HiPay Group SA
HiPay Group SA ALHYP.PA Peers
See (ALHYP.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALHYP.PA | €10.40 | -2.80% | 65.7M | 8.89 | €1.17 | N/A |
| ADYEN.AS | €1,542.40 | +0.60% | 48.6B | 52.11 | €29.60 | N/A |
| EXN.PA | €18.96 | +0.00% | 1.7B | 43.09 | €0.44 | +27.90% |
| OVH.PA | €10.74 | -0.83% | 1.6B | 134.25 | €0.08 | N/A |
| WLN.PA | €3.64 | +1.03% | 1B | -3.47 | -€1.05 | N/A |
| ITE.PA | €9.52 | +5.78% | 766.7M | 52.89 | €0.18 | +2.10% |
| ALLIX.PA | €23.85 | -3.44% | 156.8M | -34.57 | -€0.69 | N/A |
| MLMFI.PA | €12.00 | N/A | 27.8M | -55.30 | -€0.22 | N/A |
| VMX.PA | €0.28 | -1.41% | 24.3M | -2.79 | -€0.10 | N/A |
| KEYW.BR | €0.84 | +1.20% | 18.1M | 16.80 | €0.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ALHYP.PA vs ADYEN.AS Comparison
ALHYP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALHYP.PA stands at 65.7M. In comparison, ADYEN.AS has a market cap of 48.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALHYP.PA is priced at €10.40, while ADYEN.AS trades at €1,542.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALHYP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.89, whereas ADYEN.AS's P/E ratio is 52.11. In terms of profitability, ALHYP.PA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADYEN.AS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ALHYP.PA is more volatile compared to ADYEN.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALHYP.PA.
ALHYP.PA vs EXN.PA Comparison
ALHYP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALHYP.PA stands at 65.7M. In comparison, EXN.PA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALHYP.PA is priced at €10.40, while EXN.PA trades at €18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALHYP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.89, whereas EXN.PA's P/E ratio is 43.09. In terms of profitability, ALHYP.PA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EXN.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ALHYP.PA is more volatile compared to EXN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALHYP.PA.
ALHYP.PA vs OVH.PA Comparison
ALHYP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALHYP.PA stands at 65.7M. In comparison, OVH.PA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALHYP.PA is priced at €10.40, while OVH.PA trades at €10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALHYP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.89, whereas OVH.PA's P/E ratio is 134.25. In terms of profitability, ALHYP.PA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OVH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALHYP.PA is more volatile compared to OVH.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALHYP.PA.
ALHYP.PA vs WLN.PA Comparison
ALHYP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALHYP.PA stands at 65.7M. In comparison, WLN.PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALHYP.PA is priced at €10.40, while WLN.PA trades at €3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALHYP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.89, whereas WLN.PA's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, ALHYP.PA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WLN.PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ALHYP.PA is more volatile compared to WLN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALHYP.PA.
ALHYP.PA vs ITE.PA Comparison
ALHYP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALHYP.PA stands at 65.7M. In comparison, ITE.PA has a market cap of 766.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ALHYP.PA is priced at €10.40, while ITE.PA trades at €9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALHYP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.89, whereas ITE.PA's P/E ratio is 52.89. In terms of profitability, ALHYP.PA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ITE.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALHYP.PA is more volatile compared to ITE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALHYP.PA.
ALHYP.PA vs ALLIX.PA Comparison
ALHYP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALHYP.PA stands at 65.7M. In comparison, ALLIX.PA has a market cap of 156.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ALHYP.PA is priced at €10.40, while ALLIX.PA trades at €23.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALHYP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.89, whereas ALLIX.PA's P/E ratio is -34.57. In terms of profitability, ALHYP.PA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALLIX.PA's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ALHYP.PA is more volatile compared to ALLIX.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALHYP.PA.
ALHYP.PA vs MLMFI.PA Comparison
ALHYP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALHYP.PA stands at 65.7M. In comparison, MLMFI.PA has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ALHYP.PA is priced at €10.40, while MLMFI.PA trades at €12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALHYP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.89, whereas MLMFI.PA's P/E ratio is -55.30. In terms of profitability, ALHYP.PA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLMFI.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ALHYP.PA is more volatile compared to MLMFI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALHYP.PA.
