Ambu A/S
Ambu A/S (AMBBY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AMBBY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Devices Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMBBY | $12.61 | +0.00% | 3.4B | 40.13 | $0.32 | +0.26% |
| SMMNY | $24.32 | +0.00% | 112.1B | 22.22 | $1.12 | +1.48% |
| SEMHF | $49.27 | +0.00% | 56.4B | 22.25 | $2.27 | +2.34% |
| RYLPF | $33.00 | +0.00% | 31.4B | 29.20 | $1.13 | +2.90% |
| SONVF | $252.74 | +0.00% | 15.1B | 22.59 | $11.19 | +2.15% |
| SONVY | $50.65 | +0.00% | 15B | 22.24 | $2.27 | +2.13% |
| SNNUF | $16.59 | +0.24% | 14.1B | 29.62 | $0.56 | +2.30% |
| CHEOF | $180.67 | +0.00% | 11.8B | 43.96 | $4.11 | +1.53% |
| CHEOY | $70.23 | +0.00% | 9.2B | 37.41 | $1.87 | +1.87% |
| WILYY | $14.13 | +0.00% | 6.2B | 15.88 | $0.89 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AMBBY vs SMMNY Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SMMNY has a market cap of 112.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while SMMNY trades at $24.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas SMMNY's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMMNY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY is less volatile compared to SMMNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBBY.Check SMMNY's competition here
AMBBY vs SEMHF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SEMHF has a market cap of 56.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while SEMHF trades at $49.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas SEMHF's P/E ratio is 22.25. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEMHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY is less volatile compared to SEMHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBBY.Check SEMHF's competition here
AMBBY vs RYLPF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, RYLPF has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while RYLPF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas RYLPF's P/E ratio is 29.20. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RYLPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and RYLPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RYLPF's competition here
AMBBY vs SONVF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SONVF has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while SONVF trades at $252.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas SONVF's P/E ratio is 22.59. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SONVF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and SONVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SONVF's competition here
AMBBY vs SONVY Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SONVY has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while SONVY trades at $50.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas SONVY's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SONVY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY is less volatile compared to SONVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBBY.Check SONVY's competition here
AMBBY vs SNNUF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SNNUF has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while SNNUF trades at $16.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas SNNUF's P/E ratio is 29.62. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNNUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY is less volatile compared to SNNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBBY.Check SNNUF's competition here
AMBBY vs CHEOF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CHEOF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while CHEOF trades at $180.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas CHEOF's P/E ratio is 43.96. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHEOF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and CHEOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHEOF's competition here
AMBBY vs CHEOY Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CHEOY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while CHEOY trades at $70.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas CHEOY's P/E ratio is 37.41. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHEOY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY is less volatile compared to CHEOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBBY.Check CHEOY's competition here
AMBBY vs WILYY Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, WILYY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while WILYY trades at $14.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas WILYY's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WILYY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and WILYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WILYY's competition here
AMBBY vs WILLF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, WILLF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while WILLF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas WILLF's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WILLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and WILLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WILLF's competition here
AMBBY vs GNGBY Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GNGBY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while GNGBY trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas GNGBY's P/E ratio is 24.23. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GNGBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY is less volatile compared to GNGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBBY.Check GNGBY's competition here
AMBBY vs GNGBF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GNGBF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while GNGBF trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas GNGBF's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GNGBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and GNGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNGBF's competition here
AMBBY vs AMBFF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AMBFF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while AMBFF trades at $13.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas AMBFF's P/E ratio is 42.66. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMBFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and AMBFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMBFF's competition here
AMBBY vs NHNKY Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NHNKY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while NHNKY trades at $11.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas NHNKY's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NHNKY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY is less volatile compared to NHNKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBBY.Check NHNKY's competition here
AMBBY vs MCRPF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MCRPF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while MCRPF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas MCRPF's P/E ratio is -17.44. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MCRPF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and MCRPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCRPF's competition here
AMBBY vs GGNDF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GGNDF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while GGNDF trades at $16.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas GGNDF's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GGNDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and GGNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GGNDF's competition here
AMBBY vs GNNDY Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GNNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while GNNDY trades at $44.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas GNNDY's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GNNDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and GNNDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNNDY's competition here
AMBBY vs OSSFF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, OSSFF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while OSSFF trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas OSSFF's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OSSFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and OSSFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OSSFF's competition here
AMBBY vs OSSUY Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, OSSUY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while OSSUY trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas OSSUY's P/E ratio is 22.30. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OSSUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and OSSUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OSSUY's competition here
AMBBY vs DRWKF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, DRWKF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while DRWKF trades at $96.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas DRWKF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DRWKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and DRWKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DRWKF's competition here
AMBBY vs NHNKF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NHNKF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while NHNKF trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas NHNKF's P/E ratio is 30.28. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NHNKF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and NHNKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NHNKF's competition here
AMBBY vs DWRKF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, DWRKF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while DWRKF trades at $543.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas DWRKF's P/E ratio is 75.94. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DWRKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and DWRKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DWRKF's competition here
AMBBY vs MEDGF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MEDGF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while MEDGF trades at $83.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas MEDGF's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MEDGF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and MEDGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MEDGF's competition here
AMBBY vs STSEY Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, STSEY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while STSEY trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas STSEY's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STSEY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and STSEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STSEY's competition here
