Affinity Gold Corporation
Affinity Gold Corporation AFYG Peers
See (AFYG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFYG | $0.00 | +0.00% | 5.1K | N/A | -$0.06 | N/A |
| ZIJMF | $2.58 | -2.29% | 72B | 13.58 | $0.19 | +2.05% |
| OPYGY | $21.00 | +0.00% | 28.4B | 2.50 | $8.39 | +835.48% |
| GFIOF | $24.03 | +0.00% | 21.5B | 17.41 | $1.38 | +2.27% |
| NESRF | $12.36 | +2.13% | 17.6B | 23.32 | $0.53 | +2.64% |
| NSTYY | $12.40 | +0.00% | 14.3B | 33.51 | $0.37 | +1.44% |
| NCMGY | $15.59 | +2.84% | 13.9B | 17.92 | $0.87 | N/A |
| NCMGF | $15.20 | -2.53% | 13.6B | 17.47 | $0.87 | N/A |
| LUGDF | $52.86 | +0.32% | 12.8B | 23.81 | $2.22 | +2.96% |
| CAHPF | $5.15 | -1.15% | 10.2B | 22.39 | $0.23 | +1.78% |
Stock Comparison
AFYG vs ZIJMF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, ZIJMF has a market cap of 72B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while ZIJMF trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZIJMF's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to ZIJMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to ZIJMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs OPYGY Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, OPYGY has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while OPYGY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPYGY's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to OPYGY's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG and OPYGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AFYG vs GFIOF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, GFIOF has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while GFIOF trades at $24.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFIOF's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to GFIOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to GFIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs NESRF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, NESRF has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while NESRF trades at $12.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NESRF's P/E ratio is 23.32. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to NESRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG and NESRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AFYG vs NSTYY Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, NSTYY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while NSTYY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSTYY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to NSTYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG and NSTYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AFYG vs NCMGY Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, NCMGY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while NCMGY trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCMGY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to NCMGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to NCMGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs NCMGF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, NCMGF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while NCMGF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCMGF's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to NCMGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to NCMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs LUGDF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, LUGDF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while LUGDF trades at $52.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUGDF's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to LUGDF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to LUGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs CAHPF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, CAHPF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while CAHPF trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAHPF's P/E ratio is 22.39. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to CAHPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to CAHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs OCANF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, OCANF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while OCANF trades at $14.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OCANF's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to OCANF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to OCANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs HGMCF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, HGMCF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while HGMCF trades at $14.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGMCF's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to HGMCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to HGMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs ZHAOF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, ZHAOF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while ZHAOF trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZHAOF's P/E ratio is 50.40. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to ZHAOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to ZHAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs AULGF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, AULGF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while AULGF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AULGF's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to AULGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG and AULGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AFYG vs EDVMF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, EDVMF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while EDVMF trades at $30.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDVMF's P/E ratio is -73.24. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to EDVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to EDVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs SBYSF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, SBYSF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while SBYSF trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBYSF's P/E ratio is -13.27. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to SBYSF's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to SBYSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs ARGTF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, ARGTF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while ARGTF trades at $17.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARGTF's P/E ratio is -256.00. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to ARGTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to ARGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs ZIJMY Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, ZIJMY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while ZIJMY trades at $54.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZIJMY's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to ZIJMY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to ZIJMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs DGMLF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, DGMLF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while DGMLF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGMLF's P/E ratio is -154.50. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to DGMLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to DGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs GSISF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, GSISF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while GSISF trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSISF's P/E ratio is 41.00. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to GSISF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to GSISF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs PMNXF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, PMNXF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while PMNXF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMNXF's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to PMNXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to PMNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs GRLGF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, GRLGF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while GRLGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRLGF's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to GRLGF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to GRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs CRNLF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, CRNLF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while CRNLF trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRNLF's P/E ratio is 50.77. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to CRNLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG and CRNLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AFYG vs TORXF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, TORXF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while TORXF trades at $32.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TORXF's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to TORXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to TORXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs KNTNF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, KNTNF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while KNTNF trades at $11.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNTNF's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to KNTNF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to KNTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs DPMLF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, DPMLF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while DPMLF trades at $15.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DPMLF's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to DPMLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to DPMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs CELTF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, CELTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while CELTF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CELTF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to CELTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG and CELTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AFYG vs RGRNF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, RGRNF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while RGRNF trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGRNF's P/E ratio is -291.00. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to RGRNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG and RGRNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AFYG vs ELKMF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, ELKMF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while ELKMF trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELKMF's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to ELKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG and ELKMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AFYG vs WDOFF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, WDOFF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while WDOFF trades at $13.