ARC Resources Ltd.

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, NSTKF has a market cap of 66.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while NSTKF trades at $22.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas NSTKF's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NSTKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to NSTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check NSTKF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, WOPEF has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while WOPEF trades at $15.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas WOPEF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WOPEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to WOPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check WOPEF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, IPXHY has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while IPXHY trades at $16.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas IPXHY's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IPXHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to IPXHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check IPXHY's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, IPXHF has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while IPXHF trades at $15.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas IPXHF's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IPXHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to IPXHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check IPXHF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, PEXNY has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while PEXNY trades at $9.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas PEXNY's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PEXNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to PEXNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check PEXNY's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, RGRLF has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while RGRLF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas RGRLF's P/E ratio is -9.35. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RGRLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to RGRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check RGRLF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, DETNF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while DETNF trades at $26.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas DETNF's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DETNF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to DETNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check DETNF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, STOSF has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while STOSF trades at $5.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas STOSF's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STOSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to STOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check STOSF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SSLZY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while SSLZY trades at $5.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas SSLZY's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SSLZY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to SSLZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check SSLZY's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, TRMLF has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while TRMLF trades at $41.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas TRMLF's P/E ratio is 14.34. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TRMLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to TRMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check TRMLF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, NOVKY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while NOVKY trades at $38.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas NOVKY's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NOVKY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to NOVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check NOVKY's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SPGYF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while SPGYF trades at $7.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas SPGYF's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SPGYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to SPGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check SPGYF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, PTRRY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while PTRRY trades at $7.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas PTRRY's P/E ratio is 3.05. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PTRRY's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to PTRRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check PTRRY's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, DKDRF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while DKDRF trades at $4.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas DKDRF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DKDRF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to DKDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check DKDRF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, MEGEF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while MEGEF trades at $20.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas MEGEF's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MEGEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to MEGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check MEGEF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, HBRIY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while HBRIY trades at $3.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas HBRIY's P/E ratio is -11.24. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HBRIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to HBRIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check HBRIY's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, PMOIF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while PMOIF trades at $3.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas PMOIF's P/E ratio is -10.69. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PMOIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to PMOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check PMOIF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, VSOGF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while VSOGF trades at $43.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas VSOGF's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VSOGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to VSOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check VSOGF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, PREKF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while PREKF trades at $17.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas PREKF's P/E ratio is 26.12. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PREKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to PREKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check PREKF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, DELKY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while DELKY trades at $21.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas DELKY's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DELKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to DELKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check DELKY's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, DLKGF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while DLKGF trades at $209.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas DLKGF's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DLKGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to DLKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check DLKGF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, OASPW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while OASPW trades at $55.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas OASPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OASPW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to OASPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check OASPW's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, PEYUF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while PEYUF trades at $13.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas PEYUF's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PEYUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to PEYUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check PEYUF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, EFVIF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while EFVIF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas EFVIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EFVIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to EFVIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check EFVIF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, EERGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while EERGF trades at $12.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas EERGF's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EERGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to EERGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check EERGF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, BTEGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while BTEGF trades at $4.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas BTEGF's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BTEGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to BTEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check BTEGF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, DKLRF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while DKLRF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas DKLRF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DKLRF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to DKLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check DKLRF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, ATHOF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while ATHOF trades at $4.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas ATHOF's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATHOF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to ATHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check ATHOF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, NUVSF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while NUVSF trades at $10.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas NUVSF's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NUVSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to NUVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check NUVSF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, PRMRF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while PRMRF trades at $14.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas PRMRF's P/E ratio is 2.02. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRMRF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to PRMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check PRMRF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, IPCFF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while IPCFF trades at $18.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas IPCFF's P/E ratio is 41.93. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IPCFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to IPCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check IPCFF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, PTGIF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while PTGIF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas PTGIF's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PTGIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to PTGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check PTGIF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, BCHEY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while BCHEY trades at $17.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas BCHEY's P/E ratio is -68.72. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BCHEY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to BCHEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check BCHEY's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, BEPTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while BEPTF trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas BEPTF's P/E ratio is -80.90. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BEPTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to BEPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check BEPTF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, MEYYY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while MEYYY trades at $7.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas MEYYY's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MEYYY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to MEYYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check MEYYY's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, JPTXF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while JPTXF trades at $7.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas JPTXF's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JPTXF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to JPTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check JPTXF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, FRHLF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while FRHLF trades at $9.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas FRHLF's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FRHLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to FRHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check FRHLF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, DTNOF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while DTNOF trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas DTNOF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DTNOF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to DTNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check DTNOF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, AAVVF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while AAVVF trades at $7.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas AAVVF's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AAVVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to AAVVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check AAVVF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, BIREF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while BIREF trades at $4.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas BIREF's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BIREF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to BIREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check BIREF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, PARXF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while PARXF trades at $12.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas PARXF's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PARXF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to PARXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check PARXF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, CDDRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while CDDRF trades at $4.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas CDDRF's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CDDRF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to CDDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check CDDRF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, CRCQW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while CRCQW trades at $17.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas CRCQW's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CRCQW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to CRCQW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check CRCQW's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, WLLAW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while WLLAW trades at $22.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas WLLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WLLAW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to WLLAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check WLLAW's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, UNEGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while UNEGF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas UNEGF's P/E ratio is 4.40. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UNEGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to UNEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check UNEGF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, BWEFF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while BWEFF trades at $4.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas BWEFF's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BWEFF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to BWEFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check BWEFF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, KELTF has a market cap of 995.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while KELTF trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas KELTF's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KELTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to KELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check KELTF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SQZZF has a market cap of 923.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while SQZZF trades at $2.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas SQZZF's P/E ratio is -29.37. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SQZZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to SQZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check SQZZF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, KRNGF has a market cap of 915.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while KRNGF trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas KRNGF's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KRNGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to KRNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check KRNGF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, AOIFF has a market cap of 889M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while AOIFF trades at $1.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas AOIFF's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AOIFF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to AOIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check AOIFF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, CWEGF has a market cap of 866.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while CWEGF trades at $5.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas CWEGF's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CWEGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to CWEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check CWEGF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, CRLFF has a market cap of 863.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while CRLFF trades at $5.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas CRLFF's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CRLFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to CRLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check CRLFF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, KWTEF has a market cap of 750.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while KWTEF trades at $17.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas KWTEF's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KWTEF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to KWTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check KWTEF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, DALXF has a market cap of 729.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while DALXF trades at $3.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas DALXF's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DALXF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to DALXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check DALXF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, RCKHF has a market cap of 639.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while RCKHF trades at $0.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas RCKHF's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RCKHF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to RCKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check RCKHF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, AAGEF has a market cap of 569.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while AAGEF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas AAGEF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AAGEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to AAGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check AAGEF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, GUKYF has a market cap of 552.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while GUKYF trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas GUKYF's P/E ratio is 84.83. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GUKYF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to GUKYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check GUKYF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, PTHRF has a market cap of 529M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while PTHRF trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas PTHRF's P/E ratio is -42.70. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PTHRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to PTHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check PTHRF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, ZPTAF has a market cap of 510.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while ZPTAF trades at $5.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas ZPTAF's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZPTAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to ZPTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check ZPTAF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, GFKSY has a market cap of 509.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while GFKSY trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas GFKSY's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GFKSY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to GFKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check GFKSY's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SHASF has a market cap of 462.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while SHASF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas SHASF's P/E ratio is 5.38. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHASF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to SHASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check SHASF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, PTALF has a market cap of 456.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while PTALF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas PTALF's P/E ratio is 6.24. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PTALF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to PTALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check PTALF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, KRNGY has a market cap of 456.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while KRNGY trades at $2.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas KRNGY's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KRNGY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to KRNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check KRNGY's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, ATUUF has a market cap of 441.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while ATUUF trades at $16.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas ATUUF's P/E ratio is 4.21. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATUUF's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to ATUUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check ATUUF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, COPJF has a market cap of 424.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while COPJF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas COPJF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to COPJF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to COPJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check COPJF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, TBNRF has a market cap of 414M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while TBNRF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas TBNRF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TBNRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to TBNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check TBNRF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, BKBEF has a market cap of 384.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while BKBEF trades at $1.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas BKBEF's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BKBEF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to BKBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check BKBEF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, OILSF has a market cap of 359.