AmTrust Financial Services, Inc.
AmTrust Financial Services, Inc. (AFSIB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AFSIB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFSIB | $14.25 | +3.64% | 2.8B | 14.59 | $0.98 | +13.18% |
| TKOMF | $39.12 | -2.78% | 71.8B | 10.84 | $3.48 | +3.48% |
| TKOMY | $36.91 | +0.27% | 70.2B | 10.60 | $3.48 | +3.34% |
| SMPNY | $18.10 | +0.50% | 69.1B | 12.56 | $1.44 | +2.56% |
| PINXF | $0.82 | +0.00% | 45.4B | 5.86 | $0.14 | +4.36% |
| PPCCY | $50.01 | -2.11% | 44.5B | 8.05 | $6.21 | +3.69% |
| PPCCF | $1.96 | +0.00% | 43.6B | 7.84 | $0.25 | +4.09% |
| MSADF | $25.71 | -0.92% | 37.5B | 8.29 | $3.10 | +3.92% |
| MSADY | $24.81 | -1.08% | 36.6B | 8.13 | $3.05 | +3.55% |
| PINXY | $16.37 | +0.00% | 36.2B | 5.76 | $2.84 | +2.89% |
Stock Comparison
AFSIB vs TKOMF Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TKOMF has a market cap of 71.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while TKOMF trades at $39.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas TKOMF's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TKOMF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is more volatile compared to TKOMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check TKOMF's competition here
AFSIB vs TKOMY Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TKOMY has a market cap of 70.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while TKOMY trades at $36.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas TKOMY's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TKOMY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is less volatile compared to TKOMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check TKOMY's competition here
AFSIB vs SMPNY Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SMPNY has a market cap of 69.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while SMPNY trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas SMPNY's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SMPNY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is more volatile compared to SMPNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check SMPNY's competition here
AFSIB vs PINXF Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PINXF has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while PINXF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas PINXF's P/E ratio is 5.86. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PINXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is less volatile compared to PINXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check PINXF's competition here
AFSIB vs PPCCY Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PPCCY has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while PPCCY trades at $50.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas PPCCY's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PPCCY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is less volatile compared to PPCCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check PPCCY's competition here
AFSIB vs PPCCF Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PPCCF has a market cap of 43.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while PPCCF trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas PPCCF's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PPCCF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is more volatile compared to PPCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check PPCCF's competition here
AFSIB vs MSADF Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MSADF has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while MSADF trades at $25.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas MSADF's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MSADF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is more volatile compared to MSADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check MSADF's competition here
AFSIB vs MSADY Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MSADY has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while MSADY trades at $24.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas MSADY's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MSADY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is less volatile compared to MSADY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check MSADY's competition here
AFSIB vs PINXY Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PINXY has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while PINXY trades at $16.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas PINXY's P/E ratio is 5.76. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PINXY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is less volatile compared to PINXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check PINXY's competition here
AFSIB vs FRFHF Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FRFHF has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while FRFHF trades at $1,653.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas FRFHF's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FRFHF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is more volatile compared to FRFHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check FRFHF's competition here
AFSIB vs NHOLF Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NHOLF has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while NHOLF trades at $39.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas NHOLF's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NHOLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is more volatile compared to NHOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check NHOLF's competition here
AFSIB vs IFCZF Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, IFCZF has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while IFCZF trades at $186.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas IFCZF's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to IFCZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is more volatile compared to IFCZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check IFCZF's competition here
AFSIB vs QBEIF Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, QBEIF has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while QBEIF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas QBEIF's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to QBEIF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is more volatile compared to QBEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check QBEIF's competition here
AFSIB vs QBIEY Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, QBIEY has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while QBIEY trades at $14.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas QBIEY's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to QBIEY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is more volatile compared to QBIEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check QBIEY's competition here
AFSIB vs FAXXF Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FAXXF has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while FAXXF trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas FAXXF's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FAXXF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is more volatile compared to FAXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check FAXXF's competition here
AFSIB vs FRFXF Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FRFXF has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while FRFXF trades at $18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas FRFXF's P/E ratio is 0.19. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FRFXF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is less volatile compared to FRFXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check FRFXF's competition here
AFSIB vs FRFGF Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FRFGF has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while FRFGF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas FRFGF's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FRFGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is more volatile compared to FRFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check FRFGF's competition here
AFSIB vs FXFLF Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FXFLF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while FXFLF trades at $16.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas FXFLF's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FXFLF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is less volatile compared to FXFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check FXFLF's competition here
AFSIB vs FRFFF Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FRFFF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while FRFFF trades at $18.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas FRFFF's P/E ratio is 0.19. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FRFFF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is less volatile compared to FRFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check FRFFF's competition here
AFSIB vs PZAKY Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PZAKY has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while PZAKY trades at $17.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas PZAKY's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PZAKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is less volatile compared to PZAKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check PZAKY's competition here
AFSIB vs PWZYF Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PWZYF has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while PWZYF trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas PWZYF's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PWZYF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is less volatile compared to PWZYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check PWZYF's competition here
AFSIB vs AMIGY Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AMIGY has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while AMIGY trades at $44.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas AMIGY's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AMIGY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is more volatile compared to AMIGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check AMIGY's competition here
AFSIB vs SNMCY Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SNMCY has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while SNMCY trades at $11.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas SNMCY's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SNMCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is less volatile compared to SNMCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check SNMCY's competition here
AFSIB vs SNMYF Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SNMYF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while SNMYF trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas SNMYF's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SNMYF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is more volatile compared to SNMYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check SNMYF's competition here
AFSIB vs IAUGF Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, IAUGF has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while IAUGF trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas IAUGF's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to IAUGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is less volatile compared to IAUGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check IAUGF's competition here
AFSIB vs IAUGY Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, IAUGY has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while IAUGY trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas IAUGY's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to IAUGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is less volatile compared to IAUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check IAUGY's competition here
AFSIB vs AMIGF Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AMIGF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while AMIGF trades at $37.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas AMIGF's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AMIGF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is more volatile compared to AMIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check AMIGF's competition here
