AgriBank, FCB
AgriBank, FCB AGRIP Peers
See (AGRIP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AGRIP | $99.80 | +0.05% | 46.8B | 103.63 | $0.96 | N/A |
| ORXCF | $20.00 | N/A | 22.8B | 9.30 | $2.15 | +2.91% |
| EDNMF | $45.00 | +47.78% | 10.7B | 19.65 | $2.29 | +2.64% |
| MIUFY | $13.96 | +5.36% | 10B | 10.58 | $1.32 | +1.89% |
| MIUFF | $6.54 | -9.79% | 9.4B | 10.06 | $0.65 | +2.16% |
| EDNMY | $15.77 | -0.19% | 7.5B | 13.71 | $1.15 | +3.76% |
| FREJO | $19.74 | +2.55% | 5.3B | -216.92 | -$0.09 | N/A |
| FREJP | $19.56 | +8.67% | 4.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MAURY | $38.87 | -4.67% | 3.5B | 19.34 | $2.01 | +1.25% |
| KGTHY | $12.68 | +3.85% | 3.3B | 14.25 | $0.89 | +2.29% |
Stock Comparison
AGRIP vs ORXCF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, ORXCF has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while ORXCF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas ORXCF's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ORXCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and ORXCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs EDNMF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, EDNMF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while EDNMF trades at $45.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas EDNMF's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EDNMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to EDNMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs MIUFY Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, MIUFY has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while MIUFY trades at $13.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas MIUFY's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MIUFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and MIUFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs MIUFF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, MIUFF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while MIUFF trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas MIUFF's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MIUFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and MIUFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs EDNMY Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, EDNMY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while EDNMY trades at $15.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas EDNMY's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EDNMY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to EDNMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs FREJO Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, FREJO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while FREJO trades at $19.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas FREJO's P/E ratio is -216.92. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FREJO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to FREJO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs FREJP Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, FREJP has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while FREJP trades at $19.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas FREJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FREJP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to FREJP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs MAURY Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, MAURY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while MAURY trades at $38.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas MAURY's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAURY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and MAURY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs KGTHY Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, KGTHY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while KGTHY trades at $12.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas KGTHY's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KGTHY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to KGTHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs MAURF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, MAURF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while MAURF trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas MAURF's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAURF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to MAURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs CSASF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, CSASF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while CSASF trades at $19.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas CSASF's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CSASF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and CSASF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs CMPRF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, CMPRF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while CMPRF trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas CMPRF's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMPRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and CMPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs SHGKY Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, SHGKY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while SHGKY trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas SHGKY's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHGKY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to SHGKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs AEOJF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, AEOJF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while AEOJF trades at $9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas AEOJF's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEOJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and AEOJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs KRKKF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, KRKKF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while KRKKF trades at $101.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas KRKKF's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KRKKF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to KRKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs EHMEF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, EHMEF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while EHMEF trades at $109.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas EHMEF's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EHMEF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to EHMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs ZIZTF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, ZIZTF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while ZIZTF trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas ZIZTF's P/E ratio is -33.25. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZIZTF's ROE of +9.56%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and ZIZTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs HYPOF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, HYPOF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while HYPOF trades at $225.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas HYPOF's P/E ratio is 88.93. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HYPOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and HYPOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs AIFLF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, AIFLF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while AIFLF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas AIFLF's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AIFLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and AIFLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs UMTAF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, UMTAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while UMTAF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas UMTAF's P/E ratio is 4.58. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UMTAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and UMTAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs AIFLY Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, AIFLY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while AIFLY trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas AIFLY's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AIFLY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and AIFLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs PRLPF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, PRLPF has a market cap of 910.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while PRLPF trades at $23.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas PRLPF's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRLPF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and PRLPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs ZNKKY Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, ZNKKY has a market cap of 751.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while ZNKKY trades at $8.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas ZNKKY's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZNKKY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and ZNKKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs MITJF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, MITJF has a market cap of 562.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while MITJF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas MITJF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MITJF's ROE of -245.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and MITJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs ECNCF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, ECNCF has a market cap of 557.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while ECNCF trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas ECNCF's P/E ratio is 39.60. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ECNCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to ECNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs EGTIF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, EGTIF has a market cap of 539.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while EGTIF trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas EGTIF's P/E ratio is 22.06. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EGTIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and EGTIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs FDCHF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, FDCHF has a market cap of 487.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while FDCHF trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas FDCHF's P/E ratio is 0.92. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FDCHF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to FDCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs IPFPF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, IPFPF has a market cap of 468.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while IPFPF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas IPFPF's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IPFPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and IPFPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs ITJTY Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, ITJTY has a market cap of 361.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while ITJTY trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas ITJTY's P/E ratio is -6.38. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ITJTY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and ITJTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs INJJF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, INJJF has a market cap of 338.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while INJJF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas INJJF's P/E ratio is -4.79. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INJJF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to INJJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs IMMFF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, IMMFF has a market cap of 285.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while IMMFF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas IMMFF's P/E ratio is -4.71. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IMMFF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to IMMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs NECA Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, NECA has a market cap of 275M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while NECA trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas NECA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NECA's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to NECA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs GCSSF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, GCSSF has a market cap of 249M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while GCSSF trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas GCSSF's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GCSSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and GCSSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs HUNTF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, HUNTF has a market cap of 204M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while HUNTF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas HUNTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HUNTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to HUNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs CHFHF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, CHFHF has a market cap of 202.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while CHFHF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas CHFHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHFHF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to CHFHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs SEZNL Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, SEZNL has a market cap of 180.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while SEZNL trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas SEZNL's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SEZNL's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and SEZNL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs CFNB Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, CFNB has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while CFNB trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas CFNB's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFNB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to CFNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs FPLPF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, FPLPF has a market cap of 161.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while FPLPF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas FPLPF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FPLPF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to FPLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs FAVO Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, FAVO has a market cap of 93.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while FAVO trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas FAVO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FAVO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to FAVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs RYTTF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, RYTTF has a market cap of 34.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while RYTTF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas RYTTF's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RYTTF's ROE of +16.55%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and RYTTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs RMIAF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, RMIAF has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while RMIAF trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas RMIAF's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RMIAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to RMIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs FIGI Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, FIGI has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while FIGI trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas FIGI's P/E ratio is -68.33. