Aurubis AG
Aurubis AG AIAGF Peers
See (AIAGF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Copper Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIAGF | $87.20 | +0.00% | 3.3B | 4.15 | $18.26 | +2.16% |
| ANFGF | $25.68 | +0.00% | 25.3B | 30.57 | $0.84 | +2.14% |
| FQVLF | $18.10 | +2.09% | 14.8B | 99.06 | $0.18 | N/A |
| AIAGY | $51.35 | +0.00% | 9.2B | 5.75 | $9.15 | +1.56% |
| LUNMF | $10.92 | +4.01% | 9B | 87.29 | $0.12 | +2.28% |
| JIAXF | $1.76 | +0.00% | 8.4B | 5.86 | $0.29 | +5.68% |
| OZMLF | $19.00 | +0.00% | 6.4B | 46.34 | $0.41 | N/A |
| KGHPF | $35.00 | +0.00% | 6.4B | 8.56 | $3.74 | N/A |
| CSCCF | $6.19 | +1.14% | 4.7B | 55.80 | $0.11 | N/A |
| MMLTF | $0.44 | +0.00% | 4.2B | 17.30 | $0.02 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AIAGF vs ANFGF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ANFGF has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while ANFGF trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas ANFGF's P/E ratio is 30.57. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ANFGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF is less volatile compared to ANFGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIAGF.
AIAGF vs FQVLF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FQVLF has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while FQVLF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas FQVLF's P/E ratio is 99.06. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FQVLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF is less volatile compared to FQVLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIAGF.
AIAGF vs AIAGY Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AIAGY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while AIAGY trades at $51.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas AIAGY's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AIAGY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF and AIAGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIAGF vs LUNMF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LUNMF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while LUNMF trades at $10.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas LUNMF's P/E ratio is 87.29. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LUNMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF is less volatile compared to LUNMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIAGF.
AIAGF vs JIAXF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, JIAXF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while JIAXF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas JIAXF's P/E ratio is 5.86. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JIAXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF and JIAXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIAGF vs OZMLF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, OZMLF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while OZMLF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas OZMLF's P/E ratio is 46.34. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OZMLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF and OZMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIAGF vs KGHPF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, KGHPF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while KGHPF trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas KGHPF's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KGHPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF and KGHPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIAGF vs CSCCF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CSCCF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while CSCCF trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas CSCCF's P/E ratio is 55.80. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CSCCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF is less volatile compared to CSCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIAGF.
AIAGF vs MMLTF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MMLTF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while MMLTF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas MMLTF's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MMLTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF and MMLTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIAGF vs SFRRF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SFRRF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while SFRRF trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas SFRRF's P/E ratio is 32.63. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SFRRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF and SFRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIAGF vs IPMLF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, IPMLF has a market cap of 580.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while IPMLF trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas IPMLF's P/E ratio is -19.91. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IPMLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF is less volatile compared to IPMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIAGF.
AIAGF vs CPORF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CPORF has a market cap of 542.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while CPORF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas CPORF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CPORF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF and CPORF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIAGF vs CAMLF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CAMLF has a market cap of 370.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while CAMLF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas CAMLF's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CAMLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF and CAMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIAGF vs ARREF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ARREF has a market cap of 262.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while ARREF trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas ARREF's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARREF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF is less volatile compared to ARREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIAGF.
AIAGF vs ASCUF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ASCUF has a market cap of 243M. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while ASCUF trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas ASCUF's P/E ratio is -27.25. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASCUF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF is less volatile compared to ASCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIAGF.
AIAGF vs AMRZF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AMRZF has a market cap of 183.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while AMRZF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas AMRZF's P/E ratio is -22.39. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMRZF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF and AMRZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIAGF vs CPPKF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CPPKF has a market cap of 135.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while CPPKF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas CPPKF's P/E ratio is -7.32. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CPPKF's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF is less volatile compared to CPPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIAGF.
AIAGF vs LSANF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LSANF has a market cap of 132.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while LSANF trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas LSANF's P/E ratio is 29.87. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LSANF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF and LSANF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIAGF vs CPFXF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CPFXF has a market cap of 105.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while CPFXF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas CPFXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CPFXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF and CPFXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIAGF vs HHLKF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, HHLKF has a market cap of 62.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while HHLKF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas HHLKF's P/E ratio is -8.28. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HHLKF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF and HHLKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIAGF vs HDRSF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, HDRSF has a market cap of 52.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while HDRSF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas HDRSF's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HDRSF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF is less volatile compared to HDRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIAGF.
