Affinor Growers Inc.

AFI.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AFI.CN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, DC-A.TO has a market cap of 199.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AFI.CN is priced at CA$0.06, while DC-A.TO trades at CA$2.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AFI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas DC-A.TO's P/E ratio is 2.82. In terms of profitability, AFI.CN's ROE is -15.10%, compared to DC-A.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AFI.CN is less volatile compared to DC-A.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFI.CN.

AFI.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AFI.CN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, OPTI.CN has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AFI.CN is priced at CA$0.06, while OPTI.CN trades at CA$0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AFI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas OPTI.CN's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, AFI.CN's ROE is -15.10%, compared to OPTI.CN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AFI.CN is less volatile compared to OPTI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFI.CN.

AFI.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AFI.CN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, GLG.TO has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AFI.CN is priced at CA$0.06, while GLG.TO trades at CA$0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AFI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas GLG.TO's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, AFI.CN's ROE is -15.10%, compared to GLG.TO's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, AFI.CN is less volatile compared to GLG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFI.CN.

AFI.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AFI.CN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, ULTA.CN has a market cap of 277.3K. Regarding current trading prices, AFI.CN is priced at CA$0.06, while ULTA.CN trades at CA$0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AFI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas ULTA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, AFI.CN's ROE is -15.10%, compared to ULTA.CN's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, AFI.CN and ULTA.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).

AFI.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AFI.CN stands at 2.4M. In comparison, VFF.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AFI.CN is priced at CA$0.06, while VFF.TO trades at CA$8.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AFI.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.00, whereas VFF.TO's P/E ratio is -117.68. In terms of profitability, AFI.CN's ROE is -15.10%, compared to VFF.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AFI.CN is less volatile compared to VFF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFI.CN.