Acorn Income Fund Limited
Acorn Income Fund Limited AIF.L Peers
See (AIF.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIF.L | £367.50 | -5.77% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 0QYU.L | £128.15 | -0.35% | 205.6B | 16.31 | £7.86 | +2.89% |
| 0L3I.L | £88.50 | -0.34% | 160.8B | 31.95 | £2.77 | +1.18% |
| 0KYY.L | £514.05 | +0.14% | 157.7B | 36.72 | £14.00 | +0.91% |
| 0QZZ.L | £977.65 | -0.29% | 151.5B | 24.56 | £39.80 | +2.10% |
| 0R3C.L | £148.80 | N/A | 127.1B | 14.89 | £10.00 | +0.99% |
| 0HT4.L | £191.89 | +1.43% | 122.8B | 7.51 | £25.57 | +1.25% |
| 0Z1W.L | £120.52 | +1.23% | 107.3B | 26.04 | £4.63 | +0.59% |
| 0HR2.L | £285.86 | +1.15% | 103B | 37.42 | £7.64 | +3.67% |
| 0JC3.L | £178.19 | -0.17% | 102.2B | 24.74 | £7.20 | +1.03% |
Stock Comparison
AIF.L vs 0QYU.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0QYU.L has a market cap of 205.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0QYU.L trades at £128.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QYU.L's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0QYU.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0QYU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0L3I.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0L3I.L has a market cap of 160.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0L3I.L trades at £88.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0L3I.L's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0L3I.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0L3I.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0KYY.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0KYY.L has a market cap of 157.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0KYY.L trades at £514.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0KYY.L's P/E ratio is 36.72. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0KYY.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0KYY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0QZZ.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0QZZ.L has a market cap of 151.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0QZZ.L trades at £977.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QZZ.L's P/E ratio is 24.56. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0QZZ.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0QZZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0R3C.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0R3C.L has a market cap of 127.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0R3C.L trades at £148.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0R3C.L's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0R3C.L's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0R3C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0HT4.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0HT4.L has a market cap of 122.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0HT4.L trades at £191.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0HT4.L's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0HT4.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0HT4.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0Z1W.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0Z1W.L has a market cap of 107.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0Z1W.L trades at £120.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0Z1W.L's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0Z1W.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0Z1W.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0HR2.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0HR2.L has a market cap of 103B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0HR2.L trades at £285.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0HR2.L's P/E ratio is 37.42. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0HR2.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0HR2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0JC3.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0JC3.L has a market cap of 102.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0JC3.L trades at £178.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0JC3.L's P/E ratio is 24.74. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0JC3.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0JC3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0K36.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0K36.L has a market cap of 86.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0K36.L trades at £480.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0K36.L's P/E ratio is 45.56. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0K36.L's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0K36.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0IBC.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0IBC.L has a market cap of 65.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0IBC.L trades at £202.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0IBC.L's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0IBC.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0IBC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0HLQ.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0HLQ.L has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0HLQ.L trades at £89.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0HLQ.L's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0HLQ.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0HLQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0K4T.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0K4T.L has a market cap of 47.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0K4T.L trades at £82.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0K4T.L's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0K4T.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0K4T.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0KU1.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0KU1.L has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0KU1.L trades at £147.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0KU1.L's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0KU1.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0KU1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0QOQ.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0QOQ.L has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0QOQ.L trades at £1,087.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QOQ.L's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0QOQ.L's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0QOQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0L9G.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0L9G.L has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0L9G.L trades at £97.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0L9G.L's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0L9G.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0L9G.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0HQN.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0HQN.L has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0HQN.L trades at £227.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0HQN.L's P/E ratio is 48.70. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0HQN.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0HQN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0RH1.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0RH1.L has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0RH1.L trades at £80.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0RH1.L's P/E ratio is 5.39. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0RH1.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0RH1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0LC3.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0LC3.L has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0LC3.L trades at £58.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0LC3.L's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0LC3.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0LC3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0K91.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0K91.L has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0K91.L trades at £108.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0K91.L's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0K91.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0K91.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0KNY.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0KNY.L has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0KNY.L trades at £95.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0KNY.L's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0KNY.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0KNY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0HHP.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0HHP.L has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0HHP.L trades at £22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0HHP.L's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0HHP.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0HHP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0RT6.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0RT6.L has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0RT6.L trades at £22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0RT6.L's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0RT6.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0RT6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0QI9.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0QI9.L has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0QI9.L trades at £79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QI9.L's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0QI9.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0QI9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0HD0.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0HD0.L has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0HD0.L trades at £34.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0HD0.L's P/E ratio is 4.31. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0HD0.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0HD0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0SAY.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0SAY.L has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0SAY.L trades at £49.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0SAY.L's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0SAY.