A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S
A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S AMKBY Peers
See (AMKBY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Marine Shipping Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMKBY | $9.51 | +3.82% | 28.9B | 4.22 | $2.25 | +11.72% |
| CICOY | $8.89 | +2.42% | 34.5B | 4.15 | $2.14 | +11.80% |
| CICOF | $1.70 | -1.16% | 32.4B | 3.95 | $0.43 | +12.66% |
| AMKAF | $1,854.00 | +3.00% | 29.3B | 4.12 | $449.95 | +8.82% |
| AMKBF | $1,858.00 | +2.30% | 29.2B | 4.13 | $449.96 | +8.80% |
| HPGLY | $76.68 | +2.19% | 27B | 9.11 | $8.42 | +6.05% |
| HLAGF | $147.23 | +0.00% | 25.9B | 8.75 | $16.83 | +6.53% |
| NPNYY | $7.29 | -1.49% | 15.8B | 4.91 | $1.48 | +4.00% |
| ICTEF | $7.68 | +5.06% | 15.5B | 18.29 | $0.42 | +3.22% |
| NYUKF | $36.10 | +0.00% | 15.4B | 4.89 | $7.38 | +0.04% |
Stock Comparison
AMKBY vs CICOY Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, CICOY has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while CICOY trades at $8.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas CICOY's P/E ratio is 4.15. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CICOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to CICOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs CICOF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, CICOF has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while CICOF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas CICOF's P/E ratio is 3.95. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CICOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to CICOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs AMKAF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, AMKAF has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while AMKAF trades at $1,854.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas AMKAF's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMKAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to AMKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs AMKBF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, AMKBF has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while AMKBF trades at $1,858.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas AMKBF's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMKBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to AMKBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs HPGLY Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, HPGLY has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while HPGLY trades at $76.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas HPGLY's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HPGLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to HPGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs HLAGF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, HLAGF has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while HLAGF trades at $147.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas HLAGF's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HLAGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to HLAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs NPNYY Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, NPNYY has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while NPNYY trades at $7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas NPNYY's P/E ratio is 4.91. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NPNYY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to NPNYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs ICTEF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, ICTEF has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while ICTEF trades at $7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas ICTEF's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ICTEF's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to ICTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs NYUKF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, NYUKF has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while NYUKF trades at $36.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas NYUKF's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NYUKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to NYUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs MSLOY Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, MSLOY has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while MSLOY trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas MSLOY's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MSLOY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to MSLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs OROVF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, OROVF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while OROVF trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas OROVF's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OROVF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to OROVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs MSLOF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, MSLOF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while MSLOF trades at $32.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas MSLOF's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MSLOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to MSLOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs OROVY Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, OROVY has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while OROVY trades at $83.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas OROVY's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OROVY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to OROVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs KAIKY Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, KAIKY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while KAIKY trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas KAIKY's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KAIKY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to KAIKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs KAKKF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, KAKKF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while KAKKF trades at $14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas KAKKF's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KAKKF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to KAKKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs SITIY Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, SITIY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while SITIY trades at $32.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas SITIY's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SITIY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to SITIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs CMHHF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, CMHHF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while CMHHF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas CMHHF's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CMHHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to CMHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs SITIF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, SITIF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while SITIF trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas SITIF's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SITIF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to SITIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs CMHHY Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, CMHHY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while CMHHY trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas CMHHY's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CMHHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to CMHHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs QNDPF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, QNDPF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while QNDPF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas QNDPF's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to QNDPF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to QNDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs MIHDF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, MIHDF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while MIHDF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas MIHDF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MIHDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to MIHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs CSDXF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, CSDXF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while CSDXF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas CSDXF's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSDXF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to CSDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs CITAF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, CITAF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while CITAF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas CITAF's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CITAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to CITAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs DLPTF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, DLPTF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while DLPTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas DLPTF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DLPTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to DLPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs HAFNF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, HAFNF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while HAFNF trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas HAFNF's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HAFNF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to HAFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs PTAUF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, PTAUF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while PTAUF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas PTAUF's P/E ratio is 57.14. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PTAUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to PTAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs HFIAF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, HFIAF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while HFIAF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas HFIAF's P/E ratio is -26.16. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HFIAF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to HFIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs CSPKF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, CSPKF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while CSPKF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas CSPKF's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSPKF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to CSPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs PTAUY Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, PTAUY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while PTAUY trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas PTAUY's P/E ratio is 37.58. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PTAUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to PTAUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs TDGMW Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, TDGMW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while TDGMW trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas TDGMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TDGMW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to TDGMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs BWLLY Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, BWLLY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while BWLLY trades at $15.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas BWLLY's P/E ratio is 4.26. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BWLLY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to BWLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs BWLLF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, BWLLF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while BWLLF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas BWLLF's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BWLLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to BWLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs HOEGF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, HOEGF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while HOEGF trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas HOEGF's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HOEGF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to HOEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs CADLF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, CADLF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while CADLF trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas CADLF's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CADLF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to CADLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs CITAY Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, CITAY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while CITAY trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas CITAY's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CITAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to CITAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs CKNHF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, CKNHF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while CKNHF trades at $45.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas CKNHF's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CKNHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to CKNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs HHULF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, HHULF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while HHULF trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas HHULF's P/E ratio is 37.24. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HHULF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to HHULF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs SOIEF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, SOIEF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while SOIEF trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas SOIEF's P/E ratio is 2.99. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SOIEF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to SOIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs PCFBF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, PCFBF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while PCFBF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas PCFBF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PCFBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to PCFBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs PCFBY Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, PCFBY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while PCFBY trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas PCFBY's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PCFBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to PCFBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs HCTPF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, HCTPF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while HCTPF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas HCTPF's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HCTPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to HCTPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs WTSHF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, WTSHF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while WTSHF trades at $19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas WTSHF's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WTSHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to WTSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs HHULY Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, HHULY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while HHULY trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas HHULY's P/E ratio is 24.71. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HHULY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to HHULY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs IRCUF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, IRCUF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while IRCUF trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas IRCUF's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IRCUF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to IRCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs CHDGF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, CHDGF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while CHDGF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas CHDGF's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CHDGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to CHDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs DPBSF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, DPBSF has a market cap of 910M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while DPBSF trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas DPBSF's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DPBSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to DPBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs OKENF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, OKENF has a market cap of 876M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while OKENF trades at $27.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas OKENF's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OKENF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to OKENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs MPZZF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, MPZZF has a market cap of 687.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while MPZZF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas MPZZF's P/E ratio is 2.77. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MPZZF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to MPZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs LTKBF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, LTKBF has a market cap of 623M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while LTKBF trades at $49.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas LTKBF's P/E ratio is 30.99. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LTKBF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to LTKBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs SEMUF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, SEMUF has a market cap of 585.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while SEMUF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas SEMUF's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SEMUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to SEMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs TJIPF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, TJIPF has a market cap of 492.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while TJIPF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas TJIPF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TJIPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to TJIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs DMCOF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, DMCOF has a market cap of 486.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while DMCOF trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas DMCOF's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DMCOF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to DMCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs AGMJF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, AGMJF has a market cap of 476.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while AGMJF trades at $11.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas AGMJF's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AGMJF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to AGMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs TSMTF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, TSMTF has a market cap of 396.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while TSMTF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas TSMTF's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TSMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to TSMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs PSGFF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, PSGFF has a market cap of 285.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while PSGFF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas PSGFF's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSGFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to PSGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs JMSFF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, JMSFF has a market cap of 272.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while JMSFF trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas JMSFF's P/E ratio is -8.03. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JMSFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to JMSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs TTBKF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, TTBKF has a market cap of 260M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while TTBKF trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas TTBKF's P/E ratio is 5.41. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TTBKF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to TTBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs SLOFF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, SLOFF has a market cap of 254.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while SLOFF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas SLOFF's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SLOFF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to SLOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs MKOTF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, MKOTF has a market cap of 238.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while MKOTF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas MKOTF's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MKOTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to MKOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs CSPKY Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, CSPKY has a market cap of 237.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while CSPKY trades at $6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas CSPKY's P/E ratio is 7.22. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSPKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to CSPKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs HSPPF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, HSPPF has a market cap of 183.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while HSPPF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas HSPPF's P/E ratio is -82.17. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HSPPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to HSPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs VKGLF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, VKGLF has a market cap of 174.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while VKGLF trades at $10.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas VKGLF's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VKGLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to VKGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs BSEAF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, BSEAF has a market cap of 97M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while BSEAF trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas BSEAF's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BSEAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to BSEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs HUPHY Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, HUPHY has a market cap of 85.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while HUPHY trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas HUPHY's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HUPHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to HUPHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs JNSTF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, JNSTF has a market cap of 59M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while JNSTF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas JNSTF's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JNSTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to JNSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs WSSTF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, WSSTF has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while WSSTF trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas WSSTF's P/E ratio is -16.62. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WSSTF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to WSSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs AWLNF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, AWLNF has a market cap of 42.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while AWLNF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas AWLNF's P/E ratio is 2.47. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AWLNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to AWLNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs GEOUF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, GEOUF has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while GEOUF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas GEOUF's P/E ratio is -8.95. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GEOUF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to GEOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs ADCUF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, ADCUF has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while ADCUF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas ADCUF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADCUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to ADCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs GTMAY Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, GTMAY has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while GTMAY trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas GTMAY's P/E ratio is 6.77. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GTMAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to GTMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs ASCJF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, ASCJF has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while ASCJF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas ASCJF's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASCJF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to ASCJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs SEAOF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, SEAOF has a market cap of 66.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while SEAOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas SEAOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SEAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to SEAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs BBLKF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, BBLKF has a market cap of 27K. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while BBLKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas BBLKF's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBLKF's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to BBLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs ULTRF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, ULTRF has a market cap of 14.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while ULTRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas ULTRF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ULTRF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to ULTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs TEUFF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, TEUFF has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while TEUFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas TEUFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TEUFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to TEUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs WLOLQ Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, WLOLQ has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while WLOLQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas WLOLQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WLOLQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to WLOLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs PRGNF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, PRGNF has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while PRGNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas PRGNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRGNF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is less volatile compared to PRGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs TEUCF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, TEUCF has a market cap of 31. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while TEUCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas TEUCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TEUCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to TEUCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs SEPI Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, SEPI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while SEPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas SEPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SEPI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to SEPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.
AMKBY vs ITKSF Comparison
AMKBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMKBY stands at 28.9B. In comparison, ITKSF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMKBY is priced at $9.51, while ITKSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMKBY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.22, whereas ITKSF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, AMKBY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ITKSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMKBY is more volatile compared to ITKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMKBY.