AKWEL
AKWEL AKW.PA Peers
See (AKW.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AKW.PA | €7.30 | +0.27% | 192.4M | 5.29 | €1.38 | N/A |
| ML.PA | €32.69 | -0.15% | 23.1B | 11.97 | €2.73 | +4.22% |
| EO.PA | €21.27 | N/A | 4.2B | -8.79 | -€2.42 | N/A |
| FR.PA | €8.59 | +0.54% | 2.1B | 13.02 | €0.66 | +4.89% |
| POM.PA | €10.90 | -0.55% | 1.6B | 9.65 | €1.13 | N/A |
| FRVIA.PA | €7.69 | +0.79% | 1.5B | -8.18 | -€0.94 | N/A |
| BUR.PA | €373.00 | +0.27% | 653.8M | 5.70 | €65.47 | +4.29% |
| KENDR.AS | €11.72 | +2.63% | 185.2M | 36.63 | €0.32 | +3.84% |
| ALATI.PA | €3.22 | N/A | 64.7M | 4.67 | €0.69 | +3.73% |
| ALDEL.PA | €21.00 | N/A | 54.5M | -420.00 | -€0.05 | +5.48% |
Stock Comparison
AKW.PA vs ML.PA Comparison
AKW.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKW.PA stands at 192.4M. In comparison, ML.PA has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AKW.PA is priced at €7.30, while ML.PA trades at €32.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKW.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas ML.PA's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, AKW.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ML.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AKW.PA and ML.PA have similar daily volatility (0.82).
AKW.PA vs EO.PA Comparison
AKW.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKW.PA stands at 192.4M. In comparison, EO.PA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKW.PA is priced at €7.30, while EO.PA trades at €21.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKW.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas EO.PA's P/E ratio is -8.79. In terms of profitability, AKW.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EO.PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AKW.PA is less volatile compared to EO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKW.PA.
AKW.PA vs FR.PA Comparison
AKW.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKW.PA stands at 192.4M. In comparison, FR.PA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AKW.PA is priced at €7.30, while FR.PA trades at €8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKW.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas FR.PA's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, AKW.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FR.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AKW.PA is less volatile compared to FR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKW.PA.
AKW.PA vs POM.PA Comparison
AKW.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKW.PA stands at 192.4M. In comparison, POM.PA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AKW.PA is priced at €7.30, while POM.PA trades at €10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKW.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas POM.PA's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, AKW.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to POM.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AKW.PA is less volatile compared to POM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKW.PA.
AKW.PA vs FRVIA.PA Comparison
AKW.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKW.PA stands at 192.4M. In comparison, FRVIA.PA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AKW.PA is priced at €7.30, while FRVIA.PA trades at €7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKW.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas FRVIA.PA's P/E ratio is -8.18. In terms of profitability, AKW.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FRVIA.PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AKW.PA is less volatile compared to FRVIA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKW.PA.
AKW.PA vs BUR.PA Comparison
AKW.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKW.PA stands at 192.4M. In comparison, BUR.PA has a market cap of 653.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AKW.PA is priced at €7.30, while BUR.PA trades at €373.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKW.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas BUR.PA's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, AKW.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BUR.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AKW.PA is less volatile compared to BUR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKW.PA.
AKW.PA vs KENDR.AS Comparison
AKW.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKW.PA stands at 192.4M. In comparison, KENDR.AS has a market cap of 185.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AKW.PA is priced at €7.30, while KENDR.AS trades at €11.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKW.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas KENDR.AS's P/E ratio is 36.63. In terms of profitability, AKW.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KENDR.AS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AKW.PA is less volatile compared to KENDR.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKW.PA.
AKW.PA vs ALATI.PA Comparison
AKW.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKW.PA stands at 192.4M. In comparison, ALATI.PA has a market cap of 64.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AKW.PA is priced at €7.30, while ALATI.PA trades at €3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKW.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas ALATI.PA's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, AKW.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALATI.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AKW.PA is less volatile compared to ALATI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKW.PA.
AKW.PA vs ALDEL.PA Comparison
AKW.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKW.PA stands at 192.4M. In comparison, ALDEL.PA has a market cap of 54.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AKW.PA is priced at €7.30, while ALDEL.PA trades at €21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKW.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas ALDEL.PA's P/E ratio is -420.00. In terms of profitability, AKW.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALDEL.PA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AKW.PA is less volatile compared to ALDEL.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKW.PA.
AKW.PA vs PVL.PA Comparison
AKW.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKW.PA stands at 192.4M. In comparison, PVL.PA has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AKW.PA is priced at €7.30, while PVL.PA trades at €1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKW.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas PVL.PA's P/E ratio is -9.57. In terms of profitability, AKW.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PVL.PA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AKW.PA is less volatile compared to PVL.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKW.PA.
AKW.PA vs MLMAZ.BR Comparison
AKW.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKW.PA stands at 192.4M. In comparison, MLMAZ.BR has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AKW.PA is priced at €7.30, while MLMAZ.BR trades at €2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKW.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas MLMAZ.BR's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, AKW.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MLMAZ.BR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AKW.PA is more volatile compared to MLMAZ.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKW.PA.
AKW.PA vs MLSTR.PA Comparison
AKW.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKW.PA stands at 192.4M. In comparison, MLSTR.PA has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AKW.PA is priced at €7.30, while MLSTR.PA trades at €8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKW.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas MLSTR.PA's P/E ratio is -10.60. In terms of profitability, AKW.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MLSTR.PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AKW.PA is less volatile compared to MLSTR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKW.PA.
AKW.PA vs ATI.PA Comparison
AKW.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKW.PA stands at 192.4M. In comparison, ATI.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AKW.PA is priced at €7.30, while ATI.PA trades at €4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKW.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.29, whereas ATI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AKW.PA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATI.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AKW.PA is less volatile compared to ATI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKW.PA.