AFSIB vs BZLYF Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BZLYF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while BZLYF trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas BZLYF's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BZLYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is more volatile compared to BZLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check BZLYF's competition here
AFSIB vs HCXLY Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HCXLY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while HCXLY trades at $42.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas HCXLY's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to HCXLY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is more volatile compared to HCXLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check HCXLY's competition here
AFSIB vs HCXLF Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HCXLF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while HCXLF trades at $19.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas HCXLF's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to HCXLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is more volatile compared to HCXLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check HCXLF's competition here
AFSIB vs DIISY Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DIISY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while DIISY trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas DIISY's P/E ratio is 30.51. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DIISY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is less volatile compared to DIISY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check DIISY's competition here
AFSIB vs IFZZF Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, IFZZF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while IFZZF trades at $20.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas IFZZF's P/E ratio is 2.36. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to IFZZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is more volatile compared to IFZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check IFZZF's competition here
AFSIB vs IFTPF Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, IFTPF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while IFTPF trades at $20.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas IFTPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to IFTPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is more volatile compared to IFTPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check IFTPF's competition here
AFSIB vs QUCOF Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, QUCOF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while QUCOF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas QUCOF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to QUCOF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is more volatile compared to QUCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check QUCOF's competition here
AFSIB vs INFFF Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, INFFF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while INFFF trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas INFFF's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to INFFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is more volatile compared to INFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check INFFF's competition here
AFSIB vs ZZHGY Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ZZHGY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while ZZHGY trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas ZZHGY's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ZZHGY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is more volatile compared to ZZHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check ZZHGY's competition here
AFSIB vs INTAF Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, INTAF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while INTAF trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas INTAF's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to INTAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is less volatile compared to INTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check INTAF's competition here
AFSIB vs AFSIC Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AFSIC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while AFSIC trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas AFSIC's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AFSIC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is more volatile compared to AFSIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check AFSIC's competition here
AFSIB vs AFSIM Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AFSIM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while AFSIM trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas AFSIM's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AFSIM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is more volatile compared to AFSIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check AFSIM's competition here
AFSIB vs AFSIP Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AFSIP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while AFSIP trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas AFSIP's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AFSIP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is less volatile compared to AFSIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check AFSIP's competition here
AFSIB vs AFSIA Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AFSIA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while AFSIA trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas AFSIA's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AFSIA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is more volatile compared to AFSIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check AFSIA's competition here
AFSIB vs AFSIN Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AFSIN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while AFSIN trades at $13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas AFSIN's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AFSIN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is more volatile compared to AFSIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check AFSIN's competition here
AFSIB vs ZZHGF Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ZZHGF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while ZZHGF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas ZZHGF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ZZHGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is less volatile compared to ZZHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check ZZHGF's competition here
AFSIB vs LNDAF Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LNDAF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while LNDAF trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas LNDAF's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to LNDAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is more volatile compared to LNDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check LNDAF's competition here
AFSIB vs FFHPF Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FFHPF has a market cap of 396.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while FFHPF trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas FFHPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FFHPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is more volatile compared to FFHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check FFHPF's competition here
AFSIB vs FXFHF Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FXFHF has a market cap of 388M. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while FXFHF trades at $17.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas FXFHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FXFHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is less volatile compared to FXFHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check FXFHF's competition here
AFSIB vs FAXRF Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FAXRF has a market cap of 294.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while FAXRF trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas FAXRF's P/E ratio is 0.14. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FAXRF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is less volatile compared to FAXRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check FAXRF's competition here
AFSIB vs EGFHF Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, EGFHF has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while EGFHF trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas EGFHF's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to EGFHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is more volatile compared to EGFHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check EGFHF's competition here
AFSIB vs FIGP Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FIGP has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while FIGP trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas FIGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FIGP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is more volatile compared to FIGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check FIGP's competition here
AFSIB vs SGYI Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SGYI has a market cap of 6.3K. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while SGYI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas SGYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SGYI's ROE of +40.43%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is more volatile compared to SGYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check SGYI's competition here
AFSIB vs MAJCQ Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MAJCQ has a market cap of 5.6K. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while MAJCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas MAJCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MAJCQ's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is less volatile compared to MAJCQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check MAJCQ's competition here
AFSIB vs AFHIF Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AFHIF has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while AFHIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas AFHIF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AFHIF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is less volatile compared to AFHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check AFHIF's competition here
AFSIB vs FNHCQ Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FNHCQ has a market cap of 18. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while FNHCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas FNHCQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FNHCQ's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is more volatile compared to FNHCQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check FNHCQ's competition here
AFSIB vs SBBG Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SBBG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while SBBG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas SBBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SBBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is less volatile compared to SBBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check SBBG's competition here
AFSIB vs AFHIQ Comparison March 2026
AFSIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFSIB stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AFHIQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AFSIB is priced at $14.25, while AFHIQ trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFSIB currently has a P/E ratio of 14.59, whereas AFHIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFSIB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AFHIQ's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AFSIB is less volatile compared to AFHIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFSIB.Check AFHIQ's competition here