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0SAY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0QLD.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0QLD.L has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0QLD.L trades at £475.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QLD.L's P/E ratio is 37.05. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0QLD.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0QLD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0UAN.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0UAN.L has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0UAN.L trades at £14.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0UAN.L's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0UAN.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0UAN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0RPW.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0RPW.L has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0RPW.L trades at £37.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0RPW.L's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0RPW.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0RPW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0RGB.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0RGB.L has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0RGB.L trades at £115.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0RGB.L's P/E ratio is -9.83. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0RGB.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0RGB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0JXQ.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0JXQ.L has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0JXQ.L trades at £56.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0JXQ.L's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0JXQ.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0JXQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0HA8.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0HA8.L has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0HA8.L trades at £84.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0HA8.L's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0HA8.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0HA8.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0QJX.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0QJX.L has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0QJX.L trades at £14.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QJX.L's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0QJX.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0QJX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0IZM.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0IZM.L has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0IZM.L trades at £6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0IZM.L's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0IZM.L's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0IZM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0RP0.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0RP0.L has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0RP0.L trades at £19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0RP0.L's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0RP0.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0RP0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0J4M.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0J4M.L has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0J4M.L trades at £17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0J4M.L's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0J4M.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0J4M.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0J2Z.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0J2Z.L has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0J2Z.L trades at £25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0J2Z.L's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0J2Z.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0J2Z.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0QPJ.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0QPJ.L has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0QPJ.L trades at £100.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QPJ.L's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0QPJ.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0QPJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0RL4.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0RL4.L has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0RL4.L trades at £29.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0RL4.L's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0RL4.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0RL4.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0O2B.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0O2B.L has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0O2B.L trades at £48.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0O2B.L's P/E ratio is 116.55. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0O2B.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0O2B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs GCVG.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, GCVG.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while GCVG.L trades at £33.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCVG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GCVG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to GCVG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0R25.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0R25.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0R25.L trades at £3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0R25.L's P/E ratio is 1.57. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0R25.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0R25.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0K5R.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0K5R.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0K5R.L trades at £13.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0K5R.L's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0K5R.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0K5R.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0HHU.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0HHU.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0HHU.L trades at £16.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0HHU.L's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0HHU.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0HHU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0A26.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0A26.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0A26.L trades at £12.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0A26.L's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0A26.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0A26.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0QOC.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0QOC.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0QOC.L trades at £173.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QOC.L's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0QOC.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0QOC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0N5Z.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0N5Z.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0N5Z.L trades at £28.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0N5Z.L's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0N5Z.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0N5Z.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0KH0.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0KH0.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0KH0.L trades at £10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0KH0.L's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0KH0.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0KH0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0NDP.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0NDP.L has a market cap of 905M. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0NDP.L trades at £8.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0NDP.L's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0NDP.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0NDP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs JPXU.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, JPXU.L has a market cap of 651.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while JPXU.L trades at £214.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPXU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JPXU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to JPXU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs PEYS.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, PEYS.L has a market cap of 553.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while PEYS.L trades at £800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEYS.L's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PEYS.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to PEYS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0J0N.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0J0N.L has a market cap of 505.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0J0N.L trades at £9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0J0N.L's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0J0N.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0J0N.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0JD3.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0JD3.L has a market cap of 493.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0JD3.L trades at £7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0JD3.L's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0JD3.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0JD3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0JTZ.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0JTZ.L has a market cap of 473.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0JTZ.L trades at £34.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0JTZ.L's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0JTZ.L's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0JTZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0RG7.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0RG7.L has a market cap of 472.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0RG7.L trades at £83.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0RG7.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0RG7.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0RG7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0DK7.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0DK7.L has a market cap of 445.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0DK7.L trades at £10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0DK7.L's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0DK7.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0DK7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0R7T.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0R7T.L has a market cap of 394.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0R7T.L trades at £10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0R7T.L's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0R7T.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0R7T.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0OPJ.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0OPJ.L has a market cap of 364.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0OPJ.L trades at £6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0OPJ.L's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0OPJ.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0OPJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0E1L.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0E1L.L has a market cap of 339.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0E1L.L trades at £1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0E1L.L's P/E ratio is 7.68. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0E1L.L's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0E1L.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0QNE.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0QNE.L has a market cap of 322.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0QNE.L trades at £17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QNE.L's P/E ratio is 2.14. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0QNE.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0QNE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0K7X.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0K7X.L has a market cap of 290.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0K7X.L trades at £11.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0K7X.L's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0K7X.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0K7X.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0HO6.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0HO6.L has a market cap of 248M. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0HO6.L trades at £3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0HO6.L's P/E ratio is 5.12. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0HO6.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0HO6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0RWM.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0RWM.L has a market cap of 238.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0RWM.L trades at £47.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0RWM.L's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0RWM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0RWM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs OIT.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, OIT.L has a market cap of 201.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while OIT.L trades at £150.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OIT.L's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to OIT.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to OIT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs JARA.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, JARA.L has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while JARA.L trades at £76.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JARA.L's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JARA.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to JARA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0QLZ.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0QLZ.L has a market cap of 129.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0QLZ.L trades at £9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QLZ.L's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0QLZ.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0QLZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0R4W.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0R4W.L has a market cap of 107.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0R4W.L trades at £5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0R4W.L's P/E ratio is -454.55. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0R4W.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0R4W.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs AJG.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, AJG.L has a market cap of 71.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while AJG.L trades at £172.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AJG.L's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to AJG.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. AIF.L has daily volatility of 18.67 and AJG.L has daily volatility of N/A.
AIF.L vs 0XWD.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0XWD.L has a market cap of 56.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0XWD.L trades at £1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0XWD.L's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0XWD.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0XWD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0LHX.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0LHX.L has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0LHX.L trades at £2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0LHX.L's P/E ratio is 3.41. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0LHX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0LHX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs 0HKM.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, 0HKM.L has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while 0HKM.L trades at £4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0HKM.L's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0HKM.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to 0HKM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs SSIF.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, SSIF.L has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while SSIF.L trades at £4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSIF.L's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SSIF.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is less volatile compared to SSIF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs FTFX.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, FTFX.L has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while FTFX.L trades at £24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTFX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to FTFX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to FTFX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs WESG.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, WESG.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while WESG.L trades at £35.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WESG.L's P/E ratio is 24.55. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to WESG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to WESG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs JESC.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, JESC.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while JESC.L trades at £499.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JESC.L's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JESC.L's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to JESC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs BHGU.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, BHGU.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while BHGU.L trades at £19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHGU.L's P/E ratio is 3.81. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to BHGU.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to BHGU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs SLS.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, SLS.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while SLS.L trades at £732.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLS.L's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SLS.L's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to SLS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs NUC.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, NUC.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while NUC.L trades at £191.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUC.L's P/E ratio is 0.47. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to NUC.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to NUC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs ANW.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, ANW.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while ANW.L trades at £398.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANW.L's P/E ratio is 1.21. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to ANW.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to ANW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs SIGB.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, SIGB.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while SIGB.L trades at £0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIGB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SIGB.L's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to SIGB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.
AIF.L vs ELTA.L Comparison
AIF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIF.L stands at 0. In comparison, ELTA.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIF.L is priced at £367.50, while ELTA.L trades at £63.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIF.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELTA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIF.L's ROE is N/A, compared to ELTA.L's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AIF.L is more volatile compared to ELTA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIF.L.