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FIGI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and FIGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs ACCFF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, ACCFF has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while ACCFF trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas ACCFF's P/E ratio is -5.61. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACCFF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and ACCFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs IOUFF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, IOUFF has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while IOUFF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas IOUFF's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IOUFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and IOUFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs AMSA Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, AMSA has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while AMSA trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas AMSA's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMSA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and AMSA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs MRBLF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, MRBLF has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while MRBLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas MRBLF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MRBLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to MRBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs PRPS Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, PRPS has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while PRPS trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas PRPS's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRPS's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to PRPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs GWSFF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, GWSFF has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while GWSFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas GWSFF's P/E ratio is -12.44. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GWSFF's ROE of +2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and GWSFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs SPFX Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, SPFX has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while SPFX trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas SPFX's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPFX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to SPFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs ALEDY Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, ALEDY has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while ALEDY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas ALEDY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALEDY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and ALEDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs KYNC Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, KYNC has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while KYNC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas KYNC's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KYNC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to KYNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs MBDC Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, MBDC has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while MBDC trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas MBDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MBDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to MBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs XSHLF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, XSHLF has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while XSHLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas XSHLF's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XSHLF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to XSHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs AIJTY Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, AIJTY has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while AIJTY trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas AIJTY's P/E ratio is 3.89. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AIJTY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and AIJTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs CUROQ Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, CUROQ has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while CUROQ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas CUROQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CUROQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and CUROQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs CHWWF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, CHWWF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while CHWWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas CHWWF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHWWF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and CHWWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs CAFI Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, CAFI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while CAFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas CAFI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CAFI's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to CAFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs FNNZF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, FNNZF has a market cap of 932.9K. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while FNNZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas FNNZF's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FNNZF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and FNNZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs ATNPQ Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, ATNPQ has a market cap of 925.8K. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while ATNPQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas ATNPQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATNPQ's ROE of +24.88%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to ATNPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs YUANF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, YUANF has a market cap of 489.2K. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while YUANF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas YUANF's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YUANF's ROE of +2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to YUANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs CYIO Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, CYIO has a market cap of 460.2K. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while CYIO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas CYIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CYIO's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to CYIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs COSG Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, COSG has a market cap of 458.6K. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while COSG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas COSG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to COSG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and COSG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs CBRJ Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, CBRJ has a market cap of 415.6K. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while CBRJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas CBRJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBRJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to CBRJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs CFGX Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, CFGX has a market cap of 315.9K. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while CFGX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas CFGX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFGX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and CFGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs ARWD Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, ARWD has a market cap of 307K. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while ARWD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas ARWD's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARWD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to ARWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs BCAP Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, BCAP has a market cap of 284.2K. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while BCAP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas BCAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCAP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and BCAP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs WORC Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, WORC has a market cap of 191K. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while WORC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas WORC's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WORC's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to WORC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs SUNLQ Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, SUNLQ has a market cap of 79.2K. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while SUNLQ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas SUNLQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SUNLQ's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to SUNLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs ECDD Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, ECDD has a market cap of 28.9K. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while ECDD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas ECDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ECDD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and ECDD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs CHFI Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, CHFI has a market cap of 28.8K. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while CHFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas CHFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHFI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to CHFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs RBRI Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, RBRI has a market cap of 18.6K. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while RBRI trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas RBRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RBRI's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and RBRI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs FDTC Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, FDTC has a market cap of 8.7K. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while FDTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas FDTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FDTC's ROE of -4.54%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to FDTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs RAHGF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, RAHGF has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while RAHGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas RAHGF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RAHGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and RAHGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs VIEWF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, VIEWF has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while VIEWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas VIEWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VIEWF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to VIEWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs EPOR Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, EPOR has a market cap of 2.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while EPOR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas EPOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EPOR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and EPOR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs DKGH Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, DKGH has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while DKGH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas DKGH's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DKGH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and DKGH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs GAFL Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, GAFL has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while GAFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas GAFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GAFL's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to GAFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs WEIDY Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, WEIDY has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while WEIDY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas WEIDY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WEIDY's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to WEIDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs FRNV Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, FRNV has a market cap of 596. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while FRNV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas FRNV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FRNV's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to FRNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs TSLMF Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, TSLMF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while TSLMF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas TSLMF's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TSLMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and TSLMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs EPORP Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, EPORP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while EPORP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas EPORP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EPORP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and EPORP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs KTBA Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, KTBA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while KTBA trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas KTBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KTBA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP is less volatile compared to KTBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGRIP.
AGRIP vs CIAS Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, CIAS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while CIAS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas CIAS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIAS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and CIAS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs FLXP Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, FLXP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while FLXP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas FLXP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FLXP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and FLXP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs AATRL Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, AATRL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while AATRL trades at $54.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas AATRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AATRL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and AATRL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AGRIP vs AWKS Comparison
AGRIP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AGRIP stands at 46.8B. In comparison, AWKS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AGRIP is priced at $99.80, while AWKS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AGRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 103.63, whereas AWKS's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, AGRIP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AWKS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AGRIP and AWKS have similar daily volatility (0.00).