AMBBY vs DGWPF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, DGWPF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while DGWPF trades at $72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas DGWPF's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DGWPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and DGWPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DGWPF's competition here
AMBBY vs ELEAF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ELEAF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while ELEAF trades at $16.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas ELEAF's P/E ratio is 21.28. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELEAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY is less volatile compared to ELEAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBBY.Check ELEAF's competition here
AMBBY vs VTRLY Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, VTRLY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while VTRLY trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas VTRLY's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VTRLY's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and VTRLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VTRLY's competition here
AMBBY vs FDMDF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, FDMDF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while FDMDF trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas FDMDF's P/E ratio is -21.90. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FDMDF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and FDMDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FDMDF's competition here
AMBBY vs MDRSF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MDRSF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while MDRSF trades at $100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas MDRSF's P/E ratio is -1666.67. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MDRSF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and MDRSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MDRSF's competition here
AMBBY vs LFTSF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, LFTSF has a market cap of 858.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while LFTSF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas LFTSF's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LFTSF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY is less volatile compared to LFTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBBY.Check LFTSF's competition here
AMBBY vs XVIPF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, XVIPF has a market cap of 740.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while XVIPF trades at $23.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas XVIPF's P/E ratio is 261.33. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XVIPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and XVIPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XVIPF's competition here
AMBBY vs IOBCF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, IOBCF has a market cap of 533.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while IOBCF trades at $18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas IOBCF's P/E ratio is 26.78. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IOBCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and IOBCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IOBCF's competition here
AMBBY vs AVMR Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AVMR has a market cap of 494.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while AVMR trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas AVMR's P/E ratio is -18.34. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AVMR's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and AVMR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AVMR's competition here
AMBBY vs CALZF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CALZF has a market cap of 472.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while CALZF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas CALZF's P/E ratio is 68.45. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CALZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and CALZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CALZF's competition here
AMBBY vs BRSYF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, BRSYF has a market cap of 451.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while BRSYF trades at $11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas BRSYF's P/E ratio is 72.13. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRSYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and BRSYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRSYF's competition here
AMBBY vs CSSPF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CSSPF has a market cap of 384.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while CSSPF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas CSSPF's P/E ratio is 92.00. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CSSPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and CSSPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSSPF's competition here
AMBBY vs CLVSF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CLVSF has a market cap of 378M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while CLVSF trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas CLVSF's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CLVSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and CLVSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLVSF's competition here
AMBBY vs CYBQY Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CYBQY has a market cap of 363.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while CYBQY trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas CYBQY's P/E ratio is -204.00. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CYBQY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and CYBQY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYBQY's competition here
AMBBY vs HYBT Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, HYBT has a market cap of 361.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while HYBT trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas HYBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HYBT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and HYBT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HYBT's competition here
AMBBY vs DMTRF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, DMTRF has a market cap of 284.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while DMTRF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas DMTRF's P/E ratio is -118.50. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DMTRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY is less volatile compared to DMTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBBY.Check DMTRF's competition here
AMBBY vs CYBQF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CYBQF has a market cap of 261.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while CYBQF trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas CYBQF's P/E ratio is -196.00. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CYBQF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY is less volatile compared to CYBQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBBY.Check CYBQF's competition here
AMBBY vs HTLZF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, HTLZF has a market cap of 245.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while HTLZF trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas HTLZF's P/E ratio is -159.01. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HTLZF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and HTLZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HTLZF's competition here
AMBBY vs EAPIF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, EAPIF has a market cap of 240.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while EAPIF trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas EAPIF's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EAPIF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and EAPIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EAPIF's competition here
AMBBY vs IMPZY Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, IMPZY has a market cap of 200.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while IMPZY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas IMPZY's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IMPZY's ROE of +15.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and IMPZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IMPZY's competition here
AMBBY vs VMTHF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, VMTHF has a market cap of 184.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while VMTHF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas VMTHF's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VMTHF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and VMTHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VMTHF's competition here
AMBBY vs DTXMF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, DTXMF has a market cap of 180.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while DTXMF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas DTXMF's P/E ratio is -9.52. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DTXMF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY is less volatile compared to DTXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBBY.Check DTXMF's competition here
AMBBY vs EKDHF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, EKDHF has a market cap of 151.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while EKDHF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas EKDHF's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EKDHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and EKDHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EKDHF's competition here
AMBBY vs PXMBF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PXMBF has a market cap of 149.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while PXMBF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas PXMBF's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PXMBF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and PXMBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PXMBF's competition here