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WDOFF's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to WDOFF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to WDOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs KOZAY Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, KOZAY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while KOZAY trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOZAY's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to KOZAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to KOZAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs ORAAF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, ORAAF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while ORAAF trades at $25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORAAF's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to ORAAF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to ORAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs HCHDF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, HCHDF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while HCHDF trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCHDF's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to HCHDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to HCHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs RMLRF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, RMLRF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while RMLRF trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMLRF's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to RMLRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG and RMLRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AFYG vs CXBMF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, CXBMF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while CXBMF trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CXBMF's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to CXBMF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to CXBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs WFRSF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, WFRSF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while WFRSF trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WFRSF's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to WFRSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to WFRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs EOGSF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, EOGSF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while EOGSF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EOGSF's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to EOGSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to EOGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs REDLF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, REDLF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while REDLF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REDLF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to REDLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to REDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs DRDGF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, DRDGF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while DRDGF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRDGF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to DRDGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to DRDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs OBNNF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, OBNNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while OBNNF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OBNNF's P/E ratio is -351.00. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to OBNNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to OBNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs PAFRF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, PAFRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while PAFRF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAFRF's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to PAFRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to PAFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs MAUTF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, MAUTF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while MAUTF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAUTF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to MAUTF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to MAUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs MWSNF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, MWSNF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while MWSNF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MWSNF's P/E ratio is -90.00. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to MWSNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to MWSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs AURQF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, AURQF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while AURQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AURQF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to AURQF's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG and AURQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AFYG vs SNWGF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, SNWGF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while SNWGF trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNWGF's P/E ratio is -44.54. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to SNWGF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to SNWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs BELGF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, BELGF has a market cap of 964.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while BELGF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BELGF's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to BELGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to BELGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs HCHDY Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, HCHDY has a market cap of 930.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while HCHDY trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCHDY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to HCHDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG and HCHDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AFYG vs SVLKF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, SVLKF has a market cap of 927.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while SVLKF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVLKF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to SVLKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG and SVLKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AFYG vs SGSVF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, SGSVF has a market cap of 880.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while SGSVF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGSVF's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to SGSVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to SGSVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs KRRGF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, KRRGF has a market cap of 862.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while KRRGF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRRGF's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to KRRGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to KRRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs RMGGF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, RMGGF has a market cap of 809M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while RMGGF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMGGF's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to RMGGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to RMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs RUPRF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, RUPRF has a market cap of 802.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while RUPRF trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUPRF's P/E ratio is -171.50. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to RUPRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to RUPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs WTGRF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, WTGRF has a market cap of 677.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while WTGRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTGRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to WTGRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to WTGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs RGDFF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, RGDFF has a market cap of 676.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while RGDFF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGDFF's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to RGDFF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to RGDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs PDIYF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, PDIYF has a market cap of 655.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while PDIYF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDIYF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to PDIYF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to PDIYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs RMGGY Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, RMGGY has a market cap of 608.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while RMGGY trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMGGY's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to RMGGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to RMGGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs ASGOF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, ASGOF has a market cap of 601.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while ASGOF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASGOF's P/E ratio is -8.57. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to ASGOF's ROE of -22.71%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to ASGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs RMLFF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, RMLFF has a market cap of 570.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while RMLFF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMLFF's P/E ratio is -11.57. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to RMLFF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to RMLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs MNSAF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, MNSAF has a market cap of 559.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while MNSAF trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNSAF's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to MNSAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to MNSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs ECRTF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, ECRTF has a market cap of 529.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while ECRTF trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECRTF's P/E ratio is -11.81. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to ECRTF's ROE of -6.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to ECRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs NVMLF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, NVMLF has a market cap of 512.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while NVMLF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVMLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to NVMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to NVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs RIOFF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, RIOFF has a market cap of 505.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while RIOFF trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIOFF's P/E ratio is 119.00. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to RIOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to RIOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs GUYGF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, GUYGF has a market cap of 498.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while GUYGF trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUYGF's P/E ratio is -68.93. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to GUYGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to GUYGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs OSKA Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, OSKA has a market cap of 483.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while OSKA trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSKA's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to OSKA's ROE of -36.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to OSKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs ARNGF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, ARNGF has a market cap of 468.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while ARNGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARNGF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to ARNGF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to ARNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs RSRBF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, RSRBF has a market cap of 453.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while RSRBF trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSRBF's P/E ratio is 78.00. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to RSRBF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to RSRBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs ORZCF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, ORZCF has a market cap of 444.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while ORZCF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORZCF's P/E ratio is 6.44. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to ORZCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to ORZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs LMGDF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, LMGDF has a market cap of 384.