Advertisement

Ads Placeholder
Loading...

Fountaine Pajot SA

ALFPC.PAEURONEXT
Consumer Cyclical
Auto - Recreational Vehicles
93.50
-0.50(-0.53%)
U.S. Market opens in 52h 4m

Fountaine Pajot SA (ALFPC.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

See (ALFPC.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.

Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Recreational Vehicles Industry

Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.

SymbolPriceChange %Market CapP/E RatioEPSDividend Yield
ALFPC.PA€93.50-0.53%155.9M4.65€20.10+2.70%
TRI.PA€141.50-2.48%2.7B11.40€12.41+2.79%
CATG.PA€2.36-1.46%73.5M2.31€1.02+5.51%
ALCAT.PA€2.36-1.46%67.3M5.02€0.47+5.51%

Stock Comparison

Select a stock to compare (requires JavaScript). Showing default comparison.

ALFPC.PA vs TRI.PA Comparison April 2026

ALFPC.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALFPC.PA stands at 155.9M. In comparison, TRI.PA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALFPC.PA is priced at €93.50, while TRI.PA trades at €141.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALFPC.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.65, whereas TRI.PA's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, ALFPC.PA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TRI.PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALFPC.PA is less volatile compared to TRI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALFPC.PA.Check TRI.PA's competition here

Stock price comparison of stocks in the Consumer Cyclical Sector

Loading...

Frequently Asked Questions