ALHYP.PA vs VMX.PA Comparison
ALHYP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALHYP.PA stands at 65.7M. In comparison, VMX.PA has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ALHYP.PA is priced at €10.40, while VMX.PA trades at €0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALHYP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.89, whereas VMX.PA's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, ALHYP.PA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VMX.PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALHYP.PA is more volatile compared to VMX.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALHYP.PA.
ALHYP.PA vs KEYW.BR Comparison
ALHYP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALHYP.PA stands at 65.7M. In comparison, KEYW.BR has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ALHYP.PA is priced at €10.40, while KEYW.BR trades at €0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALHYP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.89, whereas KEYW.BR's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, ALHYP.PA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KEYW.BR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ALHYP.PA is more volatile compared to KEYW.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALHYP.PA.
ALHYP.PA vs EAS2P.AS Comparison
ALHYP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALHYP.PA stands at 65.7M. In comparison, EAS2P.AS has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ALHYP.PA is priced at €10.40, while EAS2P.AS trades at €0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALHYP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.89, whereas EAS2P.AS's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, ALHYP.PA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EAS2P.AS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALHYP.PA is more volatile compared to EAS2P.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALHYP.PA.
ALHYP.PA vs ALMUN.PA Comparison
ALHYP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALHYP.PA stands at 65.7M. In comparison, ALMUN.PA has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ALHYP.PA is priced at €10.40, while ALMUN.PA trades at €0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALHYP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.89, whereas ALMUN.PA's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, ALHYP.PA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALMUN.PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALHYP.PA is less volatile compared to ALMUN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALHYP.PA.
ALHYP.PA vs ALKLK.PA Comparison
ALHYP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALHYP.PA stands at 65.7M. In comparison, ALKLK.PA has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, ALHYP.PA is priced at €10.40, while ALKLK.PA trades at €0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALHYP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.89, whereas ALKLK.PA's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, ALHYP.PA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALKLK.PA's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ALHYP.PA is more volatile compared to ALKLK.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALHYP.PA.
ALHYP.PA vs ALGEC.PA Comparison
ALHYP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALHYP.PA stands at 65.7M. In comparison, ALGEC.PA has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ALHYP.PA is priced at €10.40, while ALGEC.PA trades at €3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALHYP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.89, whereas ALGEC.PA's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, ALHYP.PA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALGEC.PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALHYP.PA is more volatile compared to ALGEC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALHYP.PA.
ALHYP.PA vs MLIFC.PA Comparison
ALHYP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALHYP.PA stands at 65.7M. In comparison, MLIFC.PA has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ALHYP.PA is priced at €10.40, while MLIFC.PA trades at €2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALHYP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.89, whereas MLIFC.PA's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, ALHYP.PA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLIFC.PA's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ALHYP.PA is more volatile compared to MLIFC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALHYP.PA.
ALHYP.PA vs MLFSG.PA Comparison
ALHYP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALHYP.PA stands at 65.7M. In comparison, MLFSG.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALHYP.PA is priced at €10.40, while MLFSG.PA trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALHYP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.89, whereas MLFSG.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALHYP.PA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLFSG.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALHYP.PA is more volatile compared to MLFSG.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALHYP.PA.
ALHYP.PA vs MSF.BR Comparison
ALHYP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALHYP.PA stands at 65.7M. In comparison, MSF.BR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALHYP.PA is priced at €10.40, while MSF.BR trades at €319.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALHYP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.89, whereas MSF.BR's P/E ratio is 33.01. In terms of profitability, ALHYP.PA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MSF.BR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ALHYP.PA is more volatile compared to MSF.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALHYP.PA.
ALHYP.PA vs GLOG.BR Comparison
ALHYP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALHYP.PA stands at 65.7M. In comparison, GLOG.BR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALHYP.PA is priced at €10.40, while GLOG.BR trades at €4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALHYP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.89, whereas GLOG.BR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALHYP.PA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLOG.BR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ALHYP.PA is more volatile compared to GLOG.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALHYP.PA.
ALHYP.PA vs MLCEC.PA Comparison
ALHYP.PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALHYP.PA stands at 65.7M. In comparison, MLCEC.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALHYP.PA is priced at €10.40, while MLCEC.PA trades at €0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALHYP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.89, whereas MLCEC.PA's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, ALHYP.PA's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLCEC.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALHYP.PA is more volatile compared to MLCEC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALHYP.PA.