AIAGF vs EMTRF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, EMTRF has a market cap of 47.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while EMTRF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas EMTRF's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EMTRF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF and EMTRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIAGF vs ATCUF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ATCUF has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while ATCUF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas ATCUF's P/E ratio is -21.25. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATCUF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF is less volatile compared to ATCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIAGF.
AIAGF vs CCOXF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CCOXF has a market cap of 31.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while CCOXF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas CCOXF's P/E ratio is -28.75. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CCOXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF and CCOXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIAGF vs NEVDF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NEVDF has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while NEVDF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas NEVDF's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEVDF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF is less volatile compared to NEVDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIAGF.
AIAGF vs CPPMF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CPPMF has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while CPPMF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas CPPMF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CPPMF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF and CPPMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIAGF vs QCCUF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, QCCUF has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while QCCUF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas QCCUF's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QCCUF's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF and QCCUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIAGF vs DRCMF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DRCMF has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while DRCMF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas DRCMF's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DRCMF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF and DRCMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIAGF vs BZDLF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BZDLF has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while BZDLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas BZDLF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BZDLF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF and BZDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIAGF vs PNTZF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PNTZF has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while PNTZF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas PNTZF's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PNTZF's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF is less volatile compared to PNTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIAGF.
AIAGF vs RKCLF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, RKCLF has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while RKCLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas RKCLF's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RKCLF's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF and RKCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIAGF vs ACMDY Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ACMDY has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while ACMDY trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas ACMDY's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACMDY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF and ACMDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIAGF vs USCUF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, USCUF has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while USCUF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas USCUF's P/E ratio is -8.18. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to USCUF's ROE of -4.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF and USCUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIAGF vs AGLAF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AGLAF has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while AGLAF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas AGLAF's P/E ratio is -10.59. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGLAF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF is less volatile compared to AGLAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIAGF.
AIAGF vs WCUFF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, WCUFF has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while WCUFF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas WCUFF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WCUFF's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF is less volatile compared to WCUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIAGF.
AIAGF vs CPCPF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CPCPF has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while CPCPF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas CPCPF's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CPCPF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF is less volatile compared to CPCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIAGF.
AIAGF vs BCUFF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BCUFF has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while BCUFF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas BCUFF's P/E ratio is -4.22. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BCUFF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF and BCUFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIAGF vs ANGUF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ANGUF has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while ANGUF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas ANGUF's P/E ratio is -13.68. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ANGUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF and ANGUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIAGF vs FVVSF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FVVSF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while FVVSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas FVVSF's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FVVSF's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF and FVVSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIAGF vs HLGVF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, HLGVF has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while HLGVF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas HLGVF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HLGVF's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF and HLGVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIAGF vs BRVRF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BRVRF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while BRVRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas BRVRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BRVRF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF and BRVRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIAGF vs SLMFF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SLMFF has a market cap of 733.6K. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while SLMFF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas SLMFF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SLMFF's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF and SLMFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIAGF vs CAEN Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CAEN has a market cap of 695.9K. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while CAEN trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas CAEN's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CAEN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF and CAEN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIAGF vs JUBAF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, JUBAF has a market cap of 681K. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while JUBAF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas JUBAF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JUBAF's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF is less volatile compared to JUBAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIAGF.
AIAGF vs INUMF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, INUMF has a market cap of 606.6K. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while INUMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas INUMF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INUMF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF and INUMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIAGF vs ECMXF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ECMXF has a market cap of 446.9K. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while ECMXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas ECMXF's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ECMXF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF and ECMXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIAGF vs AEOMF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AEOMF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while AEOMF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas AEOMF's P/E ratio is -10.40. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AEOMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF and AEOMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIAGF vs CROJF Comparison
AIAGF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIAGF stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CROJF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIAGF is priced at $87.20, while CROJF trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 4.15, whereas CROJF's P/E ratio is -10.81. In terms of profitability, AIAGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CROJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AIAGF and CROJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).