ageas SA/NV

AGS.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGS.BR stands at 10.85B. In comparison, CS.PA has a market cap of 90.66B. Regarding current trading prices, AGS.BR is priced at $56.20, while CS.PA trades at $41.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGS.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas CS.PA's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, AGS.BR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CS.PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AGS.BR is less volatile compared to CS.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGS.BR.

AGS.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGS.BR stands at 10.85B. In comparison, GEN.BR has a market cap of 30.72B. Regarding current trading prices, AGS.BR is priced at $56.20, while GEN.BR trades at $19.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGS.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas GEN.BR's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, AGS.BR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GEN.BR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AGS.BR is more volatile compared to GEN.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGS.BR.

AGS.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGS.BR stands at 10.85B. In comparison, NN.AS has a market cap of 14.72B. Regarding current trading prices, AGS.BR is priced at $56.20, while NN.AS trades at $55.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGS.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas NN.AS's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, AGS.BR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NN.AS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AGS.BR is less volatile compared to NN.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGS.BR.

AGS.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGS.BR stands at 10.85B. In comparison, ASRNL.AS has a market cap of 11.87B. Regarding current trading prices, AGS.BR is priced at $56.20, while ASRNL.AS trades at $56.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGS.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas ASRNL.AS's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, AGS.BR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASRNL.AS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AGS.BR is less volatile compared to ASRNL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGS.BR.

AGS.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGS.BR stands at 10.85B. In comparison, AGN.AS has a market cap of 9.46B. Regarding current trading prices, AGS.BR is priced at $56.20, while AGN.AS trades at $5.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGS.BR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.23, whereas AGN.AS's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, AGS.BR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AGN.AS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AGS.BR is less volatile compared to AGN.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGS.BR.