Altus Strategies plc

ALS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, FRES.L has a market cap of 7.82B. Regarding current trading prices, ALS.L is priced at $46.00, while FRES.L trades at $1,061.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas FRES.L's P/E ratio is 75.79. In terms of profitability, ALS.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FRES.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ALS.L is more volatile compared to FRES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALS.L.

ALS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, POLY.L has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, ALS.L is priced at $46.00, while POLY.L trades at $215.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas POLY.L's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, ALS.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to POLY.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ALS.L has daily volatility of 7.70 and POLY.L has daily volatility of N/A.

ALS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, THS.L has a market cap of 168.27M. Regarding current trading prices, ALS.L is priced at $46.00, while THS.L trades at $57.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas THS.L's P/E ratio is 2.85. In terms of profitability, ALS.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to THS.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALS.L is more volatile compared to THS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALS.L.

ALS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SLP.L has a market cap of 128.75M. Regarding current trading prices, ALS.L is priced at $46.00, while SLP.L trades at $49.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas SLP.L's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, ALS.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SLP.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALS.L is more volatile compared to SLP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALS.L.

ALS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, EUA.L has a market cap of 122.48M. Regarding current trading prices, ALS.L is priced at $46.00, while EUA.L trades at $4.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas EUA.L's P/E ratio is -4.15. In terms of profitability, ALS.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to EUA.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ALS.L is more volatile compared to EUA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALS.L.

ALS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, EEE.L has a market cap of 68.40M. Regarding current trading prices, ALS.L is priced at $46.00, while EEE.L trades at $10.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas EEE.L's P/E ratio is -10.65. In terms of profitability, ALS.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to EEE.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ALS.L is more volatile compared to EEE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALS.L.

ALS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GMET.L has a market cap of 53.14M. Regarding current trading prices, ALS.L is priced at $46.00, while GMET.L trades at $40.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas GMET.L's P/E ratio is -40.60. In terms of profitability, ALS.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GMET.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ALS.L is more volatile compared to GMET.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALS.L.

ALS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GEM.L has a market cap of 49.64M. Regarding current trading prices, ALS.L is priced at $46.00, while GEM.L trades at $4.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas GEM.L's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, ALS.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GEM.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ALS.L is more volatile compared to GEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALS.L.

ALS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, PDL.L has a market cap of 48.94M. Regarding current trading prices, ALS.L is priced at $46.00, while PDL.L trades at $25.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas PDL.L's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, ALS.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PDL.L's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ALS.L is more volatile compared to PDL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALS.L.

ALS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0V7B.L has a market cap of 29.60M. Regarding current trading prices, ALS.L is priced at $46.00, while 0V7B.L trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas 0V7B.L's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, ALS.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0V7B.L's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ALS.L is more volatile compared to 0V7B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALS.L.

ALS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, HEX.L has a market cap of 23.70M. Regarding current trading prices, ALS.L is priced at $46.00, while HEX.L trades at $15.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas HEX.L's P/E ratio is -5.03. In terms of profitability, ALS.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HEX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ALS.L is more volatile compared to HEX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALS.L.

ALS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0V6Y.L has a market cap of 16.93M. Regarding current trading prices, ALS.L is priced at $46.00, while 0V6Y.L trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas 0V6Y.L's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, ALS.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0V6Y.L's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ALS.L is more volatile compared to 0V6Y.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALS.L.

ALS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0A4V.L has a market cap of 16.22M. Regarding current trading prices, ALS.L is priced at $46.00, while 0A4V.L trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas 0A4V.L's P/E ratio is -104.55. In terms of profitability, ALS.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0A4V.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ALS.L is more volatile compared to 0A4V.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALS.L.

ALS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GEMD.L has a market cap of 11.00M. Regarding current trading prices, ALS.L is priced at $46.00, while GEMD.L trades at $7.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas GEMD.L's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, ALS.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GEMD.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALS.L is less volatile compared to GEMD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALS.L.