AMBBY vs AVHHL Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AVHHL has a market cap of 126.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while AVHHL trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas AVHHL's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AVHHL's ROE of +4.77%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and AVHHL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AVHHL's competition here
AMBBY vs CLLKF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CLLKF has a market cap of 123.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while CLLKF trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas CLLKF's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CLLKF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and CLLKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLLKF's competition here
AMBBY vs AMEUF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AMEUF has a market cap of 120.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while AMEUF trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas AMEUF's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMEUF's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY is less volatile compared to AMEUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBBY.Check AMEUF's competition here
AMBBY vs SOMNF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SOMNF has a market cap of 111.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while SOMNF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas SOMNF's P/E ratio is -51.00. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOMNF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and SOMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOMNF's competition here
AMBBY vs BCCOY Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, BCCOY has a market cap of 105.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while BCCOY trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas BCCOY's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCCOY's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and BCCOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCCOY's competition here
AMBBY vs JMDMF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, JMDMF has a market cap of 94.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while JMDMF trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas JMDMF's P/E ratio is -13.68. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JMDMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and JMDMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JMDMF's competition here
AMBBY vs SNZZF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SNZZF has a market cap of 92.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while SNZZF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas SNZZF's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNZZF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and SNZZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNZZF's competition here
AMBBY vs RSHUF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, RSHUF has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while RSHUF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas RSHUF's P/E ratio is -5.81. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RSHUF's ROE of -4.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY is less volatile compared to RSHUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBBY.Check RSHUF's competition here
AMBBY vs CKMTF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CKMTF has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while CKMTF trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas CKMTF's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CKMTF's ROE of +2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and CKMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CKMTF's competition here
AMBBY vs TLTFF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TLTFF has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while TLTFF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas TLTFF's P/E ratio is -20.14. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TLTFF's ROE of -3.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY is less volatile compared to TLTFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBBY.Check TLTFF's competition here
AMBBY vs BLOZF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, BLOZF has a market cap of 48.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while BLOZF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas BLOZF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BLOZF's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY is less volatile compared to BLOZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBBY.Check BLOZF's competition here
AMBBY vs BRNHF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, BRNHF has a market cap of 42.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while BRNHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas BRNHF's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRNHF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and BRNHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRNHF's competition here
AMBBY vs RDGL Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, RDGL has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while RDGL trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas RDGL's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RDGL's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY is less volatile compared to RDGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBBY.Check RDGL's competition here
AMBBY vs NVYTF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NVYTF has a market cap of 33.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while NVYTF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas NVYTF's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NVYTF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and NVYTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NVYTF's competition here
AMBBY vs POSC Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, POSC has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while POSC trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas POSC's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to POSC's ROE of -3.78%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY is less volatile compared to POSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBBY.Check POSC's competition here
AMBBY vs GTHP Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GTHP has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while GTHP trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas GTHP's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GTHP's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY is less volatile compared to GTHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBBY.Check GTHP's competition here
AMBBY vs IPDQF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, IPDQF has a market cap of 28.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while IPDQF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas IPDQF's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IPDQF's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and IPDQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPDQF's competition here
AMBBY vs MKEAF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MKEAF has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while MKEAF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas MKEAF's P/E ratio is -4.11. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MKEAF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and MKEAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MKEAF's competition here
AMBBY vs KBBTF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, KBBTF has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while KBBTF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas KBBTF's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KBBTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and KBBTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KBBTF's competition here
AMBBY vs PYNKF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PYNKF has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while PYNKF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas PYNKF's P/E ratio is 3.51. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PYNKF's ROE of -2.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and PYNKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PYNKF's competition here
AMBBY vs EMITF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, EMITF has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while EMITF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas EMITF's P/E ratio is -8.57. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EMITF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and EMITF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EMITF's competition here
AMBBY vs DIZTF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, DIZTF has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while DIZTF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas DIZTF's P/E ratio is -11.16. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DIZTF's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY is less volatile compared to DIZTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBBY.Check DIZTF's competition here
AMBBY vs ASAPF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ASAPF has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while ASAPF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas ASAPF's P/E ratio is -21.38. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASAPF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY is less volatile compared to ASAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBBY.Check ASAPF's competition here
AMBBY vs VPTDF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, VPTDF has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while VPTDF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas VPTDF's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VPTDF's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY is less volatile compared to VPTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBBY.Check VPTDF's competition here
AMBBY vs TMDIF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TMDIF has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while TMDIF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas TMDIF's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TMDIF's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY is less volatile compared to TMDIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBBY.Check TMDIF's competition here
AMBBY vs ATBPF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ATBPF has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while ATBPF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas ATBPF's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATBPF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY is less volatile compared to ATBPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBBY.Check ATBPF's competition here
AMBBY vs LXXGF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, LXXGF has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while LXXGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas LXXGF's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LXXGF's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and LXXGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LXXGF's competition here
AMBBY vs RMSL Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, RMSL has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while RMSL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas RMSL's P/E ratio is 0.65. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RMSL's ROE of -12.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY is less volatile compared to RMSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBBY.Check RMSL's competition here
AMBBY vs ALRTF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ALRTF has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while ALRTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas ALRTF's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALRTF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and ALRTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALRTF's competition here
AMBBY vs PLLWF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PLLWF has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while PLLWF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas PLLWF's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PLLWF's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY is less volatile compared to PLLWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBBY.Check PLLWF's competition here
AMBBY vs PMEDF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PMEDF has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while PMEDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas PMEDF's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PMEDF's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and PMEDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PMEDF's competition here
AMBBY vs USAQ Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, USAQ has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while USAQ trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas USAQ's P/E ratio is -15.73. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to USAQ's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and USAQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check USAQ's competition here
AMBBY vs MDXHF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MDXHF has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while MDXHF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas MDXHF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MDXHF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and MDXHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MDXHF's competition here
AMBBY vs NGMDF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NGMDF has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while NGMDF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas NGMDF's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NGMDF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and NGMDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NGMDF's competition here
AMBBY vs QLIS Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, QLIS has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while QLIS trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas QLIS's P/E ratio is 2.22. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QLIS's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and QLIS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QLIS's competition here
AMBBY vs RHNMF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, RHNMF has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while RHNMF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas RHNMF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RHNMF's ROE of +15.91%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY is less volatile compared to RHNMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBBY.Check RHNMF's competition here
AMBBY vs BIEL Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, BIEL has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while BIEL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas BIEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BIEL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY is less volatile compared to BIEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBBY.Check BIEL's competition here
AMBBY vs CYDX Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CYDX has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while CYDX trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas CYDX's P/E ratio is 1.28. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CYDX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and CYDX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYDX's competition here
AMBBY vs ADMT Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ADMT has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while ADMT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas ADMT's P/E ratio is -7.10. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ADMT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and ADMT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADMT's competition here
AMBBY vs ODYY Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ODYY has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while ODYY trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas ODYY's P/E ratio is -4.51. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ODYY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and ODYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ODYY's competition here
AMBBY vs VYCO Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, VYCO has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while VYCO trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas VYCO's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VYCO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and VYCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VYCO's competition here
AMBBY vs VANIW Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, VANIW has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while VANIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas VANIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VANIW's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY is less volatile compared to VANIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBBY.Check VANIW's competition here
AMBBY vs FZMD Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, FZMD has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while FZMD trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas FZMD's P/E ratio is 1.30. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FZMD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and FZMD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FZMD's competition here
AMBBY vs TBRIF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TBRIF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while TBRIF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas TBRIF's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TBRIF's ROE of +16.81%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and TBRIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TBRIF's competition here
AMBBY vs LLBO Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, LLBO has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while LLBO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas LLBO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LLBO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and LLBO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LLBO's competition here
AMBBY vs ESMC Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ESMC has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while ESMC trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas ESMC's P/E ratio is -10.73. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ESMC's ROE of -125.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY is less volatile compared to ESMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBBY.Check ESMC's competition here
AMBBY vs KLYG Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, KLYG has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while KLYG trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas KLYG's P/E ratio is -11.80. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KLYG's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY is less volatile compared to KLYG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBBY.Check KLYG's competition here
AMBBY vs VRSEF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, VRSEF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while VRSEF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas VRSEF's P/E ratio is 0.14. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VRSEF's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and VRSEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VRSEF's competition here
AMBBY vs NUMD Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NUMD has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while NUMD trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas NUMD's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NUMD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and NUMD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NUMD's competition here
AMBBY vs UAHC Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, UAHC has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while UAHC trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas UAHC's P/E ratio is 0.57. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UAHC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and UAHC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UAHC's competition here
AMBBY vs ELXMF Comparison February 2026
AMBBY plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBBY stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ELXMF has a market cap of 541.2K. Regarding current trading prices, AMBBY is priced at $12.61, while ELXMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 40.13, whereas ELXMF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, AMBBY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELXMF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBBY and ELXMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELXMF's competition here