.79% |
| AMKBF | $2,083.00 | +0.63% | 32.7B | 4.63 | $449.92 | +7.85% |
| CICOF | $1.77 | +0.00% | 31.9B | 4.12 | $0.43 | +12.16% |
| HLAGF | $155.56 | +5.10% | 27.3B | 9.29 | $16.75 | +6.18% |
| HPGLY | $77.00 | +6.46% | 27.1B | 9.19 | $8.38 | +6.03% |
| ICTEF | $8.12 | -4.81% | 16.4B | 19.33 | $0.42 | +3.04% |
| NPNYY | $7.35 | +0.00% | 15.7B | 5.10 | $1.44 | +3.97% |
| NYUKF | $35.32 | +0.00% | 14.4B | 4.90 | $7.21 | +0.04% |
Stock Comparison
AMKBY vs CICOY Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, CICOY has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while CICOY trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas CICOY's P/E ratio is 4.45. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CICOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to CICOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs AMKAF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, AMKAF has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while AMKAF trades at $2,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas AMKAF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMKAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to AMKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs AMKBF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, AMKBF has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while AMKBF trades at $2,083.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas AMKBF's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMKBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to AMKBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs CICOF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, CICOF has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while CICOF trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas CICOF's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CICOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to CICOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs HLAGF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, HLAGF has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while HLAGF trades at $155.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas HLAGF's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HLAGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to HLAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs HPGLY Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, HPGLY has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while HPGLY trades at $77.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas HPGLY's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HPGLY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to HPGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs ICTEF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, ICTEF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while ICTEF trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas ICTEF's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ICTEF's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to ICTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs NPNYY Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, NPNYY has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while NPNYY trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas NPNYY's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NPNYY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to NPNYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs NYUKF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, NYUKF has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while NYUKF trades at $35.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas NYUKF's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NYUKF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to NYUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs OROVY Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, OROVY has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while OROVY trades at $92.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas OROVY's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OROVY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to OROVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs MSLOY Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, MSLOY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while MSLOY trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas MSLOY's P/E ratio is 4.23. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MSLOY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to MSLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs OROVF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, OROVF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while OROVF trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas OROVF's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OROVF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to OROVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs MSLOF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, MSLOF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while MSLOF trades at $32.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas MSLOF's P/E ratio is 4.09. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MSLOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to MSLOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs KAIKY Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, KAIKY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while KAIKY trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas KAIKY's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KAIKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to KAIKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs KAKKF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, KAKKF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while KAKKF trades at $14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas KAKKF's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KAKKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to KAKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs SITIY Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, SITIY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while SITIY trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas SITIY's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SITIY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to SITIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs SITIF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, SITIF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while SITIF trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas SITIF's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SITIF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to SITIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs CMHHF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, CMHHF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while CMHHF trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas CMHHF's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CMHHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to CMHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs CMHHY Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, CMHHY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while CMHHY trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas CMHHY's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CMHHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to CMHHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs QNDPF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, QNDPF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while QNDPF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas QNDPF's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to QNDPF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to QNDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs MIHDF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, MIHDF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while MIHDF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas MIHDF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MIHDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to MIHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs CSDXF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, CSDXF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while CSDXF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas CSDXF's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSDXF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to CSDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs HAFNF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, HAFNF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while HAFNF trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas HAFNF's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HAFNF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to HAFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs CITAF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, CITAF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while CITAF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas CITAF's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CITAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to CITAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs DLPTF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, DLPTF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while DLPTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas DLPTF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DLPTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to DLPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs PTAUF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, PTAUF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while PTAUF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas PTAUF's P/E ratio is 57.14. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PTAUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to PTAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs HFIAF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, HFIAF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while HFIAF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas HFIAF's P/E ratio is -26.16. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HFIAF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to HFIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs CSPKF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, CSPKF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while CSPKF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas CSPKF's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSPKF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to CSPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs TDGMW Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, TDGMW has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while TDGMW trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas TDGMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TDGMW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to TDGMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs PTAUY Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, PTAUY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while PTAUY trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas PTAUY's P/E ratio is 37.58. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PTAUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to PTAUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs BWLLY Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, BWLLY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while BWLLY trades at $15.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas BWLLY's P/E ratio is 4.26. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BWLLY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to BWLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs HOEGF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, HOEGF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while HOEGF trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas HOEGF's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HOEGF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to HOEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs CADLF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, CADLF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while CADLF trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas CADLF's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CADLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to CADLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs BWLLF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, BWLLF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while BWLLF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas BWLLF's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BWLLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to BWLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs HCTPF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, HCTPF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while HCTPF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas HCTPF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HCTPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to HCTPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs SOIEF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, SOIEF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while SOIEF trades at $28.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas SOIEF's P/E ratio is 3.66. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SOIEF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to SOIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs PCFBY Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, PCFBY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while PCFBY trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas PCFBY's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PCFBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to PCFBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs CKNHF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, CKNHF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while CKNHF trades at $46.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas CKNHF's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CKNHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to CKNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs CITAY Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, CITAY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while CITAY trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas CITAY's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CITAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to CITAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs HHULF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, HHULF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while HHULF trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas HHULF's P/E ratio is 37.24. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HHULF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to HHULF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs PCFBF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, PCFBF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while PCFBF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas PCFBF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PCFBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to PCFBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs WTSHF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, WTSHF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while WTSHF trades at $20.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas WTSHF's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WTSHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to WTSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs HHULY Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, HHULY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while HHULY trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas HHULY's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HHULY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to HHULY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs IRCUF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, IRCUF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while IRCUF trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas IRCUF's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IRCUF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to IRCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs CHDGF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, CHDGF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while CHDGF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas CHDGF's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CHDGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to CHDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs DPBSF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, DPBSF has a market cap of 910M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while DPBSF trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas DPBSF's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DPBSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to DPBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs OKENF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, OKENF has a market cap of 876M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while OKENF trades at $27.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas OKENF's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OKENF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to OKENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs MPZZF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, MPZZF has a market cap of 776.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while MPZZF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas MPZZF's P/E ratio is 3.12. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MPZZF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to MPZZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs LTKBF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, LTKBF has a market cap of 623M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while LTKBF trades at $49.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas LTKBF's P/E ratio is 30.99. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LTKBF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to LTKBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs TJIPF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, TJIPF has a market cap of 615.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while TJIPF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas TJIPF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TJIPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to TJIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs SEMUF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, SEMUF has a market cap of 585.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while SEMUF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas SEMUF's P/E ratio is -4.16. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SEMUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to SEMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs DMCOF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, DMCOF has a market cap of 506.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while DMCOF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas DMCOF's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DMCOF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to DMCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs AGMJF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, AGMJF has a market cap of 480.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while AGMJF trades at $11.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas AGMJF's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AGMJF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to AGMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs TSMTF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, TSMTF has a market cap of 396.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while TSMTF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas TSMTF's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TSMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to TSMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs PSGFF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, PSGFF has a market cap of 296.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while PSGFF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas PSGFF's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSGFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to PSGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs TTBKF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, TTBKF has a market cap of 286.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while TTBKF trades at $12.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas TTBKF's P/E ratio is 5.96. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TTBKF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to TTBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs JMSFF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, JMSFF has a market cap of 272.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while JMSFF trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas JMSFF's P/E ratio is -8.03. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JMSFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to JMSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs SLOFF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, SLOFF has a market cap of 254.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while SLOFF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas SLOFF's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SLOFF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to SLOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs CSPKY Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, CSPKY has a market cap of 243.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while CSPKY trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas CSPKY's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSPKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to CSPKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs MKOTF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, MKOTF has a market cap of 238.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while MKOTF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas MKOTF's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MKOTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to MKOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs HSPPF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, HSPPF has a market cap of 183.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while HSPPF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas HSPPF's P/E ratio is -82.17. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HSPPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to HSPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs VKGLF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, VKGLF has a market cap of 174.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while VKGLF trades at $10.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas VKGLF's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VKGLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to VKGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs BSEAF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, BSEAF has a market cap of 89.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while BSEAF trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas BSEAF's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BSEAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to BSEAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs HUPHY Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, HUPHY has a market cap of 85.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while HUPHY trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas HUPHY's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HUPHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to HUPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs JNSTF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, JNSTF has a market cap of 59M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while JNSTF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas JNSTF's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JNSTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to JNSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs WSSTF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, WSSTF has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while WSSTF trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas WSSTF's P/E ratio is -16.62. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WSSTF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to WSSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs AWLNF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, AWLNF has a market cap of 42.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while AWLNF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas AWLNF's P/E ratio is 2.47. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AWLNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to AWLNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs GEOUF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, GEOUF has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while GEOUF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas GEOUF's P/E ratio is -8.95. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GEOUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to GEOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs ADCUF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, ADCUF has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while ADCUF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas ADCUF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADCUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to ADCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs ASCJF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, ASCJF has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while ASCJF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas ASCJF's P/E ratio is 0.24. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASCJF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to ASCJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs GTMAY Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, GTMAY has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while GTMAY trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas GTMAY's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GTMAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to GTMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs SEAOF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, SEAOF has a market cap of 66.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while SEAOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas SEAOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SEAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to SEAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs BBLKF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, BBLKF has a market cap of 27K. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while BBLKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas BBLKF's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBLKF's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to BBLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs ULTRF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, ULTRF has a market cap of 14.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while ULTRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas ULTRF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ULTRF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to ULTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs TEUFF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, TEUFF has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while TEUFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas TEUFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TEUFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to TEUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs WLOLQ Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, WLOLQ has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while WLOLQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas WLOLQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WLOLQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to WLOLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs PRGNF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, PRGNF has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while PRGNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas PRGNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRGNF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to PRGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs TEUCF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, TEUCF has a market cap of 31. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while TEUCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas TEUCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TEUCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to TEUCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs SEPI Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, SEPI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while SEPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas SEPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SEPI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to SEPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs ITKSF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 32.3B. In comparison, ITKSF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $10.66, while ITKSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.75, whereas ITKSF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ITKSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to ITKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.