WINFARM SA

ALWF.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALWF.PA stands at 8.11M. In comparison, CATR.PA has a market cap of 159.92B. Regarding current trading prices, ALWF.PA is priced at $4.06, while CATR.PA trades at $327.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALWF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas CATR.PA's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, ALWF.PA's ROE is -0.22%, compared to CATR.PA's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ALWF.PA is more volatile compared to CATR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALWF.PA.

ALWF.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALWF.PA stands at 8.11M. In comparison, EXE.PA has a market cap of 236.73M. Regarding current trading prices, ALWF.PA is priced at $4.06, while EXE.PA trades at $34.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALWF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas EXE.PA's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, ALWF.PA's ROE is -0.22%, compared to EXE.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ALWF.PA is more volatile compared to EXE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALWF.PA.

ALWF.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALWF.PA stands at 8.11M. In comparison, HYDRA.AS has a market cap of 214.22M. Regarding current trading prices, ALWF.PA is priced at $4.06, while HYDRA.AS trades at $165.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALWF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas HYDRA.AS's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, ALWF.PA's ROE is -0.22%, compared to HYDRA.AS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ALWF.PA is more volatile compared to HYDRA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALWF.PA.

ALWF.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALWF.PA stands at 8.11M. In comparison, PIG.PA has a market cap of 80.43M. Regarding current trading prices, ALWF.PA is priced at $4.06, while PIG.PA trades at $2.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALWF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.14, whereas PIG.PA's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, ALWF.PA's ROE is -0.22%, compared to PIG.PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALWF.PA is more volatile compared to PIG.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALWF.PA.