What are the top competitors of Fountaine Pajot SA in Consumer Cyclical sector?

The top competitors of Fountaine Pajot SA in the Consumer Cyclical sector are: Trigano S.A. (TRI.PA), SA Catana Group (CATG.PA).

Which has better valuations & earnings, Fountaine Pajot SA or its competitors?

Fountaine Pajot SA has a market cap of 188M and a Dividend Yield of 2.23% compared to its competitors.

Which stock is more profitable: Fountaine Pajot SA or its competitors?

Fountaine Pajot SA has an EPS of €20.10, while TRI.PA has an EPS of €15.52. So, Fountaine Pajot SA is more profitable compared to TRI.PA.

What is Fountaine Pajot SA stock volatility and risk in terms of investment?

Fountaine Pajot SA has daily volatility of 1.58% as compared to its competitor TRI.PA which is 0.47%. Fountaine Pajot SA is more volatile as compared to competitors and has high risk.

Is Fountaine Pajot SA stock profitable?

Fountaine Pajot SA has a Return on Equity (ROE) of 0.34%. So, Fountaine Pajot SA is more profitable.

What is Fountaine Pajot SA stock’s 52 weeks high and low?

Fountaine Pajot SA stock has a 52-week high of (€119) and a low of (€76.4).

What was the average volume of Fountaine Pajot SA stock?

The average volume of Fountaine Pajot SA is (1.6K) in terms of investment.

Fountaine Pajot SA (ALFPC.PA) Competitors

Fountaine Pajot SA (ALFPC.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

See (ALFPC.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.

Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Recreational Vehicles Industry

Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.

Symbol	Price	Change %	Market Cap	P/E Ratio	EPS	Dividend Yield
ALFPC.PA	€114.60	+1.24%	188M	5.61	€20.10	+2.23%
TRI.PA	€149.50	-0.60%	2.9B	9.56	€15.52	+2.36%
CATG.PA	€3.74	-1.97%	113.8M	3.58	€1.02	+4.92%

Stock Comparison

Select a stock to compare (requires JavaScript). Showing default comparison.

ALFPC.PA vs TRI.PA Comparison August 2025

ALFPC.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALFPC.PA stands at 188M. In comparison, TRI.PA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALFPC.PA is priced at €114.60, while TRI.PA trades at €149.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALFPC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.61, whereas TRI.PA's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, ALFPC.PA's ROE is +0.34%, compared to TRI.PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ALFPC.PA is more volatile compared to TRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALFPC.PA.Check TRI.PA's competition here

Fountaine Pajot SA