AFC Energy plc
AFC Energy plc AFC.L Peers
See (AFC.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFC.L | £8.35 | -1.76% | 71.4M | -4.17 | -£0.02 | N/A |
| 0NX2.L | £27.51 | -0.48% | 58.6B | 12.23 | £2.25 | +1.59% |
| 0HF7.L | £178.67 | -0.38% | 41.3B | 39.88 | £4.48 | +0.64% |
| 0L2T.L | £27.00 | -2.17% | 8.5B | N/A | N/A | +0.44% |
| 0RQH.L | £42.45 | +0.47% | 7.5B | 15.22 | £2.79 | +3.30% |
| 0G9R.L | £165.20 | N/A | 1.4B | -103.64 | -£1.59 | N/A |
| SMS.L | £954.00 | +0.21% | 1.3B | 86.73 | £0.11 | +0.87% |
| 0REY.L | £159.98 | N/A | 1B | 43.93 | £3.64 | N/A |
| 0R1J.L | £18.11 | N/A | 866.3M | -18.71 | -£0.97 | N/A |
| VLX.L | £289.00 | +1.23% | 531.2M | 17.00 | £0.17 | +1.16% |
Stock Comparison
AFC.L vs 0NX2.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, 0NX2.L has a market cap of 58.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while 0NX2.L trades at £27.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas 0NX2.L's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to 0NX2.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is more volatile compared to 0NX2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.
AFC.L vs 0HF7.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, 0HF7.L has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while 0HF7.L trades at £178.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas 0HF7.L's P/E ratio is 39.88. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to 0HF7.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is more volatile compared to 0HF7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.
AFC.L vs 0L2T.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, 0L2T.L has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while 0L2T.L trades at £27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas 0L2T.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to 0L2T.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is more volatile compared to 0L2T.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.
AFC.L vs 0RQH.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, 0RQH.L has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while 0RQH.L trades at £42.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas 0RQH.L's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to 0RQH.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is more volatile compared to 0RQH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.
AFC.L vs 0G9R.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, 0G9R.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while 0G9R.L trades at £165.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas 0G9R.L's P/E ratio is -103.64. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to 0G9R.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is more volatile compared to 0G9R.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.
AFC.L vs SMS.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, SMS.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while SMS.L trades at £954.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas SMS.L's P/E ratio is 86.73. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to SMS.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is more volatile compared to SMS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.
AFC.L vs 0REY.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, 0REY.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while 0REY.L trades at £159.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas 0REY.L's P/E ratio is 43.93. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to 0REY.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is more volatile compared to 0REY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.
AFC.L vs 0R1J.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, 0R1J.L has a market cap of 866.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while 0R1J.L trades at £18.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas 0R1J.L's P/E ratio is -18.71. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to 0R1J.L's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is less volatile compared to 0R1J.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.
AFC.L vs VLX.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, VLX.L has a market cap of 531.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while VLX.L trades at £289.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas VLX.L's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to VLX.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is more volatile compared to VLX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.
AFC.L vs TFW.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, TFW.L has a market cap of 358.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while TFW.L trades at £308.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas TFW.L's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to TFW.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is more volatile compared to TFW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.
AFC.L vs 0QJY.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, 0QJY.L has a market cap of 314M. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while 0QJY.L trades at £498.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas 0QJY.L's P/E ratio is -185.34. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to 0QJY.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is more volatile compared to 0QJY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.
AFC.L vs 0QPV.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, 0QPV.L has a market cap of 294.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while 0QPV.L trades at £0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas 0QPV.L's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to 0QPV.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is more volatile compared to 0QPV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.
AFC.L vs 0A60.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, 0A60.L has a market cap of 227.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while 0A60.L trades at £7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas 0A60.L's P/E ratio is -24.93. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to 0A60.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is more volatile compared to 0A60.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.
AFC.L vs 0QP6.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, 0QP6.L has a market cap of 225.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while 0QP6.L trades at £0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas 0QP6.L's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to 0QP6.L's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is more volatile compared to 0QP6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.
AFC.L vs LUCE.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, LUCE.L has a market cap of 220.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while LUCE.L trades at £145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas LUCE.L's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to LUCE.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is more volatile compared to LUCE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.
AFC.L vs XPP.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, XPP.L has a market cap of 218.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while XPP.L trades at £782.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas XPP.L's P/E ratio is -19.55. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to XPP.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is more volatile compared to XPP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.
AFC.L vs 0MJH.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, 0MJH.L has a market cap of 206.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while 0MJH.L trades at £4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas 0MJH.L's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to 0MJH.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is more volatile compared to 0MJH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.
AFC.L vs SUP.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, SUP.L has a market cap of 205.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while SUP.L trades at £175.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas SUP.L's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to SUP.L's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is more volatile compared to SUP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.
AFC.L vs 0QL5.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, 0QL5.L has a market cap of 142.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while 0QL5.L trades at £200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas 0QL5.L's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to 0QL5.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is less volatile compared to 0QL5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.
AFC.L vs CWR.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, CWR.L has a market cap of 141M. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while CWR.L trades at £72.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas CWR.L's P/E ratio is -4.85. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to CWR.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is more volatile compared to CWR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.
AFC.L vs DWHT.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, DWHT.L has a market cap of 58.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while DWHT.L trades at £930.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas DWHT.L's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to DWHT.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is more volatile compared to DWHT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.
AFC.L vs 0O27.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, 0O27.L has a market cap of 58.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while 0O27.L trades at £9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas 0O27.L's P/E ratio is -14.12. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to 0O27.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is more volatile compared to 0O27.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.
AFC.L vs IKA.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, IKA.L has a market cap of 56.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while IKA.L trades at £33.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas IKA.L's P/E ratio is -16.75. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to IKA.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is less volatile compared to IKA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.
AFC.L vs DWHA.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, DWHA.L has a market cap of 56.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while DWHA.L trades at £567.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas DWHA.L's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to DWHA.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is more volatile compared to DWHA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.
AFC.L vs 0GYQ.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, 0GYQ.L has a market cap of 51.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while 0GYQ.L trades at £75.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas 0GYQ.L's P/E ratio is 28.19. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to 0GYQ.L's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is more volatile compared to 0GYQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.
AFC.L vs DIA.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, DIA.L has a market cap of 42.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while DIA.L trades at £106.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas DIA.L's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to DIA.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is less volatile compared to DIA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.
AFC.L vs GELN.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, GELN.L has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while GELN.L trades at £14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas GELN.L's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to GELN.L's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is less volatile compared to GELN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.
AFC.L vs EAAS.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, EAAS.L has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while EAAS.L trades at £5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas EAAS.L's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to EAAS.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is more volatile compared to EAAS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.
AFC.L vs LPA.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, LPA.L has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while LPA.L trades at £52.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas LPA.L's P/E ratio is -26.25. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to LPA.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is more volatile compared to LPA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.
AFC.L vs PPS.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, PPS.L has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while PPS.L trades at £0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas PPS.L's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to PPS.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is less volatile compared to PPS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.
AFC.L vs DGI.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, DGI.L has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while DGI.L trades at £0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas DGI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to DGI.L's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is less volatile compared to DGI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.
AFC.L vs AMTE.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, AMTE.L has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while AMTE.L trades at £0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas AMTE.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to AMTE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is more volatile compared to AMTE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.
AFC.L vs MEL.L Comparison
AFC.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFC.L stands at 71.4M. In comparison, MEL.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AFC.L is priced at £8.35, while MEL.L trades at £1,424.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFC.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.17, whereas MEL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFC.L's ROE is -0.65%, compared to MEL.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AFC.L is more volatile compared to MEL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFC.L.