ALS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, COBR.L has a market cap of 10.75M. Regarding current trading prices, ALS.L is priced at $46.00, while COBR.L trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas COBR.L's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, ALS.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to COBR.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ALS.L is more volatile compared to COBR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALS.L.

ALS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, UFO.L has a market cap of 6.44M. Regarding current trading prices, ALS.L is priced at $46.00, while UFO.L trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas UFO.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALS.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to UFO.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALS.L is less volatile compared to UFO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALS.L.

ALS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, FME.L has a market cap of 3.95M. Regarding current trading prices, ALS.L is priced at $46.00, while FME.L trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas FME.L's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, ALS.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FME.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ALS.L is less volatile compared to FME.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALS.L.

ALS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, ROCK.L has a market cap of 3.72M. Regarding current trading prices, ALS.L is priced at $46.00, while ROCK.L trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas ROCK.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALS.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ROCK.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALS.L is less volatile compared to ROCK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALS.L.

ALS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, URAH.L has a market cap of 3.04M. Regarding current trading prices, ALS.L is priced at $46.00, while URAH.L trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas URAH.L's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ALS.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to URAH.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ALS.L is less volatile compared to URAH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALS.L.

ALS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, SEFA.L has a market cap of 2.91M. Regarding current trading prices, ALS.L is priced at $46.00, while SEFA.L trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas SEFA.L's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, ALS.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SEFA.L's ROE of -2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ALS.L is more volatile compared to SEFA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALS.L.

ALS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, FMET.L has a market cap of 2.47M. Regarding current trading prices, ALS.L is priced at $46.00, while FMET.L trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas FMET.L's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ALS.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FMET.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ALS.L is less volatile compared to FMET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALS.L.

ALS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, BOD.L has a market cap of 1.80M. Regarding current trading prices, ALS.L is priced at $46.00, while BOD.L trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas BOD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALS.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BOD.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALS.L is more volatile compared to BOD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALS.L.

ALS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, CMRS.L has a market cap of 1.62M. Regarding current trading prices, ALS.L is priced at $46.00, while CMRS.L trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas CMRS.L's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, ALS.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CMRS.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALS.L is less volatile compared to CMRS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALS.L.

ALS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, KDR.L has a market cap of 1.00M. Regarding current trading prices, ALS.L is priced at $46.00, while KDR.L trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas KDR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALS.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to KDR.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ALS.L is more volatile compared to KDR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALS.L.

ALS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, BRD.L has a market cap of 929180.00. Regarding current trading prices, ALS.L is priced at $46.00, while BRD.L trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas BRD.L's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, ALS.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BRD.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ALS.L has daily volatility of 7.70 and BRD.L has daily volatility of N/A.

ALS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, NTVO.L has a market cap of 612169.00. Regarding current trading prices, ALS.L is priced at $46.00, while NTVO.L trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas NTVO.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ALS.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NTVO.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ALS.L is less volatile compared to NTVO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALS.L.

ALS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, PERE.L has a market cap of 218172.00. Regarding current trading prices, ALS.L is priced at $46.00, while PERE.L trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas PERE.L's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ALS.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PERE.L's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALS.L is more volatile compared to PERE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALS.L.

ALS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GEMR.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ALS.L is priced at $46.00, while GEMR.L trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas GEMR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALS.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GEMR.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ALS.L has daily volatility of 7.70 and GEMR.L has daily volatility of N/A.

ALS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, 0UH1.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ALS.L is priced at $46.00, while 0UH1.L trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas 0UH1.L's P/E ratio is -4.84. In terms of profitability, ALS.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to 0UH1.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ALS.L is more volatile compared to 0UH1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALS.L.

ALS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, DNK.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ALS.L is priced at $46.00, while DNK.L trades at $20.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas DNK.L's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, ALS.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DNK.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALS.L is more volatile compared to DNK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALS.L.

ALS.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALS.L stands at N/A. In comparison, GPSS.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ALS.L is priced at $46.00, while GPSS.L trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALS.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas GPSS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALS.L's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GPSS.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ALS.L is less volatile compared to GPSS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALS.L.