Aerius International, Inc.
Aerius International, Inc. (AERS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AERS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consulting Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AERS | $0.00 | +0.00% | 517K | -2.30 | -$0.00 | N/A |
| EXPGF | $52.85 | -1.12% | 48.3B | 41.61 | $1.27 | +1.19% |
| EXPGY | $52.25 | -1.15% | 47.7B | 41.40 | $1.26 | +1.12% |
| SGSOY | $10.12 | -0.05% | 19.6B | 27.31 | $0.37 | +3.81% |
| SGSOF | $99.86 | -0.36% | 19.5B | 26.87 | $3.73 | +3.72% |
| BVRDF | $31.94 | +0.00% | 14.2B | 19.01 | $1.68 | +3.33% |
| BVVBY | $61.12 | -1.18% | 13.8B | 18.15 | $3.36 | +2.50% |
| BYCRF | $56.33 | +0.00% | 8.5B | 38.85 | $1.45 | +0.31% |
| CPBLF | $12.03 | +0.00% | 6.1B | 35.37 | $0.34 | +2.10% |
| DKSHF | $66.87 | +0.00% | 4.3B | 19.78 | $3.38 | +3.98% |
Stock Comparison
AERS vs EXPGF Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, EXPGF has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while EXPGF trades at $52.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas EXPGF's P/E ratio is 41.61. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to EXPGF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS and EXPGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EXPGF's competition here
AERS vs EXPGY Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, EXPGY has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while EXPGY trades at $52.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas EXPGY's P/E ratio is 41.40. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to EXPGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS is less volatile compared to EXPGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERS.Check EXPGY's competition here
AERS vs SGSOY Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, SGSOY has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while SGSOY trades at $10.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas SGSOY's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to SGSOY's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS is less volatile compared to SGSOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERS.Check SGSOY's competition here
AERS vs SGSOF Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, SGSOF has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while SGSOF trades at $99.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas SGSOF's P/E ratio is 26.87. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to SGSOF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS and SGSOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGSOF's competition here
AERS vs BVRDF Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, BVRDF has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while BVRDF trades at $31.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas BVRDF's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to BVRDF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS and BVRDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BVRDF's competition here
AERS vs BVVBY Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, BVVBY has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while BVVBY trades at $61.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas BVVBY's P/E ratio is 18.15. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to BVVBY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS is less volatile compared to BVVBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERS.Check BVVBY's competition here
AERS vs BYCRF Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, BYCRF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while BYCRF trades at $56.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas BYCRF's P/E ratio is 38.85. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to BYCRF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS is less volatile compared to BYCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERS.Check BYCRF's competition here
AERS vs CPBLF Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, CPBLF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while CPBLF trades at $12.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas CPBLF's P/E ratio is 35.37. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to CPBLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS is less volatile compared to CPBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERS.Check CPBLF's competition here
AERS vs DKSHF Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, DKSHF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while DKSHF trades at $66.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas DKSHF's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to DKSHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS is less volatile compared to DKSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERS.Check DKSHF's competition here
AERS vs IPSOF Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, IPSOF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while IPSOF trades at $53.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas IPSOF's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to IPSOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS is less volatile compared to IPSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERS.Check IPSOF's competition here
AERS vs EUBG Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, EUBG has a market cap of 535.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while EUBG trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas EUBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to EUBG's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS is less volatile compared to EUBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERS.Check EUBG's competition here
AERS vs BGPBF Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, BGPBF has a market cap of 433M. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while BGPBF trades at $23.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas BGPBF's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to BGPBF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS is less volatile compared to BGPBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERS.Check BGPBF's competition here
AERS vs RCDOF Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, RCDOF has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while RCDOF trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas RCDOF's P/E ratio is -274.20. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to RCDOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS is less volatile compared to RCDOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERS.Check RCDOF's competition here
AERS vs AYAG Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, AYAG has a market cap of 126.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while AYAG trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas AYAG's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to AYAG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS and AYAG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AYAG's competition here
AERS vs KMNCF Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, KMNCF has a market cap of 78.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while KMNCF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas KMNCF's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to KMNCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS and KMNCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KMNCF's competition here
AERS vs FLCX Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, FLCX has a market cap of 49.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while FLCX trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas FLCX's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to FLCX's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS and FLCX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FLCX's competition here
AERS vs MANOF Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, MANOF has a market cap of 45.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while MANOF trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas MANOF's P/E ratio is 34.67. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to MANOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS is less volatile compared to MANOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERS.Check MANOF's competition here
AERS vs DFCO Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, DFCO has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while DFCO trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas DFCO's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to DFCO's ROE of -3.94%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS is less volatile compared to DFCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERS.Check DFCO's competition here
AERS vs GPLS Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, GPLS has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while GPLS trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas GPLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to GPLS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS is less volatile compared to GPLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERS.Check GPLS's competition here
AERS vs VIZC Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, VIZC has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while VIZC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas VIZC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to VIZC's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS is less volatile compared to VIZC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERS.Check VIZC's competition here
AERS vs AIMH Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, AIMH has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while AIMH trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas AIMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to AIMH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS is less volatile compared to AIMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERS.Check AIMH's competition here
AERS vs ADHC Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, ADHC has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while ADHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas ADHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ADHC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS is less volatile compared to ADHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERS.Check ADHC's competition here
AERS vs INTO Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, INTO has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while INTO trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas INTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to INTO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS and INTO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INTO's competition here
AERS vs ENCC Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, ENCC has a market cap of 789.8K. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while ENCC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas ENCC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ENCC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS is less volatile compared to ENCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERS.Check ENCC's competition here
AERS vs MRDH Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, MRDH has a market cap of 774.5K. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while MRDH trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas MRDH's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to MRDH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS and MRDH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MRDH's competition here
AERS vs QPRC Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, QPRC has a market cap of 468.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while QPRC trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas QPRC's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to QPRC's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS is less volatile compared to QPRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERS.Check QPRC's competition here
AERS vs SGDH Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, SGDH has a market cap of 348.8K. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while SGDH trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas SGDH's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to SGDH's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS is less volatile compared to SGDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERS.Check SGDH's competition here
AERS vs DEQI Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, DEQI has a market cap of 278.5K. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while DEQI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas DEQI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to DEQI's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS and DEQI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DEQI's competition here
AERS vs BLDV Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, BLDV has a market cap of 269.3K. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while BLDV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas BLDV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to BLDV's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS is less volatile compared to BLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERS.Check BLDV's competition here
AERS vs AMMJ Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, AMMJ has a market cap of 204.4K. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while AMMJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas AMMJ's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to AMMJ's ROE of +15.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS and AMMJ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMMJ's competition here
AERS vs DCAC Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, DCAC has a market cap of 174.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while DCAC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas DCAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to DCAC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS is less volatile compared to DCAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERS.Check DCAC's competition here
AERS vs LGBS Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, LGBS has a market cap of 140.4K. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while LGBS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas LGBS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to LGBS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS is less volatile compared to LGBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERS.Check LGBS's competition here
AERS vs SYNJ Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, SYNJ has a market cap of 101.9K. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while SYNJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas SYNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to SYNJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS is less volatile compared to SYNJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERS.Check SYNJ's competition here
AERS vs MSYN Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, MSYN has a market cap of 87.5K. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while MSYN trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas MSYN's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to MSYN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS is less volatile compared to MSYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERS.Check MSYN's competition here
AERS vs CSLI Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, CSLI has a market cap of 75.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while CSLI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas CSLI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to CSLI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS and CSLI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSLI's competition here
AERS vs ITEC Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, ITEC has a market cap of 72K. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while ITEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas ITEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ITEC's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS is less volatile compared to ITEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERS.Check ITEC's competition here
AERS vs GTVH Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, GTVH has a market cap of 71K. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while GTVH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas GTVH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to GTVH's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS is less volatile compared to GTVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERS.Check GTVH's competition here
AERS vs PCHK Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, PCHK has a market cap of 35.2K. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while PCHK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas PCHK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to PCHK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS and PCHK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PCHK's competition here
AERS vs FUGI Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, FUGI has a market cap of 28.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while FUGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas FUGI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to FUGI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS is less volatile compared to FUGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERS.Check FUGI's competition here
AERS vs STWC Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, STWC has a market cap of 8.9K. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while STWC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas STWC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to STWC's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS is less volatile compared to STWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERS.Check STWC's competition here
AERS vs HDST Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, HDST has a market cap of 141. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while HDST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas HDST's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to HDST's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AERS and HDST have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HDST's competition here
AERS vs RPSGF Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, RPSGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while RPSGF trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas RPSGF's P/E ratio is 62.25. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to RPSGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AERS and RPSGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RPSGF's competition here
AERS vs ISAT Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, ISAT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while ISAT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas ISAT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ISAT's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, AERS and ISAT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ISAT's competition here
AERS vs GLSEF Comparison August 2025
AERS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERS stands at 517K. In comparison, GLSEF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AERS is priced at $0.00, while GLSEF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas GLSEF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, AERS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to GLSEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AERS and GLSEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLSEF's competition here