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while OILSF trades at $1.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas OILSF's P/E ratio is 2.45. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OILSF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to OILSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check OILSF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, PRYGF has a market cap of 357.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while PRYGF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas PRYGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRYGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to PRYGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check PRYGF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, PEGIY has a market cap of 350.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while PEGIY trades at $3.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas PEGIY's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PEGIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to PEGIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check PEGIY's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, ENQUF has a market cap of 316M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while ENQUF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas ENQUF's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ENQUF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to ENQUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check ENQUF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, CEIEF has a market cap of 315.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while CEIEF trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas CEIEF's P/E ratio is -29.59. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CEIEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to CEIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check CEIEF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, FECCF has a market cap of 306.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while FECCF trades at $4.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas FECCF's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FECCF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to FECCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check FECCF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, ZNOG has a market cap of 262.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while ZNOG trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas ZNOG's P/E ratio is -23.60. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZNOG's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to ZNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check ZNOG's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, EXCE has a market cap of 259M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while EXCE trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas EXCE's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EXCE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to EXCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check EXCE's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, PESAF has a market cap of 257.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while PESAF trades at $2.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas PESAF's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PESAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to PESAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check PESAF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, IPOOF has a market cap of 223.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while IPOOF trades at $8.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas IPOOF's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IPOOF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to IPOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check IPOOF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, GEGYF has a market cap of 222.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while GEGYF trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas GEGYF's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GEGYF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to GEGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check GEGYF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, TUWLF has a market cap of 219.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while TUWLF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas TUWLF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TUWLF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to TUWLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check TUWLF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, EEGUF has a market cap of 215.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while EEGUF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas EEGUF's P/E ratio is -17.40. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EEGUF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to EEGUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check EEGUF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, HZNFF has a market cap of 211.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while HZNFF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas HZNFF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HZNFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to HZNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check HZNFF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, TUWOY has a market cap of 204.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while TUWOY trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas TUWOY's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TUWOY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to TUWOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check TUWOY's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, ITEEF has a market cap of 198.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while ITEEF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas ITEEF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ITEEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to ITEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check ITEEF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, CRNZF has a market cap of 195.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while CRNZF trades at $2.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas CRNZF's P/E ratio is -17.81. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CRNZF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to CRNZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check CRNZF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, GASXF has a market cap of 193.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while GASXF trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas GASXF's P/E ratio is -8.33. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GASXF's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to GASXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check GASXF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, PSHIF has a market cap of 186.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while PSHIF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas PSHIF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PSHIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to PSHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check PSHIF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, HRCXF has a market cap of 184M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while HRCXF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas HRCXF's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HRCXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to HRCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check HRCXF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SEUSF has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while SEUSF trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas SEUSF's P/E ratio is -15.17. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SEUSF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to SEUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check SEUSF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, RECWF has a market cap of 169.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while RECWF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas RECWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RECWF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to RECWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check RECWF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, BDRSF has a market cap of 166.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while BDRSF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas BDRSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BDRSF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to BDRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check BDRSF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, PIFYF has a market cap of 162.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while PIFYF trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas PIFYF's P/E ratio is -11.33. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PIFYF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to PIFYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check PIFYF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, GEGYY has a market cap of 157.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while GEGYY trades at $0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas GEGYY's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GEGYY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to GEGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check GEGYY's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, SVNNF has a market cap of 157.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while SVNNF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas SVNNF's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SVNNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to SVNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check SVNNF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, ALVOF has a market cap of 156.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while ALVOF trades at $4.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas ALVOF's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALVOF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to ALVOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check ALVOF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, PNWRF has a market cap of 155.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while PNWRF trades at $1.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas PNWRF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PNWRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is more volatile compared to PNWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check PNWRF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, KGEIF has a market cap of 155M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while KGEIF trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas KGEIF's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KGEIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to KGEIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check KGEIF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, RUBLF has a market cap of 145.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while RUBLF trades at $1.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas RUBLF's P/E ratio is 2.78. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RUBLF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to RUBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check RUBLF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, RGNNF has a market cap of 138.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while RGNNF trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas RGNNF's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RGNNF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to RGNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check RGNNF's competition here

AETUF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AETUF stands at 11.4B. In comparison, HMENF has a market cap of 137M. Regarding current trading prices, AETUF is priced at $19.47, while HMENF trades at $1.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AETUF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas HMENF's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, AETUF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HMENF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AETUF is less volatile compared to HMENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AETUF.Check HMENF's competition here