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while LMGDF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMGDF's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to LMGDF's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to LMGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs THXPF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, THXPF has a market cap of 370.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while THXPF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THXPF's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to THXPF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to THXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs ELEMF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, ELEMF has a market cap of 368.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while ELEMF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELEMF's P/E ratio is 75.00. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to ELEMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to ELEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs GDRZF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, GDRZF has a market cap of 362.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while GDRZF trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDRZF's P/E ratio is -32.10. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to GDRZF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to GDRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs KSKGF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, KSKGF has a market cap of 360.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while KSKGF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSKGF's P/E ratio is 2.59. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to KSKGF's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to KSKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs TPRXF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, TPRXF has a market cap of 343.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while TPRXF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPRXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to TPRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to TPRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs PROBF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, PROBF has a market cap of 331.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while PROBF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PROBF's P/E ratio is -13.54. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to PROBF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to PROBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs MNDJF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, MNDJF has a market cap of 325.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while MNDJF trades at $3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNDJF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to MNDJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to MNDJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs MAKOF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, MAKOF has a market cap of 304.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while MAKOF trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAKOF's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to MAKOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to MAKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs OGNRF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, OGNRF has a market cap of 292.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while OGNRF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OGNRF's P/E ratio is 145.00. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to OGNRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to OGNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs OMGGF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, OMGGF has a market cap of 281.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while OMGGF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMGGF's P/E ratio is -22.94. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to OMGGF's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to OMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs MGDPF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, MGDPF has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while MGDPF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGDPF's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to MGDPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to MGDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs ALKEF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, ALKEF has a market cap of 278.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while ALKEF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALKEF's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to ALKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to ALKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs FDMIF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, FDMIF has a market cap of 270M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while FDMIF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDMIF's P/E ratio is -28.35. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to FDMIF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to FDMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs OSIIF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, OSIIF has a market cap of 254.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while OSIIF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSIIF's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to OSIIF's ROE of +4.74%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG and OSIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AFYG vs ERRSF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, ERRSF has a market cap of 250.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while ERRSF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERRSF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to ERRSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to ERRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs HSTXF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, HSTXF has a market cap of 228.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while HSTXF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSTXF's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to HSTXF's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to HSTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs STBMF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, STBMF has a market cap of 227.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while STBMF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STBMF's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to STBMF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG and STBMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AFYG vs STPGF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, STPGF has a market cap of 222.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while STPGF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STPGF's P/E ratio is 4.62. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to STPGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to STPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs JAGGF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, JAGGF has a market cap of 219.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while JAGGF trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JAGGF's P/E ratio is -34.63. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to JAGGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to JAGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs WRLGF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, WRLGF has a market cap of 218.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while WRLGF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRLGF's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to WRLGF's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to WRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs AGXKF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, AGXKF has a market cap of 196.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while AGXKF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGXKF's P/E ratio is -11.47. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to AGXKF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to AGXKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs SAAGF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, SAAGF has a market cap of 193.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while SAAGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAAGF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to SAAGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG and SAAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AFYG vs CNLMF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, CNLMF has a market cap of 193.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while CNLMF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLMF's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to CNLMF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to CNLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs THSGF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, THSGF has a market cap of 185.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while THSGF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THSGF's P/E ratio is 39.02. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to THSGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to THSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs DCCNF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, DCCNF has a market cap of 182.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while DCCNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCCNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to DCCNF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG and DCCNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AFYG vs CNMXF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, CNMXF has a market cap of 180.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while CNMXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to CNMXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to CNMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs LECBF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, LECBF has a market cap of 174.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while LECBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LECBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to LECBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to LECBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs SRBIF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, SRBIF has a market cap of 174.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while SRBIF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRBIF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to SRBIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG and SRBIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AFYG vs GGAZF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, GGAZF has a market cap of 164.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while GGAZF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGAZF's P/E ratio is -7.55. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to GGAZF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to GGAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs MAIFF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, MAIFF has a market cap of 163.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while MAIFF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAIFF's P/E ratio is -3.52. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to MAIFF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to MAIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.
AFYG vs EEYMF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, EEYMF has a market cap of 156.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while EEYMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEYMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to EEYMF's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG and EEYMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AFYG vs FFMGF Comparison
AFYG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYG stands at 5.1K. In comparison, FFMGF has a market cap of 150.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYG is priced at $0.00, while FFMGF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFMGF's P/E ratio is -13.90. In terms of profitability, AFYG's ROE is -10.24%, compared to FFMGF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYG is less volatile compared to FFMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYG.